Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Awareness, Consideration and Usage Frequency of On-demand Transport Services in the Indian Context

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Transportation in Developing Economies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

App-based transport services (ABTS) are transforming both individual travel behaviour and transport systems in cities around the world. In this context, this study investigates three inter-related choice dimensions pertaining to ABTS, namely: (1) awareness, (2) consideration for work commute and (3) the overall usage frequency, in an Indian city. The role of demographic characteristics, workplace and work commute patterns, contextual influences, usage of other modes for commute and the quality of service of existing transit and IPT (Intermediate Public Transport) modes in these three choice dimensions are investigated. The results show that awareness is not endogenous with either consideration or usage frequency. However, consideration for work is endogenous with the frequency of use of ABTS. The impact of endogeneity is seen in the form of heterogeneity in responsiveness to independent variables. There are significant differences in the sensitivities to exogenous influences between those who consider ABTS for work trips and those who do not. Factors that influence the consideration of ABTS for work such as trip chaining and commuting at early hours have contrasting effects on the usage frequencies of the two user segments. Workers considering ABTS for work are more sensitive to the comfort of personal vehicle use and easy access to shared modes while the other segment is more sensitive to issues of traffic congestion and loss of productivity during travel. Some variables are also found to have contrasting effects on awareness and usage frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall JD, Palsson C, Price J (2018) Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit? J Urban Econ 108:36–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li Z, Carey WP, Zhang Z (2016) Do ride-sharing services affect traffic congestion? An empirical study of Uber entry Yili Hong. Soc Sci Res Netw. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2838043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schaller B (2017) Unsustainable? the growth of app-based ride services and traffic, travel and the future of New York city. Schaller Consulting, Brooklyn, NY. http://schallerconsult.com/rideservices/unsustainable.htm

  4. Henao A, Marshall WE (2018) The impact of ride-hailing on vehicle miles traveled. Transportation (Amst). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9923-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tirachini A, Gomez-lobo A (2020) Does ride-hailing increase or decrease vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT)? A simulation approach for Santiago de Chile. Int J Sustain Transp 14(13):187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith A (2016) Shared, collaborative and on demand: the new digital economy. Pew Res Cent 21:85

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clewlow RR, Mishra GS (2017) Disruptive transportation: the adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alemi F, Circella G, Mokhtarian P, Handy S (2018) On-demand ride services in California: investigating the factors affecting the frequency of use of Uber and Lyft. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 7550:233–248

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lavieri PS, Bhat CR (2018) MaaS in Car-Dominated Cities: Modeling the adoption, frequency, and characteristics of ride-hailing trips in Dallas, TX. Tech Pap Dep Civil, Archit Environ Eng Univ Texas Austin

  10. Rayle L, Dai D, Chan N et al (2016) Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transp Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Circella G, Alemi F, Tiedeman K, Handy S, Mokhtarian P (2018) The adoption of shared mobility in California and its relationship with other components of travel behavior. In: The National Center for Sustainable Transportation, UC Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies

  12. Jain S, Ronald N, Thompson R, Winter S (2017) Predicting susceptibility to use demand responsive transport using demographic and trip characteristics of the population. Travel Behav Soc 6:44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2016.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lavieri PS, Dias FF, Juri NR et al (2018) A model of ridesourcing demand generation and distribution. Transp Res Rec 2672(46):31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alemi F, Circella G, Handy S, Mokhtarian P (2018) What influences travelers to use Uber? Exploring the factors affecting the adoption of on-demand ride services in California. Travel Behav Soc 13:88–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coqui M, Marian A, Xu Q (2018) AlixPartners global shared mobility survey: racing into the robotaxi future. https://www.alixpartners.com/insights-impact/insights/alixpartners-global-shared-mobility-survey/

  16. Vivoda JM, Harmon AC, Babulal GM, Zikmund-Fisher BJ (2018) E-hail (rideshare) knowledge, use, reliance, and future expectations among older adults. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 55:426–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.03.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Outwater M, Sana B, Ferdous N, Woodford B, Lobb J, Schmitt D, Roux J, Sidharthan R, Pendyala S, Hess, S (2017) Characteristics of premium transit services that affect mode choice. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/22401

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Dias FF, Lavieri PS, Garikapati VM et al (2017) A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services. Transportation (Amst) 44:1307–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9797-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alemi F, Circella G, Mokhtarian P, Handy S (2018) Exploring the latent constructs behind the use of ridehailing in California. J Choice Model 29:47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2018.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feigon S, Murphy C (2016) Shared mobility and the transformation of public transit. https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/Resources/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/APTA-Shared-Mobility.pdf

  21. Feigon S, Murphy C (2018) Broadening Understanding of the interplay between public transit, shared mobility, and personal automobiles. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/24996

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor BD, Chin R, Crotty M, Dill J, Hoel LA, Manville M, Polzin S, Schaller B, Shaheen S, Sperling D, Zafar M, Zielinski S, Kortum K (2001) Between public and private mobility: examining the rise of technology-enabled transportation services. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. http://nap.edu/21875

  23. Napalang MSG, Regidor JRF (2017) Innovation versus regulation: an assessment of the metro manila experience in emerging ridesourcing transport services. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud 12:343–355

    Google Scholar 

  24. Usmani A (2017) Over half of the millennials in india don’t use taxi apps: study. In: BloombergQuint. https://www.thequint.com/news/business/half-of-millennials-dont-use-cab-aggregators-like-ola-uber. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

  25. Vohra N, Hazra K (2017) Uber vs. Ola and travel pattern of young India. https://www.regalix.com/insights/uber-vs-ola-and-travel-pattern-of-young-india

  26. Basu R, Varghese V, Jana A (2017) Comparison of traditional and emerging paratransit services in Indian metropolises with dissimilar service delivery structures. Asian Transp Stud 4:518–535

    Google Scholar 

  27. World Economic Forum (2018) Reshaping urban mobility with autonomous vehicles lessons from the city of Boston. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Reshaping_Urban_Mobility_with_Autonomous_Vehicles_2018.pdf

  28. Ola launches car-pooling service “Ola Share” in Chennai, Kolkata (2016) DNA. http://dnai.in/d8XV

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors also acknowledge the opportunity provided by the 4th Conference of the Transportation Research Group of India (4th CTRG) held at IIT Bombay, Mumbai, India between 17th December, 2017 and 20th December, 2017 to present the work that forms the basis of this manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported through the Centre of Excellence in Urban Transport at IIT Madras, funded by the Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Transportation Engineering Division, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Tamil Nadu, Chennai, 600036, India

    Aravinda Devaraj, Karthik K. Srinivasan & Shehna Basheer

Authors
  1. Aravinda Devaraj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karthik K. Srinivasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shehna Basheer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aravinda Devaraj.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Devaraj, A., Srinivasan, K.K. & Basheer, S. Awareness, Consideration and Usage Frequency of On-demand Transport Services in the Indian Context. Transp. in Dev. Econ. 6, 14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-020-00105-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-020-00105-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation