Skip to main content
Log in

Recent developments on nanomaterials-based optical sensors for Hg2+ detection

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Science China Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mercuric ion (Hg2+), released from both natural and industrial sources, has severe adverse effects on human health and the environment even at very low concentrations. It is very important to develop a rapid and economical method for the detection of Hg2+ with high sensitivity and selectivity. Nanomaterials with unique size and shape-dependent optical properties are attractive sensing materials. The application of nanomaterials to design optical sensors for Hg2+ provides a powerful method for the trace detection of Hg2+ in the environment, because these optical sensors are simple, rapidly responsive, cost-effective and highly sensitive. This review summarizes the recent advances on the development of optical assays for Hg2+ in aqueous solution by using functionalized nanomaterials (including noble metal nanoparticles, fluorescent metal nanoclusters, semiconductor quantum dots and carbon nanodots). Detection strategies based on the Hg2+-induced changes in spectral absorbance, fluorescence intensity and surface-enhanced Raman scattering signals were described. And the design principles for each optical assay were presented. In addition, the future challenge and the prospect of the development of nanomaterial optical sensors for Hg2+ detection were also discussed.

摘要

汞离子(Hg2+)即使在微量浓度下也会给人类健康和环境带来危害, 因此发展快速、 经济、 具有高灵敏度和高选择性检测汞离子的方法是非常重要的. 纳米材料由于其优异的光学特性, 为环境中检测痕量汞离子的光学传感器的设计提供了一种强有力的手段. 纳米材料的光学传感器具有简单、 快速、 经济、 灵敏等优异特性. 本文综述了利用功能化纳米材料(包括贵金属, 金属团簇, 半导体量子点和碳点)检测汞离子的光学方法的最新进展, 分别描述了比色法、 荧光法和表面增强拉曼散射法对汞离子的检测路线. 我们给出了每种检测方法的检测原理, 同时也讨论了未来发展基于纳米材料检测汞离子的光学传感器的前景和挑战.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boening DW. Ecological effects, transport, and fate of mercury: a general review. Chemosphere, 2000, 40: 1335–1351

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clarkson TW, Magos L, Myers GJ. The toxicology of mercury-current exposures and clinical manifestations. N Engl J Med, 2003, 349: 1731–1737

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nolan EM, Lippard SJ. Tools and tactics for the optical detection of mercuric ion. Chem Rev, 2008, 108: 3443–3480

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vil’pan YA, Grinshtein IL, Akatove AA, Gucer S. Direct atomic absorption determination of mercury in drinking water and urine using a two-step electrothermal atomizer. J Anal Chem, 2008, 60: 38–44

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu LP, Yan XP. Flow injection online sorption preconcentration coupled with cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry with online oxidative elution for determination of trace mercury in water samples. At Spectrosc, 2004, 25: 145–153

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moreton JA, Delves HT. Simple direct method for the determination of total mercury levels in blood and urine and nitric acid digests of fish by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom, 1998, 13: 659–665

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu SJ, Nie HG, Jiang JH, Shen GL, Yu RQ. Electrochemical sensor for mercury(II) based on conformational switch mediated by interstrand cooperative coordination. Anal Chem, 2009, 81: 5724–5730

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fitzgerald WF, Gill GA. Subnanogram determination of mercury by two-stage gold amalgamation and gas phase detection applied to atmospheric analysis. Anal Chem, 1979, 51: 1714–1720

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krishna MVB, Castro J, Brewer TM, Marcus RK. Online mercury speciation through liquid chromatography with particle beam/electron ionization mass spectrometry detection. J Anal At Spectrom, 2007, 22: 283–291

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang LD, Fang M. Nanomaterials in pollution trace detection and environmental improvement. Nano Today, 2010, 5: 128–142

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guo SJ, Wang EK, Noble metal nanomaterials: controllable synthesis and application in fuel cells and analytical sensors. Nano Today, 2011, 6: 240–264

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vilela D, González MC, Escarpa A. Sensing colorimetric approaches based on gold and silver nanoparticles aggregation: chemical creativity behind the assay. a review. Anal Chim Acta, 2012, 751: 24–43

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grasseschi D, Zamarion VM, Araki K, Toma HE. Surface enhanced raman scattering spot tests: a new insight on feigl’s analysis using gold nanoparticles. Anal Chem, 2010, 82: 9146–9149

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huang CC, Chiang CK, Lin ZH, Lee KH, Chang HT. Bioconjugated gold nanodots and nanoparticles for protein assays based on photoluminescence quenching. Anal Chem, 2008, 80: 1497–1504

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xu HX, Suslick KS. Water-soluble fluorescent silver nanoclusters. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 1078–1082

    Google Scholar 

  16. Han CP, Li HB. Host-molecule-coated quantum dots as fluorescent sensors. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2010, 397:1437–1444

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li HT, Kang ZH, Liu Y, Lee ST. Carbon nanodots: synthesis, properties and applications. J Mater Chem, 2012, 22: 24230–24253

    Google Scholar 

  18. Costa-Fernández JM., Pereiro R, Sanz-Medel A. The use of luminescent quantum dots for optical sensing. Trends Anal Chem, 2006, 25: 207–218

    Google Scholar 

  19. Knecht MR, Sethi M. Bio-inspired colorimetric detection of Hg2+ and Pb2+ heavy metal ions using Au nanoparticles. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2009, 394: 33–46

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin YW, Huang CC, Chang HT. Gold nanoparticle probes for the detection of mercury, lead and copper ions. Analyst, 2011, 136: 863–871

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu DB, Wang Z, Jiang XY. Gold nanoparticles for the colorimetric and fluorescent detection of ions and small organic molecules. Nanoscale, 2011, 3: 1421–1433

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aragay G, Pons J, Merkoc A. Recent trends in macro-, micro-, and nanomaterial-based tools and strategies for heavy-metal detection. Chem Rev, 2011, 111: 3433–3458

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kim HN, Ren WX, Kim JS, Yoon J. Fluorescent and colorimetric sensors for detection of lead, cadmium, and mercury ions. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41: 3210–3244

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lou YB, Zhao YX, Chen JX, Zhu JJ. Metal ions optical sensing by semiconductor quantum dots. J Mater Chem C, 2014, 2: 595–613

    Google Scholar 

  25. Costas-Mora I, Romero V, Lavilla I, Bendicho C. An overview of recent advances in the application of quantum dots as luminescent probes to inorganic-trace analysis. Trends Anal Chem, 2014, 57: 64–72

    Google Scholar 

  26. El-Safty SA, Shenashen MA. Mercury-ion optical sensors. Trends Anal Chem, 2012, 38: 98–115

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mahato P, Saha S, Das P, Agarwal H, Das A. An overview of the recent developments on Hg2+ recognition. RSC Advances, 2014, 4: 36140–36174

    Google Scholar 

  28. Du JJ, Jiang L, Shao Q, et al. Colorimetric detection of mercury ions based on plasmonic nanoparticles. Small, 2013, 9:1467–1481

    Google Scholar 

  29. Botasini S, Heijo G, Méndez E. Toward decentralized analysis of mercury (II) in real samples. a critical review on nanotechnology-based methodologies. Anal Chim Acta, 2013, 800: 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lee JS, Han MS, Mirkin CA. Colorimetric detection of mercuric ion (Hg2+) in aqueous media using DNA-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2007, 46: 4093–4096

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xue XJ, Wang F, Liu, XG. One-step, room temperature, colorimetric detection of mercury (Hg2+) using DNA/nanoparticle conjugates. J Am Chem Soc, 2008, 130: 3244–3245

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kim YJ, Johnson RC, Hupp JT. Gold nanoparticle-based sensing of “spectroscopically silent” heavy metal ions. Nano Lett, 2001, 1: 165–167

    Google Scholar 

  33. Huang CC, Chang HT. Parameters for selective colorimetric sensing of mercury(II) in aqueous solutions using mercaptopropionic acid-modified gold nanoparticles. Chem Commun, 2007, 1215–1217

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kim YR, Mahajan RK, Kim JS, Kim H. Highly sensitive gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric sensing of mercury(II) through simple ligand exchange reaction in aqueous media. ACS Appl Mater Inter, 2010, 2: 292–295

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tan ZQ, Liu JF, Liu R, Yin YG, Jiang GB. Visual and colorimetric detection of Hg2+ by cloud point extraction with functionalized gold nanoparticles as a probe. Chem Commun, 2009, 7030–7032

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chen L, Lou TT, Yu CW, Kang Q, Chen LX. N-1-(2-mercaptoethyl) thymine modification of gold nanoparticles: a highly selective and sensitive colorimetric chemosensor for Hg2+. Analyst, 2011, 136: 4770–4773

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu CW, Hsieh YT, Huang CC, Lin ZH, Chang HT. Detection of mercury(II) based on Hg2+-DNA complexes inducing the aggregation of gold nanoparticles. Chem Commun, 2008, 2242-2244

  38. Li D, Wieckowska A, Willner I. Optical analysis o f Hg2+ ions by oligonucleotide-gold-nanoparticle hybrids and DNA-based machines. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2008, 47: 3927–3931

    Google Scholar 

  39. Xu XW, Wang J, Jiao K, Yang XR. Colorimetric detection of mercury ion (Hg2+) based on DNA oligonucleotides and unmodified gold nanoparticles sensing system with a tunable detection range. Biosens Bioelectron, 2009, 24: 3153–3158

    Google Scholar 

  40. Liu DB, Qu WS, Chen WW, et al. Highly sensitive, colorimetric detection of mercury(II) in aqueous media by quaternary ammonium group-capped gold nanoparticles at room temperature. Anal Chem, 2010, 82: 9606–9610

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lin CY, Yu CJ, Lin YH, Tseng WL. Colorimetric sensing of silver(I) and mercury(II) ions based on an assembly of tween 20-stabilized gold nanoparticles. Anal Chem, 2010, 82: 6830–6837

    Google Scholar 

  42. Chen XJ, Zu YB, Xie H, Kemas AM, Gao ZQ. Coordination of mercury( II) to gold nanoparticle associated nitrotriazole towards sensitive colorimetric detection of mercuric ion with a tunable dynamic range. Analyst, 2011, 136: 1690–1696

    Google Scholar 

  43. Xu YY, Deng L, Wang H, et al. Metal-induced aggregation of mononucleotides-stabilized gold nanoparticles: an efficient approach for simple and rapid colorimetric detection of Hg(II). Chem Commun, 2011, 47: 6039–6041

    Google Scholar 

  44. Du JJ, Sun YH, Jiang L, et al. Flexible colorimetric detection of mercuric ion by simply mixing nanoparticles and oligopeptides. Small, 2011, 7: 1407–1411

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li Y, Wu P, Xu H, Zhang ZP, Zhong XH. Highly selective and sensitive visualizable detection of Hg2+ based on anti-aggregation of gold nanoparticles. Talanta, 2011, 84: 508–512

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lou TT, Chen ZP, Wang YQ, Chen LX. Blue-to-red colorimetric sensing strategy for Hg2+ and Ag+ via redox-regulated surface chemistry of gold nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2011, 3: 1568–1573

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hung YL, Hsiung T M, Chen YY, Huang YF, Huang CC. Colorimetric detection of heavy metal ions using label-free gold nanoparticles and alkanethiols. J Phys Chem C, 2010, 114: 16329–16334

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yang XR, Liu HX, Xu J, et al. A simple and cost-effective sensing strategy of mercury(II) based on analyte-inhibited aggregation of gold nanoparticles. Nanotechnology, 2011, 22: 275503

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ding N, Zhao H, Peng WB, et al. A simple colorimetric sensor based on anti-aggregation of gold nanoparticles for Hg2+ detection. Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Aspects, 2012, 395: 161–167

    Google Scholar 

  50. You J, Hu HZ, Zhou JP, et al. Novel cellulose polyampholyte-gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric competition assay for the detection of cysteine and mercury(II). Langmuir, 2013, 29: 5085–5092

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lou TT, Chen L, Zhang CR, et al. A simple and sensitive colorimetric method for detection of mercury ions based on anti-aggregation of gold nanoparticles. Anal Method, 2012, 4: 488–491

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wu JK, Li LY, Zhu D, et al. Colorimetric assay for mercury (II) based on mercury-specific deoxyribonucleic acid-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Anal Chim Acta, 2011, 694: 115–119

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lee JS, Lytton-Jean AKR, Hurst SJ, Mirkin CA. Silver nanoparticle-oligonucleotide conjugates based on DNA with triple cyclic disulfide moieties. Nano Lett, 2007, 7: 2112–2115

    Google Scholar 

  54. Henglein A, Brancewicz C. Absorption spectra and reactions of colloidal bimetallic nanoparticles containing mercury. Chem Mater, 1997, 9: 2164–2167

    Google Scholar 

  55. Fan YJ, Liu Z, Wang L, Zhan JH. Synthesis of starch-stabilized Ag nanoparticles and Hg2+ recognition in aqueous media. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2009, 4: 1230–1235

    Google Scholar 

  56. Farhadi K, Forough M, Molaei R, Hajizadeh S, Rafipour A. Highly selective Hg2+ colorimetric sensor using green synthesized and unmodified silver nanoparticles. Sens Actuators B, 2012, 161: 880–885

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bera RK, Das AK, Raj CR. Enzyme-cofactor-assisted photochemical synthesis of Ag nanostructures and shape-dependent optical sensing of Hg(II) ions. Chem Mater, 2010, 22: 4505–4511

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ramesh GV, Radhakrishnan TP. A universal sensor for mercury (Hg, HgI, HgII) based on silver nanoparticle-embedded polymer thin film. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2011, 3: 988–994

    Google Scholar 

  59. Apilux A, Siangproh W, Praphairaksit N, Chailapakul O. Simple and rapid colorimetric detection of Hg(II) by a paper-based device using silve nanoplates. Talanta, 2012, 97: 388–394

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wang Y, Yang F, Yang XR. Colorimetric detection of mercury(II) ion using unmodified silver nanoparticles and mercury-specific oligonucleotides. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2010, 2: 339–342

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wang GL, Zhu XY, Jiao HJ, Dong YM, Li ZJ. Ultrasensitive and dual functional colorimetric sensors for mercury (II) ions and hydrogen peroxide based on catalytic reduction property of silver nanoparticles. Biosens Bioelectron, 2012, 31: 337–342

    Google Scholar 

  62. Duan JL, Yin HZ, Wei RR, Wang WW. Facile colorimetric detection of Hg2+ based on anti-aggregation of silver nanoparticles. Biosens Bioelectron, 2014, 57: 139–142

    Google Scholar 

  63. Chen L, Fu XL, Lu WH, Chen LX. Highly sensitive and selective colorimetric sensing of Hg2+ based on the morphology transition of silver nanoprisms. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2013, 5: 284–290

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zang L, Liu R, Holman MW, Nguyen KT, Adams DM. A single-molecule probe based on intramolecular electron transfer. J Am Chem Soc, 2002, 124: 10640–10641

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wu CL, Zhao YB. CdS quantum dots as fluorescence probes for the sensitive and selective detection of highly reactive HSe? ions in aqueous solution. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2007, 388: 717–722

    Google Scholar 

  66. Chen Y, Rosenzweig Z. Luminescent CdS quantum dots as selective ion probes. Anal Chem, 2002, 74: 5132–5138

    Google Scholar 

  67. Cai ZX, Yang H, Zhang Y, Yan XP. Preparation, characterization and evaluation of water-soluble l-cysteine-capped-CdS nanoparticles as fluorescence probe for detection of Hg(II) in aqueous solution. Anal Chim Acta, 2006, 559: 234–239

    Google Scholar 

  68. Chen JL, Gao YC, Xu ZB, et al. A novel fluorescent array for mercury (II) ion in aqueous solution with functionalized cadmium selenide nanoclusters. Anal Chim Acta, 2006, 577: 77–84

    Google Scholar 

  69. Xia YS, Zhu CQ. Use of surface-modified CdTe quantum dots as fluorescent probes in sensing mercury (II). Talanta, 2008, 75: 215–221

