Abstract
Reflected blast pressure and impulse for bare 226.8 g spherical C-4 charges under various atmospheric pressure conditions were studied both experimentally and numerically. Blast pressure measurements were conducted using an array of high resonant frequency tourmaline-based piezoelectric pressure transducers to record normally reflected blast pressure histories at a 61 cm standoff. The explosive detonation and pressure measurements were conducted inside a pressure vessel which allowed the ambient pressure surrounding the C-4 charge to be varied. The recorded pressure histories were analyzed for blast wave arrival time, peak reflected overpressure, and positive phase impulse. The numerical analysis of blast pressures under varying ambient conditions was conducted using an axi-symmetric Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) finite element technique with LS-DYNA. Numerical predictions were carried out for a 61 cm standoff that allowed direct comparison to the measured data. Additionally, the ALE simulations considered the effects of ambient pressure on blast impulse for varying standoff distances in the range of 12.7 to 61 cm. At a 61 cm standoff, measured peak reflected pressures showed no significant effect of varying ambient pressure while normally reflected impulses increased with increasing ambient pressure. Predictions by LS-DYNA for standoffs less than 61 cm showed a decreasing effect of ambient pressure on the normally reflected impulse as the standoff distance decreased. For small standoff distances it was predicted that the effects of ambient air pressure on normally reflected impulse were not significant. As the standoff distance between the explosive charge and the reflecting structure increases, higher ambient air pressures did cause a significant increase in reflected impulse.
References
Sachs RG (1944) The dependence of blast on ambient pressure and temperature, BRL Report No. 466. Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen, MD
Swisdak MM (1975) Explosion effects and properties, Part I – Explosion effects in air, Report NSWC/WOL/TR 75–116. Naval Surface Weapons Center, Silver Springs, MD
ConWep, “Conventional weapons effects” (1997) USAE Engineer Research & Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, version 2.1.0.8
Olson WC, Patterson JD, Williams JS (1960) The effect of atmospheric pressure on the reflected impulse from air blast waves, MR No. 1241. Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen, MD
Johnson OT, Patterson JD, Olson WC (1957) A simple mechanical method for measuring the reflected impulse of air blast waves, MR No. 1088. Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen, MD
Dewey JM, Johnson OT, Patterson JD (1962) Mechanical impulse measurements close to explosive charges, MR No. 1182. Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen, MD
Silnikov MV, Chernyshov MV, Mikhaylin AI (2015) Blast wave parameters at diminished ambient pressure. Acta Astronaut 109:235–240
Izadifard RA, Foroutan M (2010) Blastwave parameters assessment at different altitudes using numerical simulation. Turk J Eng Environ Sci 34:25–41
Veldman RL, Nansteel MW, and CC-T Chen (2011) “Measurement of blast reflected overpressure at small charge standoff with tourmaline piezoelectric transducers”, 26th International Ballistics Symposium & Exhibition, Miami, Florida
Hallquist JO (2013) LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual, Volume I, Version 7.0. Livermore Software and Technology Corporation, Livermore CA
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through research grant #06-G-019 and technical support from the Explosive Effects and Survivability Group (EESG) of the Transportation Security Laboratory (TSL). The authors also gratefully acknowledge the support of Aberdeen Test Center in Aberdeen, Maryland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Veldman, R., Nansteel, M., Chen, CT. et al. The Effect of Ambient Pressure on Blast Reflected Impulse and Overpressure. Exp Tech 41, 227–236 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-017-0171-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-017-0171-8