Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microstructural and other properties of copper slag–coal bottom ash incorporated concrete using fly ash as cement replacement

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased demand for concrete leads to an increase in utilization of cement and sand, and increased consumption of cement leads to increased CO2 emissions. Furthermore, mining restrictions in certain areas and the growing need for natural ecological sustainability lead to additional problems with river sand availability. This study promotes the utilization of industrial waste in concrete for long-term environmental sustainability and safe disposal. Out of various types of industrial byproducts, combined use of copper slag and bottom ash as sand and simultaneously fly ash as cement, the replacement has not yet been studied out. Hence, the primary goal of this research was to evaluate their usage in concrete to replace sand with copper slag and coal bottom ash waste, as well as cement with fly ash. Concrete mixtures were made using varying amounts of waste copper slag (CS) and bottom ash (CBA) (0–60%) in equal proportions as a partial substitute for natural sand, as well as fly ash (0–30%) as cement. Slump, unit weight, split tensile strength, compressive strength, and microstructural characteristics such as X-ray diffraction, SEM, and EDS of concrete mixtures were investigated. Test results reveal that workability, compressive and split tensile strength improve with increment in percentage replacement of FA, CS, and CBA. Improvement in strength with the percentage replacement is also confirmed by change in morphology by SEM and X-ray diffraction analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rana A, Kalla P, Csetenyi LJ (2015) Sustainable use of marble slurry in concrete. J Clean Prod 94:304–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pathak PP (2009) Inclusion of Portland and pozzolana (fly ash waste) cement in specifications. Ind Highw 37(4):2

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rafieizonooz M, Mirza J, Salim MR, Hussin MW, Khankhaje E (2016) Investigation of coal bottom ash and fly ash in concrete as replacement for sand and cement. Constr Build Mater 116:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang KH, Jung YB, Cho MS, Tae SH (2015) Effect of supplementary cementitious materials on reduction of CO2 emissions from concrete. J Clean Prod 103:774–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nie S, Zhou J, Yang F, Lan M, Li J, Zhang Z, Sanjayan JG (2022) Analysis of theoretical carbon dioxide emissions from cement production: methodology and application. J Clean Prod 334:130270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. IBEF, India Brand Equity Foundation. www.ibef.org/industry/cement-india.aspx, 2022 (accessed 09.09.22)

  7. Mardani-Aghabaglou A, Tuyan M, Ramyar K (2015) Mechanical and durability performance of concrete incorporating fine recycled concrete and glass aggregates. Mater Struct 48(8):2629–2640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khankhaje E, Hussin MW, Mirza J, Rafieizonooz M, Salim MR, Siong HC, Warid MNM (2016) On blended cement and geopolymer concretes containing palm oil fuel ash. Mater Des 89:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ashish DK (2018) Feasibility of waste marble powder in concrete as partial substitution of cement and sand amalgam for sustainable growth. J Build Eng 15:236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozkan O, Yuksel I, Muratoglu O (2007) Strength properties of concrete incorporating coal bottom ash and granulated blast furnace slag. Waste Manage 27(2):161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aggarwal Y, Siddique R (2014) Microstructure and properties of concrete using bottom ash and waste foundry sand as partial replacement of fine aggregates. Constr Build Mater 54:210–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh M, Siddique R (2014) Strength properties and micro-structural properties of concrete containing coal bottom ash as partial replacement of fine aggregate. Constr Build Mater 50:246–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fly ash management: legal requirement and other issues, presentation by Ms. Sanchita Jindal, MoEF

  14. Singh M, Siddique R (2013) Effect of coal bottom ash as partial replacement of sand on properties of concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl 72:20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou H, Bhattarai R, Li Y, Si B, Dong X, Wang T, Yao Z (2022) Towards sustainable coal industry: turning coal bottom ash into wealth. Sci Total Environ 804:149985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma R, Khan RA (2017) Durability assessment of self compacting concrete incorporating copper slag as fine aggregates. Constr Build Mater 155:617–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ICSG (2021) Icsg Releases Latest Copper Market Forecast 2021–2022. Available from: http://www.icsg.org/index.php/111-icsg-releases-latest-copper-market-forecast-2021-2022

  18. Sharma R, Khan RA (2017) Sustainable use of copper slag in self compacting concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials. J Clean Prod 151:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi C, Meyer C, Behnood A (2008) Utilization of copper slag in cement and concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:1115–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Obe RKD, de Brito J, Mangabhai R, Lye CQ (2016) Sustainable construction materials: copper slag. Woodhead Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gorai B, Jana RK (2003) Characteristics and utilisation of copper slag—a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 39(4):299–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Supekar N (2007) Utilisation of copper slag for cement manufacture construction management and review. Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd, Tuticorin

  23. Prem PR, Verma M, Ambily PS (2018) Sustainable cleaner production of concrete with high volume copper slag. J Clean Prod 193:43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yüksel İ, Bilir T, Özkan Ö (2007) Durability of concrete incorporating non-ground blast furnace slag and bottom ash as fine aggregate. Build Environ 42(7):2651–2659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bilir T (2012) Effects of non-ground slag and bottom ash as fine aggregate on concrete permeability properties. Constr Build Mater 26(1):730–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh G, Chaurasia S (2022) Feasibility of waste copper slag with coal bottom ash in concrete as partial substitution of fine aggregate. Innov Infrastruct Solut 7(2):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rathee M, Singh N (2022) Durability properties of copper slag and coal bottom ash based I-shaped geopolymer paver blocks. Constr Build Mater 347:128461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. IS: 1489–1991 (Part-I). Portland Pozzolana cement specification. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standard

  29. IS383 (2016) Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete—Specification. Bureau of Indian Standards, pp. 1–29. ICS No. 91.100.30 (CED 2-7992)

  30. Saeed KR (1995) Technique of multi-step concrete mixing. Mater Struct 28(4):230–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. BIS: 516-1959. Indian standard code of practice- methods of test for strength of concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

  32. BIS: 5816-1999 (1999) Indian standard splitting tensile strength of concrete-test method. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards.

  33. Ranjbar N, Mehrali M, Behnia A, Alengaram UJ, Jumaat MZ (2014) Compressive strength and microstructural analysis of fly ash/palm oil fuel ash based geopolymer mortar. Mater Des 59:532–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sata V, Jaturapitakkul C, Kiattikomol K (2007) Influence of pozzolan from various by-product materials on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 21(7):1589–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kou SC, Poon CS, Chan D (2007) Influence of fly ash as cement replacement on the properties of recycled aggregate concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 19(9):709–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Singh S, Khan S, Khandelwal R, Chugh A, Nagar R (2016) Performance of sustainable concrete containing granite cutting waste. J Clean Prod 119:86–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur.

Funding

Nil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, G., ShriRam Microstructural and other properties of copper slag–coal bottom ash incorporated concrete using fly ash as cement replacement. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 8, 78 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01051-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01051-7

Keywords

Navigation