Skip to main content
Log in

Wage Differentials Among Workers: An Empirical Analysis of the Manufacturing and Service Sectors

  • Research Note
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Labour Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper examines the existence of wage differentials and attempts to enquire into the factors determining such differentials in the manufacturing and service sectors of Haryana state. It highlights the relative importance of worker-specific factors and firm-specific factors in explaining wage differentials in the labour market using a semi-logarithmic regression model. Worker-specific factors such as education, work experience, gender and marital status explain around half of the variation in the wage level of workers, whereas firm-specific factors such as nature, size, type and location of the enterprise are able to explain only a small proportion of variation in the wage level, ranging from 17% in the manufacturing sector to 12% in the service sector. This study pinpoints the relative importance of worker-specific factors over firm-specific factors in determining the wage level of workers. Empirical evidence highlights that a significant proportion of the unexplained part in the variation of wages can be attributed to the employer- or firm-specific factors/variables. Thus, this study highlights the importance of human capital in raising the income level of workers and brings out the fact that the quality of human capital is not only important to narrow wage differentials but also helpful in raising the wage level of workers, which is a proxy of standard of living and is the ultimate objective of development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Agell, J., and K.E. Lommerud. 1997. Minimum Wage and Incentives for Skill Formation. Journal of Public Economics 64(1): 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G.A. 1984. Gift Exchange and Efficiency-Wage Theory: Four Views. American Economic Review 74(2): 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslam, M., and G.G. Kingdon. 2009. Public-Private Sector Segmentation in the Pakistani Labour Market. Journal of Asian Economics 20: 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azam, M., and N. Prakash. 2010. A Distributional Analysis of the Public-Private Wage Differential in India, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 5132, IZA—Institute of Labour Economics, Bonn, Germany.

  • Blundell, R., L. Dearden, C. Meghir, and B. Sianesi. 2009. Human Capital Investment: The Returns from Education and Training to the Individual, the Firm and the Economy. Fiscal Studies 20(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J., and G. Johnson. 1992. Changes in the Structure of Wages in the 1980s: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations. American Economic Review 82(3): 371–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broecke, S. 2016. Do Skills Matter for Wage Inequality? IZA, World of Labour, OCED, France.

  • Brown, C., and C. Medoff. 1989. The Employer Size-Wage Effect. Journal of Political Economy 97(5): 1027–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caroli, E., and J. Van Reenen. 2001. Skill-Biased Organizational Change? Evidence from a Panel of British and French Establishments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4): 1449–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A., E. Fehr, and L. Gotte. 2015. Fair Wages and Effort: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Management Science 61(8): 1777–1794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, P. 2012. Wage Inequality in India: Decomposition by Sector, Gender and Activity Status. Economic and Political Weekly 47(50): 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, P., R. Basu, and A. Halder. 2017. Employment, Wage and Productivity: Analysis of Trend and Causality in Indian Manufacturing Industries. The Journal of Industrial Statistics 6(1): 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, A., D. Goel., and S. Khanna. (2015). Bad Karma or Discrimination? Male-Female Wage Gaps among Salaried Workers in India, IZA Discussion Paper No. 9485, Bonn, Germany.

  • Ehrenberg, R., and R.S. Smith. 2013. Modern Labour Economics: Theory and Public Policy, Chapter 5. 11th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R.G., and R.S. Smith. 2003. Modern Labour Economics: Theory and Public Policy. 8th ed. London: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D.E.A. 1982. The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semi Logarithmic Equations. Economics Letters 10(1–2): 77–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D.E. (2011). Interpreting Dummy Variables in Semi-logarithmic Regression Models: Exact Distributional Results; Econometrics Working Paper EWP1101, Department of Economics, University of Victoria Victoria, B.C., Canada.

  • Gujarati, D.N., D.C. Porter, and S. Gunasekar. 2013. Basic Econometrics. 5th ed. New Delhi: McGraw Hill Education (India) Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazans, M. 2005. Unemployment and the Earnings Structure in Latvia, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (No. 3504). Washington DC, World Bank.

  • Huang, Tung-Chun. 1999. The Impact of Education and Seniority on the Male-Female Wage Gap: Is More Education the Answer? International Journal of Manpower 20(6): 361–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organisation. 2016. Wage Inequality in the Workplace, Global Wage Report 2016/17. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, R., A. Kinyondo, and J. Nganga. 2015. Real Wage and Labour Productivity in Tanzania: How do they Link? Journal of African Studies and Development 7(3): 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javeed, S., and A. Manuhaar. 2013. Women and Wage Discrimination in India: A Critical Analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention 2(4): 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karan, A.K., and S. Selvaraj. 2008. Trends in Wage and Earning in India: Increasing Wage Difference in a Segmented Labour Market., ILO Asian Pacific Working Series New Delhi: Subregional Office for South Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L.F., and A.L. Revenga. 1989. Changes in the Structure of Wages: The United States vs. Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 3(4): 522–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P.E. 1981. Estimation with Correctly Interpreted Dummy Variables in Semi Logarithmic Equations. American Economic Review 71(4): 801–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, S. (2012). Gender Wage Discrimination in India: Glass Ceiling or Sticky Floor?, Centre for Development Economics, Working Paper No. 214. http://www.cdedse.org/pdf/work214.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.

  • Krishna, M., and G.D. Bino Paul. 2013. What Explains Wage in India? Indian Journal of Industrial Relations 48(3): 487–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A.B., and L.H. Summers. 1988. Efficiency Wages and the Inter-Industry Wage Structure. Econometrica 56(2): 259–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N.P. 2013. Labour Market Discrimination and Earning Differentials—An Evidence from Uttar Pradesh Based on NSS Data, Socio-Economic Voices. https://www.indiastat.com/SOCIO_PDF/97/fulltext.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.

  • Moene, K.O., and M. Wallerstein. 1997. Pay Inequality. Journal of Labour Economics 15(3): 403–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morissette, R. 1993. Canadian Jobs and Firm Size: Do Smaller Firms Pay Less? The Canadian Journal of Economics 26(1): 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, D. 2007. Post-Reform Trends in Wage Differentials: A Decomposition Analysis for India. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics 50(4): 955–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K.M., and F. Welch. 1992. The Structure of Wages. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(285): 285–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, A. 2012. Skills Development for Youth in India: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of International Cooperation in Education 15(2): 169–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, S. 2016. Improvising Skill Development & Employability Potential through Higher Education, Research & Innovations in India. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology 5(1): 680–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patra, S., and S.R. Nayak. 2012. A Theoretical Study on the Relationship between Wages and Labour Productivity in Industries. International Journal of Economic Research 3(3): 157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehkonen, J., and S. Pehkonen. 2017. Wage Effects of Firm Size: Evidence from Linked Employer-Employee Panel. Finnish Economic Papers 28(1): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riga. 2006. Wages and Impacting Factors, The “Labour Market Studies” Project of the European Structural Fund National Programme, Labour Market Studies of the Ministry of Welfare; No. VPD1/ESF/NVA/04/NP/3.1.5.1./0001/0003. pp. 1–172.

  • Salter, W.E.G. 1966. Productivity and Technical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., and B.S. Mehta. 2010. Income Inequality in India: Pre- and Post-Reform Periods. Economic and Political Weekly 45(37): 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C.M., and K.F. Zimmermann. 1991. Work Characteristics, Firm Size and Wages. The Review of Economics and Statistics 73(4): 705–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, K. 2008. Employment, Wages and Poverty in the Non-Agricultural Sector: All-India, 2000-05. Economic and Political Weekly 43(22): 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Garderen, K.J., and C. Shah. 2002. Exact Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semi Logarithmic Equations. Econometrics Journal 5(1): 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinoj, A. 2007. Growth and Inequality of Wages in India: Recent Trends and Patterns. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics 50(4): 927–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Ian, and Yu. Zhu. 2003. Education, Earnings and Productivity: Recent UK Evidence. Labour Market Trends 3(3): 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun, M.S. 2009. Wage Differentials, Discrimination and Inequality: A Cautionary Note on The Juhn, Murphy and Pierce Decomposition Method. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 56(1): 114–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonu Madan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Madan, S. Wage Differentials Among Workers: An Empirical Analysis of the Manufacturing and Service Sectors. Ind. J. Labour Econ. 62, 731–747 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-019-00195-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-019-00195-4

Keywords

Navigation