    Google Scholar 

  70. Pei JY, Zhu H, Wang XL, Zhang HC, Yang XR. Synthesis of cysteamine-coated CdTe quantum dots and its application in mercury (II) detection. Anal Chim Acta, 2012, 757: 63–68

    Google Scholar 

  71. Duan JL, Song LX, Zhan JH. One-pot synthesis of highly luminescent CdTe quantum dots by microwave irradiation reduction and their Hg2+-sensitive properties. Nano Research, 2009, 2: 61–68

    Google Scholar 

  72. Chao MR, Chang YZ, Chen JL. Hydrophilic ionic liquid-passivated CdTe quantum dots for mercury ion detection. Biosens Bioelectron, 2013, 42: 397–402

    Google Scholar 

  73. Koneswaran M, Narayanaswamy R. CdS/ZnS core-shell quantum dots capped with mercaptoacetic acid as fluorescent probes for Hg(II) ions. Microchim Acta, 2012, 178: 171–178

    Google Scholar 

  74. Chen HQ, Fu J, Wang L, et al. Ultrasensitive mercury(II) ion detection by europium(III)-doped cadmium sulfide composite nanoparticles. Talanta, 2010, 83: 139–144

    Google Scholar 

  75. Fu J, Wang L, Chen HQ, et al. A selective fluorescence probe for mercury ion based on the fluorescence quenching of terbium(III)-doped cadmium sulfide composite nanoparticles. Spectrochim Acta Part A, 2010, 77: 625–629

    Google Scholar 

  76. Liang JG, Ai XP, He ZK, Pang DW. Functionalized CdSe quantum dots as selective silver ion chemodosimeter. Analyst, 2004, 129: 619–622

    Google Scholar 

  77. Dong C, Qian H, Fang N, Ren JJ. Study of fluorescence quenching and dialysis process of CdTe quantum dots, using ensemble techniques and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Phys Chem B, 2006, 110: 11069–11075

    Google Scholar 

  78. Li M, Wang QY, Shi XD, Hornak LA, Wu NQ. Detection of mercury(II) by quantum dot/DNA/gold nanoparticle ensemble based nanosensor via nanometal surface energy transfer. Anal Chem, 2011, 83: 7061–7065

    Google Scholar 

  79. Huang DW, Niu CG, Ruan M, et al. Highly sensitive strategy for Hg2+ detection in environmental water samples using long lifetime fluorescence quantum dots and gold nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol, 2013, 47: 4392–4398

    Google Scholar 

  80. Duan JL, Jiang XC, Ni SQ, Yang M, Zhan JH. Facile synthesis of N-acetyl-L-cysteine capped ZnS quantum dots as an eco-friendly fluorescence sensor for Hg2+. Talanta, 2011, 85: 1738–1743

    Google Scholar 

  81. Liu JW, Lu Y. A DNAzyme catalytic beacon sensor for paramagnetic Cu2+ ions in aqueous solution with high sensitivity and selectivity. J Am Chem Soc, 2007, 129: 9838–9839

    Google Scholar 

  82. Zhu CQ, Li L, Fang F, Chen JL, Wu YQ. Functional InP nanocrystals as novel near-infrared fluorescent sensors for mercury ions. Chem Lett, 2005, 34: 898–899

    Google Scholar 

  83. Huang DW, Niu CG, Wang XY, Lv XX, Zeng GM. “Turn-on” fluorescent sensor for Hg2+ based on single-stranded DNA functionalized Mn:CdS/ZnS quantum dots and gold nanoparticles by time-gated mode. Anal Chem, 2013, 85: 1164–1170

    Google Scholar 

  84. Liang AN, Wang L, Chen HQ, et al. Synchronous fluorescence determination of mercury ion with glutathione-capped CdS nanoparticles as a fluorescence probe. Talanta, 2010, 81: 438–443

    Google Scholar 

  85. Wang YQ, Liu Y, He XW, Li WY, Zhang YK. Highly sensitive synchronous fluorescence determination of mercury (II) based on the denatured ovalbumin coated CdTe QDs. Talanta, 2012, 99: 69–74

    Google Scholar 

  86. Huang CC, Chang HT. Selective gold-nanoparticle-based “turn-on” fluorescent sensors for detection of mercury(II) in aqueous solution. Anal Chem, 2006, 78: 8332–8338

    Google Scholar 

  87. Darbha GK, Ray A, Ray PC. Gold nanoparticle-based miniaturized nanomaterial surface energy transfer probe for rapid and ultrasensitive detection of mercury in soil, water, and fish. ACS Nano, 2007, 1: 208–214

    Google Scholar 

  88. Wang H, Wang YX, Jin JY, Yang RH. Gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric and “turn-on” fluorescent probe for mercury(II) ions in aqueous solution. Anal Chem, 2008, 80: 9021–9028

    Google Scholar 

  89. Wei H, Wang ZD, Yang LM, et al. Lysozyme-stabilized gold fluorescent cluster: synthesis and application as Hg2+ sensor. Analyst, 2010, 135: 1406–1410

    Google Scholar 

  90. Xie JP, Zheng YG, Ying JY. Highly selective and ultrase nsitive detection of Hg2+ based on fluorescence quenching of Au nanoclusters by Hg2+-Au+ interactions. Chem Commun, 2010, 46: 961–963

    Google Scholar 

  91. Cai YQ, Yan L, Liu GY, Yuan HY, Xiao D. In-situ synthesis of fluorescent gold nanoclusters with electrospun fibrous membrane and application on Hg(II) sensing. Biosens Bioelectron, 2013, 41: 875–879

    Google Scholar 

  92. Shang L, Yang LX, Stockmar F, et al. Microwave-assisted rapid synthesis of luminescent gold nanoclusters for sensing Hg2+ in living cells using fluorescence imaging. Nanoscale, 2012, 4: 4155–4160

    Google Scholar 

  93. Lin YH, Tseng WL. Ultrasensitive sensing of Hg2+ and CH3Hg+ based on the fluorescence quenching of lysozyme type VI-stabilized gold nanoclusters. Anal Chem, 2010, 82: 9194–9200

    Google Scholar 

  94. Huang CC, Yang Z, Lee KH, Chang HT. Synthesis of highly fluorescent gold nanoparticles for sensing mercury(II). Angew Chem Int Ed, 2007, 46: 6824–6828

    Google Scholar 

  95. Guo W, Yuan J, Wang E. Olig onucleotide-stabilized Ag n anoclusters as novel fluorescence probes for the highly selective and sensitive detection of the Hg2+ ion. Chem Commun, 2009, 3395–3397

  96. Guo CL, Irudayaraj J. Fluorescent Ag clusters via a protein-directed approach as a Hg(II) ion sensor. Anal Chem, 2011, 83: 2883–2889

    Google Scholar 

  97. Yuan X, Yeow TJ, Zhang QB, Lee JY, Xie JP. Highly luminescent Ag+ nanoclusters for Hg2+ ion detection. Nanoscale, 2012, 4: 1968–1971

    Google Scholar 

  98. Wang CX, Xu L, Wang Y, et al. Fluorescent silver nanoclusters as effective probes for highly selective detection of mercury(II) at partsper-billion levels. Chem Asian J, 2012, 7: 1652–1656

    Google Scholar 

  99. Adhikari B, Banerjee A. Facile synthesis of water-soluble fluorescent silver nanoclusters and HgII sensing. Chem Mater, 2010, 22: 4364–4371

    Google Scholar 

  100. Deng L, Zhou ZX, Li J, Li T, Dong SJ. Fluorescent silver nanoclusters in hybridized DNA duplexes for the turn-on detection of Hg2+ ions. Chem Commun, 2011, 47: 11065–11067

    Google Scholar 

  101. Tao Y, Lin YH, Huang ZZ, Ren JS, Qu XG. Poly(acrylic acid)-templated silver nanoclusters as a platform for dual fluorometric turnon and colorimetric detection of mercury (II) ions. Talanta, 2012, 88: 290–294

    Google Scholar 

  102. MacLean JL, Morishita K, Liu JW. DNA stabilized silver nanoclusters for ratiometric and visual detection of Hg2+ and its immobilization in hydrogels. Biosens Bioelectron, 2013, 48: 82–86

    Google Scholar 

  103. Lu WB, Qin XY, Liu S, et al. Economical, green synthesis of fluorescent carbon nanoparticles and their use as probes for sensitive and selective detection of mercury(II) ions. Anal Chem, 2012, 84: 5351–5357

    Google Scholar 

  104. Zhou L, Lin YH, Huang ZZ, Ren JS, Qu XG. Carbon nanodots as fluorescence probes for rapid, sensitive, and label-free detection of Hg2+ and biothiols in complex matrices. Chem Commun, 2012, 48: 1147–1149

    Google Scholar 

  105. Luo YH, Li K, Wen GQ, et al. A rapid surface-enhanced Raman scattering method for the determination of trace Hg2+ using rhodamine 6G-aggregated nanosilver as probe. Plasmonics, 2012, 7: 461–468

    Google Scholar 

  106. Han D, Lim SY, Kim BJ, Piao L, Chung TD. Mercury(II) detection by SERS based on a single gold microshell. Chem Commun, 2010, 46: 5587–5589

    Google Scholar 

  107. Kang T, Yoo SM, Yoon I, et al. Au nanowire-on-film SERRS sensor for ultrasensitive Hg2+ detection. Chem Eur J, 2011, 17: 2211–2214

    Google Scholar 

  108. Zhang L, Chang HX, Hirata A, et al. Nanoporous gold based optical sensor for sub-ppt detection of mercury ions. ACS Nano, 2013, 7: 4595–4600

    Google Scholar 

  109. Grasseschi D, Zamarion VM, Araki K, Toma HE. Surface enhanced Raman scattering spot tests: a new insight on Feigl’s analysis using gold nanoparticles. Anal Chem, 2010, 82: 9146–9149

    Google Scholar 

  110. Ma YM, Liu HL, Qian K, Yang LB, Liu JH. A displacement principle for mercury detection by optical waveguide and surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2012, 386: 451–455

    Google Scholar 

  111. Du YX, Liu RY, Liu BH, et al. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering chip for femtomolar detection of mercuric ion (II) by ligand exchange. Anal Chem, 2013, 85: 3160–3165

    Google Scholar 

  112. Wang GQ, Lim C, Chen LX, et al. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering in nanoliter droplets: towards high-sensitivity detection of mercury (II) ions. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2009, 394: 1827–1832

    Google Scholar 

  113. Li K, Liang AH, Jiang CN, et al. A stable and reproducible nanosilver-aggregation-4-mercaptopyridine surface-enhanced Raman scattering probe for rapid determination of trace Hg2+. Talanta, 2012, 99: 890–896

    Google Scholar 

  114. Chen Y, Wu LH, Chen YH, et al. Determination of mercury(II) by surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy based on thiol-functionalized silver nanoparticles. Microchim Acta, 2012, 177: 341–348

    Google Scholar 

  115. Duan JL, Yang M, Zhan JH. A colorimetric and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) dual-signal sensor for Hg2+ based on Bismuthiol II-capped gold nanoparticles. Anal Chim Acta, 2012, 723: 88–93

    Google Scholar 

  116. Li F, Wang J, Lai YM, et al. Ultrasensitive and selective detection of copper (II) and mercury (II) ions by dye-coded silver nanoparticle-based SERS probes. Biosens Bioelectron, 2013, 39: 82–87

    Google Scholar 

  117. Wang XF, Shen YH, Xie AJ, et al. Assembly of dandelion-like Au/PANI nanocomposites and their application as SERS nanosensors. Biosens Bioelectron, 2011, 26: 3063–3067

    Google Scholar 

  118. Lee C, Choo J. Selective trace analysis of mercury (II) ions in aqueous media using SERS-based aptamer sensor. Bull Korean Chem Soc, 2011, 32: 2003–2007

    Google Scholar 

  119. Mulvihill MJ, Ling XY, Henzie J, Yang PD. Anisotropic etching of silver nanoparticles for plasmonic structures capable of single-particle SERS. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132: 268–274

    Google Scholar 

  120. Senapati T, Senapati D, Singh AK, et al. Highly selective SERS probe for Hg(II) detection using tryptophan-protected popcorn shaped gold nanoparticles. Chem Commun, 2011, 47: 10326–10328

    Google Scholar 

  121. Ma W, Sun MZ, Xu LG, et al. A SERS active gold nanostar dimer for mercury ion detection. Chem Commun, 2013, 49: 4989–4991

    Google Scholar 

  122. Zamarion VM, Timm RA, Araki K, Toma HE, Ultrasensitive SERS nanoprobes for hazardous metal ions based on trimercaptotriazine-modified gold nanoparticles. Inorg Chem, 2008, 47: 2934–2936

    Google Scholar 

  123. Tan EZ, Yin PG, Lang XF, Zhang HY, Guo L. A novel surface-enhanced Raman scattering nanosensor for detecting multiple heavy metal ions based on 2-mercaptoisonicotinic acid functionalized gold nanoparticles. Spectrochim Acta, Part A, 2012, 97: 1007–1012

    Google Scholar 

  124. Qian HF, Pretzer LA, Velazquez JC, Zhao Z, Wong MS. Gold nanoparticles for cleaning contaminated water. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 2013, 88: 735–741

    Google Scholar 

  125. Thatai S, Khurana P, Boken J, Prasad S, Kumar D. Nanoparticles and core-shell nanocomposite based new generation water remediation materials and analytical techniques: a review. Microchem J, 2014, 116: 62–76

    Google Scholar 

  126. Ojea-Jimenez I, Lopez X, Arbiol J, Puntes V. Citrate-coated gold nanoparticles as smart scavengers for mercury(II) removal from polluted waters. ACS Nano, 2012, 6: 2253–2260

    Google Scholar 

  127. Sumesh E, Bootharaju MS, Pradeep AT. A practical silver nanoparticle-based adsorbent for the removal of Hg2+ from water. J Hazard Mater, 2011, 189: 450–457

    Google Scholar 

  128. Qi XX, Li NJ, Xu QF, et al. Water-soluble Fe3O4 superparamagnetic nanocomposites for the removal of low concentration mercury(II) ions from water. RSC Adv., 2014, 4: 47643–47648

    Google Scholar 

  129. Gupta A, Vidyarthi SR, Sankararamakrishnan N. Enhanced sorption of mercury from compact fluorescent bulbs and contaminated water streams using functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Hazard Mater, 2014, 274: 132–144

    Google Scholar 

  130. Qu Z, Yan LL, Li L, et al. Ultraeffective ZnS nanocrystals sorbent for mercury(II) removal based on size-dependent cation exchange. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 18026–18032

    Google Scholar 

  131. Kandjani AE, Sabri YM, Mohammad-Taheri M, Bansal V, Bhargava SK. Detect, remove and reuse: a new paradigm in sensing and removal of Hg (II) from wastewater via SERS-active ZnO/Ag nanoarrays. Environ Sci Technol, 2015, 3: 1578–1584

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinhua Zhan.

Additional information

Junling Duan was born in 1981. She received her PhD from the Department of Chemistry of Shandong University, Jinan, China, in 2012. Currently, she is a lecturer in the College of Chemistry and Material Science, Shandong Agricultural University. Her research interests include the development of nanomaterials-based optical sensors for the detection of heavy metal ions.

Jinhua Zhan was born in 1974 in Anhui Province of China. He received his BSc in Chemistry from Northeast Normal University in 1996, and PhD in Chemistry from University of Science and Technology of China in 2000. Then he became a postdoctoral fellow at Taiwan University. He joined the National Institute for Materials Science as a special researcher in 2003. He became a full professor of chemistry at Shandong University in 2006. Up to now, he has published more than 110 papers in the international peer-reviewed journals. These papers have been cited above 3000 times. His h-index reaches 33. His current research interests include nanomaterials synthesis and their applications for environmental sensors and biosensors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, J., Zhan, J. Recent developments on nanomaterials-based optical sensors for Hg2+ detection. Sci. China Mater. 58, 223–240 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-015-0031-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-015-0031-8

Keywords

Navigation