Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element analysis of the shear performance of box-groove interface of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC)-normal strength concrete (NSC) composite girder

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) has been widely used in hybrid structures with normal strength concrete (NSC) due to the high performance of UHPC. However, there is limited knowledge on interface shear performance between UHPC and NSC. This study proposed a shear strength model for a long-span UHPC-NSC composite girder with a groove interface. A finite element model of the UHPC-NSC interfaces was established. The interface shear performance of precast NSC and cast-in-place UHPC with different interfaces, including the box groove, were numerically analyzed and validated by experimental data obtained from a push-off test. The numerical analysis indicates that the reinforcement across the UHPC-NSC interface could effectively improve the ultimate shear resistance of the interface with the groove surface. The eccentric loading distance slightly decreases the ultimate shear resistance. The AFGC-2013 recommendations provide better prediction accuracy than the ACI 318-14 and AASHTO LRFD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu Z, Shi C, Khayat KH (2019) Investigation of mechanical properties and shrinkage of ultra-high performance concrete: influence of steel fiber content and shape. Compos Part B Eng 174:107021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amini Pishro A, Feng X, Ping Y et al (2020) Comprehensive equation of local bond stress between UHPC and reinforcing steel bars. Constr Build Mater 262:119942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tayeh BA, Aadi AS, Hilal NN et al (2019) Properties of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC)—a review paper. AIP Conf Proc 2157:20040. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5126575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graybeal BA (2006) Material property characterization of ultra-high performance concrete. United States. Federal highway administration. Office of infrastructure

  5. Graybeal B, Tanesi J (2007) Durability of an ultrahigh-performance concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 19:848–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shafieifar M, Farzad M, Azizinamini A (2017) Experimental and numerical study on mechanical properties of ultra high performance concrete (UHPC). Constr Build Mater 156:402–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Russell HG, Graybeal BA, Russell HG (2013) Ultra-high performance concrete: a state-of-the-art report for the bridge community. United States. Federal highway administration. Office of infrastructure

  8. Wang J, Yuan W, Feng R et al (2020) Dynamic performances of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete–strengthened concrete columns subjected to blast impacts. Adv Struct Eng 23:3009–3023. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220924797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang Y, Du X, Yu Y, Pan Y (2020) Experimental study on the seismic performance of composite columns with an ultra-high-strength concrete-filled steel tube core. Adv Struct Eng 23:794–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219879805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faried AS, Mostafa SA, Tayeh BA, Tawfik TA (2021) Mechanical and durability properties of ultra-high performance concrete incorporated with various nano waste materials under different curing conditions. J Build Eng 43:102569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tayeh BA, Abu Bakar BH, Megat Johari MA (2013) Characterization of the interfacial bond between old concrete substrate and ultra high performance fiber concrete repair composite. Mater Struct Constr 46:743–753. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9931-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Afefy HM, El-Tony ETM (2019) Punching shear resistance of strengthened reinforced concrete interior slab–column connections using ultra-high-performance strain-hardening cementitious composite material. Adv Struct Eng 22:1799–1816. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433218823841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baharuddin NK, Nazri FM, Bakar BHA et al (2020) Potential use of ultra high-performance fibre-reinforced concrete as a repair material for fire-damaged concrete in terms of bond strength. Int J Integr Eng. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2020.12.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bae JH, Hwang HH, Park SY (2019) Structural safety evaluation of precast, prestressed concrete deck slabs cast using 120-MPa high-performance concrete with a reinforced joint. Materials (Basel) 12(18):3040. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12183040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang H, Sun T, Tang C, Wang J (2020) Experimental and numerical investigation of steel–ultra-high-performance concrete continuous composite beam behavior. Adv Struct Eng 23:2220–2236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220911140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ronanki VS, Aaleti S, Binard JP (2019) Long-span hybrid precast concrete bridge girder using ultra-high-performance concrete and normalweight concrete. PCI J. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij64.6-02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ali Dadvar S, Mostofinejad D, Bahmani H (2020) Strengthening of RC columns by ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) jacketing. Constr Build Mater 235:117485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aaleti S, Sritharan S (2019) Quantifying bonding characteristics between UHPC and normal-strength concrete for bridge deck application. J Bridg Eng 24:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Committee 318 (2014) ACI 318-14: Building code requirements for St

  20. Jiang H, Fang Z, Ma ZJ et al (2016) Shear-friction behavior of groove interface in concrete bridge rehabilitation. J Bridg Eng 21:04016081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baran E (2015) Effects of cast-in-place concrete topping on flexural response of precast concrete hollow-core slabs. Eng Struct 98:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Semendary AA, Hamid WK, Steinberg EP, Khoury I (2020) Shear friction performance between high strength concrete (HSC) and ultra high performance concrete (UHPC) for bridge connection applications. Eng Struct 205:110122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qi J, Wang J, Zhang Z et al (2019) Flexural behavior of an innovative dovetail ultra-high performance concrete joint using steel wire mesh interface treatment in composite bridges. Adv Struct Eng 23:1142–1153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219891531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Y, Zhang C, Zhu Y et al (2020) An experimental study: various influence factors affecting interfacial shear performance of UHPC-NSC. Constr Build Mater 236:117480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sriram A, Sri S (2019) Quantifying bonding characteristics between UHPC and normal-strength concrete for bridge deck application. J Bridg Eng 24:4019041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haber ZB, Munoz JF, De la Varga I, Graybeal BA (2018) Bond characterization of UHPC overlays for concrete bridge decks: laboratory and field testing. Constr Build Mater 190:1056–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu P, Wu C, Liu Z, Hao H (2019) Investigation of shear performance of UHPC by direct shear tests. Eng Struct 183:780–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu J, Chen Z, Guan D et al (2020) Experimental study on interfacial shear behaviour between ultra-high performance concrete and normal strength concrete in precast composite members. Constr Build Mater 261:120008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jang H-O, Lee H-S, Cho K, Kim J (2018) Numerical and experimental analysis of the shear behavior of ultrahigh-performance concrete construction joints. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:6429767. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6429767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Crane CK (2010) Shear and shear friction of ultra-high performance concrete bridge girders. Georgia Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  31. AASHTO LRFD (2014) Bridge design specifications, U.S. customary units (7th Edition)

  32. Harries KA, Zeno G, Shahrooz B (2012) Toward an improved understanding of shear-friction behavior. ACI Struct J 109:835

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shaw DM, Sneed LH (2014) Interface shear transfer of lightweight-aggregate concretes cast at different times. Pci J 59(3):130–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sneed LH, Krc K, Wermager S, Meinheit D (2016) Interface shear transfer of lightweight-aggregate concretes with different lightweight aggregates. Pci J 61(2):38–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu Y, Yin H, Ding X et al (2020) Shear behavior of large stud shear connectors embedded in ultra-high-performance concrete. Adv Struct Eng 23:3401–3414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220939208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen G, Fang Z, Wang S et al (2019) Numerical analysis on shear behavior of joints under low confining and eccentric loads. Adv Civ Eng 2019:4589824. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4589824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yong L, Lanhui G, Bing Q (2021) Shear transfer capacity of angle connectors in u-shaped composite girder: experimental and numerical study. J Struct Eng 147:4021046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shaodi W, Zhuangcheng F, Gongfa C et al (2021) Numerical analysis on shear behavior of grouped head stud shear connectors between steel girders and precast concrete slabs with high-strength concrete-filled shear pockets. J Bridg Eng 26:4021030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Valikhani A, Jahromi AJ, Mantawy IM, Azizinamini A (2021) Effect of mechanical connectors on interface shear strength between concrete substrates and uhpc: experimental and numerical studies and proposed design equation. Constr Build Mater 267:120587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang X, Liu Y, Li Y et al (2020) Bond behavior and shear transfer of steel section-concrete interface with studs: testing and modeling. Constr Build Mater 264:120251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mansour W, Tayeh BA (2020) Shear behaviour of RC beams strengthened by various ultrahigh performance fibre-reinforced concrete systems. Adv Civ Eng 2020:2139054. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2139054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bassam WMMS, Tayeh A, Tarek Khalifa AS (2021) Development of shear capacity equations for RC beams strengthened with UHPFRC. Comput Concr 27(5):473–487

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dassault A (2014) 6.14-Abaqus analysis user’s manual. Dassault systèmes simulia corp

  44. Jang H-O, Lee H-S, Cho K, Kim J (2017) Experimental study on shear performance of plain construction joints integrated with ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC). Constr Build Mater 152:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jeeho L, Fenves GL (1998) Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. J Eng Mech 124:892–900. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hognestad E, Hanson NW, McHenry D (1955) Concrete stress distribution in ultimate strength design. Journal proceedings. pp 455–480

    Google Scholar 

  47. Béton CE-I du (1993) CEB-FIP model code 1990: design code. Thomas Telford Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chinese Standard GB (2010) 50010, Code for design of concrete structures. GB50010-2010

  49. Guo X, Kang J, Zhu J (2017) Constitutive relationship of ultrahigh performance concrete under uni-axial compression. J Southeast Univ 47:369–376

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang Z, Shao XD, Li WG et al (2015) Axial tensile behavior test of ultra high performance concrete. China J Highw Transp 8:50

    Google Scholar 

  51. Li L, Fan X, Shi X, Shao X (2018) Experimental study on flexural behavior of large-scale prestressed UHPC T-shaped beam. China Civ Eng J 51:84–94

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang Y, Zhu P, Liao Z, Wang L (2020) Interfacial bond properties between normal strength concrete substrate and ultra-high performance concrete as a repair material. Constr Build Mater 235:117431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Abaqus UM, Manual SU (2003) Version 6.3, Hibbitt. Karlsson & Sorensen, USA

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mattock AH, Hawkins NM (1972) Shear transfer in reinforced concrete—recent research. Pci J 17:55–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Loov RE, Patnaik AK (1994) Horizontal shear strength of composite concrete beams. PCI J Chic 39(1):48–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mansur MA, Vinayagam T, Tan K-H (2008) Shear transfer across a crack in reinforced high-strength concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 20:294–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Jiang H, Shao T, Fang Z et al (2021) Shear-friction behavior of grooved construction joints between a precast UHPC girder and a cast-in-place concrete slab. Eng Struct 228:111610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Resplendino J (2011) Ultra high performance concrete: new AFGC recommendations. Designing and building with UHPFRC. John Wiley & Sons, pp 713–722

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Hebei Transportation Science and Technology Project [grant number RW202011] and the Tianjin Transportation Science and Technology Development Plan Project [grant number 2019B-21]. These supports are gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinsong Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farouk, A.I.B., Zhu, J. & Yuhui, G. Finite element analysis of the shear performance of box-groove interface of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC)-normal strength concrete (NSC) composite girder. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 7, 212 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00815-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00815-x

Keywords

Navigation