Skip to main content
Log in

Barriers analysis for reverse logistics in Thailand’s palm oil industry using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for prioritizing the solutions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Granular Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The palm oil industry faces significant pressure because of the environmental problems from the plantation process and the palm oil milling process in their supply chain, which is due to the constraints of natural resources and the growing ecological awareness among customers. Reverse logistics (RL) has been considered as a systematic approach for the palm oil industry to improve the environmental impact. However, there are more barriers which cannot be detected in the RL. Therefore, this study proposes robust and flexible strategies for overcoming such barriers by focusing on identifying and ranking the solutions on RL adoption in Thailand’s palm oil industry. We use a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods based on fuzzy analytical network process (ANP) and Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) to prioritize related solutions and strategies. Firstly, fuzzy ANP is applied to identify the weighting of each barrier using pairwise comparison, while the final ranking of the solution on RL adoption is obtained through VIKOR. This model will help business analysis and supply chain managers formulate both short-term and long-term, flexible decision strategies for successfully managing and implementing RL adoption in the supply chain scenarios. In addition, sensitivity analysis is used to illustrate the method, and comparisons with other existing methods is also presented in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulrahman MD, Gunasekaran A, Subramanian N (2014) Critical barriers in implementing reverse logistics in the Chinese manufacturing sectors. Int J Prod Econ 147:460–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Awasthi A, Govindan K, Gold S (2018) Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. Int J Prod Econ 195:106–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Azizzadeh L, Zadeh L, Zahed L, Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets, information and control. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Badenhorst A (2016) Prioritising the implementation of practices to overcome operational barriers in reverse logistics. JTSCM 10:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Bei W, Sun L (2005) A review of reverse logistics. Appl Sci 7:16–29

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzon M, Govindan K, Rodriguez CMT (2015) Reducing the extraction of minerals: Reverse logistics in the machinery manufacturing industry sector in Brazil using ISM approach. Resour Policy 46:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzon M, Govindan K, Rodriguez CMT, Campos LMS (2016) Identification and analysis of reverse logistics barriers using fuzzy Delphi method and AHP. Resour Conserv Recy 108:182–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JJ (1985) Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Set Syst 15:21–31

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang DY (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95:649–655

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C-W, Wu C-R, Lin H-L (2009) Applying fuzzy hierarchy multiple attributes to construct an expert decision making process. Expert Syst Appl 36:7363–7368

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Kar S (2017) Unified Granular-number-based AHP-VIKOR multi-criteria decision framework. Granul Comput 2:199–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Bandyopadhyay A, Ghosh A, Kar S (2015) Assessment of environmental factors causing wetland degradation, using fuzzy analytic network process: a case study on Keoladeo National Park, India. Ecol Model 316:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM (1998) Aggregating fuzzy opinions in the group decision-making environment. Cybern Syst 29:363–376

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Chang YC (2011) Weighted fuzzy rule interpolation based on ga-based weight-learning techniques. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 19:729–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Munif A, Chen GS, Liu HC, Kuo BC (2012) Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different left heights and right heights. Expert Syst Appl 39:6320–6334

    Google Scholar 

  • Choong CG, Mckay A (2014) Sustainability in the Malaysian palm oil industry. J Clean Prod 85:258–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann M (2003) Reverse Logistics Network Structures and Design. Social Science Electronic Publishing

  • Galankashi MR, Chegeni A, Soleimanynanadegany A, Memari A, Anjomshoae A, Helmi SA, Dargi A (2015) Prioritizing green supplier selection criteria using fuzzy analytical network process. Procedia CIRP 26:689–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvez D, Rakotondranaivo A, Morel L, Camargo M, Fick M (2015) Reverse logistics network design for a biogas plant: an approach based on MILP optimization and analytical hierarchical process (AHP). J Manuf Syst 37:616–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Palaniappan M, Zhu Q, Kannan D (2012) Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling. Int J Prod Econ 140:204–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Jafarian A (2013) A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J Clean Prod 47:345–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Kaliyan M, Kannan D, Haq AN (2014) Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 147:555–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CH, Wang F-K, Tzeng G-H (2012) The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR. Resour Conserv Recy 66:95–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang JJ, Tzeng GH, Liu HH (2009) A revised VIKOR model for multiple criteria decision making—the perspective of regret theory. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilgin MA, Gupta SM (2010) Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): a review of the state of the art. J Environ Manag 91:563–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Jindal A, Sangwan KS (2011) Development of an interpretive structural model of barriers to reverse logistics implementation in Indian industry. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jr VDRG, Wassenhove LNV (2009) Or forum—the evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper Res 57:10–18

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan G, Pokharel S, Kumar PS (2010) A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider. Resour Conserv Recy 54:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MSA, Abdullah S, Ali A, Amin F (2018) An extension of VIKOR method for multi-attribute decision-making under Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy setting. Granul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-018-0102-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CL, Tzeng GH (2009) A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL. Expert Syst Appl 36:9683–9697

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou JJH, Tsai CY, Lin RH, Tzeng GH (2011) A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality. J Air Transp Manag 17:57–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu K, Liu Y, Qin J (2018) An integrated ANP-VIKOR methodology for sustainable supplier selection with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Granul Comput 3:193–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Onut S, Tuzkaya UR, Torun E (2011) Selecting container port via a fuzzy ANP-based approach: a case study in the Marmara Region, Turkey. Transp Policy 18:182–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S (1998) Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Fac Civ Eng Belgard 2(1):5–21

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156:445–455

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2007) Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res 178:514–529

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash C, Barua MK (2015) Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment. J Manuf Syst 37:599–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash C, Barua MK (2016) A combined MCDM approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics partner for Indian electronics industry. Sustain Prod Consum 7:66–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash C, Barua MK, Pandya KV (2015) Barriers analysis for reverse logistics implementation in indian electronics industry using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 189:91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Presley A, Meade L, Sarkis J (2007) A strategic sustainability justification methodology for organizational decisions: a reverse logistics illustration. Int J Prod Res 45:4594–4620

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbani A, Zamani M, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Zavadskas EK (2014) Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies. Expert Syst Appl 41:7316–7327

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravi V, Shankar R (2005) Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technol Forecast Soc Change 72:1011–1029

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers DS, Tibben-Lembke R (1999) Going backwards: reverse logistics trends and practices. University of Nevada, Reno, Center for Logistics Management, Reno

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers DS, Tibben-Lembke R (2011) An examination of reverse logistics practices. J Bus Logist 22:129–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saswattecha K, Kroeze C, Jawjit W, Hein L (2015) Assessing the environmental impact of palm oil produced in Thailand. J Clean Prod 100:150–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafim O, Gwohshiung T (2002) A comparative analysis of the DEA-CCR model and the VIKOR method. J Oper Res 18:187–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafiee M (2015) A fuzzy analytic network process model to mitigate the risks associated with offshore wind farms. Expert Syst Appl 42:2143–2152

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirisawat P, Kiatcharoenpol T (2018) Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approaches to prioritizing solutions for reverse logistics barriers. Comput Ind Eng 117:303–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y-C (2009) An approach to budget allocation for an aerospace company—fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and artificial neural network. Neurocomputing 72:3477–3489

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng M-L, Lin R-J, Lin Y-H, Chen R-H, Tan K (2014) Close-loop or open hierarchical structures in green supply chain management under uncertainty. Expert Syst Appl 41:3250–3260

    Google Scholar 

  • Uygun Ö, Dede A (2016) Performance evaluation of green supply chain management using integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making techniques. Comput Ind Eng 102:502–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Uygun Ö, Kaçamak H, Kahraman ÜA (2015) An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company. Comput Ind Eng 86:137–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinodh S, Anesh Ramiya R, Gautham SG (2011) Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing organisation. Expert Syst Appl 38:272–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang HY, Chen SM (2008) Evaluating students’ answerscripts using fuzzy numbers associated with degrees of confidence. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16:403–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang NY, Chen SM (2009) Temperature prediction and TAIFEX forecasting based on automatic clustering techniques and two-factors high-order fuzzy time series. Expert Syst Appl 36:2143–2154

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu WW, Lee YT (2007) Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Syst Appl 32:499–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Zhang B, Xu C, Li L (2018) Site selection decision framework using fuzzy ANP-VIKOR for large commercial rooftop PV system based on sustainability perspective. Sustain Cities Soc 40:454–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia X, Govindan K, Zhu Q (2015) Analyzing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach. J Clean Prod 87:811–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin N, Bayrakdaroglu A, Kahraman C (2012) Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries. Pergamon Press, Inc., Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zailani S, Govindan K, Shaharudin MR, Kuan EEL (2017) Barriers to product return management in automotive manufacturing firms in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 141:22–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Geng Y (2013) Drivers and barriers of extended supply chain practices for energy saving and emission reduction among Chinese manufacturers. J Clean Prod 40:6–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 71671188), and Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (no. 2016JJ1024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunqiao Tan.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phochanikorn, P., Tan, C. & Chen, W. Barriers analysis for reverse logistics in Thailand’s palm oil industry using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for prioritizing the solutions. Granul. Comput. 5, 419–436 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00155-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00155-9

Keywords

Navigation