Abstract
Soils in their natural form are often deemed unsatisfactory to be directly used as a construction material for their respective applications. Under such circumtances, employment of ground improvement techniques to better suit the soil for its function is typically the most economical approach. Consequently, the present research investigated into the beneficial effect of modernized soil treatment techniques, i.e., geopolymer stabilization using fly ash as the precursor and geotextile reinforcement, on the strength enhancement of natural residual soil. A series of unconsolidated undrained (UU) triaxial compression tests were carried out to assess variation of geopolymer stabilized residual soil strength based on the varying number of geotextile layers, geotextile arrangement, and confining pressures. It was found that the increase in the number of geotextile layers resulted in a corresponding rise in soil strength and stiffness. It was also discovered that placement of geotextile layers at sample regions which suffered the maximum tensile stress–strain during loading was more effective compared to random placement. Soil strength was observed to reduce with increasing confining pressure which demonstrated the effectiveness of utilizing geotextile reinforcement at greater depths below the ground to be less. Failure patterns showed that while unreinforced soil resulted in failure along a shear plane at an approximate angle of 45 + φ/2 (φ: angle of internal friction), reinforced samples demonstrated a bulging failure where the soil between adjacent layers of geotextiles appeared to bulge. The findings deemed the employment of geopolymer stabilization and geotextile reinforcement on natural residual soil very effective with regards to the enhancement of soil strength and stiffness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Walker P (1995) Strength, durability and shrinkage characteristics of cement stabilised soil blocks. Cement Concr Compos 17(4):301–310
Zhang M, Guo H, El-Korchi T, Zhang G, Tao M (2013) Experimental feasibility study of geopolymer as the next-generation soil stabilizer. Constr Build Mater 47:1468–1478
Consoli NC, Bassani MAA, Festugato L (2010) Effect of fiber-reinforcement on the strength of cemented soils. GeotextGeomembr 28(4):344–351
Firoozi AA, Olgun CG, Firoozi AA, Baghini MS (2017) Fundamentals of soil stabilization. Int J GeoEng 8(1):26
Zhang M, Zhao M, Zhang G, Nowak P, Coen A, Tao M (2015) Calcium-free geopolymer as a stabilizer for sulfate-rich soils. Appl Clay Sci 108:199–207
Phummiphan I, Horpibulsuk S, Sukmak P, Chinkulkijniwat A, Arulrajah A, Shen S-L (2016) Stabilisation of marginal lateritic soil using high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer. Road Mater Pavement Des 17(4):877–891
Sukmak P, Sukmak G, Horpibulsuk S, Setkit M, Kassawat S, Arulrajah A (2019) Palm oil fuel ash-soft soil geopolymer for subgrade applications: strength and microstructural evaluation. Road Mater Pavement Des 20(1):110–131
Zornberg JG (1996) Performance of geotextile-reinforced soil structures
Haeri S, Noorzad R, Oskoorouchi A (2000) Effect of geotextile reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of sand. GeotextGeomembr 18(6):385–402
Goodarzi S, Shahnazari H (2019) Strength enhancement of geotextile-reinforced carbonate sand. GeotextGeomembr 47(2):128–139
Ling HI, Leshchinsky D, Tatsuoka F (2003) Reinforced soil engineering: advances in research and practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Cristelo N, Glendinning S, Fernandes L, Pinto AT (2012) Effect of calcium content on soil stabilisation with alkaline activation. Constr Build Mater 29:167–174
Bera AK, Chandra SN, Ghosh A, Ghosh A (2009) Unconfined compressive strength of fly ash reinforced with jute geotextiles. GeotextGeomembr 27(5):391–398
A. Standard C618-12a (2012) Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. 5
Wardhono A (2018) Comparison study of class F and class C fly ashes as cement replacement material on strength development of non-cement mortar. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, IOP Publishing, p 012019
Abdullah HH, Shahin MA, Sarker P (2019) Use of fly-ash geopolymer incorporating ground granulated slag for stabilisation of kaolin clay cured at ambient temperature. GeotechGeolEng 37(2):721–740
Temuujin JV, Van Riessen A, Williams R (2009) Influence of calcium compounds on the mechanical properties of fly ash geopolymer pastes. J Hazard Mater 167(1–3):82–88
Alsafi S, Farzadnia N, Asadi A, Huat BK (2017) Collapsibility potential of gypseous soil stabilized with fly ash geopolymer; characterization and assessment. Constr Build Mater 137:390–409
Liu Z, Cai C, Liu F, Fan F (2016) Feasibility study of loess stabilization with fly ash–based geopolymer. J Mater CivEng 28(5):04016003
Leong HY, Ong DEL, Sanjayan JG, Nazari A (2018) Strength development of soil–fly ash geopolymer: assessment of soil, fly ash, alkali activators, and water. J Mater CivEng 30(8):04018171
Mudgal A, Sarkar R, Shrivastava AK (2018) Influence of geotextiles in enhancing the shear strength of Yamuna sand. Int J ApplEng Res 13(12):10733–10740
Karakan E (2018) Factors effecting the shear strength of geotextile reinforced compacted clays. DokuzEylülÜniversitesiMühendislikFakültesi Fen veMühendislikDergisi 20(60):725–742
Portelinha F, Zornberg J, Pimentel V (2014) Field performance of retaining walls reinforced with woven and nonwoven geotextiles. Geosynth Int 21(4):270–284
Chai J, Duy QN (2013) Geocomposite induced consolidation of clayey soils under stepwise loads. GeotextGeomembr 37:99–108
Lopez RH, Kang YC, Zornberg J (2005) Geosynthetic with in-plane drainage as reinforcement in poorly draining soil. In: Inter American conference on non-conventional materials and technologies in ecological and sustainable construction IAC-NOCMAT
Palmeira EM, Tatsuoka F, Bathurst RJ, Stevenson PE, Zornberg JG (2008) Advances in geosynthetics materials and applications for soil reinforcement and environmental protection works. Electron J GeotechEng 13:1–38
Heshmati S (1993) The action of geotextiles in providing combined drainage and reinforcement to cohesive soil. Newcastle University
Kempton G, Jones C, Jewell R, Naughton P (2000) Construction of slopes using cohesive fills and a new innovative geosynthetic material. In: Proceedings of EuroGeo, pp 825–828
Zornberg J, Kang Y (2005) Pullout of geosynthetic reinforcement with in-plane drainage capability. In: Geosynthetics Research and Development in Progress, Eighteenth Geosynthetic Research Institute Conference (GRI-18), pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1061/40782(161)33
O’Kelly BC, Naughton PJ (2008) On the interface shear resistance of a novel geogrid with in-plane drainage capability. GeotextGeomembr 26(4):357–362
Vajrala RK, Yenigalla RV (2019) Comparitive study on effect of diverse geosynthetics and their spacing on soft clayey soil. Int J Recent Technol Eng (IJRTE) 8(1):1480–1484
Tan T, BK Huat B, Anggraini V, Shukla SK (2019) Improving the engineering behaviour of residual soil with fly ash and treated natural fibres in alkaline condition. Int J Geotech Eng 1–14
Li L, Zhang J, Xiao H, Hu Z, Wang Z (2019) Experimental investigation of mechanical behaviors of fiber-reinforced fly ash-soil mixture. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2019:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1050536
Naeini S, Gholampoor N (2014) Cyclic behaviour of dry silty sand reinforced with a geotextile. GeotextGeomembr 42(6):611–619
Nguyen M, Yang K, Lee S, Wu C, Tsai M (2013) Behavior of nonwoven-geotextile-reinforced sand and mobilization of reinforcement strain under triaxial compression. Geosynth Int 20(3):207–225
Karim HH, Samueel ZW, Jassem AH (2020) Behaviour of soft clayey soil improved by fly ash and geogrid under cyclic loading. CivEng J 6(2):225–237
Pancar EB, Akpınar MV (2016) Comparison of effects of using geosynthetics and lime stabilization to increase bearing capacity of unpaved road subgrade. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2016:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7129356
Jahandari S, Saberian M, Zivari F, Li J, Ghasemi M, Vali R (2019) Experimental study of the effects of curing time on geotechnical properties of stabilized clay with lime and geogrid. Int J GeotechEng 13(2):172–183
Jahandari S, Mojtahedi SF, Zivari F, Jafari M, Mahmoudi MR, Shokrgozar A, Kharazmi S, Vosough Hosseini B, Rezvani S, Jalalifar H (2020) The impact of long-term curing period on the mechanical features of lime-geogrid treated soils. Geomech Geoeng. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2020.1739753
Gümüşer C, Senol A (2014) Effect of fly ash and different lengths of polypropylene fibers content on the soft soils. Int J Civil Eng 12:134–145
Kafodya I, Okonta F (2018) Effects of natural fiber inclusions and pre-compression on the strength properties of lime-fly ash stabilised soil. Constr Build Mater 170:737–746
Tan T, Huat BB, Anggraini V, Shukla SK, Nahazanan H (2019) Strength behavior of fly ash-stabilized soil reinforced with coir fibers in alkaline environment. J Nat Fibers. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.1691701
Hu Y-C, Song H, Zhao Z-J (2009) Experimental study on behavior of geotextile-reinforced soil. In: ICCTP 2009: critical issues in transportation systems planning, development, and management 2009, pp 1–10
Tiwari N, Satyam N (2020) An experimental study on the behavior of lime and silica fume treated coir geotextile reinforced expansive soil subgrade. Eng Sci Technol Int J 23(5):1214–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.12.006
Latifi N, Rashid ASA, Siddiqua S, Majid MZA (2016) Strength measurement and textural characteristics of tropical residual soil stabilised with liquid polymer. Measurement 91:46–54
Goswami R, Singh B (2005) Influence of fly ash and lime on plasticity characteristics of residual lateritic soil. Proc Inst CivEng Ground Improv 9(4):175–182
Joel M, Agbede IO (2011) Mechanical-cement stabilization of laterite for use as flexible pavement material. J Mater CivEng 23(2):146–152
Basha E, Hashim R, Mahmud H, Muntohar A (2005) Stabilization of residual soil with rice husk ash and cement. Constr Build Mater 19(6):448–453
Teing TT, Huat BB, Shukla SK, Anggraini V, Nahazanan H (2019) Effects of alkali-activated waste binder in soil stabilization. Int J GEOMATE 17(59):82–89
A. Standard, D2850-03a (2007) Standard test method for unconsolidated-undrained triaxial compression test on cohesive soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania
B. Standard, 5930 (1981) Code of practice for site investigations. British Standards Institution, London, p 147
Latha GM, Murthy VS (2007) Effects of reinforcement form on the behavior of geosynthetic reinforced sand. GeotextGeomembr 25(1):23–32
Noorzad R, Mirmoradi S (2010) Laboratory evaluation of the behavior of a geotextile reinforced clay. GeotextGeomembr 28(4):386–392
Murmu AL, Jain A, Patel A (2019) Mechanical properties of alkali activated fly ash geopolymer stabilized expansive clay. KSCE J CivEng 23(9):3875–3888
Adhikari B, Khattak MJ, Adhikari S (2019) Mechanical and durability characteristics of flyash-based soil-geopolymer mixtures for pavement base and subbase layers. Int J Pavement Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2019.1668562
Simatupang M, Mangalla LK, Edwin RS, Putra AA, Azikin MT, Aswad NH, Mustika W (2020) The mechanical properties of fly-ash-stabilized sands. Geosciences 10(4):132
Moghadas TS, Asakereh A (2007) Strength evaluation of wet reinforced silty sand by triaxial test. Int J CivEng 5:274–283
Denine S, Della N, Dlawar MR, Sadok F, Canou J, Dupla J-C (2016) Effect of geotextile reinforcement on shear strength of sandy soil: laboratory study. Stud GeotechMech 38(4):3–13
Fabian K, Fourie A (1986) Performance of geotextile-reinforced clay samples in undrained triaxial tests. GeotextGeomembr 4(1):53–63
Yang K-H, Nguyen MD, Yalew WM, Liu C-N, Gupta R (2016) Behavior of geotextile-reinforced clay in consolidated-undrained tests: reinterpretation of porewater pressure parameters. J Geoeng 11(2):45–57
Singh H (2013a) Effects of geogrid sheet on strength and stiffness of loose sand. Int J Innov Res Sci EngTechnol 2(10):5290–5299
Singh H (2013b) Strength and stiffness of soil reinforced with jute geotextile sheets. Int J CurrEngTechnol 3:1143–1146
Clancy J, Naughton P (2008) Design of steep slopes using fine grained fills and novel multifunctional geocomposites. In: Proceedings of the fourth European conference of geosynthetics, Edinburgh, Scotland, CD-ROM, paper
Zornberg J, Odgers B, Roodi G, Azevedo M (2013) Advantages and applications of enhanced lateral drainage in pavement systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd African regional conference on geosynthetics, pp 539–548
BS Standard 1377 (1990) Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. British Standards Institution, London
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge Monash University Malaysia and TenCate Geosynthetics Asia for the provision of required laboratory facilities and Polyfelt PEC35 geotextiles, respectively.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jayawardane, V.S., Anggraini, V., Li-Shen, A.T. et al. Strength Enhancement of Geotextile-Reinforced Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Stabilized Residual Soil. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 6, 50 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-00233-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-00233-y