Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental investigation on bond behaviour, durability and microstructural analysis of self-compacting concrete using waste copper slag

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study will investigate the viability of SCC constructed using fine aggregates derived from waste copper slag (WCS). WCS replacement ranged from 0 to 70% (10% increments) with sand at constant W/C ratio of 0.43; eight SCC mixtures were prepared. The cement content was substituted with 17.85% fly ash (FA), and a consistent amount of superplasticizer was utilized for the experiment. Tests on SCC mixes included mechanical properties like compressive strength at 28, and 56 days, pull-out tests after 28 days of curing, and durability tests, including rapid chloride permeability test (RCPT), and water absorption, and sorptivity after 28 days of curing were tested. Results showed that maximum compressive strength was noticed for 40% WCS. In the pull-out test, the maximum pull-out load and bond stress are recorded at 40% and 50% WCS is 44.35kN, 44.3kN and 11.76 MPa, 11.54 MPa compared to the control concrete mix (WCS0%). In terms of longevity, there is a strong link between CMS and several other performance metrics. Scanning electron microscopy, XRD analysis, and energy dispersive spectroscopy were used to analyze the microstructure of concrete. WCS may be used as a substitute for fine aggregates in concrete up to 70% which can benefit the building industry. By using this method, copper slag may be safely disposed of without damaging the environment or requiring land management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Rajasekar A, Arunachalam K, Kottaisamy M (2019) Assessment of strength and durability characteristics of copper slag incorporated ultra-high strength concrete. J Clean Prod 208:402–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dey S, Kumar VVP, Goud KR et al (2021) State of art review on self-compacting concrete using mineral admixtures. J Build Rehabil 6:18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-021-00110-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hooton R, Al-Jabri K, Taha R, Al-Ghassani M (2002) Use of copper slag and cement by-pass dust as cementitious materials. Cement Concr Aggreg 24(1):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Samabangi A, Eluru A (2022) Industrial copper waste as a sustainable material in high strength SCC. Clean Eng Technol 6:100403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaitanya BK, Sivakumar I (2022) Flow-behaviour, microstructure, and strength properties of self-compacting concrete using waste copper slag as fine aggregate. Innov Infrastruct Solut 7:181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00766-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaitanya BK, Kumar IS (2022) Effect of waste copper slag as a substitute in cement and concrete—a review. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 982(1):012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/982/1/012029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krishna Chaitanya B, Sivakumar I (2021) Influence of waste copper slag on flexural strength properties of self-compacting concrete. Mater Today Proc 42:671–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma R, Khan RA (2018) Influence of copper slag and metakaolin on the durability of self-compacting concrete. J Clean Prod 171:1171–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta N, Siddique R (2020) Durability characteristics of self-compacting concrete made with copper slag. Constr Build Mater 247:118580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma R, Khan RA (2017) Durability assessment of self compacting concrete incorporating copper slag as fine aggregates. Constr Build Mater 155:617–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Najimi M, Sobhani J, Pourkhorshidi A (2011) Durability of copper slag contained concrete exposed to sulfate attack. Constr Build Mater 25(4):1895–1905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mithun BM, Narasimhan MC (2016) Performance of alkali activated slag concrete mixes incorporating copper slag as fine aggregate. J Clean Prod 112(1):837–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brindha D, Nagan S (2011) Durability studies on copper clag admixed concrete. Asian J Civ Eng (Build Hous) 12(5):563–578

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chithra S, Senthil Kumar S, Chinnaraju K (2016) The effect of colloidal nano-silica on workability, mechanical and durability properties of high-performance concrete with copper slag as partial fine aggregate. Constr Build Mater 113:794–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandra N, Kawaai K, Ujike I (2020) Influence of copper slag on corrosion behavior of horizontal steel bars in reinforced concrete column specimen due to chloride-induced corrosion. Constr Build Mater 255:119265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. IS:269:2015 (2015) Ordinary portland cement—specification (sixth revision). Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

  17. IS 9103: 1999 (1999) Concrete admixtures-specification (first revision). Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

  18. IS 383-2016 (2016) Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete. Bureau Of Indian Standard, New Delhi

  19. IS:2386 (Part-3) (1963) Indian Standard methods of test for aggregates for concrete. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

  20. EFNARC (2002) Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete

  21. EFNARC (2005) The European guidelines for self-compacting concrete. Specification, Production and Use

  22. IS 10262:2019, Concrete mix, proportioning guidelines (first revision). Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

  23. ACI-237R-07 (2007) Self-consolidating concrete. ACI Committee 237, USA

  24. IS 516:2015 (2015) Methods of tests for strength of concrete. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  25. IS 2770 (Part I)—1967 (Reaffirmed 2007) (2007) Indian Standard methods of testing bond in reinforced concrete (part 1): pull-out test

  26. BIS, IS 1124-1974 (1974) Specification for water absorption for concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  27. ASTM C1202-07 (2007) Standard test method for electrical indication of concrete’s ability to resist chloride ion penetration. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  28. ASTM C1585-13 (2013) Standard test method for measurement of rate of absorption of water by hydraulic-cement concretes. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  29. Arel HS, Aydin E (2018) Use of industrial and agricultural wastes in construction concrete. ACI Mater J. https://doi.org/10.14359/51700991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aydin E, Arel HŞ (2017) Characterization of high-volume fly-ash cement pastes for sustainable construction applications. Constr Build Mater 157:96–107 (ISSN 0950-0618)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jalal M, Mansouri E, Sharifipour M, Pouladkhan AR (2012) Mechanical, rheological, durability and microstructural properties of high-performance self-compacting concrete containing SiO2 micro and nanoparticles. Mater Des 34:389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Adak D, Sarkar M, Mandal S (2014) Effect of nano-silica on strength and durability of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 70:453–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dey S, Kumar VVP, Manoj AV (2022) An experimental study on strength and durability characteristics of self-curing self-compacting concrete. Struct Concr. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202100446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mavroulidou M (2017) Mechanical properties and durability of concrete with water-cooled copper slag aggregate. Waste Biomass Valoriz 8(5):1841–1854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharifi Y, Afshoon I, Asad-Abadi S, Aslani F (2020) Environmental protection by using waste copper slag as a coarse aggregate in self-compacting concrete. J Environ Manag 271:111013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Swathi V, Asadi SS (2022) An experimental investigation on mechanical, durability and microstructural properties of high-volume fly ash-based concrete. J Build Pathol Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-022-00172-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Venkatesh C, Ruben N, Madduru SR (2020) Role of red mud as a cementing material in concrete: a comprehensive study on durability behavior. Innov Infrastruct Solut 6:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00371-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gupta N, Siddique R (2019) Strength and micro-structural properties of self-compacting concrete incorporating copper slag. Constr Build Mater 224:894–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fadaee M, Mirhosseini RT, Tabatabaei R, Fadaee M (2015) Investigation on using copper slag as part of cementitious materials in self compacting concrete. Asian J Civ Eng (BHRC) 16(3):368–381

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nurwidayati R, Ekaputri J, Triwulan T, Suprobo P (2019) Bond behaviour between reinforcing bars and geopolymer concrete by using pull-out test. MATEC Web Conf 280:04008. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201928004008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Baena M, Torres L, Turon A, Barris C (2009) Experimental study of bond behaviour between concrete and FRP bars using a pull-out test. Compos Part B Eng 40(8):784–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. de Almeida Filho FM, El Debs MK, El Debs ALHC (2008) Bond-slip behavior of self-compacting concrete and vibrated concrete using pull-out and beam tests. Mater Struct 41:1073–1089. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9307-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ponmalar P (2018) Bond behaviour of self-compacting concrete. Sel Sci Pap J Civ Eng 13:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1515/sspjce-2018-0009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cunha VMCF, Barros JAO, Sena-Cruz JM (2010) Pull-out behavior of steel fibers in self-compacting concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 22(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE_MT.1943-5533.0000001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. IS 456:2000 (2000) Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete code of practice, (fourth revision). Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

  46. Bellum RR, Al Khazaleh M, Pilla RK et al (2022) Effect of slag on strength, durability and microstructural characteristics of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. J Build Rehabil 7:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-022-00163-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Khotbehsara MM, Mohseni E, Ozbakkaloglu T, Ranjbar MM (2017) Durability characteristics of self-compacting concrete incorporating pumice and metakaolin. J Mater Civ Eng 29(11):04017218

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bypaneni Krishna Chaitanya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declared there is no conflict of interest on behalf of all authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaitanya, B.K., Sivakumar, I. Experimental investigation on bond behaviour, durability and microstructural analysis of self-compacting concrete using waste copper slag. J Build Rehabil 7, 85 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-022-00224-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-022-00224-8

Keywords

Navigation