Skip to main content
Log in

Crack propagation in jointed rock and its effect on rock macrofracture resistance: insights from discrete element analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The complicated fracturing process of jointed rock increases the difficulty of underground cavern support and deep earth resource exploitation. Herein, the crack propagation behavior and its effect on macrofracture resistance of jointed rock were evaluated through discrete element modeling (DEM). To quantify the joint distribution, strength ratio between joint and rock matrix on rock fracture toughness, a series of simplified rock structures were established in notched semi-circular bending tests. The results indicated that the apparent fracture toughness of jointed rock is governed by the cracking process and path in jointed rock mass. Cracking patterns could be classified into three types (deflection-dominant, pattern competition, and penetration-dominant) by strength ratio where high fracture toughness is found in the region of pattern competition. Thereafter, the influences of joint spacing on rock cracking and apparent fracture toughness were assessed by comparing our DEM results and previous laboratory tests. Finally, scale effects on fracture profile and toughness of jointed rock were elucidated along with the comparison of rock fracturing processes in homogeneous and jointed rock. The results clarify the correlation between cracking and rock fracture resistance, which helps us understand rock fracture and crack propagation in underground space for the extraction of geothermal energy and shale oil/gas resources.

Article Highlights

  1. 1.

    Three regions of fracture pattern were classified in terms of joint distribution and strength.

  2. 2.

    Effects of joint spacing on the relationship between nominal tensile strength and apparent fracture toughness were revealed.

  3. 3.

    The influences of rock size on fracture width and toughness of jointed rock were clarified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayatollahi M, Akbardoost J (2014) Size and geometry effects on rock fracture toughness: mode I fracture. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:677–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP (1984) Size effect in blunt fracture: concrete, rock, metal. J Eng Mech 110:518–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Kazemi M (1990) Determination of fracture energy, process zone length and brittleness number from size effect, with application to rock and concrete. Int J Fract 44:111–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler MR, Mecklenburgh J, Rutter E, Lee P (2019) Fluid injection experiments in shale at elevated confining pressures: determination of flaw sizes from mechanical experiments. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 124:5500–5520

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler MR, Meredith PG, Brantut N, Crawford BR (2016) Fracture toughness anisotropy in shale. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121:1706–1729

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang S-H, Lee C-I, Jeon S (2002) Measurement of rock fracture toughness under modes I and II and mixed-mode conditions by using disc-type specimens. Eng Geol 66:79–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Jin X, Wang M (2018) A new thermo-mechanical coupled DEM model with non-spherical grains for thermally induced damage of rocks. J Mech Phys Solids 116:54–69

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Xia K, Dai F, Lu F, Luo S (2009) Determination of dynamic fracture parameters using a semi-circular bend technique in split Hopkinson pressure bar testing. Eng Fract Mech 76:1268–1276

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Zhang C, Lu Q, Chen H, Yang Z, Wen Y, Hu S, Chen L (2019) A two-set order parameters phase-field modeling of crack deflection/penetration in a heterogeneous microstructure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 347:1085–1104

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterell B, Rice J (1980) Slightly curved or kinked cracks. Int J Fract 16:155–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui Z, Liu D-a, Tang T, Han W (2017) Empirical estimation of the mode-I fracture toughness of brittle rocks using Brazilian Tensile Strength, 51st US Rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association.

  • da Silva BG, Einstein H (2018) Physical processes involved in the laboratory hydraulic fracturing of granite: visual observations and interpretation. Eng Fracture Mech 191:125–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Zhu J, Chen S, Zhao Z, Zhou Y, Zhao J (2014) Numerical study on tunnel damage subject to blast-induced shock wave in jointed rock masses. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 43:88–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan K, Hu X, Wittmann FH (2007) Size effect on specific fracture energy of concrete. Eng Fract Mech 74:87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi M, Balint D, Sutton A, Dini D (2019) A discrete crack dynamics model of toughening in brittle polycrystalline material by crack deflection. Eng Fract Mech 214:95–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan F, Sih G (1963) On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. J Basic Eng 84:519–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Fakhimi A, Tarokh A (2013) Process zone and size effect in fracture testing of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao F, Stead D (2014) The application of a modified Voronoi logic to brittle fracture modelling at the laboratory and field scale. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 68:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao F, Stead D, Elmo D (2016) Numerical simulation of microstructure of brittle rock using a grain-breakable distinct element grain-based model. Comput Geotech 78:203–217

    Google Scholar 

  • He M-Y, Hutchinson JW (1989) Crack deflection at an interface between dissimilar elastic materials. Int J Solids Struct 25:1053–1067

    Google Scholar 

  • Horii H, Nemat-Nasser S (1985) Compression-induced microcrack growth in brittle solids: axial splitting and shear failure. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 90:3105–3125

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal M, Mohanty B (2007) Experimental calibration of ISRM suggested fracture toughness measurement techniques in selected brittle rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 40:453

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin GR (1957) Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack transversing a plate. J Appl Mech 24:361–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Itasca (2011) UDEC, Version 5.0, Itasca Consulting Group. Inc., Minneapolis.

  • Ju M, Li J, Li X, Zhao J (2019) Fracture surface morphology of brittle geomaterials influenced by loading rate and grain size. Int J Impact Eng 133:103363

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju M, Li J, Li J, Zhao J (2020) Loading rate effects on anisotropy and crack propagation of weak bedding plane-rich rocks. Eng Fracture Mech 230:106983

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju M, Wang D, Shi J, Li J, Yao Q, Li X (2021) Physical and numerical investigations of bedding adhesion strength on stratified rock roof fracture with longwall coal mining. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour 7:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Kataoka M, Obara Y, Kuruppu M (2015) Estimation of fracture toughness of anisotropic rocks by semi-circular bend (SCB) tests under water vapor pressure. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1353–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazerani T, Zhao J (2010) Micromechanical parameters in bonded particle method for modelling of brittle material failure. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 34:1877–1895

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lan H, Martin CD, Hu B (2010) Effect of heterogeneity of brittle rock on micromechanical extensile behavior during compression loading. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen B, Gudmundsson A, Grunnaleite I, Sælen G, Talbot MR, Buckley SJ (2010) Effects of sedimentary interfaces on fracture pattern, linkage, and cluster formation in peritidal carbonate rocks. Mar Pet Geol 27:1531–1550

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee W, Clegg W (1996) The deflection of cracks at interfaces. Key Eng Mater. 116:193–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Ma G, Zhao J (2010) An equivalent viscoelastic model for rock mass with parallel joints. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Rong L, Li H, Hong S (2019a) An SHPB test study on stress wave energy attenuation in jointed rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:403–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Jin Z, Cusatis G (2019b) Size effect analysis for the characterization of marcellus shale quasi-brittle fracture properties. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim SS, Martin CD, Åkesson U (2012) In-situ stress and microcracking in granite cores with depth. Eng Geol 147:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Xie H, Ren L, Zhang R, Li C, Gao C (2018) Linear elastic fracture mechanics characterization of an anisotropic shale. Sci Rep 8:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahabadi O, Tatone B, Grasselli G (2014) Influence of microscale heterogeneity and microstructure on the tensile behavior of crystalline rocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:5324–5341

    Google Scholar 

  • Masoumi H, Roshan H, Hedayat A, Hagan PC (2018) Scale-size dependency of intact rock under point-load and indirect tensile Brazilian testing. Int J Geomech 18:04018006

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasseri M, Grasselli G, Mohanty B (2010) Fracture toughness and fracture roughness in anisotropic granitic rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:403–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasseri M, Mohanty B, Robin P-Y (2005) Characterization of microstructures and fracture toughness in five granitic rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1997(42):450–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasseri M, Tatone B, Grasselli G, Young R (2009) Fracture toughness and fracture roughness interrelationship in thermally treated Westerly granite. Pure Appl Geophys 166:801–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Noselli G, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2013) An analysis of competing toughening mechanisms in layered and particulate solids. Int J Fract 183:241–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy DG, Singh T, Kodikara J (2017) Influence of joint anisotropy on the fracturing behavior of a sedimentary rock. Eng Geol 228:224–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Scavia C (1996) The effect of scale on rock fracture toughness: a fractal approach. Géotechnique 46:683–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarokh A, Makhnenko RY, Fakhimi A, Labuz JF (2017) Scaling of the fracture process zone in rock. Int J Fract 204:191–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien YM, Kuo MC (2001) A failure criterion for transversely isotropic rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:399–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Zhang S, Xie H (2010) Rock dynamic fracture toughness tested with holed-cracked flattened Brazilian discs diametrically impacted by SHPB and its size effect. Exp Mech 50:877–885

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Jiang Y, Li B (2017) Experimental and numerical study on crack propagation and deformation around underground opening in jointed rock masses. Geosci J 21:291–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe N, Egawa M, Sakaguchi K, Ishibashi T, Tsuchiya N (2017) Hydraulic fracturing and permeability enhancement in granite from subcritical/brittle to supercritical/ductile conditions. Geophys Res Lett 44:5468–5475

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei M-D, Dai F, Xu N-W, Zhao T, Liu Y (2017) An experimental and theoretical assessment of semi-circular bend specimens with chevron and straight-through notches for mode I fracture toughness testing of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 99:28–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker BN, Singh RN, Sun G (1992) Rock fracture mechanics: principles, design, and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M (1956) On the stress distribution at the base of a stationary crack. J Appl Mech 24:109–114

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wong L, Einstein H (2009) Crack coalescence in molded gypsum and Carrara marble: part 1. Macroscopic observations and interpretation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42:475–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Li H, Zhao J (2015) Dynamic responses of non-welded and welded rock fractures and implications for P-wave attenuation in a rock mass. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 100:174–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Ma L, Fan L (2018) Investigation of the characteristics of rock fracture process zone using coupled FEM/DEM method. Eng Fract Mech 200:355–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Wu X, Hassan N, Wang Y, Ma W, Liu G (2020) Modified zipper fracturing in enhanced geothermal system reservoir and heat extraction optimization via orthogonal design. Renew Energy 161:373–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z (2002) An empirical relation between mode I fracture toughness and the tensile strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Zhao J (2014) Quasi-static and dynamic fracture behaviour of rock materials: phenomena and mechanisms. Int J Fract 189:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Hu X, Wu Z, Li Q (2018) Influence of grain size on granite strength and toughness with reliability specified by normal distribution. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 96:534–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Wong L, Chan KK (2019) An extended grain-based model accounting for microstructures in rock deformation. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 124:125–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Kou S, Lindqvist P, Yu Y (1998) The relationship between the fracture toughness and tensile strength of rock. Strength theories: applications, development & prospects for 21st century, pp 215–219.

  • Zhou S, Zhuang X, Zhu H, Rabczuk T (2018) Phase field modelling of crack propagation, branching and coalescence in rocks. Theor Appl Fract Mech 96:174–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XP, Zhang JZ, Yang SQ, Berto F (2021) Compression-induced crack initiation and growth in flawed rocks: a review. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 44:1681–1707

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Xia K-w, Li X, Li H, Ma G, Zhao J, Zhou Z, Dai F (2011) Suggested methods for determining the dynamic strength parameters and mode-I fracture toughness of rock materials. In: Ulusay R (ed) The ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 2007–2014. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Zietlow WK, Labuz JF (1998) Measurement of the intrinsic process zone in rock using acoustic emission. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35:291–299

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the China Scholarship Council-Monash University (CSC-Monash) Project (NO. 201606420068), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 52104101, NO. 52009138), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (NO. BK20200583). The authors are very grateful to the financial contribution and convey their appreciation for supporting this basic research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haozhe Xing.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors whose names listed in this article certify that there is NO actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ju, M., Xing, H. Crack propagation in jointed rock and its effect on rock macrofracture resistance: insights from discrete element analysis. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour. 8, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-021-00326-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-021-00326-6

Keywords

Navigation