Abstract
Engineers have often encountered many structural problems such as buckling, corrosion, and excessive loading and bending in damaged structures. To this end, the use of carbon-fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites has expanded rapidly in recent years. These materials have many advantages over steel plates most important of which is their high strength-to-weight ratio. This article investigates the possible effects of CFRP and steel plates on retrofitting deficient steel square hollow section (SHS) columns. The effects of axial loading, stiffness, axial displacement, the position of the deficient region on the bottom of steel SHS columns, and slenderness ratio are examined through a detailed parametric study. Eight specimens are tested for failure under axial compression in a laboratory and simulated using finite element analysis based on a numerical approach. The results indicate a stress reduction in the damaged region caused by the application of CFRP sheets and steel plates which prevents or retards local deformation around the deficiency. Also, a deficiency can lead to the reduced load-carrying capacity of steel SHS columns, so the retrofitting method causes an increase in the steel columns' load-bearing capacity. Finally, CFRP performed better than steel plates in compensating axial force made by cross-section reduction due to the problems of using steel plates, such as in welding, increased weight, thermal stress around welding location, and the possibility of creating another deficiency by welding.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig12_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig16_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig17_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig18_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41062-022-00955-0/MediaObjects/41062_2022_955_Fig19_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bambach MR, Elchalakani M (2007) Plastic mechanism analysis of steel SHS strengthened with CFRP under large axial deformation. Thin-Walled Struct 45(2):159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2007.02.004
Shahraki M, Sohrabi MR, Azizyan GR, Narmashiri K (2018) Experimental and numerical investigation of strengthened deficient steel SHS columns under axial compressive loads. Struct Eng Mech 67(2):207–217
Ghaemdoust MR, Narmashiri K, Yousefi O (2016) Structural behaviors of deficient steel SHS short columns strengthened using CFRP. Construct Build Mater 126:1002–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.099
Wu X, Yu Z, Gordon S, Olson D, Liu S, Bryan CR, Shayer Z (2017) Finite element analysis of weld residual stresses in austenitic stainless steel canisters in dry storage of spent fuel (No. SAND2017–5514C). Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Dieng L, Amine D, Falaise Y, Chataigner S (2017) Parametric study of the finite element modeling of shot peening on welded joints. J Constr Steel Res 130:234–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.12.018
Bambach MR, Jama HH, Elchalakani M (2009) Axial capacity and design of thin-walled steel SHS strengthened with CFRP. Thin-Walled Struct 47(10):1112–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2008.10.006
Teng JG, Yu T, Fernando D (2012) Strengthening of steel structures with fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Constr Steel Res 78:131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.06.011
Benzaid R, Mesbah HA (2013) Strength model for square concrete columns confined by external CFRP sheets. Struct Eng Mech 46(1):111–135
Park JW, Yeom HJ, Yoo JH (2013) Axial loading tests and FEM analysis of slender square hollow section (SHS) stub columns strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced polymers. Int J Steel Struct 13(4):731–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-013-4014-x
Park JW, Yoo JH (2015) Flexural and compression behavior for steel structures strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRPs) sheet. Steel Compos Struct 19(2):441–465
Keykha AH, Nekooei M, Rahgozar R (2015) Experimental and theoretical analysis of hollow steel columns strengthening by CFRP. Civil Eng Dimens 17(2):101–107. https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.17.2.101-107
Keykha AH, Nekooei M, Rahgozar R (2016) Analysis and strengthening of SHS steel columns using CFRP composite materials. Compos Mech Comput Appl Int J,. https://doi.org/10.1615/CompMechComputApplIntJ.v7.i4.20
Keykha AH, Nekooei M, Rahgozar R (2016) Numerical and experimental investigation of hollow steel columns strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced polymer. J Struct Construct Eng 3(1):49–58
Yurdakul O, Avsar O (2015) Structural repairing of damaged reinforced concrete beam-column assemblies with CFRPs. Struct Eng Mech 54(3):521–543
Narmashiri K, Mehramiz G (2016) Strengthening of steel hollow pipe sections subjected to transverse loads using CFRP. Struct Eng Mech Int J 60(1):163–173
Yousefi O, Narmashiri K, Ghaemdoust MR (2017) Structural behaviors of notched steel beams strengthened using CFRP strips. Steel Compos Struct Int J 25(1):35–43
Karimian M, Narmashiri K, Shahraki M, Yousefi O (2017) Structural behaviors of deficient steel CHS short columns strengthened using CFRP. J Constr Steel Res 138:555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.07.021
Makhdoumi H, Rahgozar R, Mohammadizadeh M, SaediDaryan A, Narmashiri K (2021) The effect of fire on the behavior of perforated short steel compression members and evaluation after retrofitting. Amirkabir J Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2021.19938.7289
Makhdoumi Darmian H, Rahgozar R, Mohammadizadeh M, Saedi Daryan A, Narmashiri K (2022) Post-fire evaluation of SHS retrofitted steel columns. Innov Infrastruct Sol 7(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00732-5
Tang H, Liu R, Zhao X, Guo R, Jia Y (2021) Axial compression behavior of CFRP-confined rectangular concrete-filled stainless steel tube stub column. Front Struct Civ Eng 15(5):1144–1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0762-4
Sikawrap-230C (2006) Product data sheet. Edition 13/06/2006. Adliya, Kingdom of Bahrain
Sikadur-330 (2012) Product data sheet. Edition 21/02/2012. West mead, South Africa
Park JW, Yoo JH (2013) Axial loading tests and load capacity prediction of slender SHS stub columns strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced polymers. Steel Compos Struct 15(2):131
Narmashiri K, Jumaat MZ (2011) Reinforced steel I-beams: a comparison between 2D and 3D simulation. Simul Model Pract Theory 19(1):564–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2010.08.012
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shahraki, M., Darmiyan, H.M. Structural behaviors of strengthened deficient steel square hollow section columns under axial compressive loads. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 8, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00955-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00955-0