Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cobalt Dissolution from Concentrate in Sulfuric Acid—Ferrous Sulfate System: Process Parameters Optimization by Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is dedicated to exploring the effect of pH, leaching time, ferrous sulfate amount, temperature, as well as their interaction on the dissolution of cobalt by response surface methodology. The ferrous sulfate was used as an effective reducing agent for the dissolution of heterogenite, which constitutes the main cobalt mineral found in Congolese Copperbelt, and the experiments conducted were based on central composite design. Analysis of variance was carried out to study the effects of the individual variable as well as their combined interactive effects on the recovery of cobalt. The optimum process conditions for the cobalt recovery were determined by a desirability function. The results showed that the amount of ferrous sulfate, leaching time, and leaching temperature were statistically significant as independent linear terms. The results also revealed that the interaction of leaching time and the amount of ferrous sulfate has an important effect on cobalt dissolution. The optimal cobalt recovery was 95.79% at the leaching time of 104.48 min, pH of 1.87, amount of ferrous sulfate of 14.9 g, and temperature of 54.8 °C, while the experiment of validation at these optimum conditions gave the cobalt recovery of 93.82%. This testifies on the goodness of the model developed in this work, thus, verifying that the model is suitable and fits the experimental data with a reasonable error.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swartz B, Donegan S, Amos SR (2009) Processing considerations for cobalt recovery from Congolese copperbelt ores. In: Hydrometallurgy conference, pp 385–400

  2. Laznicka P (2010) Giant metallic deposits: future sources of industrial metals, 2nd edn. Springer

  3. Mbuya B, Ntakamusthi P, Bill M, Léon K, Nkulu G (2021) Metallurgical evaluation of the leaching behavior of copper–cobalt-bearing ores by the principal component analysis approach: case study of the DRC copperbelt ore deposits. J Sustain Metall 7(3):985–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-021-00389-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferron CJ, Henry P (2008) The use of ferrous sulphate to enhance the dissolution of cobaltic minerals. In: Hydrometallurgy 2008: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium, pp. 1088–1097

  5. Bevandić S, Xanthopoulos P, Muchez P (2021) Chemical leaching of sulfidic mining waste, plombières tailings pond, Eastern Belgium: insights from a mineralogical approach. J Sustain Metall 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-021-00445-0

  6. Everaert M, Guerrero F, Kamariah N, Spooren J (2021) Fundamental insights in alcoholic ammoniacal systems for selective solvometallurgical extraction of Cu, Zn, and Pb from tailings. J Sustain Metall 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-021-00382-y

  7. Kasongo KB, Mwanat HM (2021) Application of Taguchi method and artificial neural network model for the prediction of reductive leaching of cobalt(III) from oxidised low-grade ores. S Afr J Sci 117(5):1–8. https://doi.org/10.17159/SAJS.2021/8743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Apua MC, Bafubiandi AFM (2011) Dissolution of oxidised Co–Cu ores using hydrochloric acid in the presence of ferrous chloride. Hydrometallurgy 108(3–4):233–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.04.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferron CJ (2008) Sulfur dioxide: a versatile reagent for the processing of cobaltic oxide minerals. JOM 60:50–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tekin T, Bayramoǧlu M (1993) Kinetics of the reduction of MnO2 with Fe2+ ions in acidic solutions. Hydrometallurgy 32(1):9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-386X(93)90053-G

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Das SC, Sahoo PK, Rao PK (1982) Extraction of manganese from low-grade manganese ores by FeSO4 leaching. Hydrometallurgy 8(1):35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-386X(82)90029-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mbuya BI, Kime MB, Tshimombo AMD (2017) Comparative study of approaches based on the Taguchi and ANOVA for optimising the leaching of copper–cobalt flotation tailings. Chem Eng Commun 204(4):512–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2017.1278588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kime M-B, Kanowa EK, Mulaba-Bafubiandi AF, Diyambi SN (2016) Value recovery from mukondo mine low-grade cobalt ore by heap leaching and solvent extraction value recovery from mukondo mine low-grade cobalt ore by heap leaching and solvent extraction. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35313.28001

  14. Hamzaoui AH, Jamoussi B, M’nif A (2008) Lithium recovery from highly concentrated solutions: Response surface methodology (RSM) process parameters optimization. Hydrometallurgy 90(1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2007.09.005

  15. Herzog MH, Francis G, Clarke A (2019) Understanding statistics and experimental design: how to not lie with statistics. Springer

  16. Montgomery DC (2017) Design and analysis of experiments, Ninth. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  17. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM (2016) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 4th edn. Wiley series in probability and statistics

  18. Bhattacharya S (2016) Central composite design for response surface methodology and its application in pharmacy. In: Response surface methodology in engineering science design, IntechOpen, pp 1–19

  19. Goupy J, Creighton L (2009) Introduction aux plans d’expériences. Dunod

  20. Simate GS, Ndlovu S, Gericke M (2009) Bacterial leaching of nickel laterites using chemolithotrophic microorganisms: process optimisation using response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design. Hydrometallurgy 98(3–4):241–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.05.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmadi A, Rezaei M, Sadeghieh SM (2021) Interaction effects of flotation reagents for SAG mill reject of copper sulphide ore using response surface methodology. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China (English Ed.), 31(3):792–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(21)65539-5.

  22. Imoisili PE, Jen TC (2021) Modelling and optimization of the impact strength of plantain (Musa paradisiacal) fibre/MWCNT hybrid nanocomposite using response surface methodology. J Mater Res Technol 13:1946–1954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.05.101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mbuya BI, Kime MB, Kawama FN, Arad S (2021) Application of the response surface methodology to determine optimal conditions of castine calcination in a full-scale rotary kiln. Miner Process Extr Metall Trans Inst Min Metall 130(2):105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/25726641.2019.1591792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li D, Park KH, Wu Z, Guo XY (2010) Response surface design for nickel recovery from laterite by sulfation-roasting-leaching process. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China (English Ed.) 20(SUPPL.1):s92–s96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60019-2

  25. Jalali F, Fakhari J, Zolfaghari A (2019) Response surface modeling for lab-scale column bioleaching of low-grade uranium ore using a new isolated strain of Acidithiobacillus Ferridurans. Hydrometallurgy 185:194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.02.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wan Omar WNN, Amin NAS (2016) Multi response optimization of oil palm frond pretreatment by ozonolysis. Ind Crops Prod 85:389–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.01.027

  27. Yirgu Z, Leta S, Hussen A, Khan MM, Aragaw T (2021) Optimization of microwave-assisted carbohydrate extraction from indigenous Scenedesmus sp. grown in brewery effluent using response surface methodology. Heliyon 7(5):e07115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07115

  28. Afolabi FO, Musonge P, Bakare BF (2021) Application of the response surface methodology in the removal of Cu2+ and Pb2+ from aqueous solutions using orange peels. Sci Afr e00931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00931

  29. Li YR, Shue MF, Hsu YC, Lai WL, Chen JJ (2014) Application of factorial design methodology for optimization of transesterification reaction of microalgae lipids. Energy Procedia 52:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Peng C, Hamuyuni J, Wilson BP, Lundström M (2018) Selective reductive leaching of cobalt and lithium from industrially crushed waste Li-ion batteries in sulfuric acid system. Waste Manag 76:582–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kasongo B, Monga J-J, Mwanat H (2021) Implementation of Artificial Neural network into the copper and cobalt leaching process. In: 2021 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA), pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA52254.2021.9377230

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Metallurgy and Materials, Faculty of Engineering, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo

    Mbal Henock-Michel Mwanat

  2. Department of Metallurgy, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein Campus, P.O. Box 17911, Johannesburg, 2028, South Africa

    Kubangala Brest Kasongo

  3. Metlab Solutions (MS) Ltd, Haut-Katanga, 10 Koni, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo

    Mbal Henock-Michel Mwanat & Kubangala Brest Kasongo

Authors
  1. Mbal Henock-Michel Mwanat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kubangala Brest Kasongo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MH-MM: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. KBK: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kubangala Brest Kasongo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

The contributing editor for this article was Atsushi Shibayama.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mwanat, M.HM., Kasongo, K.B. Cobalt Dissolution from Concentrate in Sulfuric Acid—Ferrous Sulfate System: Process Parameters Optimization by Response Surface Methodology (RSM). J. Sustain. Metall. 7, 1838–1851 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-021-00460-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-021-00460-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation