Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The assessment of active labor market policies: evidence from OECD countries

  • Published:
Economia Politica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper tries to detect the effectiveness of active labor market policy (ALMP) on the unemployment rate. The generalized method of moments system for dynamic panel introduced by Blundell and Bond (J Econ 87(1):115–143, 1998) is applied to our sample over a fifteen-year period from 2000 to 2014, where we aim at examining how the policy intervention, the cyclical, the institutional and macroeconomic factors interact to determine unemployment. The effect of total ALMP (service public employment, training, employment incentives, supported employment and rehabilitation, direct job creation, start-up incentives) is significantly negative on unemployment. Our results show that start-up incentives seem to be the most effective policy to reduce the unemployment rate because of its low cost. Other control variables, such as the tax wedge, employment protection legislation, inflation, investment, and GDP are also important in determining the unemployment rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: OECD (2015)

Fig. 2

Source: OECD (2015)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aisen, A., & Veiga, F. J. (2013). How does political instability affect economic growth? European Journal of Political Economy, 29, 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amable, B., Demmou, L., & Gatti, D. (2007). Employment performance and institutions: New answers to an old question. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 2731

  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspalter, C., Jinsoo, K., & Sojeung, P. (2009). Analysing the Welfare State in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovenia: An ideal-typical perspective. Social Policy and Administration, 43(2), 170–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D., Howell, D., & Schmitt, J. (2005). Labor Market Institutions and Unemployment. In D. R. Howell (Ed.), Fighting unemployment: The limits of free market orthodoxy (pp. 72–118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, L. M., Furceri, D., Leigh, M. D., & Loungani, M. P. (2013). The distributional effects of fiscal consolidation (No. 13-151). International Monetary Fund.

  • Bande, R., & Karanassou, M. (2014). Spanish regional unemployment revisited: The role of capital accumulation. Regional Studies, 48(11), 1863–1883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (2013). Inflation and economic growth. Annals of Economics and Finance, 14(1), 85–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartóková, Ľ., & Gontkovičová, B. (2014). Labour markets of EMU countries in the context of OCA. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassanini, A., & Duval, R. (2006). Employment patterns in OECD countries: Reassessing the role of policies and institutions. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 486.

  • Bassanini, A., & Duval, R. (2009). Unemployment, institutions and reform complementarities: Re-assessing the aggregate evidence for OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press (OUP), 25(1), 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, H., & Caliendo, M. (2008). Turning unemployment into self-employment: Effectiveness of two start-up programmes. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), 347–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellmann, L., & Jackman, R. (1996). Aggregate Impact Analysis”. In J. O’Reilly, K. Schömann, & G. Schmid (Eds.), International handbook of labour market policy and evaluation (pp. 143–162). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belot, M., Boone, J., & Van Ours, J. (2002). Welfare effects of employment protection. Tilburg Center Discussion Paper, No. 2002-48.

  • Belot, M., & Van Ours, J. C. (2004). Does the recent success of some OECD countries in lowering their unemployment rates lie in the clever design of their labor market reforms? Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 621–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertola, G., Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2001). Comparative analysis of labor market outcomes: Lessons for the US from international long-run evidence (No. w8526). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., & Wolfers, J. (2000). The role of shocks and institutions in the rise of European unemployment: The aggregate evidence. The Economic Journal, 110, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasco, S., & Pertold-Gebicka, B. (2013). Employment policies, hiring practices and firm performance. Labour Economics, 25, 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeri, T. (2002). Let social policy models compete and Europe will win. In A conference hosted by the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University (Vol. 11, No. 12, pp. 22–28).

  • Bond, S. R. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, J., & van Ours, J. C. (2004). Effective active labor market policies, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 335, Center Discussion Paper No. 2004-87. Brookings Institute, Washington, p. 175.

  • Cahuc, P., Carcillo, S., Zylberberg, A., & MeCuaig, W. (2014). Labors economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahuc, P., & Le Barbanchon, T. (2010). Labor market policy evaluation in equilibrium: Some lessons of the job search and matching model. Labour Economics, 17(1), 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calmfors, L. (1994). Active labor market policy and unemployment—a framework for the analysis of crucial design features. OECD Economic Studies, 22, 7–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calmfors, L. (1995). Labor market policy and unemployment. European Economic Review, 39, 1611–1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calmfors, L., & Skedinger, P. (1995). Does active labor market policy increase employment? Theoretical considerations and some empirical evidence from Sweden. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 11, 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., Kluve, J., & Weber, A. (2009). Active labor market policy evaluations: A meta-analysis, IZA Discussion Paper No. 4002.

