Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Bearing Capacity of Foundations on Soft Clay Stabilized with Granular Material

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over-excavation and replacement are the most commonly used ground modification techniques for shallow foundations. In soft soils, however, the extent of replacement by relatively larger (up to 19 mm) granular material was unknown. A total of 97 tests, consisting of 10 small and 87 numerical model tests, were carried out on two types of foundations, namely strip, and square. The width W and the depth of the replaced zone H were varied in each test and the ultimate bearing capacity qu was calculated. The experimental and numerical analyses were compared by computing qu from two methods (tangent intersection method (TIM) and 0.1B method). The improvement in qu was plotted as the dimensionless factor bearing capacity ratio (BCR) vs. depth ratio H/B for each foundation. A significant increase in BCR was observed from H/B of 1.5 to 4 for strip foundation and 2.5 to 3 for a square foundation. There was an insignificant increase in BCR after H/B of 4 and 3 for strip and square foundations, respectively. The width of the replacement was recommended as 2B for square foundations, while no value was suggested for strip foundation owing to a steady increase in the BCR. In addition, it has been observed that the depth of replacement is a major component in improving the bearing capacity compared to the width of replacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

References

  1. Lawton EC (2001) Section 6A “Soil Improvement and Stabilization”, Practical Foundation Engineering Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

  2. Han J (2015) Principles and practice of ground improvement. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Madhav MR, Vitkar PP (1978) Strip footing on weak clay stabilized with a granular trench or pile. Can Geotech J 15:600–605. https://doi.org/10.1139/t78-066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abhishek SV, Rajyalakshmi K, Madhav MR (2014) Bearing capacity of strip footing on reinforced foundation bed over soft ground with granular trench. Indian Geotech J 45:304–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-014-0138-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michalowski RL, Shi L (1995) Bearing capacity of footings over two-layer foundation soils. J Geotech Eng 121:421–428. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:5(421)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bai X-H, Huang X-Z, Zhang W (2013) Bearing capacity of square footing supported by a geobelt-reinforced crushed stone cushion on soft soil. Geotext Geomembr 38:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hemalatha A, Mahendran N, Ganesh Prabhu G (2014) Prediction of effects of geogrid reinforced granular fill on the behaviour of static liquefaction. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2014:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/210843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ornek M, Laman M, Demir A, Yildiz A (2012) Prediction of bearing capacity of circular footings on soft clay stabilized with granular soil. Soils Found 52:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang W, Du D, Bai X (2018) In situ testing of square footing resting on geobelt-reinforced gravel thin cushion on soft silt. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3563914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamed H (1986) Bearing capacity of strip foundation on a granular trench in soft clay, University of Texas. El Paso. https://doi.org/10.4203/ccp.9.18.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khing KH, Das BM, Puri VK, Yen SC, Cook EE (1993) Foundation on strong sand underlain by weak clay with geogrid at the interface. Geotext Geomembr 13:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(95)90238-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee KM, Manjunath VR, Dewaiker DM (1999) Numerical and model studies of strip footing supported by a reinforced granular fill–soft soil system. Can Geotech J 36:793–806. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-2927.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rethaliya RP, Verma AK (2009) Strip footing on sand overlying soft clay with geotextile interface. Indian Geotech J 39:271–287

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kolay PK, Kumar S, Tiwari D (2013) Improvement of bearing capacity of shallow foundation on geogrid reinforced silty clay and sand. J Constr Eng 2013:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/293809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fattah MY, Al-Waily MJM (2015) Bearing capacity of foundations resting on a trench of local reclaimed asphalt pavement material. Glob J Eng Sci Res Manag 2:90–105

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dalaly NK, Al-Soud MS, Abdul Jabar SS (2015) A new technique of strengthening soft soil under a strip footing by a granular trench reinforced with geogrid micro mesh. Aust J Civ Eng 13:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2015.1092633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fattah MY, Al-Neami MA, Al-Suhaily AS (2015) Improvement of bearing capacity of footings on soft clay by partial soil replacement technique. 2nd International conference on building, construction, environmental engineering

  18. Likitlersuang S, Surarak C, Wanatowski D, Oh E, Suwansawat S, Balasubramaniam A (2014) Simplified finite-element modelling for tunnelling-induced settlements. Geotech Res 1:133–152. https://doi.org/10.1680/gr.14.00016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Likitlersuang S, Surarak C, Wanatowski D, Oh E, Balasubramaniam A (2013) Finite element analysis of a deep excavation: a case study from the Bangkok MRT. Soils Found 53:756–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Likitlersuang S, Chheng C, Surarak C, Balasubramaniam A (2018) Strength and stiffness parameters of Bangkok clays for finite element analysis. Author Downloaded from Griffith Research Online Strength and Stiffness Parameters of Bangkok Clays for Finite Element Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.07.009

  21. Unnikrishnan N, Johnson AS, Rajan S (2010) Response of strip footings supported on granular trench. In: Indian geotechnical conference, pp 525–528

  22. Unnikrishnan N, Rajan S, Johnson AS (2011) Bearing capacity of strip footings on encapsulated granular trenches. In: Indian geotechnical conference

  23. Kumar J, Chakraborty M (2015) Bearing capacity of a circular foundation on layered sand-clay media. Soils Found 55:1058–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gupta R, Trivedi A (2009) Bearing capacity and settlement of footing resting on confined loose silty sands. Electron J Geotech Eng 14A:1–17

  25. Aparna SR, Unnikrishnan N (2016) Behaviour of strip footing supported on stressed encapsulated granular trenches. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 5:292–302

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hasanzadeh A, Choobbasti AJ (2016) Estimation of bearing capacity of circular footings on clay stabilized with granular soil: case study. Int J Civ Eng Geo-Environ 6:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fattah MY, Al-Baghdadi W, Omar M, Shanableh A (2010) Analysis of strip footings resting on reinforced granular trench by the finite element method. Int J Geotech Eng 4:471–482. https://doi.org/10.3328/ijge.2010.04.04.471-482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bouassida M, Jellali B, Lyamin A (2014) Ultimate bearing capacity of a strip footing on ground reinforced by a trench. Int J Geomech 15:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ranjbar A, Golshani AA (2018) The effect of granular trench’s depth on bearing capacity of shallow foundations on the soft ground. J New Approach Civ Eng 2:39–48. https://doi.org/10.30469/JNACE.2018.69393

  30. Bhattacharya P, Kumar J (2017) Bearing capacity of foundations on soft clays with granular column and trench. Soils Found 57:488–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ASTM D 698 (2009) Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0698-12R21

  32. ASTM D 2216 (2000) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2166-00

  33. Wroth CP, Wood DM (1978) The correlation of index properties with some basic engineering properties of soils. Can Geotech J 15:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cerato AB, Lutenegger AJ (2005) Bearing capacity of square and circular footings on a finite layer of granular soil underlain by a rigid base. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132:1496–1501. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:11(1496)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. ASTM D 2850 (2003) Standard test method for unconsolidated-undrained triaxial compression test on cohesive soils, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2850-15

  37. ASTM D 5084 (2010) Standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1520/D5084-10

  38. ASTM D 6913 (2004) Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6913-04R09E01.2

  39. ASTM C 127 (2007) Standard test method for density, relative density (specific gravity), and absorption of coarse aggregate, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0127-15

  40. ASTM D 854 (2002) Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0854-14

  41. ASTM D 4318 (2000) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4318-17E01

  42. ASTM D 2487 (2000) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system), 04:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-17E01

  43. ASTM D 4718 (1987) Standard practice for correction of unit weight and water content for soils containing oversize particles, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4718-87R07.2

  44. ASTM D 3080 (2011) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1520/D3080

  45. Alias R, Kasa A, Taha MR (2014) Particle size effect on shear strength of granular materials in direct shear test. Int J Civ Archit Struct Constr Eng 8:1084–1087. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096805

  46. Nakao T, Fityus S (2008) Direct shear testing of a marginal material using a large shear box. Geotech Test J 31:10. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ101237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. NAVFAC (1986) Soil Mechanics Design Manual 7.01, 7.1-139

  48. Habib PA (1974) Scale effect for shallow footings on dense sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 100:95–99

    Google Scholar 

  49. Brinkgreve RBJ, Broere W, Waterman D (2004) Plaxis finite element code for soil and rock analysis, 2D—Version 8

  50. Cicek E, Guler E (2015) Bearing capacity of strip footing on reinforced layered granular soils. J Civ Eng Manag 21:605–614. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.890651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ornek M, Demir A, Laman M, Yildiz A (2012) Numerical analysis of circular footings on natural clay stabilized with a granular fill. ACTA Geotech Slov 1:61–75

    Google Scholar 

  52. Obrzud RIF, Truty A (2018) The hardening soil model—a practical guidebook Z soil, 71

  53. AASHTO (2012) AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

  54. Bolton MD (1986) The strength and dilatancy of sands. Geotechnique 36:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.1.65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Potyondy JG (1961) Skin friction between various soils and construction materials. Géotechnique 11:339–353. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1961.11.4.339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen S-L, Li S-F, Fang S-F (1994) Elastoplastic large deflection analysis of cold-formed members using spline finite strip method. In: Twelfth international special conference on cold-formed steel structures, St. Louis, pp 251–263

  57. Vesic AS (1973) Analysis of ultimate loads of shallow foundations. J Soil Mech Found Div 99:45–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Binquet J, Lee KL (1975) Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Eng Div 101:1241–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Al-Shenawy AO, Al-karni A (2005) Derivation of bearing capacity equation for a two layered system of weak clay layer overlaid by dense sand layer. Pertanika J Sci Technol 13:213–235

  60. Ismail Ibrahim KMH (2014) Bearing capacity of circular footing resting on granular soil overlying soft clay. Hous Build Natl Res Cent J 12:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.07.004

  61. Kumar A, Ohri ML, Bansal RK (2006) Bearing capacity tests of strip footings on reinforced layered soil. Geotech Geol Eng 25:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-006-0011-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The main idea was conceptualized by ZBM and SMJ, while the methodology was defined by ZBM and BA. The material was collected by ZBM. The experimental part was implemented by ZBM with the help of DU under the supervision of BA. The original draft was prepared by ZBM with help of DU. The review of the manuscript was done by BA. The overall work was carried out under the supervision of BA and SMJ.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Badee Alshameri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Originality statement

The manuscript of this paper, even with a minor overlap with text, research objectives, presentation of research data, figures/photographs, tables, research findings, conclusions, etc., has not been submitted to any other journal for simultaneous consideration. Also, no part of this paper manuscript has been published earlier by me/us and others at any publication platform (technical journal, conference proceedings, magazine, newspaper, etc.). The details as reported in this paper are truly my/our unpublished original research work in all aspects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malik, Z.B., Alshameri, B., Jamil, S.M. et al. Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Bearing Capacity of Foundations on Soft Clay Stabilized with Granular Material. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 7, 91 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-021-00334-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-021-00334-2

Keywords

Navigation