Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Characterization and benchmarking of seven managed aquifer recharge systems in south-western Europe

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainable Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European MARSOL project includes different examples of managed aquifer recharge (MAR) facilities in the Mediterranean area. A methodical characterization of the whole recharge process has been carried out to ensure that all functions and facilities are clearly comparable independent of size, budget or location. The seven selected MAR demo sites are located in two countries. Four are in Portugal—Rio Seco and Noras (Campina de Faro Aquifer), S. Bartolomeu de Messines and Cerro do Bardo (Querença-Silves) in Algarve, and three are in Spain—Llobregat (Catalonia), Santiuste and El Carracillo (Castilla y León). The systems have been defined using a form divided into four sections, including alpha-numerical data, orthophotographs, sketches and schedules. A first draft using a bibliography was reviewed by the authors, who recorded a detailed analysis and further reports to complete the characterization, as shown in several tables. The article covers MAR benchmarking serial steps for infrastructure measurements (surfaces, lengths, facilities, costs), functions categorization (transport, infiltration, treatment, restoration) and evolution in time and space (maps, sketches and calendars). MAR measuring displays contrasting interpretations depending on scale. The benchmarking process was found to be difficult to apply to seven sites with different sizes, aims, operational procedures and time scales. However, some parameters, such as mean infiltration rate, have shown their potential as management decision tools in the long term. Mediterranean areas, characterized by water supply irregularity, which is likely to be exacerbated by climate change models, can benefit from the use of MAR as a water management technique and from its diverse functions, although these objectives have not generally been attached to recharge. Null energy cost and low initial investment can also play important roles in boosting MAR development as a feasible alternative in short-term water planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bekele E, Toze S, Patterson B, Higginson S (2011) Managed aquifer recharge of treated wastewater: water quality changes resulting from infiltration through the vadose zone. Water Res 45(17):5764–5772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp R (1989) Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. ASQC Productivity Press. New York. USA. ISBN 9781563273520

  • CETaqua, Centro Tecnológico del Agua (2013) Enhancement of soil aquifer treatment to improve the quality of recharge water in the Llobregat River Delta Aquifer Life + ENSAT project 2010–2012 Layman’s Report. Barcelona, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Clara M, Strenn B, Kreuzinger N (2004) Carbamazepine as a possible anthropogenic marker in the aquatic environment: investigations on the behavior of carbamazepine in wastewater treatment and during groundwater infiltration. Water Res 38(4):947–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa L et al (2015) Estimating harvested rainwater at greenhouses in South Portugal aquifer Campina de Faro for potential infiltration in managed aquifer recharge. Geophys Res 17. http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2015/EGU2015-10415-3.pdf (EGU2015-10415-3, 2015 EGU General Assembly).

  • De Pascale S, Magio A (2005) Sustainable protected cultivation at a Mediterranean climate. Perspectives and challenges. Acta Hort 691:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon P, Toze S, Page D, Vanderzalm J, Bekele E, Sidhu J, Rinck-Pfeiffer S (2010) Managed aquifer recharge: rediscovering nature as a leading edge technology. Water Sci Technol 62(10):2338–2345. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewes JE, Heberer T, Rauch T, Reddersen K (2003) Fate of pharmaceuticals during ground water recharge. Ground Water Monit Remed 23(3):64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta T et al (2015) Vadose zone oxygen (O2) dynamics during drying and wetting cycles: an artificial recharge laboratory experiment. J Hydrol 527:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban E, Dinar A (2013) Cooperative management of groundwater resources in the presence of environmental externalities. Environ Resour Econ 54(3):443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Escalante E, Sánchez RC, Hernández ML (2013) Environmental education criteria applied to hydrogeology and specially to managed aquifer recharge. A strategic proposition and some examples for Spain. ML Environ Earth Sci 70:2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2711-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Escalante E (2005) Recarga artificial de acuíferos en cuencas fluviales. Aspectos cualitativos y medioambientales. Criterios técnicos derivados de la experiencia en la Cubeta de Santiuste, Segovia. PhD Thesis. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. ISBN13: 978-84-669-2800-7$4

  • Fernández-Escalante F, San-Sebastián-Sauto J (2012) Rechargeable sustainability. The key is the storage. Tragsa Ed. Madrid, p 126. ISBN 10:84-615-8704-9 / 13: 978-84-615-8704-9 AQ17

  • Fernández-Escalante E et al (2015) Los Arenales demonstration site characterization. Report on the Los Arenales pilot site improvements. MARSOL Project deliverable 5–1, 2015-03-31 (restricted publication). MARSOL-EC

  • Fifer RM (1989) Cost benchmarking functions in the value chain. Plann Rev 17(3):18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freixa A et al (2016) The effects of sediment depth and oxygen concentration on the use of organic matter: an experimental study using an infiltration sediment tank. Sci Total Environ 540:20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Lionello P (2008) Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region. Glob Planet Change 63(2–3):90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann E, Stuyfzand PJ, Greskowiak J, Timmer H, Massmann G (2015) The fate of organic micropollutants during long-term/long-distance river bank filtration. Sci Total Environ 545–546:629–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.057

  • ITA (Instituto Tecnológico Agrario) (2013) Plan de monitorización de los cultivos de regadío en Castilla y León. Resultados de la Encuesta de cultivos de la campaña 2012. Consejería de Agricultura y Ganadería. Junta de Castilla y León. Valladolid. Spain http://www.inforiego.org/opencms/export/system/modules/es.jcyl.ita.site.inforiego/elements/galleries/galeria_downloads/2013-05-23_Informe_ANUAL_Encuesta_CCRR_2012.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2016

  • Kajisa K, Dong B (2015) The effects of volumetric pricing policy on farmers’ water management institutions and their water use. The case of water user organization in an irrigation system in Hubei, China. Policy Research Working Paper; No. 7369. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/22453 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO. Accessed 19 Apr 2016

  • Khan S, Mushtaq S, Hanjra MA, Schaeffer J (2008) Estimating potential costs and gains from an aquifer storage and recovery program in Australia. Agric Water Manag 95:477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson M et al (2002) Process benchmarking in the water industry. IWA, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Levantesi C, La Mantia R, Masciopinto C, Böckelmann U, Ayuso-Gabella MN, Salgot M, Grohmann E (2010) Quantification of pathogenic microorganisms and microbial indicators in three wastewater reclamation and managed aquifer recharge facilities in Europe. Sci Total Environ 408(21):4923–4930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira JPL, Leitao TE (2014) Demonstrating managed aquifer recharge as a solution for climate change adaptation: results from Gabardine project and asemwaterNet coordination action in the Algarve region (Portugal) Acque Sotterranee. Ital J Groundw AS10040:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytimäki J, Assmuth T (2015) Down with the flow: public debates shaping the risk framing of artificial groundwater recharge. GeoJournal 80:113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9540-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeng SK, Sharma SK, Lekkerkerker-Teunissen K, Amy GL (2011) Occurrence and fate of bulk organic matter and pharmaceutically active compounds in managed aquifer recharge: a review. Water Res 45:3015–3033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maliva RG (2014) Economics of managed aquifer recharge. Water 6:1257–1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6051257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miret M, Vilanova E, Molinero J, Sprenger C (2012) Managed aquifer recharge in the european legal framework. DEMEAU Work Package 12 Report. http://demeau-fp7.eu/sites/files/D121%20legal%20framework%20and%20MAR%20DEMEAU%20project_1.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2016

  • Petrovic M, de Alda MJ, Diaz-Cruz S, Postigo C, Radjenovic J, Gros M, Barcelo D (2009) Fate and removal of pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs in conventional and membrane bioreactor wastewater treatment plants and by riverbank filtration. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 367(1904):3979–4003. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard E, Johnson T (2005) Assessment of regional management strategies for controlling seawater intrusion. J Water Resour Plann Manage. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496.(2005)131:4(280)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Escales P, Folch A, van Breukelen BM, Vidal-Gavilan G, Sanchez-Vila X (2016) Modeling long term Enhanced in situ Biodenitrification and induced heterogeneity in column experiments under different feeding strategies. J Hydrol 538:127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubol S et al (2014) Connecting bacterial colonization to physical and biochemical changes in a sand box infiltration experiment. J Hydrol 517(0):317–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San-Sebastián-Sauto J, Fernández-Escalante E, González-Herralte F (2015) La demanda gestionada en Santiuste: 13 años de usos y servicios múltiples para la comunidad rural. Tierras Riego nº 234:78–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon BR, Healy RW, Cook PG (2002) Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeol J 10(1):18–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedighi A, Klammler H, Brown C, Hatfield K (2006) A semi-analytical model for predicting water quality from an aquifer storage and recovery system. J Hydrol V329(3–4):403–412

  • Valhondo C et al (2014) Behavior of nine selected emerging trace organic contaminants in an artificial recharge system supplemented with a reactive barrier. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21(20):11832–11843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valhondo C et al (2015) Characterizing redox conditions and monitoring attenuation of selected pharmaceuticals during artificial recharge through a reactive layer. Sci Tot Environ 512–513(0):240–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article has been developed and written within the framework of the MARSOL project (Demonstrating Managed Aquifer Recharge as a Solution to Water Scarcity and Drought FP7, http://www.marsol.eu, GA 119120), financed by the European Commission and Tragsa Group. The authors wish to thank Ms. Miren San-Sebastián and Mr. James Haworth who assisted in proof-reading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Building and Engineering, Tragsatec, Julián Camarillo 6B, 28037, Madrid, Spain

    J. San-Sebastián-Sauto

  2. Department of R&D Integrated Water Management, Tragsa, Maldonado 58, 28006, Madrid, Spain

    E. Fernández-Escalante & R. Calero-Gil

  3. TARH Terra, Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos, Lda, Rua Forte do Monte Cintra 1, 2° C, 2685-141, Sacavém, Portugal

    T. Carvalho

  4. Hydrogeology Group (UPC-CSIC), Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Jordi Girona 1-3, Mòdul D-2, 08034, Barcelona, Spain

    P. Rodríguez-Escales

Authors
  1. J. San-Sebastián-Sauto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Fernández-Escalante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Calero-Gil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Carvalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Rodríguez-Escales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. San-Sebastián-Sauto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This article is part of the special issue on Managed Aquifer Recharge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

San-Sebastián-Sauto, J., Fernández-Escalante, E., Calero-Gil, R. et al. Characterization and benchmarking of seven managed aquifer recharge systems in south-western Europe. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 4, 193–215 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0232-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0232-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation