Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Solidification Time on Microstructure, Wettability, and Corrosion Properties of A205-T7 Aluminum Alloys

  • Published:
International Journal of Metalcasting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Commentary to this article was published on 29 May 2020

Abstract

In the present study, the grain size, second-phase morphology, hardness, water wetting behavior, and corrosion resistance of A205, as a function of solidification time, were investigated. A205 is aluminum–copper alloy that is described in the AA Pink Sheets as “Primarily used for making metal matrix composites” (AA Registration Record Pink Sheets, ISSN: 2377-6722, Footnote 13, Aluminum Association, 2018) and as defined by AMS as a “dilute aluminum/TiB2 metal matrix composite” (AMS D Nonferrous Alloys Committee in Cast aluminum alloy composite 4.6Cu–3.4Ti–1.4B–0.75Ag–0.27Mg (205.0/TiB2/3p-T7P) investment cast, solution, and precipitation heat treated, SAE International, 2014). To study the effect of solidification time, a step sand casting, with varying section thickness, was made and subjected to a modified T7 heat treatment. Optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction analysis were utilized to study microstructure, morphology, elemental composition, and phases in the A205 samples, respectively. Potentiodynamic polarization experiment was used to measure the corrosion resistance of the A205 samples. The casting process was also simulated by use of a commercial software. Conclusions drawn from the simulation process show that larger thickness allows for higher solidification time and greater microporosity. It was observed that solidification time has a direct impact on grain size. The phase identification result shows that the two main phases of the alloys are Al and TiB2, while a modified heat treatment cycle makes a complete solution of copper in the grains. Wetting study shows that surface chemistry is not a controlling factor on contact angles, while corrosion result shows a relationship between solidification time and corrosion resistance of the A205 samples. It was observed that there is almost 70% decrease in corrosion rate from the sample with the least section thickness to the sample with the largest section thickness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.B. Djurdjević, Z. Odanović, J. Pavlović-Krstić, Melt quality control at aluminum casting plants. Metall. Mater. Eng. 16(1), 63–76 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. O.N. Senkov, A.P. Druschitz, S.V. Senkova, K.L. Kendig, J. Griffin, Ultra-high strength sand castings from aluminum alloy 7042, in Shape Casting (Wiley, London, 2011), pp. 199–206

  3. G. García-García, J. Espinoza-Cuadra, H. Mancha-Molinar, Copper content and cooling rate effects over second phase particles behavior in industrial aluminum–silicon alloy 319. Mater. Des. 28(2), 428–433 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.-H. Cho, S.H. Han, C.G. Lee, Cooling effect on microstructure and mechanical properties during friction stir welding of Al–Mg–Si aluminum alloys. Mater. Lett. 180, 157–161 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.05.157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Quan, L. Ren, M. Zhou, 2.13 Solutionizing and Age Hardening of Aluminum Alloys, Comprehensive materials finishing (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2017)

  6. L.Y. Zhang et al., Effect of cooling rate on solidified microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminium-A356 alloy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 207(1–3), 107–111 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. AA Registration Record Pink Sheets, ISSN: 2377-6722, Footnote 13, Aluminum Association, Oct-2018

  8. AMS D Nonferrous Alloys Committee, Cast Aluminum alloy composite 4.6Cu–3.4Ti–1.4B–0.75Ag–0.27Mg (205.0/TiB2/3p-T7P) investment cast, solution and precipitation heat treated, SAE International (2014)

  9. J.R. Davis, J.R.D. Associates, A.I.H. Committee, Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys. ASM International(1993)

  10. R.N. Wenzel, Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem. 28(8), 988–994 (1936)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Kordijazi, Optimization of Ni–P–Zn electroless bath and investigation of corrosion resistance of as-plated coatings. Mater. Res. Express 6(9), 096565 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Kordijazi, Electrochemical characteristics of an optimized Ni-P-Zn electroless composite coating. Adv. Mater. Res. 1043, 124–128 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. V. Hejazi, Wetting, superhydrophobicity, and icephobicity in biomimetic composite materials (2014)

  14. J.-Y. Shiu, C.-W. Kuo, P. Chen, C.-Y. Mou, Fabrication of tunable superhydrophobic surfaces by nanosphere lithography. Chem. Mater. 16(4), 561–564 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Ramachandran, M. Nosonovsky, Coupling of surface energy with electric potential makes superhydrophobic surfaces corrosion-resistant. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17(38), 24988–24997 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Kordijazi, S.K. Behera, O. Akbarzadeh, M. Povolo, P. Rohatgi, A statistical analysis to study the effect of silicon content, surface roughness, droplet size and elapsed time on wettability of hypoeutectic cast aluminum–silicon alloys, in Light Metals 2020 (Springer, Berlin, 2020), pp. 185–193

  17. S. Das, A. Kordijazi, O. Akbarzadeh, P.K. Rohatgi, An innovative process for dispersion of graphene nanoparticles and nickel spheres in A356 alloy using pressure infiltration technique, Eng. Rep., p. e12110

  18. T. Hashimoto, X. Zhang, X. Zhou, P. Skeldon, S.J. Haigh, G.E. Thompson, Investigation of dealloying of S phase (Al2CuMg) in AA 2024–T3 aluminium alloy using high resolution 2D and 3D electron imaging. Corros. Sci. 103, 157–164 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. K.L. Tee, L. Lu, M.O. Lai, Synthesis of in situ Al–TiB2 composites using stir cast route. Compos. Struct. 47(1–4), 589–593 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. I.G. Davies, J.M. Dennis, A. Hellawell, The nucleation of aluminum grains in alloys of aluminum with titanium and boron. Metall. Trans. 1(1), 275–280 (1970)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Sahoo, M.J. Koczak, Microstructure-property relationships of in situ reacted TiC/Al–Cu metal matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 131(1), 69–76 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(91)90345-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. B.D. Cullity, S.R. Stock, Elements of X-ray Diffraction, vol. 3 (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Wiedemann, H. Oettel, M. Jerenz, Structure of deposited and annealed TiB2 layers. Surf. Coat. Technol. 97(1–3), 313–321 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. C.E. Lyman, M.J. Carr, Identification of Unknowns. Electron Diffr. Tech. 2, 373–417 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  25. D.C. Montgomery, G.C. Runger, Applied statistics and probability for engineers (Wiley, London, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. A.B.D. Cassie, S. Baxter, Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc. 40, 546–551 (1944)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. X.-M. Li, D. Reinhoudt, M. Crego-Calama, What do we need for a superhydrophobic surface? A review on the recent progress in the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36(8), 1350–1368 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1039/B602486F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S.D. Cramer, B.S. Covino, ASM Handbook Volume 13 Corrosion, ASM Int. Handb. Comm. (1992)

  29. D.R. Lide, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 85th edn. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. Doig, J.W. Edington, The influence of solute depleted zones on the stress-corrosion susceptibility of aged Al–7.2 mass% Mg and Al–4.4 mass% Cu alloys. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Math. Phys. Sci. 339(1616), 37–47 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Garner, D. Tromans, Direct Observation of Intergranular Corrosion in AI-4 Wt% Cu Alloy. CORROSION 35(2), 55–60 (1979). https://doi.org/10.5006/0010-9312-35.2.55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. K. Urushino, K. Sugimoto, Stress-corrosion cracking of aged Al–Cu–Mg alloys in NaCl solution. Corros. Sci. 19(4), 225–236 (1979)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. T.D. Burleigh, The postulated mechanisms for stress corrosion cracking of aluminum alloys: A review of the literature 1980–1989. Corrosion 47(2), 89–98 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge gratefully the support of the NSF Fundamental Project-1331532 Grant for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Kordijazi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kordijazi, A., Weiss, D., Das, S. et al. Effect of Solidification Time on Microstructure, Wettability, and Corrosion Properties of A205-T7 Aluminum Alloys. Inter Metalcast 15, 2–12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00457-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00457-8

Keywords

Navigation