Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainable Use of Locally Available Red Earth and Black Cotton Soils in Retaining Cd2+ and Ni2+ from Aqueous Solutions

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative performance of two soils as a sustainable material to attenuate the transport of heavy metal ions, cadmium (Cd2+) and nickel (Ni2+), from aqueous solutions has been evaluated. Red earth soil (RS) and black cotton soil (BCS) originating from India, were selected, and batch equilibrium tests including sorption kinetics and leaching studies were conducted. Langmuir isotherm was found to be more suitable than Freundlich isotherm for both the soils. Kinetic data were fitted on four models namely pseudo first order, pseudo second order, Elovich and intraparticle diffusion. Correlation coefficients obtained by all models fitted well in the following ranking: Elovich > Intraparticle diffusion > pseudo second order > pseudo first order. Based on extensive experimental data, it is concluded that the ranking on sorption was of the order Cd > Ni for both the soils, and BCS exhibited relatively higher retention levels compared to RS. It is further concluded that BCS can be used as a substitute to filter material, RS a substitute to main liner material in attenuating Cd2+ and Ni2+ from an industrial landfill leachate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sivapullaiah PV, Moghal AAB (2010) Leachability of trace elements from two stabilized low lime indian fly ashes. Environ Earth Sci 61:1735–1744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sungur A, Soylak M, Yilmaz E, Yilmaz S, Ozcan H (2015) Characterization of heavy metal fractions in agricultural soils by sequential extraction procedure: the relationship between soil properties and heavy metal fractions. J Soil Sed Cont 24(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  3. ATSDR (Agency for toxic substances and disease registry)(2012), Toxicological profile for Cadmium–potential for human exposure: accessed November 11th, 2014; http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp5-c6.pdf/

  4. ATSDR (Agency for toxic substances and disease registry)(2005). Toxicological profile for Nickel—potential for human exposure: accessed November 11th, 2014; http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp15-c6.pdf/

  5. Heike BB (2004) Adsorption of Heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents. J Colloid Interface Sci 277:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gadepalle VP, Ouki SK, Herwijnen RV, Hutchings T (2007) Immobilization of heavy metals in soil using natural and waste materials for vegetation establishment on contaminated sites. J Soil Sed Cont 16(2):233–251

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sivapullaiah PV, Moghal AAB (2011) Gypsum treated fly ash as a liner for waste disposal facilities. J Waste Manag 31:359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho YS, Mc Kay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. J Pro Biochem 34:451–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moghal AAB, Mohammed SAS, Basha BM, Shamrani MAA (2014) Surface complexation modeling for stabilization of an industrial sludge by alternate materials. Geotech Spec Publ 234:2235–2244

    Google Scholar 

  10. Veli S, Alyuz B (2007) Adsorption of Zinc and zinc from aqueous solutions by using natural clay. J Hazard Mat 149:226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McKinley JD, Thomas HR, Williams KP, Reid JM (2001) Chemical analysis of contaminated soil strengthened by the addition of lime. J Eng Geo 60(1–4):181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilkinson A, Haque A, Kodikara J (2010) Stabilisation of clayey soils with industrial by-products: part A. Proc Inst Civ Eng Ground Improv 163(3):149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Falamaki A (2013) Artificial neural network application for predicting soil distribution coefficient of nickel. J Environ Radioact 115:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Falamaki A, Tavallali H, Eskandari M, Farahmand SR (2016) Immobilizing some heavy metals by mixing contaminated soils with phosphate admixtures. Int J Civ Eng. doi:10.1007/s40999-016-0006-5

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moghal AAB, Mohammed SAS, Shamrani MAA, Zahid WM (2014) Performance of soils and soil lime mixtures as liners to retain heavy metal ions in aqueous solutions. Geotech Spec Publ 241:160–169

    Google Scholar 

  16. Niu ZX, Sun LN, Sun TH (2011) The bioadsorption of cadmium and lead by bacteria in root exudates culture. J Soil Sed Cont 20(8):877–891

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu HB, Guo PT, Wei W, Wang ZY (2011) Assessment of soil arsenic, chromium, mercury, and lead at an agricultural landscape scale. J Soil Sed Cont 20(8):995–1007

    Google Scholar 

  18. ASTM (American Standard Testing Methods) (2008). Standard Test Method for 24-h Batch-Type Measurement of Contaminant Sorption by Soils and Sediments D4646. West Conshohocken, PA

  19. ASTM (American Standard Testing Methods) (2012). Standard Practice for Shake Extraction of Solid Waste with Water D3987. West Conshohocken, PA

  20. Harter RD (1983) Effect of soil pH on adsorption of lead, copper, zinc, and nickel. J Soil Sci Soc Am 47(1):47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gherbi N, Meniai AH, Bencheikh M, Mansri A, Morcellet M, Bellir K, Bacquet M, Martel B (2004) Study of retention phenomenon of copper II by calcinated wheat by products. J Desalination 166:363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moghal AAB, Reddy KR, Mohammed SAS, Shamrani MAA, Zahid WM (2017) Retention studies on arsenic from aqueous solutions by lime treated semi arid soils. Int J Geomate 12(29):2836–2843

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pérez AM, Paradelo M, Munoz JC, Estevez MA, Sanjurjo MJF, Rodriguez EA, Delgado AN (2013) Heavy metal retention in copper mine soil treated with mussel shells: batch and column experiments. J Hazard Mat 248–249:122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moirou A, Xenidis A, Paspaliaris I (2001) Stabilization Pb, Zn, and Cd-contaminated soil by means of natural zeolite. J Soil Sed Cont 10(3):251–267

    Google Scholar 

  25. Coles CA, Yong RN (2006) Use of equilibrium and initial metal concentrations in determining Freundlich isotherms for soils and sediments. J Eng Geo 85:19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nemr A (2009) Potential of pomegranate husk carbon for Cr(VI) removal from wastewater: kinetic and Isotherm studies. J Hazard Mat 161:132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Moghal AAB, Shamrani MAA, Zahid WM (2015) heavy metal desorption studies on the artificially contaminated Al-Qatif soil. Int J Geomate 8(2):1323–1327

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sawell SE, Bridle TR, Constable TW (1988) Heavy metal leachability from solid waste incinerator ashes. J Waste Manag Res 6(3):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bhattacharyya KG, Gupta SS (2008) Adsorption of a few heavy metals on natural and modified kaolinite and montmorillonite, a review. Adv Coll Interface Sci 140(2):114–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tossavainen M, Forssberg E (1999) The potential leachability from natural road construction materials. J Sci Total Environ 239(1–3):31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moghal AAB, Sivapullaiah PV (2012) Retention characteristics of Cu2+, Pb2+ and Zn2+ from aqueous solutions by two types of low lime fly ashes. J Toxic Environ Chem 94–10:1941–1953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Covelo EF, Vega FA, Andrade ML (2007) Heavy metal sorption and desorption capacity of soils containing endogenous contaminants. J Hazard Mat 143(1–2):419–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bishop PL (1998) Leaching of inorganic hazardous constituents from stabilized/solidified hazardous wastes. J Hazard Waste Hazard Mat 5(2):129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mohammed SAS, Moghal AAB (2014) Soils amended with admixtures as stabilizing agent to retain heavy metals. Geotech Spec Publ 234:2216–2226

    Google Scholar 

  35. Meima J, Comans R (1998) Application of surface complexation/precipitation modeling to contaminant leaching from weathered municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash. J Environ Sci Tech 32:688–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Usman ARA (2008) The relative adsorption selectivities of Pb, Cu, Zn, Cd and Ni by soils developed on shale in New Valley, Egypt. J Geoderma 144(1–2):334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cappuyns V, Swennen R (2008) The application of pH state leaching tests to assess the pH-dependent release of trace metals from soils, sediments and waste material. J Hazard Mat 158(1):185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is part of a research project supported by Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India, Project No. SR/S3/MERC/0111/2012. The authors would also like to thank Mr. Kotresha K, Junior Research Fellow (JRF) for his assistance in conducting the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arif Ali Baig Moghal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammed, S.A.S., Sanaulla, P.F. & Moghal, A.A.B. Sustainable Use of Locally Available Red Earth and Black Cotton Soils in Retaining Cd2+ and Ni2+ from Aqueous Solutions. Int J Civ Eng 14, 491–505 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0052-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0052-z

Keywords

Navigation