Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical evaluation of the general flow hydraulics and estimation of the river plain by solving the Saint–Venant equation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Continuity and momentum equations govern the movement of unsteady flows in open channels, known as Saint–Venant equations. Numerical models of flood routing are classified according to the simplifications made in these equations. Among the flood routing methods, one can refer to dynamic wave and kinematic models and the Att-Kin and Muskingum hydrological models. The kinematic-wave model solves the Saint–Venant equations approximately by considering the gravity and the frictional force terms. This method assumes that the slopes of the energy gradient and the bed slope are equal. The full dynamic wave model uses all the terms in the Saint–Venant equation to simulate unsteady flows. Besides, given the historical records of the past floods and based on the flow continuity equation, the Att-Kin and Muskingum hydrological models deal with flood routing operations. This study describes the principles of Saint–Venant equations and numerical models of dynamic and kinematic-waves, as well as Att-Kin and Muskingum models, the results of which are compared. For this purpose, the Mehrian River range was used. The maximum flood discharge, the maximum area of the river flood plain, and the maximum flood flow width were estimated by presenting a new mathematical relation. The results showed that the MIKE 11 dynamic wave model yields better results than other models by solving partial differential equations. Moreover, among the hydrological methods, the mathematical flood routing and zoning indicate the closeness of Muskingum hydrological results using the least-squares model and the least error with the numerical values of the software for the observed flood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott MB (1979) Computational hydraulic. Pitman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Akan AO (2006) Open channel hydraulics. Chapter 8: Introduction to unsteady open channel flow. Elsevier, p 364

  • Akbari G (2013) A case study of flood dynamic wave simulation in natural water-ways using numerical solution of unsteady flows. CMCE J 3(2):66–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbari G (2014) Optimal methods on hydrologic flow routing operations. In: 8th national congress of civil engineering, Babol Noushirvani Industrial University

  • Aldama AA (1990) Least-square parameter estimation for muskingum flood routing. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 116(4):580–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alizadeh A (2013) The principles of applied hydrology, 36th edn. Imam Reza (AS) University, Mashhad

    Google Scholar 

  • Amein M, Fang CS (1970) Implicit flood routing in natural channels. J Hydraul Div Am Soc Civ Eng 96(2):2481–2500

    Google Scholar 

  • Azimian A (2011) Computational fluid dynamics, 4th edn. Isfahan University of Technology, Iran, p 584

    Google Scholar 

  • Balatzler RA, Lai C (1968) Computer simulation of unsteady flows in waterways. J Hydraul Div ASCE 94(HY4):1083–1117

    Google Scholar 

  • Coratol T, Moramarco1 T, Tucciarelli (2011) Discharge estimation combining flow routing and occasional measurements of velocity. Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union

  • Fread DL (1973) Technique for implicit dynamic routing in river with tributaries. Water Resour Res 9(4):919–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghivechi M, Fadafan M (2011) Calibration of simple flood routing methods with dynamic wave method in Karoon River. In: 4th water resources management conference, Tehran, Amirkabir University of Technology

  • Goodarzi MR, Hoseini A (2015) Numerical modeling of hydraulic assessment of the flood and zoning by Saint–Venant in the River Bostanak. In: 1st national conference on architecture and civil engineering

  • Haghighi A, Ashrafi M (2006) A comparative study of dynamic and kinematic wave in flood routing in river engineering studies. In: 7th international conference on river engineering, Ahvaz, Water and Power Organization of Khuzestan, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

  • Karimian KR, Honarbakhsh A, Sadhi Samani AR (2011) Hydraulic flood routing using kinematic wave model and HEC-RAS software case study: Dams Samami River. Fourth Water Resources Conference, Amir Kabir University Iran, Tehran

  • McCuen RH (2011) Hydrologic analysis and design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Mike Software User Guide (2011) MIKE 11 a modeling system for rivers and channels. User’s Manual, 11 4.10

  • Preissmann A, Cunge J (1961) Calcul du mascaret sur machines electroniques. La Houille Blanche 5:588–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safavi HR (2014) Engineering hydrology, 4th edn. Isfahan University of Technology

  • Shuai S, Zheng X, Li F, Tian S, Lin G (2014) Flood routing simulation and system customization for a high-leakage river channel in China. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 139(6):656–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz MJ, Crosby EC, McEnery JA (2008) Kinematic wave technique applied to hydrologic distributed modeling using stationary storm events: an application to synthetic rectangular basins and an actual watershed. University of Texas at Arlington, Department of Civil Engineering

  • Stocker JJ (1957) Water waves. Inter science publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm TW (2001) Open channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Timbadiya PL, Patel PD, Porey PD (2014) One-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling of flooding and stage hydrographs in the lower Tapi River in India. Curr Sci 106:708–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahiri A, Sharifan S, Tamadoni S (2012) Optimization of Muskingum method for flood routing in flooded rivers. In: 1st international conference and third national conference on dam and hydroelectric power plants, Tehran

Download references

Funding

Our article does not belong to any particular organization and has not been sponsored. And the information for this article is taken from the data available on the Internet.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Roohi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roohi, M., Soleymani, K., Salimi, M. et al. Numerical evaluation of the general flow hydraulics and estimation of the river plain by solving the Saint–Venant equation. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 6, 645–658 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00718-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00718-9

Keywords

Navigation