Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling the rheological properties with shear stress limit and compressive strength of ordinary Portland cement modified with polymers

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the effect of two water reducer polymers on the thermal stability, rheology, and compressive strength of Gasin Ordinary Cement (GC) was investigated. The behavior of cement in the liquid phase (slurry) and hardened phase modified with two types of polymer varied from 0 to 0.06% (%wt) were investigated. XRD and TGA tests were conducted to identify the effect of polymers on the behavior of GC. The compressive strength of cement mixed with polymers was tested from the early aged of 1 days to 28 days of curing. The shear stress versus shear strain rate of cement slurry was modeled and the results of prediction using Vipulanandan rheological model were compared to the Vocadlo model. High reduction in the total weight loss of the GC at 800 °C when the cement modified with 0.06% of polymers detected using TGA test. The rheological properties of the cement slurry such as viscosity, yield stress, and the compressive strength of GC were increased significantly with increasing the polymer contents. Addition of polymers reduced the required water to reach the desired fluidity by about 43% based on the type of polymer. The results showed that the Vipulanandan rheological model predicted the shear-thinning relationship between the shear stress and shear strain rate of the cement slurry modified polymers very well. Also, the Vipulanandan rheological model has a maximum shear stress limit were as the Vocadlo model did not have a limit on the maximum shear stress. Based on the Vipulanandan rheological model the maximum shear stress produced by the cement slurry modified with 0% and 0.06% of polymers at the temperature of 25 °C were increased from 38.7 to 171.3 Pa and to 184.8 Pa respectively due to the addition of polymers. Nonlinear models were used to separate the effect polymer quantity, water–cement ratio, and curing time on the rheological properties and compressive strength of cement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amer AA, El-Sokkary TM, Abdullah NI (2015) Thermal durability of OPC pastes admixed with nano iron oxide. HBRC J 11(2):299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kırgız MS (2016) Strength gain mechanism for green mortar substituted marble powder and brick powder for Portland cement. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 20(sup1):s38–s63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashikhmen VA, Pronina LÉ (1986) Rheological properties of dispersed cement grouts. Power Technol Eng (formerly Hydrotech Constr) 20(10):598–603

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rosquoët F, Alexis A, Khelidj A, Phelipot A (2003) Experimental study of cement grout: rheological behavior and sedimentation. Cem Concr Res 33(5):713–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Christodoulou DN, Droudakis AI, Pantazopoulos IA, Markou IN, Atmatzidis DK (2009) Groutability and impact iveness of microfine cement grouts

  6. Lim SK, Tan CS, Chen KP, Lee ML, Lee WP (2013) Effect of different sand grading on strength properties of cement grout. Constr Build Mater 38:348–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benyounes K, Benmounah A (2014) Effect of bentonite on the rheological behavior of cement grout in presence of superplasticizer. Int J Civ Arch Struct Const Eng 8(11):1095–1098

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen JJ, Li LG, Ng PL, Kwan AKH (2017) Impact s of superfine zeolite on strength, flowability and cohesiveness of cementitious paste. Cem Concr Compos 83:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammed A, Raof H, Salih A (2018) Vipulanandan constitutive models to predict the rheological properties and stress–strain behavior of cement grouts modified with metakaolin. J Test Eval 48(5):1

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shaikh FUA, Supit SWM (2015) Compressive strength and durability of high-volume fly ash concrete reinforced with calcium carbonate nanoparticles. Fillers and reinforcements for advanced nanocomposites. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp 275–307

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Martini S, Nehdi M (2007) Effect of chemical admixtures on rheology of cement paste at high temperature. J ASTM Int 4(3):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Soroka I, Ravina D (1998) Hot weather concreting with admixtures. Cem Concr Compos 20(2–3):129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Konsta-Gdoutos MS, Metaxa ZS, Shah SP (2010) Multi-scale mechanical and fracture characteristics and early-age strain capacity of high performance carbon nanotube/cement nanocomposites. Cem Concr Compos 32(2):110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheung J, Jeknavorian A, Roberts L, Silva D (2011) Impact of admixtures on the hydration kinetics of Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 41(12):1289–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ezziane K, Ngo TT, Kaci A (2014) Evaluation of rheological parameters of mortar containing various amounts of mineral addition with polycarboxylate superplasticizer. Constr Build Mater 70:549–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jolicoeur C, Simard MA (1998) Chemical admixture-cement interactions: phenomenology and physico-chemical concepts. Cem Concr Compos 20(2–3):87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(97)00062-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Plank J, Hirsch C (2007) Impact of zeta potential of early cement hydration phases on superplasticizer adsorption. Cem Concr Res 37(4):537–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gallias JL, Kara-Ali R, Bigas JP (2000) The effect of fine mineral admixtures on water requirement of cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 30(10):1543–1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00380-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khudhair MH, Elharfi A, El-Youbi MS (2018) The effect of polymeric admixtures of water reduce of superplasticizer and setting accelerator on physical properties and mechanical performance of mortars and concretes. J Environ Res 1(1):4

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mikanovic N, Jolicoeur C (2008) Influence of superplasticizers on the rheology and stability of limestone and cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 38(7):907–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khudhair MHR, Elyoubi MS, Elharfi A (2017) Study of the influence of water reducing and setting retarder admixtures of polycarboxylate “superplasticizers” on physical and mechanical properties of mortar and concrete. J Mater Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.26872/jmes.2018.9.1.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vipulanandan C, Sunder S (2012) Impact s of meta-kaolin clay on the working and strength properties of cement grouts. In: Grouting and deep mixing, pp 1739–1747

  23. Mohammed AS (2018) Vipulanandan model for the rheological properties with ultimate shear stress of oil well cement modified with nanoclay. Egypt J Pet 27(3):335–347

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Livescu S (2012) Mathematical modeling of thixotropic drilling mud and crude oil flow in wells and pipelines—a review. J Pet Sci Eng 98:174–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohammed AS (2017) Effect of temperature on the rheological properties with shear stress limit of iron oxide nanoparticle modified bentonite drilling muds. Egypt J Pet 26(3):791–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed AS (2014) Hyperbolic rheological model with shear stress limit for acrylamide polymer modified bentonite drilling muds. J Pet Sci Eng 122:38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2015) XRD and TGA, swelling and compacted properties of polymer treated sulfate contaminated CL soil. J Test Eval 44(6):2270–2284

    Google Scholar 

  28. Qadir W, Ghafor K, Mohammed A (2019) Characterizing and modeling the mechanical properties of the cement mortar modified with fly ash for various water-to-cement ratios and curing times. Adv Civ En 2019:11 (Article ID 7013908)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A, Ganpatye AS (2018) Smart cement performance enhancement with NanoAl2O3 for real time monitoring applications using Vipulanandan models. In: Offshore technology conference. Offshore Technology Conference

  30. Mohammed Ahmed S, Vipulanandan Cumaraswamy (2014) Compressive and tensile behavior of polymer treated sulfate contaminated CL soil. Geotech Geol Eng 32(1):71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohammed Ahmed, Vipulanandan Cumaraswamy (2015) Testing and modeling the short-term behavior of lime and fly ash treated sulfate contaminated CL soil. Geotech Geol Eng 33(4):1099–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mohammed AS (2018) Vipulanandan models to predict the electrical resistivity, rheological properties and compressive stress–strain behavior of oil well cement modified with silica nanoparticles. Egypt J Pet 27(4):1265–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2015) Smart cement modified with iron oxide nanoparticles to enhance the piezoresistive behavior and compressive strength for oil well applications. Smart Mater Struct 24(12):125020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2015) Smart cement rheological and piezoresistive behavior for oil well applications. J Pet Sci Eng 135:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vipulanandan C, Krishnamoorti R, Mohammed A, Boncan V, Narvaez G, Head B, Pappas JM (2015) Iron nanoparticle modified smart cement for real time monitoring of ultra deepwater oil well cementing applications. In: Offshore technology conference. Offshore Technology Conference

  36. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2015) Effect of nanoclay on the electrical resistivity and rheological properties of smart and sensing bentonite drilling muds. J Pet Sci Eng 130:86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2017) Rheological properties of piezoresistive smart cement slurry modified with iron-oxide nanoparticles for oil-well applications. J Test Eval 45(6):2050–2060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2018) Smart cement compressive piezoresistive, stress–strain, and strength behavior with nanosilica modification. J Test Eval 47(2):1

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A, Samuel RG (2018) Fluid loss control in smart bentonite drilling mud modified with nanoclay and quantified with Vipulanandan fluid loss model. In: Offshore technology conference. Offshore Technology Conference

  40. Mohammed A, Vipulanandan C (2019) Magnetic field strength and temperature effects on the behavior of oil well cement slurry modified with iron oxide nanoparticles and quantified with Vipulanandan models. J Test Eval 48(6):1

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mohammed A, Mahmood W (2019) New Vipulanandan p-q model for particle size distribution and groutability limits for sandy soils. J Test Eval 48(5):1

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2018) New Vipulanandan failure model and property correlations for sandstone, shale and limestone rocks. IFCEE 2018:365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mohammed AS (2018) Electrical resistivity and rheological properties of sensing bentonite drilling muds modified with lightweight polymer. Egypt J Pet 27(1):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mohammed AS (2018) Property correlations and statistical variations in the geotechnical properties of (CH) clay soils. Geotech Geol Eng 36(1):267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A, Samuel RG (2017) Smart bentonite drilling muds modified with iron oxide nanoparticles and characterized based on the electrical resistivity and rheological properties with varying magnetic field strengths and temperatures. In: Offshore technology conference. Offshore Technology Conference

  46. Afolabi RO, Orodu OD, Seteyeobot I (2018) Predictive modelling of the impact of silica nanoparticles on fluid loss of water based drilling mud. Appl Clay Sci 151:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mohammed A, Mahmood W (2018) Statistical variations and new correlation models to predict the mechanical behavior and ultimate shear strength of gypsum rock. Open Eng 8(1):213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mohammed A, Mahmood W (2018) Vipulanandan failure models to predict the tensile strength, compressive modulus, fracture toughness and ultimate shear strength of calcium rocks. Int J Geotech Eng 1:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mohammed AS (2019) Vipulanandan models to predict the mechanical properties, fracture toughness, pulse velocity and ultimate shear strength of shale rocks. Geotech Geol Eng 37(2):625–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Meng W, Kumar A, Khayat KH (2019) Effect of silica fume and slump-retaining polycarboxylate-based dispersant on the development of properties of Portland cement paste. Cement Concr Compos 99:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cardoso SS, Cartwright JH, Steinbock O, Stone DA, Thomas NL (2017) Cement nanotubes: on chemical gardens and cement. Struct Chem 28(1):33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

University of Sulaimani, Civil Engineering Department, Gasin Cement Co. and Zarya Construction Co. supported this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Mohammed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarwar, W., Ghafor, K. & Mohammed, A. Modeling the rheological properties with shear stress limit and compressive strength of ordinary Portland cement modified with polymers. J Build Rehabil 4, 25 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-019-0064-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-019-0064-6

Keywords

Navigation