Skip to main content
Log in

A shared identity promotes herding in an information cascade game

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Economic Science Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our research addresses the effect of shared vs. mixed group identities in an information cascade game. We vary whether subjects always choose after a decision maker who shares the same identity or after a decision maker with a different identity. We find that subjects’ inclination to follow their predecessor is stronger in groups uniquely consisting of ingroup members compared to mixed groups. We relate this result to recent social cognition research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Bannerjee (1992) and Bikchandani et al. (1992) for theory, and Huck and Oechssler (2000), Hung and Plott (2001), Çelen and Kariv (2004), Kübler and Weizsäcker (2004), Drehmann et al. (2005), Kübler and Weizsäcker (2005), Dominitz and Hung (2009), and Fahr and Irlenbusch (2011) for laboratory evidence.

  2. They conduct a standard double auction laboratory experiment varying the ethnic composition of the market participants. They do so both in Southeast Asia and in North America, areas with distinct and non-overlapping ethnic groups, using subjects with training in finance or business. They compare ethnically homogenous (only participants from the dominant ethnicity) and heterogeneous (at least one member of the ethnic minority) markets of six subjects and observe that homogeneity is associated with more bubble building.

  3. In related research, Le Coq et al. (2015) suggest that a common identity changes not only altruistic preferences but also people’s perceived ability to anticipate others’ behavior in a centipede and a coordination game.

  4. Accordingly, we find that the variance of choices is much higher in the mixed-identity treatment, where variance is measured by a variable with four values: 0 = all chose the same color, 1 = one chooses the one and five the other color, 2 = two choose the one and four the other color, 3 = each color is chosen by three decision makers (pMWU = 0.03, two-tailed).

  5. This effect may be reinforced by the uncertainty in our financial decision-making context, as here the credibility of social information is a key determinant of behavior (Mussweiler and Posten 2012).

References

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. R., & Holt, C. A. (1997). Information cascades in the laboratory. American Economic Review, 87(5), 847–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athey, S., Avery, C., & Zemsky, P. (2000). Mentoring and diversity. American Economic Review, 90(4), 765–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2005). Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. The American Economic Review, 95(2), 152–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural changes as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G., Feldhaus, C., & Ockenfels, A. (2016). Social interaction promotes risk taking in a stag hunt game. German Economic Review, 17(3), 409–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, S. E., Page, M. E., & West, J. E. (2010). Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1101–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çelen, B., & Kariv, S. (2004). Distinguishing informational cascades from herd behavior in the laboratory. American Economic Review, 94(3), 484–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R., & Chen, Y. (2011). The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. American Economic Review, 101(6), 2562–2589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Li, S. X. (2009). Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review, 99(1), 431–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominitz, J., & Hung, A. (2009). Empirical models of discrete choice and belief updating in observational learning experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69, 94–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drehmann, M., Oechssler, J., & Roider, A. (2005). Herding and contrarian behavior in financial markets—An internet experiment. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1403–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahr, R., & Irlenbusch, B. (2011). Who follows the crowd—Groups or individuals? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80(1), 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbacher, U. (2007). Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2009). The impact of information from similar or different advisors on judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goeree, J. K., Palfrey, T. R., & McKelvey, B. W. (2007). Self-correcting information cascades. Review of Economic Studies, 74(3), 733–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 114–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huck, S., & Oechssler, J. (2000). Informational cascades in the laboratory: Do they occur for the right reasons? Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(6), 661–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, A., & Plott, C. R. (2001). Information cascades: Replication and an extension to majority rule and conformity-rewarding institutions. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1508–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kübler, D., & Weizsäcker, G. (2004). Limited depth of reasoning and failure of cascade formation in the laboratory. Review of Economic Studies, 71(2), 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kübler, D., & Weizsäcker, G. (2005). Are longer cascades more stable? Journal of the European Economic Association (Papers and Proceedings), 3(2–3), 330–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Coq, C., Tremewan, J., & Wagner, A. K. (2015). On the effects of group identity strategic environments. European Economic Review, 76, 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. S., Apfelbaum, E. P., Bernard, M., Bartelt, V. L., Zajac, E. J., & Stark, D. (2014). Ethnic diversity deflates price bubbles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(52), 18524–18529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeish, K. N., & Oxoby, R. J. (2007). Identity, cooperation, and punishment. Working Paper.

  • Mussweiler, T., & Ockenfels, A. (2013). Similarity increases altruistic punishment in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 19318–19323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mussweiler, T., & Posten, A.-C. (2012). Relatively certain! Comparative thinking reduces uncertainty. Cognition, 122, 236–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nöth, M., & Weber, M. (2003). Information aggregation with random ordering: Cascades and overconfidence. Economic Journal, 113(484), 166–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ockenfels, A., & Werner, P. (2014). Beliefs and ingroup favoritism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 108, 453–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and inter-group behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 81, 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizsäcker, G. (2010). Do we follow others when we should? A simple test of rational expectations. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2340–2360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegelmeyer, A., March, C., & Krügel, S. (2013). Do we follow others when we should? A simple test of rational expectations: Comment. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2633–2642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kevin Breuer for excellent help in programing and running the experiment, Mattia Nardotto and Peter Werner for statistical advice, participants of the workshop of the Research Unit “Design and Behavior” 2012 and 2013, and seminar participants at the University of Cologne for valuable comments. Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft is gratefully acknowledged by all authors through support of the Research Unit “Design and Behavior: Economic Engineering of Firms and Markets” (FOR 1371), by Berger through the research scholarship program (LO 1826/1-1), and by Ockenfels through the Leibniz-Program of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Berger.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 45 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berger, S., Feldhaus, C. & Ockenfels, A. A shared identity promotes herding in an information cascade game. J Econ Sci Assoc 4, 63–72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-018-0050-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-018-0050-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation