Skip to main content
Log in

Online P2P Lending and Regulatory Responses in China: Opportunities and Challenges

  • Article
  • Published:
European Business Organization Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a main form of the Fintech industry, China’s online P2P lending market has undergone a period of explosive growth in the past few years to become the largest in the world, with online lending platforms having mushroomed across the country. This is a consequence of the simultaneous emergence of three key factors, namely deep penetration of internet, large supply of funds and unmet financial needs. The market exhibits several distinctive features in terms of the size of platforms, the level of market concentration and business models. As online lending gathers moment in China, many problems have come into light. China has recently established a relatively complete regulatory regime for online lending, introducing a number of significant changes, such as the restriction on the business model that can be adopted by platforms, registration requirements, custodian requirements, information disclosure requirements and lending limits. The new regime will have far-reaching implications, including a reshuffling of the market and more collaboration between online lending platforms and traditional banks. A comparative analysis of the Chinese experience with those in other jurisdictions such as the US, the UK, Hong Kong and Japan is conducted to examine the extent to which the new regime is likely to achieve a proper balance between its two main objectives, namely facilitating the growth of the online lending market and protecting financial consumers. While the new regime is generally sound, its efficacy will ultimately depend on how it is enforced in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. McAuley (2015).

  2. Financial Stability Analysis Group of the People’s Bank of China (2014), p 171.

  3. Steering Group (2016), p 13.

  4. Ibid., pp 15–16.

  5. These terms will be used interchangeably in this paper, but as discussed later, the Chinese law adopts online lending as the formal term.

  6. Moldow (2016).

  7. Wangluo Jiedai Xinxi Zhongjie Jigou Yewu Huodong Guanli Zanxing Banfa (网络借贷信息中介机构业务活动管理暂行办法) [Interim Measures for the Administration of the Business Activities of Online Lending Information Intermediary Institutions] (promulgated on 17 August 2016 by the China Banking Regulatory Commission and others).

  8. Citi GPS (2016), p 54.

  9. This analytical framework is inspired by that Professor Gilson develops to explain the development of the venture capital market. Gilson (2003), pp 1076–1078.

  10. China Internet Network Information Centre (2017).

  11. Woetzel et al. (2014).

  12. Emarketer (2016).

  13. For certain industries such as the housing market, the PBOC may still issue special rules on the lending activities of commercial banks.

  14. The official website of Wangdai Zhijia (网贷之家), http://www.wdzj.com/.

  15. Huang (2010b), p 219.

  16. Huang (2010a), p 157.

  17. World Bank (2013).

  18. Development Bank of Singapore, Ernst and Young (2016).

  19. Shen (2015), p 800.

  20. ‘P2P Lending: Banking without Banks’, The Economist, 1 March 2014.

  21. CrowdfundingHub (2016), p 63.

  22. The figures were calculated using the data collected from Wang Dai Zhi Jia.

  23. FCA (2015), paras. 17–18. In 2014, business loans surpassed personal loans in terms of value for the first time.

  24. Kirby and Worner (2014).

  25. Available at http://www.ppdai.com/. The so-called notary model is similar to the client segregated account model in which the platform also acts as an intermediary between lenders and borrowers. The key difference is, however, that the work of originating loans will rest on a bank instead of the platform itself. After the required money proposed by the borrower is reached, the platform will then issue a note to the lender for his/her contribution to the loan, thus handing over proprietary interest. This note is, in general, a security, and shifts the risk of non-payment of the loan from the bank to the lenders. The notary model is mainly adopted by online lending platforms in the US, such as Prosper.

  26. Aveni (2015), p 19.

  27. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 40.

  28. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 20.

  29. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 11.

  30. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 25.

  31. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 3.

  32. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 10(1).

  33. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 10(2).

  34. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 10(3).

  35. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 10(8).

  36. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 5(2).

  37. Wangluo Jiedai Xinxi Zhongjie BeiAn Dengji Guanli Zhiyin (网络借贷信息中介备案登记管理指引) [Guideline on the Administration of Recordation and Registration of Online Lending Information Intermediary Institutions] (issued by CBRC, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, and State Administration of Industry and Commerce, 28 November 2016).

  38. Guangdongsheng Wangluo Jiedai Xinxi Zhongjie Jigou BeiAn Dengji Guanli Shishi Xize (广东省网络借贷信息中介机构备案登记管理实施细则) [Guangdong Province Implementing Rules on the Administration of Recordation and Registration of Online Lending Information Intermediary Institutions] (issued on 14 February 2017).

  39. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 14.

  40. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 26.

  41. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 17.

  42. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 26.

  43. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 28.

  44. Wangluo Jiedai Zijin Cunguan Yewu Zhiyin (网络借贷资金存管业务指引) [Guideline on the Custodian Business for Online Lending Funds] (issued by China Banking Regulatory Commission on 22 February 2017).

  45. 2017 Guideline on Custodian Business, Art. 5.

  46. 2017 Guideline on Custodian Business, Art. 12.

  47. 2017 Guideline on Custodian Business, Art. 14.

  48. 2017 Guideline on Custodian Business, Arts. 2, 22.

  49. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 30.

  50. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 31.

  51. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 31.

  52. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 31.

  53. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 32.

  54. Hulianwang Jinrong Xinxi Pilu Geti Wangluo Jiedai (互联网金融信息披露个体网络借贷) [Standard on Internet Finance Information Disclosure for Online Lending] (issued by the National Internet Finance Associate of China on 28 October 2016).

  55. Zhongguo Hulianwang Jinrong Xiehui Xinxi Pilu Zilv Guanli Guifan (中国互联网金融协会信息披露自律管理办法) [NIFAC Rule on Self-regulation of Information Disclosure] (issued by the National Internet Finance Associate of China on 28 October 2016).

  56. Wangluo Jiedai Xinxi Zhongjie Jigou Yewu Huodong Xinxi Pilu Zhiyin (网络借贷信息中介机构业务活动信息披露指引) [Guideline on Information Disclosure of the Business Activities of Online Lending Information Intermediary Institutions] (promulgated by the CBRC on 25 August 2017).

  57. The figures were calculated using the data collected from Wang Dai Zhi Jia.

  58. See official website of the China Banking Regulatory Commission, http://www.cbrc.gov.cn/index.html.

  59. Guanyu Yinfa P2P Wangluo Jiedai Fengxian Zhuanxiang Zhengzhi Gongzuo Shishi Fangan de Tongzhi (关于印发P2P网络借贷风险专项整治工作实施方案的通知) [Notice on Issuing the Implementing Plan for the Work on Managing Risks of Online P2P Lending] (issued by the China Banking Regulatory Commission on 13 April 2016).

  60. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 72(3).

  61. The figure was calculated on the basis of the data obtained from Wang Dai Zhi Jia.

  62. The 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 4.

  63. For a more detailed discussion of the institutional structure of China’s financial regulation, see Huang (2010b), p 219.

  64. Zhongguo Yinjianhui Bangongting Guanyu Renrendai Youguan Fengxian Tishi de Tongzhi (中国银监会办公厅关于人人贷有关风险提示的通知) [Notice on Relevant Risks of Peer to Peer Lending by the General Office of China Banking Regulatory Commission] (issued by China Banking Regulatory Commission on 23 August 2011).

  65. Guowuyuan Bangongting Guanyu Jiaqiang Yingzi Yinhang Jianguan Youguan Wenti de Tongzhi (国务院办公厅关于加强影子银行监管有关问题的通知) [Circular of the General Office of the State Council 2005 on Relevant Issues of Strengthening the Regulation of Shadow Banking] (State Council Circular No. 107, 2013) (hereinafter Circular No. 107).

  66. Huang (2015), p 481.

  67. Guanyu Cujin Hulianwang Jinrong Jiankang Fazhan de Zhidao Yijian (关于促进互联网金融健康发展的指导意见) [Guiding Opinion on the Promotion of Healthy Development of Internet Finance Businesses] (issued by a group of ten government agencies led by the PBOC, on 18 July 2015).

  68. Tang (2017).

  69. 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 40.

  70. Claessens and Perotti (2005).

  71. Ngai et al. (2016).

  72. Kirby and Worner (2014), p 32.

  73. Liu (2015), p 31.

  74. Jenkins (2016).

  75. FCA (2014), p 6.

  76. FCA (2015), para. 44.

  77. Ibid., p 49.

  78. FCA (2014), para. 12.3.

  79. Ibid.

  80. United States Government Accountability Office (2011), p 13.

  81. United States Government Accountability Office (2011), pp 26–30.

  82. Slattery (2013), p 252.

  83. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co., 328 US §§ 293, 301 (1946).

  84. Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 US 56 (1990).

  85. Slattery (2013), p 257.

  86. Ibid., p 261.

  87. Singletary (2016).

  88. Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (2014).

  89. The C(WUMP)O is less relevant to debt crowdfunding (online lending) than equity crowdfunding in that online lending platforms do not usually issue debentures within the meaning of securities. The prospectus requirement for securities offerings is mainly based on relevant disclosure sections in the C(WUMP)O, including s. 38, s. 38B, and s. 38D for companies incorporated in Hong Kong, and s. 342 and s. 342C for companies incorporated outside of Hong Kong.

  90. Fong (2015), p 254.

  91. Sch. 1, Pt. 2, (v) of MLO.

  92. Official website of MoneySQ, https://www.moneysq.com/.

  93. The promise may be misleading to the extent that investment made to a collective investment scheme is never risk-free. It thus may constitute an offense of fraudulently or recklessly inducing people to invest money pursuant to s. 107 of the SFO which may attract criminal or civil liabilities.

  94. The lukewarm reception online lending has got in Hong Kong is partly because online lending is seen by many as playing a less important role in Hong Kong’s highly developed financial system.

  95. Hutchinson, Wall Street Daily, May 2016, also see US Department of the Treasury (2016).

  96. Jenkins (2016).

  97. US Department of the Treasury (2016).

  98. See official website of the Credit Reference Centre of the PBOC, http://www.PBOCcrc.org.cn/zxzx/index.shtml.

  99. Zuigao Renmin Fayuan Guanyu Shenli Feifa Jizi Xingshi Anjian Juti Yingyong Falv Ruogan Wenti de Jieshi (最高人民法院关于审理非法集资刑事案件具体运用法律若干问题的解释) [Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court of Several Issues on the Specific Application of Law in the Handling of Criminal Cases about Illegal Fund-raising] (issued by the Supreme People’s Court of the PRC on 13 December 2010, effective 4 January 2011).

  100. Aveni (2015), p 23.

  101. The 2016 Interim Measures on Online Lending, Art. 10(4).

  102. FCA (2015), paras. 20, 26.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded under Direct Research Grant at the Chinese University of Hong Kong; Research support was also received under the Hong Kong Research Grants Council Theme Based Research Project ‘Enhancing Hong Kong’s Future as a Leading International Financial Centre’. An earlier version of this paper was presented in symposiums hosted by the China Banking Law Society, the Michigan Law School and the China University of Political Science and Law, and the author wishes to thank the symposium participants for helpful comments, particularly Professors Nicholas Howson, Junhai Liu and Neils Philipsen. The author also wishes to thank Gavin Yao Lin, Chao Wang and Chunyang Zhang for valuable research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Hui Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, R.H. Online P2P Lending and Regulatory Responses in China: Opportunities and Challenges. Eur Bus Org Law Rev 19, 63–92 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-018-0100-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-018-0100-z

Keywords

Navigation