Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hydrological modelling of ungauged urban watershed using SWAT model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of urbanization on hydrological processes and water resources have been quantified and predicted by detailed characterization and modeling of the affected urban area. The model of the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) has been selected to test its applicability in ungauged urban watershed of Vadodara city, Gujarat India. The main objective of this work is to study the SWAT model and its applicability i.e. test and assess the capabilities, and performance of SWAT model for Vadodara city, which is ungauged urban area by simulating the water balance components in order to understand the status of hydrological process and water resources in that area. The Vadodara city watershed is ungauged. Therefore, a regionalization approach has used to predict the river discharge at the outlet of the watershed. SUFI-2 algorism using SWAT-CUP2012 used for calibration and validation of runoff process has been done on monthly basis. The model was calibrated and validated based on the comparison of simulated and observed flow rates at the basin outlet for the periods 1979–2001 and 2002–2013 respectively. Therefore, for the monthly time step, the application of the NSE values was 0.53 and 0.61, the determining coefficient (R2) was 0.69 and 0.51, while the value of PBIAS was 5.3 and 10.4%, and RSR values were registered as 0.71 and 0.63 for the periods of the calibration and validation process respectively. The result suggests that there has been a good match between simulated and observed flow. Therefore, the model performance is applicable and strong predictive ability for the ungauged watershed of Vadodara city.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaspour KC (2015) SWATCalibration and Uncertainty Programs

  • Abbaspour KC, Johnson CA, Van Genuchten MT (2004) Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure. Vadose Zone J 3(4):1340–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbaspour KC, Vejdani M, Haghighat S (2007) SWATCUP calibration and uncertainty programs for SWAT. In: Oxley L, Kulasiri D (eds) Proceedings of international congress on modelling and simulation (MODSIM’07), 1603–1609. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O’Connell PE, Rasmussen J (1986a) An introduction to the European hydrological system—Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system. J Hydrol 87(1–2):45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O’connell PE, Rasmussen J (1986b) An introduction to the European hydrological system—Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 2: structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system. J Hydrol 87(1–2):61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Fohrer N (2005) SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling. Hydrol Process 19(3):563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development 1. 34(1):73–89

  • Arnold JG, Moriasi DN, Gassman PW, Abbaspour KC, White MJ, Srinivasan R, Santhi C, Harmel RD, Van Griensven A, Van Liew MW, Kannan N (2012) SWAT: model use, calibration, and validation. Trans ASABE 55(4):1491–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bárdossy A (2007) Calibration of hydrological model parameters for ungauged catchments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 11(2):703–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastola S, Ishidaira H, Takeuchi K (2008) Regionalization of hydrological model parameters under parameter uncertainty: a case study involving TOPMODEL and basins across the globe. J Hydrol 357(3–4):188–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braud I, Fletcher TD, Andrieu H (2013) Hydrology of peri-urban catchments: processes and modelling. J Hydrol 485:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey RO, Hochmuth GJ, Martinez CJ, Boyer TH, Dukes MD, Toor GS, Cisar JL (2013) Evaluating nutrient impacts in urban watersheds: challenges and research opportunities. Environ Pollut 173:138–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carle MV, Halpin PN, Stow CA (2005) Patterns of watershed urbanization and impacts on water quality 1

  • Di Luzio M, Srinivasan R, Arnold JC, Neitsch SL (2002) ArcView interface for SWAT2000. User’s guide. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwarakish GS, Ganasri BP (2015) Impact of land use change on hydrological systems: a review of current modeling approaches

  • Eckhardt K, Ulbrich U (2003) Potential impacts of climate change on groundwater recharge and streamflow in a central European low mountain range. J Hydrol 281:244–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher TD, Andrieu H, Hamel P (2013) Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: a state of the art. Adv Water Resour 51:261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2003) The digital soil map of the world and derived soil properties, version 3.6, Rome

  • Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Green CH, Arnold JG (2007) The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions invited review series. Trans Am Soc Agric Biol Eng 50(4):1211–1250

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL (1992) Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Baffins Lane, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves GL, Hargreaves GH, Riley JP (1985) Agricultural benefits for Senegal River basin. J Irrig Drain Eng 111(2):113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison & Whittington, 2002; Eckhardt & Ulbrich, 2003; Haverkamp et al., 2005

  • HEC (Hydrologic Engineering Center) (2000) Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS. User’s Manual, Version 2. Hydrologic Engineering Center; US Army Corps of Engineers, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtan HN, Lopez NC (1971) USDAHL-70 model of watershed hydrology (No. 1435). US Department of Agriculture

  • Kokkonen TS, Jakeman AJ, Young PC, Koivusalo HJ (2003) Predicting daily flows in ungauged catchments: model regionalization from catchment descriptors at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina. Hydrol Process 17(11):2219–2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause P, Boyle DP, Bäse F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosci 5:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JG, Heaney JP (2003) Estimation of urban imperviousness and its impacts on storm water systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 129(5):419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Ascough JC II, Ahuja LR, Shaffer MJ, Hanson JD, Rojas KW (2000) Root zone water quality model sensitivity analysis using monte carlo simulation. Trans ASAE 43(4):883–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre N, Lee H, Wheater H, Young A, Wagener T (2005) Ensemble predictions of runoff in ungauged catchments. Wat Resour Res 41(12)

  • Merz R, Blöschl G (2004) Regionalisation of catchment model parameters. J Hydrol 287(1):95–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra SK, Singh VP (2004) Long-term hydrological simulation based on the soil conservation service curve number. Hydrol Process 18(7):1291–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal A, Khare D, Kundu S, Mishra PK (2014a) Detection of land use change and future prediction with Markov chain model in a part of Narmada River Basin, Madhya Pradesh. In: Landscape Ecology and Water Management. Springer, Japan, pp 3–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal A, Khare D, Kundu S, Mishra PK, Meena PK (2014b) Landuse change prediction and its impact on surface run-off using fuzzy c-mean, Markov chain and curve number methods. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving. Springer, India, pp 365–376

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and the environment. The state and movement of water in living organisms. In: 19th Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 205–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachtergaele F, Velthuizen HV, Verelst L (2009) Har-monized World Soil Database (HWSD). Food and Agri-culture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemczynowicz J (1999) Urban hydrology and water management-present and future challenges. Urban Water 1(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyeko M (2015) Hydrologic modelling of data scarce basin with SWAT model: capabilities and limitations. Water Resour Manag 29(1):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parajka J, Merz R, Blöschl G (2005) A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9(3):157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban environment. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price RK, Vojinovic´ Z (2011) Urban hydroinformatics: data, models and decision support for integrated urban water management. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100(2):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard JC (1997) Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. J Hydrol 198(1):69–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanjay KJ, Jaivir T, Vishal S (2010) Simulation of runoff and sediment yield for a Himalayan watershed using SWAT model. J Water Resour Prot

  • Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, Hauck LM, Dugas WA (2001) Application of a watershed model to evaluate management effects on point and nonpoint source pollution. Trans ASAE 44(6):1559–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer M, Leschik S, Musolff A (2013) Current research in urban hydrogeology—a review. Adv Water Resour 51:280–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava PK, Tripathi MP, Das SN (2004) Hydrological modelling of a small watershed using satellite data and gis technique. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 32(2):145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stonestrom DA, Scanlon BR, Zhang L (2009) Introduction to special section on Impacts of Land Use Change on water resources. Water Resour Res 45:W00A00. doi:10.1029/2009WR007937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun W, Ishidaira H, Bastola S (2012) Calibration of hydrological models in ungauged basins based on satellite radar altimetry observations of river water level. Hydrol Process 26(23):3524–3537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suryavanshi S, Pandey A, Chaube UC (2016) Hydrological simulation of the Betwa River basin (India) using the SWAT model. Hydrol Sci J (just-accepted)

  • Te Chow V (1959) Open channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson AM, Brown RA, Rosenberg NJ, Srinivasan R, Izaurralde C (2005) Climate change impacts for the conterminous USA: an integrated assessment. Clim Change 69:67–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2010) World urbanization prospects: the 2009 revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Population Division), New York

  • US Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS) (1972) National engineering handbook. US Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service. Section IV, hydrology, Washington, DC, pp 4–102

  • Van Griensven A, Bauwens W (2003) Multiobjective auto calibration for semi distributed water quality models. Water Resour Res 39(12):1348–1356

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Liew MW, Schneider JM, Garbrecht JD., 2003, October. Streamflow response of an agricultural watershed to seasonal changes in precipitation. In: Proceedings of the 1st interagency conference on research in the watersheds (ICRW), pp 27–30

  • Vandewiele GL, Elias A (1995) Monthly water balance of ungauged catchments obtained by geographical regionalization. J Hydrol 170(1–4):277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng Q (2001) Modeling urban growth effects on surface runoff with the integration of remote sensing and GIS. Environ Manag 28(6):737–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR (1969) Flood routing with variable travel time or variable storage coefficients. Trans ASAE 12(1):100–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water Resources Development and Management, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India

    Ermias Sisay, Afera Halefom, Deepak Khare, Lakhwinder Singh & Tesfa Worku

Authors
  1. Ermias Sisay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Afera Halefom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deepak Khare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lakhwinder Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tesfa Worku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ermias Sisay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sisay, E., Halefom, A., Khare, D. et al. Hydrological modelling of ungauged urban watershed using SWAT model. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 3, 693–702 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0328-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0328-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation