Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic Performance of Different Types of Connections Between Steel Bracing and RC Frames

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the seismic performance of three different types of connections between steel braces and concrete frames is assessed through numerical analyses. Two of the connection types are similar to the conventional diagonal steel brace–steel frame connections, while the third type is a new connection specifically designed for increased ductility. Results of previous experimental studies are first used to verify the accuracy of numerical models of the connections. The connections are then incorporated into brace–RC frame systems, and nonlinear cyclic analyses of the brace–frame assemblage are carried out. The response hysteresis loops of the frames are then used to evaluate such strength and performance parameters as capacity, stiffness, stiffness degradation, energy dissipation, equivalent damping ratio and ductility ratio for the frames. These parameters are then compared for the frames containing the three different types of connections. It is found that while the two conventional connections can perform effectively when the capacity and stiffness of the frame are of prime interest, the new connection enhances ductility and improves energy absorption capacity of the frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou-Elfath A, Ghobarah A (2000) Behaviour of reinforced concrete frames rehabilitated with concentric steel bracing. Can J Civ Eng 27:433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ACI Committee 318 (2002) Building code requirements for reinforced concrete (ACI 318-02) and commentary (ACI 318R-02). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan

  • AISC (2001) Manual of steel construction: load and resistance factor design, 3rd edn. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago

  • ANSYS (2009) ANSYS user’s manual, revision 12. ANSYS Inc, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania

  • Badoux M, Jirsa JO (1990) Steel bracing of RC frames for seismic retrofitting. J Struct Eng ASCE 116(1):55–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush TD, Jones EA, Jirsa JO (1991) Behavior of RC frame strengthened using structural-steel bracing. J Struct Eng ASCE 117(4):1115–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffarzadeh H, Maheri MR (2006) Cyclic tests on the internally braced RC frames. JSEE 8(3):177

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmstad KD, Foooooutch DA, Del Valle E, Downs RE (1988) Forced vibration studies of an RC building retrofit with steel bracing. In: Proceedings of 9th world conference on earthquake engineering, Japan, VII, pp 469–474

  • Holzer S (1975) SINDER: a computer code for general analysis of two-dimensional reinforced concrete structures. Report. AFWL-TR-74-228 vol 1. Air force Weapons Laboratory, Kirt-Land, AFB, New Mexico

  • Kachlakev D, Miller T, Yim S, Chansawat K (2001) Finite element modeling of reinforced concrete structures strengthened with FRP laminates. Final report for Oregon Department of Transportation Research Group

  • Maheri MR, Akbari R (2003) Seismic behaviour factor, R, for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings. Eng Struct 25(12):1505–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheri MR, Ghaffarzadeh H (2008) Connection overstrength in steel-braced RC frames. Eng Struct 30(7):1938–1948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheri MR, Hadjipour A (2003) Experimental investigation and design of steel brace connection to RC frame. Eng Struct 25:1707–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheri MR, Sahebi A (1997) Use of steel bracing in reinforced concrete frames. Eng Struct 19(12):1018–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheri MR, Kousari R, Razazan M (2003) Pushover tests on steel X-braced and knee-braced RC frames. Eng Struct 25(13):1697–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohishi H, Takahashi M, Yamazaki Y (1988) A seismic strengthening design and practice of an existing reinforced concrete school building in Shizuoka city. In: Proceedings of 9th world conference on earthquake engineering, Japan, VII, pp 415–420

  • Park R, Mander JB (1984) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. ASCE J Struct Eng 114:1804–1826

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagawa Y, Aoki H, Huang T, Masuda H (1992) Experimental study of new seismic strengthening method for existing RC structure. In: Proceedings of 10th world conference on earthquake engineering, Rotterdam, pp 5193–5198

  • Tasnimi A, Masoomi A (1999) Evaluation of response of reinforced concrete frames strengthened with steel bracing. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on seismology and earthquake engineering, Iran

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

    Mahmoud R. Maheri & S. Yazdani

Authors
  1. Mahmoud R. Maheri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Yazdani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud R. Maheri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maheri, M.R., Yazdani, S. Seismic Performance of Different Types of Connections Between Steel Bracing and RC Frames. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 40, 287–296 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-016-0034-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-016-0034-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation