Skip to main content
Log in

The historical development of the basic ideas concerning chemical equilibrium

  • Lecture Text
  • Published:
ChemTexts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper outlines the historical evolution of the concept of chemical affinity that eventually supported the concept of chemical equilibrium. It provides the theoretical roots that grounded the following four key basic ideas of chemical equilibrium: ‘reversibility’, ‘incomplete reaction’, ‘equilibrium constant’ and ‘dynamic equilibrium’. The starting point of this historical reconstruction is the state of the art in the elaboration of the first affinity tables, based on the concept of elective affinities, during the eighteenth century. It is discussed how Berthollet reworked this idea, considering that the amount of the substances involved in a reaction was an essential factor determining its direction, which accounted for the early concepts of incomplete reaction and reversibility. Guldberg and Waage considered the concentrations of the chemicals involved, instead of their mass and formulated the first mathematical equations accounting for chemical equilibrium reactions. Afterwards, it is presented how Pfaundler provided the seminal ideas concerning a dynamical molecular interpretation of the macroscopic properties of equilibrium reactions. This material is intended to serve as a supplementary reading for an introductory course in physical chemistry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Two English translations are available: (a) Concerning the different affinities observed in chemistry between different substances In: Leicester HM, Klickstein HS (1963) A Source Book in Chemistry, 1400–1900. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 67–75; (b) Geoffroy EF (1996) Table of the different relations observed in chemistry between different substances, Science in Context 9:313–319. The quotations given in this paper refer to the first one.

  2. Page 68.

  3. Page 68.

  4. Page 11.

  5. Pages 6–7.

  6. Page 199.

  7. Page 199.

  8. Page 199.

  9. Page 74.

  10. Page 1045.

  11. Page 1046.

  12. Page 7.

  13. Page 10.

  14. Page 74.

  15. Page 303.

  16. Page 303.

  17. Page 24.

  18. Translated: Pfaundler L (2011) A Contribution to Chemical Statics, Bull Hist Chem 36(2):87–97. The quotations given in this paper refer to this recent translation.

  19. Page 88.

References

  1. Geoffroy EF (1718) Table des Differents Rapports Observés en Chimie entre Differentes Substances, Memoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences 202–212

  2. Bergman T (1785) A Dissertation on Elective Attractions, (2nd Edn). Frank Cass & Co Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weller SW (1999) Napoleon Bonaparte, French Scientists, chemical equilibrium, and mass action. Bull Hist Chem 24:61–65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leicester HM, Klickstein HS (1963) A source book in chemistry, 1400–1900. Harvard University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gay-Lussac LJ (1816) Observations sur l’oxydation de quelques métaux. Crochard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gay-Lussac LJ (1839) Considerations sur les Forces Chimiques. Annales de Chimie et de Physique 70:407–434

    Google Scholar 

  7. Malaguti MJ (1853) Exposition de Quelques Faits Relatifs a l’Action Réciproque des Sels Solubles. Annales de Chimie et de Physique 37:198–206

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gladstone JH (1855) On circumstances modifying the action of chemical affinity. Philosophical Transactions 145:179–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gladstone JH (1857) Some experiments illustrative of the reciprocal decomposition of salts. Q J Chem Soc 9:144–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ostwald W (1914) L’Évolution d’une Science: la Chimie. Flamarion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guldberg CM, Waage P (1867) Études sur les Affinités Chimiques. Christiania University, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  12. Waage P, Guldberg CM (1962) (Translated by Abrash, H.I.) Studies concerning affinity. J Chem Educ 63:1044–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ostwald W (1980) Outlines of general chemistry. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lund EW, Hassel O (1964) Guldberg and Waage and the law of mass action In: Bastiansen O (ed) The law of mass action. A centenary volume, 1864–1964. Det Noske Videnskaps-Akademi Oslo, Oslo, pp. 37–46

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lund EW (1965) Guldberg and Waage and the law of mass action. J Chem Educ 42:548–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Laidler KJ (1995) The world of physical chemistry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  17. King MC (1981) Experiments with time: progress and problems in the development of chemical kinetics. Ambix 28:70–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Guldberg CM, Waage P (1879) Über Die Chemische Affinität. J Prakt Chem 127:69–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lemoine MG (1882) Études sur les Équilibres Chimiques. In: Fremy M (ed) Encyclopédie Chimique, Tome I. Dunod, Paris, pp 69–372

    Google Scholar 

  20. Williamson AW (1851) Suggestions for the Dynamics of Chemistry Derived from the Theory of Etherification, Notices of the Proceedings at the Meetings of Members of the Royal Institution 1:7–24

  21. Pfaundler L (1867) Beiträge zur Chemischen Statik. Ann Phys 131:55–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Quílez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quílez, J. The historical development of the basic ideas concerning chemical equilibrium. ChemTexts 3, 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40828-017-0040-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40828-017-0040-1

Keywords

Navigation