Abstract
Minimal surfaces are receiving a renewed interest in biomedical and industrial fields, due to the capabilities of additive manufacturing technologies which allow very complex shapes. In this paper, an approach for geometric modeling of variable thickness triply periodic minimal surfaces in a CAD environment is proposed. The approach consists of three main steps: the definition of an initial mesh, the adoption of a subdivision scheme and the assignment of a variable thickness by a differential offset. Moreover, the relationship between relative density and mesh thickness was established for two types of minimal surfaces: Schoen’s gyroid, Schwarz’ Primitive. The proposed method improves the main issues highlighted in literature in the modeling of cellular materials and allows to easily obtain a consistent polygonal mesh model satisfying functional requirements. Two test cases were presented: the first shows a gradient thickness gyroid; in the second the relative density obtained by topology optimization was adopted in our modeling approach using a Schwarz’ Primitive. In both cases, guidelines for selecting the geometric modeling parameters taking into account the specific additive manufacturing process constraints were discussed. The proposed method opens new perspectives in the development of effective CAD tools for additive manufacturing, improving the shape complexity and data exchange capacity in cellular solid modeling.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bobbert FSL, Lietaert K, Eftekhari AA et al (2017) Additively manufactured metallic porous biomaterials based on minimal surfaces: a unique combination of topological, mechanical, and mass transport properties. Acta Biomater 53:572–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.024
Yoo DJ (2011) Porous scaffold design using the distance field and triply periodic minimal surface models. Biomaterials 32:7741–7754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.019
Kapfer SC, Hyde ST, Mecke K et al (2011) Minimal surface scaffold designs for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 32:6875–6882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.012
Challis VJ, Xu X, Chang L et al (2014) High specific strength and stiffness structures produced using selective laser melting. Mater Des 63:783–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.064
Yánez A, Herrera A, Martel O et al (2016) Compressive behaviour of gyroid lattice structures for human cancellous bone implant applications. Mater Sci Eng C 68:445–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.016
Fantini M, Curto M, De Crescenzio F (2017) TPMS for interactive modelling of trabecular scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. In: Advances on mechanics, design engineering and manufacturing, Part of the series Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. pp 425–435
Ambu R, Morabito AE (2017) Design and analysis of tissue engineering scaffolds based on open porous non-stochastic cells. In: Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing, Part of the series Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. pp 777–787
Zadpoor AA (2015) Bone tissue regeneration: the role of scaffold geometry. Biomater Sci 3:231–245. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4BM00291A
Afshar M, Anaraki AP, Montazerian H, Kadkhodapour J (2016) Additive manufacturing and mechanical characterization of graded porosity scaffolds designed based on triply periodic minimal surface architectures. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 62:481–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.027
Shi J, Zhu L, Li L et al (2018) A TPMS-based method for modeling porous scaffolds for bionic bone tissue engineering. Sci Rep 8:7395. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25750-9
Yoo D-J, Kim K-H (2015) An advanced multi-morphology porous scaffold design method using volumetric distance field and beta growth function. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-015-0263-2
Yoo D (2012) New paradigms in internal architecture design and freeform fabrication of tissue engineering porous scaffolds. Med Eng Phys 34:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.05.008
Yang N, Tian Y, Zhang D (2015) Novel real function based method to construct heterogeneous porous scaffolds and additive manufacturing for use in medical engineering. Med Eng Phys 37:1037–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.08.006
Yang N, Quan Z, Zhang D, Tian Y (2014) Multi-morphology transition hybridization CAD design of minimal surface porous structures for use in tissue engineering. Comput Des 56:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.06.006
Femmer T, Kuehne AJC, Wessling M (2015) Estimation of the structure dependent performance of 3-D rapid prototyped membranes. Chem Eng J 273:438–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.029
Al-ketan O, Al-rub RKA, Rowshan R (2017) Mechanical properties of a new type of architected interpenetrating phase composite materials. 2:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201600235
Dalaq AS, Abueidda DW, Abu Al-Rub RK, Jasiuk IM (2016) Finite element prediction of effective elastic properties of interpenetrating phase composites with architectured 3D sheet reinforcements. Int J Solids Struct 83:169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.01.011
Speirs M, Van Hooreweder B, Van Humbeeck J, Kruth J-P (2017) Fatigue behaviour of NiTi shape memory alloy scaffolds produced by SLM, a unit cell design comparison. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 70:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.016
Shin J, Kim S, Jeong D et al (2012) Finite element analysis of schwarz P surface pore geometries for tissue-engineered scaffolds. Math Probl Eng 2012:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/694194
Khan KA, Abu Al-Rub RK (2017) Time dependent response of architectured Neovius foams. Int J Mech Sci 126:106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.03.017
Zhang L, Feih S, Daynes S et al (2018) Energy absorption characteristics of metallic triply periodic minimal surface sheet structures under compressive loading. Addit Manuf 23:505–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.007
Bonatti C, Mohr D (2019) Mechanical performance of additively-manufactured anisotropic and isotropic smooth shell-lattice materials: simulations and experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 122:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMPS.2018.08.022
Yang L, Yan C, Han C et al (2018) Mechanical response of a triply periodic minimal surface cellular structures manufactured by selective laser melting. Int J Mech Sci 148:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.039
Maskery I, Sturm L, Aremu AO et al (2018) Insights into the mechanical properties of several triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures made by polymer additive manufacturing. Polymer 152:62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.049
Al-Ketan O, Abu Al-Rub RK, Rowshan R (2018) The effect of architecture on the mechanical properties of cellular structures based on the IWP minimal surface. J Mater Res 33:343–359. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.1
Al-Ketan O, Rowshan R, Abu Al-Rub RK (2018) Topology-mechanical property relationship of 3D printed strut, skeletal, and sheet based periodic metallic cellular materials. Addit Manuf 19:167–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.006
Al-Ketan O, Soliman A, AlQubaisi AM, Abu Al-Rub RK (2018) Nature-inspired lightweight cellular co-continuous composites with architected periodic gyroidal structures. Adv Eng Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700549
Zheng X, Fu Z, Du K et al (2018) Minimal surface designs for porous materials: from microstructures to mechanical properties. J Mater Sci 53:10194–10208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2285-5
Khaderi SN, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2014) The stiffness and strength of the gyroid lattice. Int J Solids Struct 51:3866–3877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.06.024
Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Raymont D (2012) Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 62:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.002
Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A et al (2014) Advanced lightweight 316L stainless steel cellular lattice structures fabricated via selective laser melting. Mater Des 55:533–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.027
Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A et al (2015) Microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminium alloy cellular lattice structures manufactured by direct metal laser sintering. Mater Sci Eng A 628:238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.063
Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Young P (2015) Ti-6Al-4V triply periodic minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 51:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.024
Afshar M, Pourkamali Anaraki A, Montazerian H (2018) Compressive characteristics of radially graded porosity scaffolds architectured with minimal surfaces. Mater Sci Eng C 92:254–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.06.051
Zhang B, Mhapsekar K, Anand S (2017) Design of variable-density structures for additive manufacturing using gyroid lattices. In: Volume 4: 22nd Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference; 11th International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems. ASME, p V004T05A015
Feng J, Fu J, Shang C et al (2018) Porous scaffold design by solid T-splines and triply periodic minimal surfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 336:333–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.03.007
Savio G, Rosso S, Meneghello R, Concheri G (2018) Geometric modeling of cellular materials for additive manufacturing in biomedical field: a review. Appl Bionics Biomech 2018:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1654782
Piegl L, Tiller W (1997) The NURBS book. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
Mortenson ME (1985) Geometric modeling, 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken
Feng J, Fu J, Lin Z et al (2018) A review of the design methods of complex topology structures for 3D printing. Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art 1:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-018-0004-3
Savio G, Meneghello R, Concheri G (2018) Geometric modeling of lattice structures for additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 24:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2016-0122
Savio G, Meneghello R, Rosso S, Concheri G (2019) 3D model representation and data exchange for additive manufacturing. In: Advances on mechanics, design engineering and manufacturing II. In Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
Thompson MK, Moroni G, Vaneker T et al (2016) Design for additive manufacturing: trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65:737–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004
Pasko A, Fryazinov O, Vilbrandt T et al (2011) Procedural function-based modelling of volumetric microstructures. Graph Models 73:165–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gmod.2011.03.001
Savio G, Rosso S, Curtarello A et al (2019) Implications of modeling approaches on the fatigue behavior of cellular solids. Addit Manuf 25:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.047
Catmull E, Clark J (1978) Recursively generated B-spline surfaces on arbitrary topological meshes. Comput Des 10:350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(78)90110-0
Zorin D, Schröder P (2000) Subdivision for Modeling and Animation. SIGGRAPH 2000 Course Notes Subdivision
Konečný J (2007) Catmull-Clark Subdivision Surfaces on GPU. In: CESCG 2007
Shiue L-J, Jones I, Peters J (2005) A realtime GPU subdivision kernel. ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Pap - SIGGRAPH’05 1010. https://doi.org/10.1145/1186822.1073304
Schoen AH (1970) Infinite periodic minimal surfaces without self-intersections. Nasa Tech Note D-5541 92
Schwarz HA (1980) Gesammelte Mathematische Abhandlungen. Verlag von Julius Springer., Berlin
Zorin D (2000) Subdivision zoo
Piacentino GW. Topological Mesh Editor. http://www.giuliopiacentino.com/weaverbird/. Accessed 28 Jul 2017
Tamburrino F, Graziosi S, Bordegoni M (2018) the design process of additively manufactured mesoscale lattice structures: a review. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 18:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040131
Aremu AO, Brennan-Craddock JPJ, Panesar A et al (2017) A voxel-based method of constructing and skinning conformal and functionally graded lattice structures suitable for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 13:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.10.006
Hussein A, Hao L, Yan C et al (2013) Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 213:1019–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.01.020
Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2004) Topology optimization, 2nd edn. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin
Alzahrani M, Choi S-K, Rosen DW (2015) Design of truss-like cellular structures using relative density mapping method. Mater Des 85:349–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.180
Tang Y, Kurtz A, Zhao YF (2015) Bidirectional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) based design method for lattice structure to be fabricated by additive manufacturing. Comput Des 69:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.06.001
Zhang P, Toman J, Yu Y et al (2015) efficient design-optimization of variable-density hexagonal cellular structure by additive manufacturing: theory and validation. J Manuf Sci Eng 137:21004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028724
Sawako K, Panagiotis M, Millipede. http://www.sawapan.eu/. Accessed 08 Oct 2017
Funding
This work was partially funded by the University of Padova, Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering ICEA (Grant number BIRD175287/17, 2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Savio, G., Meneghello, R. & Concheri, G. Design of variable thickness triply periodic surfaces for additive manufacturing. Prog Addit Manuf 4, 281–290 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-019-00073-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-019-00073-x