Skip to main content
Log in

Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Uncertain Linguistic Multi-attribute Decision-Making Method for Plant Location Selection with Partitioned Hamy Mean

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant location selection (PLS) is a typical and complex multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problem, which requires consideration of several alternatives and multiple attributes. However, existing research results on PLS lack sufficient consideration of complex relationship patterns between attributes, which often leads to inaccurate decision results. Thus, in this paper, a new MAGDM technique is proposed to solve the problem of PLS, in which complex interrelationship structures exist between multi-inputs and attribute values are represented as interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables (IVIULVs). First, to solve the shortcomings of the existing operations, some new operational rules are redefined for IVIULVs based on linguistic scale functions and Archimedean T-conorms and T-norms. These new rules of operation hold the closedness, and are flexible for semantic transformation processing. Then, to more accurately reflect the partition structure and the complex interrelationship pattern among multi-input arguments, we extend the traditional Hamy mean and propose the partitioned Hamy mean (PHAM), which can eliminate the impact of unrelated attributes on the results and meet the semantic conversion needs of different decision makers. Furthermore, we develop two new fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators: interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic PHAM (IVIULPHAM) and its weighted version (IVIULWPHAM). Finally, a novel MAGDM technique (IVIUL-MAGDM) based on the IVIULWPHAM operator is proposed to solve the problem of PLS. Several examples of PLS are also illustrated to show the validity and advantages of the IVIUL-MAGDM method by comparing with the other existing MAGDM methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. Mousavi, S.M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Heydar, M., Ebrahimnejad, S.: Multi-criteria decision making for plant location selection: an integrated delphicahpcpromethee methodology. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 38(5), 1255–1268 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kheybari, S., Kazemi, M., Rezaei, J.: Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method. Appl. Energy 242, 612–623 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Inform. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20(1), 87–96 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, D.-F., Chen, G.-H., Huang, Z.-G.: Linear programming method for multiattribute group decision making using if sets. Inform. Sci. 180(9), 1591–1609 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Atanassov, K., Gargov, G.: Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 31(3), 343–349 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, Z., Liu, P., Liang, X.: Multiple attribute decision-making method for dealing with heterogeneous relationship among attributes and unknown attribute weight information under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(9), 1900–1928 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu, G.-F., Li, D.-F., Fei, W.: A novel method for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making with preference deviation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 124, 58–64 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu, X., Liao, H.: A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 272(3), 1017–1027 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, D.-F., Nan, J.-X.: Extension of the topsis for multi-attribute group decision making under atanassov ifs environments. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Appl. 1(4), 47–61 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, Z., Liu, P., Liu, W., Pang, J.: Pythagorean uncertain linguistic partitioned bonferroni mean operators and their application in multi-attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 32(3), 2779–2790 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Garg, H., Agarwal, N., Tripathi, A.: Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measure of order \(\alpha \) and degree \(\beta \) and its applications to multi-criteria decision making problem. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Appl. 6(1), 86–107 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yager, R.R., Petry, F.E.: Crisply implementing subjective fuzzy requirements. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Appl. 6(3), 1–5 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dutta, P.: Medical diagnosis based on distance measures between picture fuzzy sets. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Appl. 7(4), 15–36 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, Z., Wang, S., Liu, P.: Multiple attribute group decision making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy heronian mean operators. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(12), 2341–2363 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Devi, K., Yadav, S.P.: A multicriteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for plant location selection with electre method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 66(9–12), 1219–1229 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Erdin, C., Akbaş, H.E.: A comparative analysis of fuzzy topsis and geographic information systems (gis) for the location selection of shopping malls: A case study from turkey. Sustainability 11(14), 3837 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, Y., Sun, X., Lu, Z., Zhou, J., Xu, C.: Optimal site selection of straw biomass power lant under 2-dimension uncertain linguistic environment. J. Cleaner Prod. 212, 1179–1192 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobina, A., Liang, D., He, X.: Probabilistic linguistic power aggregation operators for multi-criteria group decision making. Symmetry 9(12), 320 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fu, Z., Wu, X., Liao, H., Herrera, F.: Underground mining method selection with the hesitant fuzzy linguistic gained and lost dominance score method. IEEE Access 6, 66442–66458 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liang, D., Kobina, A., Quan, W.: Grey relational analysis method for probabilistic linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making based on geometric bonferroni mean. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(7), 2234–2244 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wan, S.-P., Li, D.-F.: Fuzzy linmap approach to heterogeneous madm considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees. Omega 41(6), 925–940 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liao, H., Qin, R., Gao, C., Wu, X., Hafezalkotob, A., Herrera, F.: Score-hedlisf: a score function of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set based on hesitant degrees and linguistic scale functions: An application to unbalanced hesitant fuzzy linguistic multimoora. Inform. Fusion 48, 39–54 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fu, Z., Liao, H.: Unbalanced double hierarchy linguistic term set: the topsis method for multi-expert qualitative decision making involving green mine selection. Inform. Fusion 51, 271–286 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoningłi. Inform. Sci. 8(3), 199–249 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. In: IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems, 8(6), 746–752 (2000)

  27. Xu, Z.: Induced uncetain linguistic owa operators applied to group decision making. Inform. Fusion 7(2), 231–238 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. In: IEEE transactions on fuzzy systems, vol. 20, pp. 109–119 (2012)

  29. Liu, P., Jin, F.: Interval-valued intuitionistic intuitionistic uncertain linguistic aggregation operators and their application to group decision making. J Ind. Eng. Manag. 28(1), 124–130 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Meng, F., Chen, X., Zhang, Q.: Some interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic choquet operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. Appl. Math. Model. 38(9–10), 2543–2557 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, H., Quan, M., Li, Z., Wang, Z.: A new integrated mcdm model for sustainable supplier selection under interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic environment. Inform. Sci. 486, 254–270 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang, J., Meng, F., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A procedure for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic linguistic fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 1–35 (2019)

  33. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 115(1), 67–82 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu, Z.: Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega 33(3), 249–254 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hara, T., Uchiyama, M., Takahasi, S.-E.: A refinement of various mean inequalities. J Inequal. Appl. 2(4), 387–395 (1998)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu, Z., Liu, P.: Intuitionistic uncertain linguistic partitioned bonferroni means and their application to multiple attribute decision-making. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 48(5), 1092–1105 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, J., Wu, J., Wang, J., Zhang, H., Chen, X.: Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Inform. Sci. 288, 55–72 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Dutta, B., Guha, D.: Partitioned bonferroni mean based on linguistic 2-tuple for dealing with multi-attribute group decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 37, 166–179 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu, P., Liu, Z., Zhang, X.: Some intuitionistic uncertain linguistic heronian mean operators and their application to group decision making. Appl. Math. Comput. 230(12), 570–586 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Zheng, Z., Li, J.: Optimal chiller loading by improved invasive weed optimization algorithm for reducing energy consumption. Energy Buildings 161, 80–88 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yu, G.-F., Fei, W., Li, D.-F.: A compromise-typed variable weight decision method for hybrid multiattribute decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 27(5), 861–872 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Duan, P.Y., Li, J.Q., Wang, Y., Sang, H.Y., Jia, B.X.: Solving chiller loading optimization problems using an improved teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm. Optimal Control Appl. Methods 39(1), 65–77 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was Funded by the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project of Ministry of Education of China (No. 17YJA630065), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. ZR2017MG007), the Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program (No. J16LN25), the National Science Foundation of China (No. 71771140), and the Special Funds of Taishan Scholars Project of Shandong Province (No. ts201511045).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengmin Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Z., Xu, H., Liu, P. et al. Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Uncertain Linguistic Multi-attribute Decision-Making Method for Plant Location Selection with Partitioned Hamy Mean. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 22, 1993–2010 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00736-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00736-5

Keywords

Navigation