Skip to main content
Log in

Strength Enhancement of Geotextile-Reinforced Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Stabilized Residual Soil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soils in their natural form are often deemed unsatisfactory to be directly used as a construction material for their respective applications. Under such circumtances, employment of ground improvement techniques to better suit the soil for its function is typically the most economical approach. Consequently, the present research investigated into the beneficial effect of modernized soil treatment techniques, i.e., geopolymer stabilization using fly ash as the precursor and geotextile reinforcement, on the strength enhancement of natural residual soil. A series of unconsolidated undrained (UU) triaxial compression tests were carried out to assess variation of geopolymer stabilized residual soil strength based on the varying number of geotextile layers, geotextile arrangement, and confining pressures. It was found that the increase in the number of geotextile layers resulted in a corresponding rise in soil strength and stiffness. It was also discovered that placement of geotextile layers at sample regions which suffered the maximum tensile stress–strain during loading was more effective compared to random placement. Soil strength was observed to reduce with increasing confining pressure which demonstrated the effectiveness of utilizing geotextile reinforcement at greater depths below the ground to be less. Failure patterns showed that while unreinforced soil resulted in failure along a shear plane at an approximate angle of 45 + φ/2 (φ: angle of internal friction), reinforced samples demonstrated a bulging failure where the soil between adjacent layers of geotextiles appeared to bulge. The findings deemed the employment of geopolymer stabilization and geotextile reinforcement on natural residual soil very effective with regards to the enhancement of soil strength and stiffness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walker P (1995) Strength, durability and shrinkage characteristics of cement stabilised soil blocks. Cement Concr Compos 17(4):301–310

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang M, Guo H, El-Korchi T, Zhang G, Tao M (2013) Experimental feasibility study of geopolymer as the next-generation soil stabilizer. Constr Build Mater 47:1468–1478

    Google Scholar 

  3. Consoli NC, Bassani MAA, Festugato L (2010) Effect of fiber-reinforcement on the strength of cemented soils. GeotextGeomembr 28(4):344–351

    Google Scholar 

  4. Firoozi AA, Olgun CG, Firoozi AA, Baghini MS (2017) Fundamentals of soil stabilization. Int J GeoEng 8(1):26

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang M, Zhao M, Zhang G, Nowak P, Coen A, Tao M (2015) Calcium-free geopolymer as a stabilizer for sulfate-rich soils. Appl Clay Sci 108:199–207

    Google Scholar 

  6. Phummiphan I, Horpibulsuk S, Sukmak P, Chinkulkijniwat A, Arulrajah A, Shen S-L (2016) Stabilisation of marginal lateritic soil using high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer. Road Mater Pavement Des 17(4):877–891

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sukmak P, Sukmak G, Horpibulsuk S, Setkit M, Kassawat S, Arulrajah A (2019) Palm oil fuel ash-soft soil geopolymer for subgrade applications: strength and microstructural evaluation. Road Mater Pavement Des 20(1):110–131

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zornberg JG (1996) Performance of geotextile-reinforced soil structures

  9. Haeri S, Noorzad R, Oskoorouchi A (2000) Effect of geotextile reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of sand. GeotextGeomembr 18(6):385–402

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goodarzi S, Shahnazari H (2019) Strength enhancement of geotextile-reinforced carbonate sand. GeotextGeomembr 47(2):128–139

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ling HI, Leshchinsky D, Tatsuoka F (2003) Reinforced soil engineering: advances in research and practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cristelo N, Glendinning S, Fernandes L, Pinto AT (2012) Effect of calcium content on soil stabilisation with alkaline activation. Constr Build Mater 29:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bera AK, Chandra SN, Ghosh A, Ghosh A (2009) Unconfined compressive strength of fly ash reinforced with jute geotextiles. GeotextGeomembr 27(5):391–398

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Standard C618-12a (2012) Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. 5

  15. Wardhono A (2018) Comparison study of class F and class C fly ashes as cement replacement material on strength development of non-cement mortar. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, IOP Publishing, p 012019

  16. Abdullah HH, Shahin MA, Sarker P (2019) Use of fly-ash geopolymer incorporating ground granulated slag for stabilisation of kaolin clay cured at ambient temperature. GeotechGeolEng 37(2):721–740

    Google Scholar 

  17. Temuujin JV, Van Riessen A, Williams R (2009) Influence of calcium compounds on the mechanical properties of fly ash geopolymer pastes. J Hazard Mater 167(1–3):82–88

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alsafi S, Farzadnia N, Asadi A, Huat BK (2017) Collapsibility potential of gypseous soil stabilized with fly ash geopolymer; characterization and assessment. Constr Build Mater 137:390–409

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Z, Cai C, Liu F, Fan F (2016) Feasibility study of loess stabilization with fly ash–based geopolymer. J Mater CivEng 28(5):04016003

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leong HY, Ong DEL, Sanjayan JG, Nazari A (2018) Strength development of soil–fly ash geopolymer: assessment of soil, fly ash, alkali activators, and water. J Mater CivEng 30(8):04018171

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mudgal A, Sarkar R, Shrivastava AK (2018) Influence of geotextiles in enhancing the shear strength of Yamuna sand. Int J ApplEng Res 13(12):10733–10740

    Google Scholar 

  22. Karakan E (2018) Factors effecting the shear strength of geotextile reinforced compacted clays. DokuzEylülÜniversitesiMühendislikFakültesi Fen veMühendislikDergisi 20(60):725–742

    Google Scholar 

  23. Portelinha F, Zornberg J, Pimentel V (2014) Field performance of retaining walls reinforced with woven and nonwoven geotextiles. Geosynth Int 21(4):270–284

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chai J, Duy QN (2013) Geocomposite induced consolidation of clayey soils under stepwise loads. GeotextGeomembr 37:99–108

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lopez RH, Kang YC, Zornberg J (2005) Geosynthetic with in-plane drainage as reinforcement in poorly draining soil. In: Inter American conference on non-conventional materials and technologies in ecological and sustainable construction IAC-NOCMAT

  26. Palmeira EM, Tatsuoka F, Bathurst RJ, Stevenson PE, Zornberg JG (2008) Advances in geosynthetics materials and applications for soil reinforcement and environmental protection works. Electron J GeotechEng 13:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  27. Heshmati S (1993) The action of geotextiles in providing combined drainage and reinforcement to cohesive soil. Newcastle University

  28. Kempton G, Jones C, Jewell R, Naughton P (2000) Construction of slopes using cohesive fills and a new innovative geosynthetic material. In: Proceedings of EuroGeo, pp 825–828

  29. Zornberg J, Kang Y (2005) Pullout of geosynthetic reinforcement with in-plane drainage capability. In: Geosynthetics Research and Development in Progress, Eighteenth Geosynthetic Research Institute Conference (GRI-18), pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1061/40782(161)33

  30. O’Kelly BC, Naughton PJ (2008) On the interface shear resistance of a novel geogrid with in-plane drainage capability. GeotextGeomembr 26(4):357–362

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vajrala RK, Yenigalla RV (2019) Comparitive study on effect of diverse geosynthetics and their spacing on soft clayey soil. Int J Recent Technol Eng (IJRTE) 8(1):1480–1484

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tan T, BK Huat B, Anggraini V, Shukla SK (2019) Improving the engineering behaviour of residual soil with fly ash and treated natural fibres in alkaline condition. Int J Geotech Eng 1–14

  33. Li L, Zhang J, Xiao H, Hu Z, Wang Z (2019) Experimental investigation of mechanical behaviors of fiber-reinforced fly ash-soil mixture. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2019:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1050536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Naeini S, Gholampoor N (2014) Cyclic behaviour of dry silty sand reinforced with a geotextile. GeotextGeomembr 42(6):611–619

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nguyen M, Yang K, Lee S, Wu C, Tsai M (2013) Behavior of nonwoven-geotextile-reinforced sand and mobilization of reinforcement strain under triaxial compression. Geosynth Int 20(3):207–225

    Google Scholar 

  36. Karim HH, Samueel ZW, Jassem AH (2020) Behaviour of soft clayey soil improved by fly ash and geogrid under cyclic loading. CivEng J 6(2):225–237

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pancar EB, Akpınar MV (2016) Comparison of effects of using geosynthetics and lime stabilization to increase bearing capacity of unpaved road subgrade. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2016:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7129356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jahandari S, Saberian M, Zivari F, Li J, Ghasemi M, Vali R (2019) Experimental study of the effects of curing time on geotechnical properties of stabilized clay with lime and geogrid. Int J GeotechEng 13(2):172–183

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jahandari S, Mojtahedi SF, Zivari F, Jafari M, Mahmoudi MR, Shokrgozar A, Kharazmi S, Vosough Hosseini B, Rezvani S, Jalalifar H (2020) The impact of long-term curing period on the mechanical features of lime-geogrid treated soils. Geomech Geoeng. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2020.1739753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gümüşer C, Senol A (2014) Effect of fly ash and different lengths of polypropylene fibers content on the soft soils. Int J Civil Eng 12:134–145

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kafodya I, Okonta F (2018) Effects of natural fiber inclusions and pre-compression on the strength properties of lime-fly ash stabilised soil. Constr Build Mater 170:737–746

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tan T, Huat BB, Anggraini V, Shukla SK, Nahazanan H (2019) Strength behavior of fly ash-stabilized soil reinforced with coir fibers in alkaline environment. J Nat Fibers. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.1691701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hu Y-C, Song H, Zhao Z-J (2009) Experimental study on behavior of geotextile-reinforced soil. In: ICCTP 2009: critical issues in transportation systems planning, development, and management 2009, pp 1–10

  44. Tiwari N, Satyam N (2020) An experimental study on the behavior of lime and silica fume treated coir geotextile reinforced expansive soil subgrade. Eng Sci Technol Int J 23(5):1214–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Latifi N, Rashid ASA, Siddiqua S, Majid MZA (2016) Strength measurement and textural characteristics of tropical residual soil stabilised with liquid polymer. Measurement 91:46–54

    Google Scholar 

  46. Goswami R, Singh B (2005) Influence of fly ash and lime on plasticity characteristics of residual lateritic soil. Proc Inst CivEng Ground Improv 9(4):175–182

    Google Scholar 

  47. Joel M, Agbede IO (2011) Mechanical-cement stabilization of laterite for use as flexible pavement material. J Mater CivEng 23(2):146–152

    Google Scholar 

  48. Basha E, Hashim R, Mahmud H, Muntohar A (2005) Stabilization of residual soil with rice husk ash and cement. Constr Build Mater 19(6):448–453

    Google Scholar 

  49. Teing TT, Huat BB, Shukla SK, Anggraini V, Nahazanan H (2019) Effects of alkali-activated waste binder in soil stabilization. Int J GEOMATE 17(59):82–89

    Google Scholar 

  50. A. Standard, D2850-03a (2007) Standard test method for unconsolidated-undrained triaxial compression test on cohesive soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania

  51. B. Standard, 5930 (1981) Code of practice for site investigations. British Standards Institution, London, p 147

  52. Latha GM, Murthy VS (2007) Effects of reinforcement form on the behavior of geosynthetic reinforced sand. GeotextGeomembr 25(1):23–32

    Google Scholar 

  53. Noorzad R, Mirmoradi S (2010) Laboratory evaluation of the behavior of a geotextile reinforced clay. GeotextGeomembr 28(4):386–392

    Google Scholar 

  54. Murmu AL, Jain A, Patel A (2019) Mechanical properties of alkali activated fly ash geopolymer stabilized expansive clay. KSCE J CivEng 23(9):3875–3888

    Google Scholar 

  55. Adhikari B, Khattak MJ, Adhikari S (2019) Mechanical and durability characteristics of flyash-based soil-geopolymer mixtures for pavement base and subbase layers. Int J Pavement Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2019.1668562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Simatupang M, Mangalla LK, Edwin RS, Putra AA, Azikin MT, Aswad NH, Mustika W (2020) The mechanical properties of fly-ash-stabilized sands. Geosciences 10(4):132

    Google Scholar 

  57. Moghadas TS, Asakereh A (2007) Strength evaluation of wet reinforced silty sand by triaxial test. Int J CivEng 5:274–283

    Google Scholar 

  58. Denine S, Della N, Dlawar MR, Sadok F, Canou J, Dupla J-C (2016) Effect of geotextile reinforcement on shear strength of sandy soil: laboratory study. Stud GeotechMech 38(4):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fabian K, Fourie A (1986) Performance of geotextile-reinforced clay samples in undrained triaxial tests. GeotextGeomembr 4(1):53–63

    Google Scholar 

  60. Yang K-H, Nguyen MD, Yalew WM, Liu C-N, Gupta R (2016) Behavior of geotextile-reinforced clay in consolidated-undrained tests: reinterpretation of porewater pressure parameters. J Geoeng 11(2):45–57

    Google Scholar 

  61. Singh H (2013a) Effects of geogrid sheet on strength and stiffness of loose sand. Int J Innov Res Sci EngTechnol 2(10):5290–5299

    Google Scholar 

  62. Singh H (2013b) Strength and stiffness of soil reinforced with jute geotextile sheets. Int J CurrEngTechnol 3:1143–1146

    Google Scholar 

  63. Clancy J, Naughton P (2008) Design of steep slopes using fine grained fills and novel multifunctional geocomposites. In: Proceedings of the fourth European conference of geosynthetics, Edinburgh, Scotland, CD-ROM, paper

  64. Zornberg J, Odgers B, Roodi G, Azevedo M (2013) Advantages and applications of enhanced lateral drainage in pavement systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd African regional conference on geosynthetics, pp 539–548

  65. BS Standard 1377 (1990) Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. British Standards Institution, London

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Monash University Malaysia and TenCate Geosynthetics Asia for the provision of required laboratory facilities and Polyfelt PEC35 geotextiles, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivi Anggraini.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jayawardane, V.S., Anggraini, V., Li-Shen, A.T. et al. Strength Enhancement of Geotextile-Reinforced Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Stabilized Residual Soil. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 6, 50 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-00233-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-00233-y

Keywords

Navigation