  • Card, D., Kluve, J., & Weber, A. (2010). Active labour market policy evaluations: A metaanalysis. The Economic Journal, 120, 452–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, V. (2013). Macroeconomic determinants of the credit risk in the banking system: The case of GIPSI. Economic Modelling, 31, 672–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebrián, I., Moreno, G., & Toharia, L. (2011). La Estabilidad Laboral y los Programas de Fomento de la Contratación Indefinida. Hacienda Pública Española/Revista de Economía Pública, 198, 103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crépon, B., Dejemeppe, M., & Gurgand, M. (2005). Counseling the unemployed: Does it lower unemployment duration and recurrence? IZA Discussion Paper No. 1796.

  • Crépon, B., Ferracci, M., & Fougère, D. (2012). Training the unemployed in France: How does it affect unemployment duration and recurrence? Annals of Economics and Statistics, 107–108, 175–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cueto, B., & Mato, J. (2006). An analysis of self-employment subsidies with duration models. Applied Economics, 38, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Koning, J., & van Nes, P. J. (1991). A quantitative approach to process evaluation: The case of the Vermeend-Moor Act. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 9(1), 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Serres, A., & Murtin, F. (2014). Unemployment at risk: The policy determinants of labour market exposure to economic shocks. Economic Policy, 29(80), 603–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolton, P., & O’Neill, N. (1996). Unemployment duration and the restart effect: Some experimental evidence. Economic Journal, 106, 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolton, P., & O’Neill, N. (2002). The long-run effects of unemployment monitoring and work-search programs: Experimental evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Labor Economics, 20, 381–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorst, W., & Konle-Seidl, R. (2016). Evaluating labour market policy. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 9966.

  • Elmeskov, J., Martin, J. P., & Scarpetta, S. (1998). Key lessons for labour market reforms: Evidence from OECD countries experience. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 5(2), 205–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escudero, V. (2014). Are active labour market policies effective in activating and integrating low-skilled individuals? An international comparison, Working paper No. 3, Geneva.

  • Eurostat. (2006). Labour market policy database METHODOLOGY REVISION OF JUNE 2006.

  • Feldmann, H. (2009). The unemployment effects of labor regulation around the world. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(1), 76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann, H. (2010). Government size and unemployment in developing countries. Applied Economics Letters, 17(3), 289–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann, H. (2013). The unemployment effect of hiring and firing regulation in developing countries: Survey evidence. Applied Economics Letters, 20(18), 1603–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forslund, et al. (2011). The determinants of the composition of public debt in developing and emerging market countries. Review of Development Finance, 1, 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. G. (2001). Panel tests of Okun’s law for ten industrial countries. Economic Inquiry, 39(4), 511–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graversen, B. K., & van Ours, J. C. (2008). How to help unemployed find jobs quickly; experimental evidence from a mandatory activation program. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 2020–2035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán, G. (2014). How effective are active employment policies to reduce unemployment in EU countries? Atlantic Review of Economics, 2, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heipertz, M., & Ward-Warmedinger, M. (2008). Economic and social models in Europe and the importance of reform. Financial Theory and Practice, 32(3), 255–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbertsson, T. T., & Zoega, G. (2002). The Modigliani ‘puzzle’. Economics Letters, 76(3), 437–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D. R. (Ed.). (2004). Fighting unemployment: The limits of free market orthodoxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hujer, R., Rodrigues, P., & Wold, K. (2009). Estimating the macroeconomic effects of active labour market policies using spatial econometric methods. International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing, 30(7), 648–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hujer, R., Thomsen, S. L., & Zeiss, C. (2004). The effects of vocational training programs on the duration of unemployment in Eastern Germany. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 90, 299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanassou, M., Sala, H., & Salvador, P. F. (2008). Capital accumulation and unemployment: new insights on the Nordic experience. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(6), 977–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanassou, M., Sala, H., & Snower, D. (2003). Unemployment in the European Union: A dynamic reappraisal. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 237–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanassou, M., Sala, H., & Snower, D. J. (2004). Unemployment in the European Union: Institutions, prices, and growth. CESifoWorking Paper, No. 1247.

  • Karanassou, M., & Snower, D. J. (2004). Unemployment invariance. German Economic Review, 5(3), 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluve, J. (2010). The effectiveness of European active labor market programs. Labour Economics, 17, 904–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluve, J., Card, D., Fertig, M., Góra, M., Jacobi, L., Jensen, P., et al. (2007). Active labor market policies in Europe: Performance and perspectives. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kluve, J., & Schmidt, Ch M. (2002). Can training and employment subsidies combat European unemployment? Economic Policy, 35, 409–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koning, J. (1993). Measuring the placement effects of two wage-subsidy schemes for the long-term unemployed. Empirical Economics, 18, 447–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, L. P., Parsons, M. B., & Reid, D. H. (2006a). Enhancing job-site training of supported workers with autism: A reemphasis on simulation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(1), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, L. P., Parsons, M. B., & Reid, D. H. (2006b). Enhancing job-site training of supported workers with autism: A reemphasis on simulation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(1), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauringson, A., Villsaar, K., Tammik, L., & Luhavee, T. (2011). Impact evaluation of labour market training. Estonian Unemployment Insurance Fund, 60.

  • Layard, R. (1997). What labour can do. London: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., Mayraz, G., & Nickell, S. (2009). Does relative income matter? Are the critics right?. CEP Discussion Paper, No. 918.

  • Layard, R., & Nickell, S. (1986). Unemployment in britain. Economica, 53(210), S121–S169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., Nickell, S., & Jackman, R. (1991). Unemployment: Macroeconomic performance and the labor market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, M., Miquel, R., & Wunsch, C. (2011). Long-run effects of public sector sponsored training in West Germany. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, 742–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, J., Mcintosh, S., Roberts, J., Murray, C. C., & Edlin, R. (2015). Policy evaluation via a statistical control: A non-parametric evaluation of the ‘Want2Work’active labour market policy. Economic Modelling, 51, 635–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. P. (2014). Activation and active labour market policies in OECD countries: Stylized facts and evidence on their effectiveness, IZA Policy Paper, No. 84.

  • Martin, J. P. (2015). Activation and active labour market policies in OECD countries: Stylised facts and evidence on their effectiveness. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 4(1), 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. P., & Grubb, D. (2001). What works and for whom: A review of OECD countries’ experiences with active labor market policies. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 8, 9–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Galbis, E. (2012). The impact of TFP growth on the unemployment rate: Does on-the-job training matter? European Economic Review, 56(8), 1692–1713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtin, F., De Serres, A., & Hijzen, A. (2012). The ins and outs of unemployment: The role of labour market institutions. Documents de travail du Département des affaires économiques de l’OCDE.

  • Murtin, F., De Serres, A., & Hijzen, A. (2014). Unemployment and the coverage extension of collective wage agreements. European Economic Review, 71, 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtin, F., & Robin, J. M. (2016). Labor market reforms and unemployment dynamics. Labour Economics.

  • Nickell, S. (1997). Unemployment and labor market rigidities: Europe versus North America. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 109, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S. (1998). Unemployment: Questions and some answers. The Economic Journal, 108(448), 802–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S., Jones, P., & Quintini, G. (2002). A picture of job insecurity facing British men. The Economic Journal, 112(476), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S., & Layard, R. (1999). Labor market institutions and economic performance. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J., & Struby, E. (2011). Would active labor market policies help combat high US unemployment?. Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 35.

  • Noor, Z. M., Nor, N. M., & Ghani, J. A. (2007). The relationship between output and unemployment in Malaysia: Does Okun’s Law exist? International Journal of Economics and Management, 1(3), 337–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2015). Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, F., & Reize, F. (2000). Business start-ups by the unemployed -an econometric analysis based on firm data. Labour Economics, 7, 629–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puerto, O. S. (2007). Labor market impact on youth: A meta-analysis of the youth employment inventory. World Bank.

  • Román, C., Congregado, E., & Millán, J. M. (2013). Start-up incentives: Entrepreneurship policy or active labor market program? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovelli, R., & Bruno, R. L. (2008). Labor Market Policies, Institutions and Employment Rates in the EU-27.

  • Sapir, A. (2006). Globalization and the reform of European social models. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2), 369–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarpetta, S. (1996). Assessing the role of labor market policies and institutional settings on unemployment: A cross-country study. OECD Economic Studies, 26, 43–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, G. M. (2003). The efficiency of public employment services: A nonparametric matching function analysis for Switzerland. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20(1), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., & Zoega, G. (2005). Unemployment, investment and global expected returns: A panel FAVAR approach. Puzzle, 1, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sögner, L., & Stiassny, A. (2002). An analysis on the structural stability of Okun’s law—a cross-country study. Applied Economics, 34(14), 1775–1787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparreboom, T., & Staneva, A. (2014). Is education the solution to decent work for youth in developing economies. Work4Youth Publication Series, 23.

  • Stober, E. O. (2015). The Validity of Okun’s Law: An assessment of United Kingdom’s unemployment–output relationship. International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, 5(1), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vliet, O., & Koster, F. (2011). Europeanization and the political economy of active labor market policies. European Union Politics, 12(2), 217–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venn, D. (2009). Legislation, collective bargaining and enforcement: Updating the OECD employment protection indicators. http://www.oecd.org/els/workingpapers.

  • Wapler, R., Daniel W, & Wolf. K. (2014). Active labour-market policies in Germany: Do regional labor markets benefit?. IAB-Discussion Paper, 28/2014, Nuremberg.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marwa Sahnoun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahnoun, M., Abdennadher, C. The assessment of active labor market policies: evidence from OECD countries. Econ Polit 35, 257–283 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-018-0102-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-018-0102-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation