Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do Pavlovian Processes Really Mediate Behavioral Momentum? Some Conflicting Issues

  • Theoretical Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the behavioral momentum theory of response strength (Nevin et al., Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 359–379, 1990), steady-state responding reflects the contingency between a response and a reinforcer (response–reinforcer relationship), whereas behavior’s resistance to change is mediated by a contingency between a stimulus and the reinforcer (stimulus–reinforcer relationship). It is further presumed in this theory that a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus (CS)–unconditioned stimulus (US) contingency overlaps with the discriminative stimulus (SD), signaling a primary reinforcer (SR+) within the 3-term contingency (SD: response [R]–SR+). The mere arranging of a stimulus–reinforcer relation in an operant preparation, however, does not necessarily imply that the resulting behavioral process is Pavlovian. This article questions how important such Pavlovian CS–SR+ relations really are in governing operant behavior and its resistance to change in view of evidence from the operant and Pavlovian literatures showing dissociation between Pavlovian and operant stimulus control. To this end, we highlight studies published in the Pavlovian associative literature (Holman and Mackintosh, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 33, 21–31, 1981; Rescorla, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 66–70, 1992b) as well as at least 1 seldom-cited study published in the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (Marcucella, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 51–60, 1981) supporting the view that CS relations embedded in the 3-term operant contingency can act independently of the discriminative stimulus functions of the SD. These CS relations appear to be neither necessary nor sufficient for sustaining operant discriminative control. Pavlovian relations are likely to be artifacts of operant conditioning—not causal mediators. It is suggested that continued and excessive focus on Pavlovian processes that only have meager influence on operant behavior in general, and behavioral momentum more specifically, will likely be an empirical cul-de-sac for improvement of behavioral management for addiction relapse and other behavioral disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bouton, M. E., & Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Analysis of the associative and occasion-setting properties of contexts participating in a Pavlovian discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.12.4.333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouton, M. E., & Swartzentruber, D. (1989). Slow reacquisition following extinction: Context, encoding, and retrieval mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.15.1.43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouton, M. E., Todd, T. P., Vurbic, D., & Winterbauer, N. E. (2011). Renewal after the extinction of free operant behavior. Learning & Behavior, 39, 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (2013). Learning (5th ed.). Cornwall-on-Hudson: Sloan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwill, R. M., & Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Associations between the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.14.2.155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwill, R. M., & Rescorla, R. A. (1990). Evidence for the hierarchical structure of instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbit, L. H., & Balleine, B. W. (2003). Instrumental and Pavlovian incentive processes have dissociable effects on components of a heterogeneous instrumental chain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.29.2.99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Ciano, P., & Everitt, B. (2003). Differential control over drug-seeking behavior by drug-associated conditioned reinforcers and discriminative stimuli predictive of drug availability. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117, 952–960.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dougher, M. J., Augustson, E. M., Markham, M. R., Greenway, D., & Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331–335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K., & Skinner, B. F. (1941). Some quantitative properties of anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, R. C., & Nevin, J. A. (1997). On the relation between preference and resistance to change. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 43–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, L. J. (1980). The effect of contingency upon the appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 297–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hineline, P. N. (1986). Re-tuning the operant-respondent distinction. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 55–79). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. C. (2004). Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30, 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.30.2.104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holman, J. G., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1981). The control of appetitive instrumental responding does not depend upon classical conditioning to the discriminative stimulus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 33, 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamin, L. J. (1968). ‘Attention-like’ processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: Aversive stimulation (pp. 9–33). Miami: University of Miami Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, J. M., Ahearn, W. H., Parry-Cruwys, D., Bancroft, S., & Dube, W. V. (2013). Persistence during extinction: Examining the effects of continuous and intermittent reinforcement on problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, F. C., Hock, M. L., Lalli, J. S., West, B. J., Belfiore, P., Pinter, E., & Brown, D. K. (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 123–141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, F. C., McComas, J. J., Mauro, B. C., Progar, P. R., Taylor, B., Ervin, R., & Zangrillo, A. N. (2010). Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior increases resistance to extinction: Clinical demonstration, animal modeling, and clinical test of one solution. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 349–367.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marcucella, H. (1981). Stimulus control of respondent and operant key pecking: A single key procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 51–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, B. C., & Mace, F. (1996). Differences in the effect of Pavlovian contingencies upon behavioral momentum using auditory versus visual stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 389–399.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, K., & Ettenberg, A. A. (1997). Reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior produced by heroin-predictive environmental stimuli. Psychopharmacology, 131, 86–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, J. A. (1984). Pavlovian determiners of behavioral momentum. Animal Learning & Behavior, 12, 363–370. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, J. A. (1993). Behavioural momentum: Implications for clinical practice. Behaviour Change, 10, 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, J. (2009). Stimuli, reinforcers, and the persistence of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 32, 285–291.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, J. A., & Grace, R. C. (1999). Does the context of reinforcement affect resistance to change? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.25.2.256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, J. A., & Grace, R. C. (2000). Behavioral momentum and the law of effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 73–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, J. A., & Shahan, T. A. (2011). Behavioral momentum theory: Equations and applications. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-877.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, J. A., Mandell, C., & Atak, J. R. (1983). The analysis of behavioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 49–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, J. A., Tota, M. E., Torquato, R. D., & Shull, R. L. (1990). Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1990.53-359.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, J. A., Roberts, A. C., Everitt, B. J., & Di Ciano, P. P. (2005). Acquisition of instrumental conditioned reinforcement is resistant to the devaluation of the unconditioned stimulus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 58, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724990444000023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podlesnik, C. A., & Kelley, M. E. (2015). Translational research on the relapse of operant behavior. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 41, 226–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podlesnik, C. A., Bai, J. H., & Elliffe, D. (2012). Resistance to extinction and relapse in combined stimulus contexts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 98, 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.98-169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Podlesnik, C. A., Jimenez-Gomez, C., & Shahan, T. A. (2013). Are preference and resistance to change convergent expressions of stimulus value? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 100, 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D., Hoerger, M., Mace, F. C., Penney, H., & Harris, B. (2014). Clinical translation of animal models of treatment relapse. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 442–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R. A. (1967). Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychological Review, 74, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R. A. (1990). Evidence for an association between the discriminative stimulus and the response-outcome association in instrumental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 326–334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R. A. (1992a). Associations between an instrumental discriminative stimulus and multiple outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R. A. (1992b). Hierarchical associative relations in Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental training. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11509749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R. A. (1994). Control of instrumental performance by Pavlovian and instrumental stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.20.1.44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R. A. (1995). Full preservation of a response–outcome association through training with a second outcome. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 252–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R. A., & Colwill, R. M. (1989). Associations with anticipated and obtained outcomes in instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troisi II, J. R. (2006). Pavlovian-instrumental transfer of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and ethanol in rats. The Psychological Record, 56, 499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troisi II, J. R. (2013a). Perhaps more consideration of Pavlovian–operant interaction may improve the clinical efficacy of behaviorally based drug treatment programs. The Psychological Record, 63, 863–894.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Troisi II, J. R. (2013b). The Pavlovian vs. operant interoceptive stimulus effects of EtOH: Commentary on Besheer, Fisher, & Durant (2012). Alcohol, 47, 433–436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Troisi II, J. R. (2015). Sensation within the skin. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 6, 209–210. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn500300a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Troisi II, J. R., Bryant, E., & Kane, J. (2012). Extinction of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine with a devalued reinforcer: Recovery following revaluation. The Psychological Record, 62, 707–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our friend and mentor Dr. Philip N. Hineline for several discussions on these topics and for commenting on a prior version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Saint Anselm College, Manchester, NH, 03102, USA

    Joseph R. Troisi II

  2. Center for Applied Behavior Analysis, The Sage Colleges, Albany, NY, USA

    Benjamin C. Mauro

Authors
  1. Joseph R. Troisi II
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin C. Mauro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph R. Troisi II.

Ethics declarations

As this was a theoretical article rather than an empirical article, there was no informed consent nor need for Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Troisi, J.R., Mauro, B.C. Do Pavlovian Processes Really Mediate Behavioral Momentum? Some Conflicting Issues. Psychol Rec 67, 597–604 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0259-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0259-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation