Abstract
Understanding the links between geoethics, land use dynamics, and groundwater governance (and more specifically, the groundwater vulnerability) is an opportunity to qualify the discussion on the rapid expansion of cash-crops in developing countries. This is the case of sugarcane expansion in the Pontal do Paranapanema Region (PPR), State of São Paulo, Brazil, where degraded pasture areas were converted into sugarcane crops in the last 20 years. The Brazilian plan for biofuels includes new areas and crops among the territory, considering the updated countries NDCs at COP26. The aim of this paper was to propose a geoethical assessment approach to sugarcane expansion along areas with natural vulnerability, focusing on groundwater governance. Despite sugarcane expanding over the pasture, not triggering direct deforestation after 1985, from the hydrogeoethical viewpoint, this expansion occurred under aquifer vulnerability, triggering negative impacts on aquifer recharge, which could affect crops in the future, because the region is dependent on groundwater for rural supply. We identified potential issues in groundwater governance using free and public data to guide future research at more detailed levels.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
The climatological, land use, legal registers and wells data that support the findings of this study are available from Google Earth Engine (https://earthengine.google.com/) and MapBiomas (https://mapbiomas.org/), Rural Environmental Registry (CAR) (https://www.car.gov.br/), and Groundwater Information System (SIAGAS) (http://siagasweb.cprm.gov.br/layout/), respectively.
References
Allison GB, Cook PG, Barnett SR, Walker GR, Jolly ID, Hughes MW (1990) Land clearance and river salinisation in the western Murray Basin, Australia. J Hydrol 119:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90030-2
Bobrowsky P, Cronin V, Di Capua G, Kieffer S, Peppoloni S (2018) The emerging field of geoethics. In: Gundersen LC (ed) Scientific integrity and ethics: with applications to the geosciences (Special Publications 73). American Geophysical Union, Wiley, Washington, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119067825.ch11
Bohle M (ed) (2019) Exploring geoethics: ethical implications, societal contexts, and professional obligations of the geosciences. Palgrave Pivot, Cham.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12010-8
Botter M, Burlando P, Fatichi S (2019) Anthropogenic and catchment characteristic signatures in the water quality of Swiss rivers: a quantitative assessment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 23:1885–1904. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1885-2019
Brauman KA, Freyberg DL, Daily GC (2014) Impacts of land-use change on groundwater supply: ecosystem services assessment in Kona, Hawaii. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000495
Brazil (2016) Intended nationally determined contribution towards achieving the objective of the United Nations framework convention on climate change. https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Brazil%20First/BRAZIL%20iNDC%20english%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2021
Calzada L, Meave J, Bonfil C, Figueroa F (2018) Land at risk: land use/land cover in two contrasting tropical dry regions of Mexico. Appl Geogr 99:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.07.021
CBH-PP (2018) Comitê das Bacias Hidrográficas do Pontal do Paranapanema. Relatório de Situação de Recursos Hídricos do Pontal do Paranapanema [Pontal do Paranapanema Hydrographic Basin Committee. Water Resources Situation Report of the Pontal do Paranapanema]. Available: https://cbhpp.org/consulta-publica-relatorio-de-situacao-dos-recursos-hidricos-do-pontal-do-paranapanema-ano-base-2018/. Accessed 27 May 2021 (in Portuguese)
Cleugh HA, Leuning R, Mu QZ, Running SW (2007) Regional evaporation estimates from flux tower and MODIS satellite data. Remote Sens Environ 106(3):285–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.007
Collin ML, Melloul AJ (2001) Combined land use and environmental factors for sustainable groundwater management. Urban Water 3:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00049-8
Conicelli B, Hirata R, Galvão P, Aranda N, Terada R, Gutiérrez OJG (2021) Groundwater governance: the illegality of exploitation and ways to minimize the problem. An Acad Bras Cienc 93:e20200623. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120200623
CPRM (2021) Sistema de Informações de Águas Subterrâneas (SIAGAS) [Groundwater Information System (SIAGAS)]. http://siagasweb.cprm.gov.br/layout/. Accessed 11 Aug 2021
CRH (2004) Conselho Estadual de Recursos Hídricos. Subsídios para o Encontro Técnico de Águas Subterrâneas: Levantamento das ações e projetos prioritários nos comitês de bacia, com vistas ao Plano Estadual de Recursos Hídricos. [State Council of Hydric Resources. Subsidies for the Groundwater Technical Meeting: Survey of priority actions and projects in the basin committees, aiming at the State Hydric Resources Plan]. http://www.sigrh.sp.gov.br/public/uploads/documents/7130/dados-comites-aguas-subterraneas.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2021 (in Portuguese)
DAEE (2013) Águas subterrâneas no Estado de São Paulo. Diretrizes de utilização e proteção. [Groundwater in the State of São Paulo. Use and protection guidelines]. Accessed 27 May 2021 (in Portuguese)
DATAGEO (2021) Infraestrutura de dados espaciais ambientais do Estado de São Paulo - IDEA-SP. https://datageo.ambiente.sp.gov.br/. Accessed 27 Oct 2021 (in Portuguese)
Deng Y, Jiang W, Tang Z, Li J, Lv J, Chen Z, Jia K (2017) Spatio-temporal change of lake water extent in Wuhan urban agglomeration based on Landsat images from 1987 to 2015. Remote Sens 9(3):270. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030270
Dirckx G, Van Daele S, Hellinck N (2016) Groundwater Infiltration Potential (GWIP) as an aid to determining the cause of dilution of wastewater. J Hydrol 542:474–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.020
Döll P (2009) Vulnerability to the impact of climate change on renewable groundwater resources: a global-scale assessment. Environ Res Lett 4:35006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/035006
EMBRAPA (2018a) Correspondência entre classes do SiBCS, WRB/ FAO e Soil Taxonomy, em nível categórico de Ordem e Subordem de suas edições mais recentes [Correspondence between SiBCS, WRB/FAO and Soil Taxonomy classes, at the categorical level of Order and Suborder of their most recent editions]. https://www.embrapa.br/solos/sibcs/correlacao-com-wrb-fao-e-soil-taxonomy. Accessed 26 Jan 2021 (in Portuguese)
EMBRAPA (2018b) Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos (SiBCS) [Brazilian Soil Classification System]. https://www.embrapa.br/solos/sibcs. Accessed 26 Jan 2021 (in Portuguese)
Favreau G, Cappelaere B, Massuel S, Leblanc M, Boucher M, Boulain N, Leduc C (2009) Land clearing, climate variability, and water resources increase in semiarid southwest Niger: a review. Water Resour Res 45:W00A16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006785
Foster SSD, Hirata R (1988) Groundwater pollution risk assessment: a methodology using available data. Pan American center for sanitary engineering and environmental sciences (CEPIS), Lima
Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica (2019) Nove dos 17 estados da Mata Atlântica estão no nível do desmatamento zero, aponta estudo [Nine of the 17 Atlantic Rainforest states are at zero deforestation level, study shows]. https://www.sosma.org.br/noticias/atlas-da-mata-atlantica. Accessed 27 May 2021 (in Portuguese)
Grassi MCB, Pereira GAG (2019) Energy-cane and RenovaBio: Brazilian vectors to boost the development of Biofuels. Ind Crops Prod 129:201–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.006
Grunwald A (2015) The imperative of sustainable development: elements of an ethics of using georesources responsibly. In: Wyss M, Peppoloni S (eds) Geoethics ethical challenges and case studies in earth sciences, pp 25–35
Gundersen LC (ed) (2018) Scientific integrity and ethics in the geosciences. American Geophysical Union, Wiley
Gyamfi C, Ndambuki JM, Salim RW (2016) Hydrological responses to land use/cover changes in the Olifants Basin, South Africa. Water 8(12):588. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8120588
Higgins L, Caretta MA (2019) Lake extent changes in Basotu, Tanzania: a mixed-methods approach to understanding the impacts of anthropogenic influence and climate variability. Landsc Res 44(1):35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1416599
Hirata R, Suhogusoff AV, Marcellini SS, Villar PC, Marcellini L (2019) A revolução silenciosa das águas subterrâneas no Brasil: uma análise da importância do recurso e os riscos pela falta de saneamento. São Paulo, Trata Brasil. http://repositorio.usp.br/directbitstream/e7d9e125-7b22-4706-915b-a397f8a91784/2928658.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct 2021
Jennings B, Paul H, Kathryn K (2009) Principles of water ethics. Minding Nat 2(2):25–28
Kizito F (2019) Monitoring and assessment guidelines and options towards land restoration and water resources management in agricultural landscapes. Technical Bried. Cali, International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/100546. Accessed 27 May 2021
Klein BC, Chagas MF, Watanabe MDB, Bonomi A, Maciel Filho R (2019) Low carbon biofuels and the New Brazilian National Biofuel Policy (RenovaBio): a case study for sugarcane mills and integrated sugarcane-microalgae biorefineries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 115:109365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109365
Leduc C, Favreau G, Schroeter P (2001) Long-term rise in a Sahelian water-table: the continental terminal in South-West Niger. J Hydrol 243:43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00403-0
Li Q, Qi J, Xing Z, Li S, Jiang Y, Danielescu S, Zhu H, Wei X, Meng FR (2014) An approach for assessing impact of land use and biophysical conditions across landscape on recharge rate and nitrogen loading of groundwater. Agric Ecosyst Environ 196:114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.06.028
Llamas MR, Mukherji A, Shah T (2006) Social and economic aspects of groundwater governance. Hydrogeol J 14(3):269–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-006-0025-4
Magnoni PHJ, Silva COF, Manzione RL (2020) Groundwater recharge and water table levels modelling using remotely sensed data and cloud-computing. Sustain Water Resour Manag 6(6):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-020-00469-6
Maksic J, Venancio IM, Shimizu MH, Chiessi CM, Piacsek P, Sampaio G, Cruz FW, Alexandre FF (2022) Brazilian biomes distribution: Past and future. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 585:110717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110717
Manzione RL, Matulovic M (2021) Decision-making in groundwater management: where artificial intelligence can really lead geoscientists? In: Abrunhosa M, Chambel A, Peppoloni S, Chaminé HI (eds) Advances in geoethics and groundwater management: theory and practice for a sustainable development. Proceedings of the 1st congress on geoethics and groundwater management (GEOETH&GWM'20), Porto, Portugal 2020. Springer International Publishing, New York, pp 441–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59320-9_93
MapBiomas (2021a) MapBiomas Brasil. https://mapbiomas.org/en?cama_set_language=en. Accessed 27 May 2021
MapBiomas (2021b) Accuracy analysis. https://mapbiomas.org/en/analise-de-acuracia?cama_set_language=en. Accessed 27 Oct 2021
MOD16A2 (2021) MODIS/Terra Net Evapotranspiration 8-Day L4 Global 500 m SIN Grid. 10.5067/MODIS/mod16a2.006. Accessed 27 Oct 2021
Moench M, Kulkarni H, Burke J (2012) Trends in local groundwater management institutions. Thematic Paper 7. In: Groundwater governance: a global framework for country action. GEF ID 3726, Groundwater Governance. http://www.zaragoza.es/contenidos/medioambiente/onu/968-eng-v7.pdf. Accessed 28 Apr 2021
Mogk DW, Bruckner MZ (2020) Geoethics training in the Earth and environmental sciences. Nat Rev Earth Environ 1:81–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0024-3
Mosase E, Ahiablame L, Park S, Bailey R (2019) Modelling potential groundwater recharge in the Limpopo River Basin with SWAT-MODFLOW. Groundw Sustain Dev 9:100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100260
Mu Q, Zhao M, Kimball JS, Mcdowell NG, Running SW (2013) A remotely sensed global terrestrial drought severity index. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94(1):83–98. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00213.1
Mukherjee S, Bebermeier W, Schütt B (2018) An overview of the impacts of land use land cover changes (1980–2014) on urban water security of Kolkata. Land 7:91. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7030091
Nikitina NK (2016) Geoethics: theory, principles, problems. Geoinformmark, Moscow
Oliveira G, Moraes EC, Brunsell NA, Shimabukuro YE, Mataveli GAV, Santos TV (2016) Analysis of precipitation and evapotranspiration in Atlantic rainforest remnants in southeastern Brazil from remote sensing data. In Blanco JA, Chang SC, Lo YH (eds) Tropical forests—the challenges of maintaining ecosystem services while managing the landscape. IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/64533
Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2012) Geoethics and geological culture: awareness, responsibility and challenges. Ann Geophys Italy 55(3):335–341. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6099
Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (eds) (2015) Geoethics: the role and responsibility of geoscientists. Geological Society, London
Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2016) Geoethics: ethical, social, and cultural values in geosciences research, practice, and education. In: Wessel G, Greenberg J (eds) Geoscience for the public good and global development: toward a sustainable future (Special Paper 520). Geological Society of America, McLean, pp 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1130/2016.2520(03)
Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2017) Geoethics: ethical, social and cultural implications in geosciences. In Peppoloni S, Di Capua G, Bobrowsky PT, Cronin VS (eds) Geoethics: at the heart of all geosciences. Ann Geophys, vol 60, no 7, p 7473. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7473
Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2018) Ethics. In: Bobrowsky PT, Marker B (eds) Earth sciences series. Encyclopedia of engineering geology. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12127-7-115-1
Peppoloni S, Bobrowsky P, Di Capua G (2015) Geoethics: a challenge for research integrity in geosciences. In: Steneck N, Anderson M, Kleinert S, Mayer T (eds) Integrity in the global research arena. World Scientific, New York, pp 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814632393_0035
Peppoloni S, Bilham N, Di Capua G (2019) Contemporary geoethics within the geosciences. In: Bohle M (ed) Exploring geoethics: ethical implications, societal contexts, and professional obligations of the geosciences. Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Pielke RA (2005) Land use and climate change. Science 310(5754):1625–1626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1120529
Rabelo D (2017) Agrohidronegócio, campesinato e a disputa pelo território no Pontal do Paranapanema (SP). Revista NERA 36:159–177. https://doi.org/10.47946/rnera.v0i36.5231(in Portuguese)
Romagnoli I, Manzione RL (2018) Groundwater vulnerability mapping and contamination risks at Pontal do Paranapanema region (UGRHI-22). Brazil J Bios Eng 12:307–326. https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2018v12n3p307-326
Rossi M (2017) Mapa Pedológico do Estado de São Paulo [São Paulo State Pedological Map]. https://www.infraestruturameioambiente.sp.gov.br/institutoflorestal/2017/09/mapa-pedologico-do-estado-de-sao-paulo-revisado-e-ampliado/. Accessed 16 Jan 2021 (in Portuguese).
Ruhoff AL, Paz AR, Aragao LEOC, Mu Q, Malhi Y, Collischonn W, Rocha HR, Running SW (2013) Assessment of the MODIS global evapotranspiration algorithm using eddy covariance measurements and hydrological modelling in the Rio Grande basin. Hydrol Sci J 58(8):1658–1676. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.837578
Salman SA, Shahid S, Mohsenipour M, Asgari H (2018) Impact of land use on groundwater quality of Bangladesh. Sustain Water Resour Manag 4:1031–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0230-z
Sandoval JA, Tiburan Junior CL (2019) Identification of potential artificial groundwater recharge sites in mount Makiling forest reserve, Philippines using GIS and analytical hierarchy. Appl Geogr 105:73–85
SFB (2020) CAR Bulletin. http://www.florestal.gov.br/documentos/car/boletim-do-car/4418-revisao-boletim-car-encaminhar-07abril2020-1/file. Accessed 28 Apr 2021 (in Portuguese)
Silva COF, Matulovic M, Manzione RL (2021a) New dilemmas, old problems: advances in data analysis and its geoethical implications in groundwater management. SN Appl Sci 3:607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04600-w
Silva COF, Matulovic M, Manzione RL (2021b) The geoethics of using geospatial big data in water governance. In: Abrunhosa M, Chambel A, Peppoloni S, Chaminé HI (eds) Advances in geoethics and groundwater management: theory and practice for a sustainable development. Advances in science, technology & innovation (IEREK Interdisciplinary Series for Sustainable Development). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59320-9_94
Souza VdA, Roberti DR, Ruhoff AL, Zimmer T, Adamatti DS, Gonçalves LGGd, Diaz MB, Alves RdCM, Moraes OLLd (2019) Evaluation of MOD16 algorithm over irrigated rice paddy using flux tower measurements in Southern Brazil. Water 11(9):1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091911
Souza CM, Shimbo JRZ, Rosa MR, Parente LL, Alencar AA, Rudorff BFT, Hasenack H, Matsumoto M, Ferreira LG, Souza-Filho PWM, Oliveira SW, Rocha WF, Fonseca AV, Marques CB, Diniz CG, Costa D, Monteiro D, Rosa ER, Vélez-Martin E, Weber EJ, Lenti FEB, Paternost FF, Pareyn FGC, Siqueira JV, Viera JL, Neto LCF, Saraiva MM, Sales MH, Salgado MPG, Vasconcelos R, Galano S, Mesquita VV, Azevedo T (2020) Reconstructing three decades of land use and land cover changes in Brazilian biomes with landsat archive and earth engine. Remote Sens 12:2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172735
Stabile MCC, Guimarães AL, Silva DS, Ribeiro V, Macedo MN, Coe MT, Pinto E, Moutinho P, Alencar A (2020) Solving Brazil’s land use puzzle: increasing production and slowing Amazon deforestation. Land Use Policy 91:104362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104362
Thomaz Junior A (2010) O agrohidronegócio no centro das disputas territoriais e de classes no Brasil no século XXI. CAMPO-TERRITÓRIO: Revista Agrária 5, 92–122 (in Portuguese)
TRMM (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission) (2011) TRMM (TMPA) Rainfall Estimate L3 3 hour 0.25 degree × 0.25 degree V7. Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), Greenbelt. https://doi.org/10.5067/TRMM/TMPA/3H/7. Accessed 27 Oct 2021
Vazquez N, Pardo A, Suso ML, Quemada M (2006) Drainage and nitrate leaching under processing tomato growth with drip irrigation and plastic mulching. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.07.009
Wyss M, Peppoloni S (eds) (2015) Geoethics: ethical challenges and case studies in earth sciences. Elsevier, Massachusetts
Yawson DO, Adu MO, Mulholland B, Ball T, Frimpong KA, Mohan S, White PJ (2019) Regional variations in potential groundwater recharge from spring barley crop fields in the UK under projected climate change. Groundw Sustain Dev 8:332–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2018.12.005
Zhang WL, Tian ZX, Zhang N, Li XQ (1996) Nitrate pollution of groundwater in Northern China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 59:223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(96)01052-3
Zhao M, Heinsch FA, Nemani R, Running SW (2005) Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set. Remote Sens Environ 95(2):164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.12.011
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to FAPESP (State of São Paulo Research Foundation)—Project no 2012/23959-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manzione, R.L., Silva, C.d.O.F. Expansion of biofuel cash-crops and its geoethical implications in the scope of groundwater governance. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 8, 34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00627-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00627-y