Abstract
The nature of quality within home-based early childhood education (HBECE) services is important, since all children have the right to access high quality ECE whether it is centre or home-based. HBECE services are increasing more rapidly than other EC services in New Zealand, and their flexible hours, local contexts, and favourable ratios and group size, are attractive to many parents. Yet recently the Early Childhood Taskforce was critical of the quality of education and care provided in HBECE, especially the lack of educator training. Research suggests that the following are critical components of quality in HBECE: educators’ general education, specialized EC training (especially recent), professional development opportunities, supervision by visiting teachers, networking opportunities and professional attitudes and practices. HBECE services can be of high quality, provided that there are opportunities and incentives for educator training and networking, and visiting teachers have frequent contact with educators, offering support and monitoring.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
While I was a member of that taskforce, I did not necessarily agree with all of its recommendations.
Observational record of the caregiving environment.
Home Observation for the Measurement of the Environment.
Family Day Care Rating scale.
References
Carroll-Lind, J., & Angus, J. (2011). Through their lens: An inquiry into non-parental education and care of infants and toddlers. Wellington, New Zealand: Office of the Commissioner for Children.
Clarke-Stewart, K. A., Vandell, D. V., Burchinal, M., O’Brien, M., & McCartney, K. (2002). Do regulable features of child-care homes affect children’s development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(1), 52–86.
Coley, R. L., Chase-Landsdale, P. L., & Li-Grining, C. P. (2001). Child care in the era of welfare reform: Quality, choices and preferences. Welfare, children and families: A three-city study. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
Dalli, C., & Te One, S. (2003). Early childhood education in 2002: Pathways to the future. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 12, 177–202.
Dalli, C., White, J., Rockel, J., Duhn, I., Buchanan, E., Davidson, S., et al. (2011). Quality early childhood education for under two-year olds: What should it look like? A literature review. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Doherty, G., Forer, B., Lero, D. S., Goelman, H., & LaGrange, A. (2006). Predictors of quality in family child care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 296–312.
Early Childhood Taskforce. (2011). An agenda for amazing children: Final report of the ECE Taskforce. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Education Counts. (2013). Annual ECE Census Summary Report 2012. Retrieved September 5, 2013 from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/statistics/ece2/annual-ece-summary-reports.
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations. (2008). Retrieved September 12, 2013 from http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2008/0204/latest/DLM1412501.html.
Education Review Office. (2009). The quality of education and care in home-based early childhood services., Early childhood monographs Wellington, New Zealand: Education Review Office.
Education Review Office. (2013). He Pou Tātaki: How ERO reviews early childhood services. Retrieved October 14, 2014 from http://www.ero.govt.nz/Review-Process/For-Early-Childhood-Services-and-Nga-Kohanga-Reo/Review-Documentation.
Everiss, L., & Dalli, C. (2003). Family day care in New Zealand: Training, quality and professional status. In A. Mooney & J. Statham (Eds.), Family day care: International perspectives on policy, practice and quality (pp. 59–77). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Groenveld, M. G., Vermeer, H. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Linting, M. (2011). Enhancing home-based child care quality through video-feedback intervention: A randomized control trial. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(1), 86–96.
Kyle, I. J. (2003). Agency and ethics: Family day care providers’ perspectives on quality. In A. Mooney & J. Statham (Eds.), Family day care: International perspectives on policy, practice and quality (pp. 129–147). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Meade, A. (1988). Education to be more: Report of the early childhood care and education working party. Wellington: Government Printer.
Ministry of Education. (2014). Establishing a home based service. Early Childhood Lead. Retrieved September 25, 2014 from http://www.lead.ece.govt.nz/ManagementInformation/EstablishingAnECEService/EstablishingAHomeBasedService.aspx.
Mitchell, L., Wylie, C., & Carr, M. (2008). Outcomes of early childhood education: Literature review: Report to the Ministry of Education. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council of Educational Research.
Moss, P. (2003). Conclusion: whither family day care? In A. Mooney & J. Statham (Eds.), Family day care: International perspectives on policy, practice and quality (pp. 234–243). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). Child care and child development: Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. New York: The Guildford Press.
Phillips, B. M., & Morse, E. E. (2011). Family child care learning environments: caregiver knowledge and practices related to early literacy and mathematics. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39, 213–222.
Raikes, H. A., Raikes, H. H., & Wilcox, B. (2005). Regulation, subsidy receipt and provider characteristics: What predicts quality in child care homes? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 164–184.
Rosenthal, M. (2003). Family day care in Israel: Policy, quality and the daily experience of children. In A. Mooney & J. Statham (Eds.), Family day care: International perspectives on policy, practice and quality (pp. 93–110). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Sheridan, S. (2007). Dimensions of pedagogical quality in preschool. International Journal of Early Years Education, 15(2), 197–217.
Smith, A. B. (1980). A community child care scheme in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 5(2), 26–31.
Smith, A. B. (2007a). Children’s rights and early childhood education: Links to theory and advocacy. Australian Journal of Early Childhood., 32(3), 1–8.
Smith, A. B. (2007b). Children and young people’s participation rights in education. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 15, 147–164.
Smith, A. B. (2013). UNCRC and rights based EC policy in New Zealand ECE: How are we doing? Early Education, 54, 6–11. Spring/Summer.
Smith, A. B., Grima, G., Gaffney, M., & Powell, K. (2000). Early childhood education: Literature review report to Ministry of Education. Dunedin: Children’s Issues Centre.
Smith, A. B., & May, H. (2006). Early Childhood Care and Education in Aotearoa – New Zealand. In E. Melhuish & K. Petrogiannis (Eds.), Early childhood care and education: International perspectives (pp. 95–114). London: Routledge.
Smith, A. B., & Swain, D. (1988). Childcare in New Zealand: People, programmes and politics. Wellington, New Zealand: Bridget Williams Books.
United Nations. (1989). United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Geneva: United Nations. Retrieved February 16, 2013 from http://treaties.un.org/pages/viewdetails.aspx?src=treaty&mtdsg_no=iv-11&chapter=4&lang=en.
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2006). General Comment No. 7 (2005). Implementing child rights in early childhood. Geneva: CRC/C/GC/7/Rev 1. Retrieved March 17, 2013 from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/AdvanceVersions/GeneralComment7Rev1.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, A.B. Can Home-Based Care Offer High Quality Early Childhood Education?. NZ J Educ Stud 50, 71–85 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0009-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0009-9