Abstract
The inclusion of a meaningful stimulus in a set of abstract stimuli enhances the likelihood of forming an equivalence class with the set. Class enhancement effects can be due to the discriminative, conditional discriminative, and class-based behavioral functions served by the meaningful stimulus. This experiment determined whether acquisition of an identity conditional discriminative function by an abstract stimulus enhances the formation of an equivalence class of which it is a member along with other abstract stimuli. Forty adults attempted to form 3 three-node five-member equivalence classes (A → B → C → D → E) using the simultaneous protocol. In the PIC group, the C stimuli were pictures and the A, B, D, and E stimuli were abstract shapes. In the ABS group, all of the stimuli were abstract shapes. In the Id-S-MTS (identity simultaneous matching-to-sample) and Id-6sD-MTS (identity 6 s delayed matching-to-sample) groups, prior to class formation, identity conditional discriminations were formed with the C stimuli using simultaneous or 6 s delayed matching-to-sample procedures, respectively. Classes were formed by 80 and 60 % of participants in the PIC and delayed identity groups, and by 0 and 10 % of participants with no prior training (ABS group) or after forming identity relations on a simultaneous basis. These outcomes were confirmed with post class formation sorting tests. Thus, a portion of the class enhancing effects of meaningful stimuli can be attributed to their presumed delayed identity conditional discriminative function. Adventitious coding or mediating behavior during identity training might have influenced acquisition of baseline relations and likelihood of class formation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arntzen, E. (2004). Probability of equivalence formation: Familiar stimuli and training sequence. The Psychological Record, 54, 275–291. Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html.
Arntzen, E. (2006). Delayed matching to sample and stimulus equivalence: Probability of responding in accord with equivalence as a function of different delays. The Psychological Record, 56, 135–167. Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html.
Arntzen, E., & Lian, T. (2010). Trained and derived relations with pictures as nodes. The Psychological Record, 60, 659–677. Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html.
Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Berryman, R., Cumming, W. W., & Nevin, J. A. (1963). Acquisition of Delayed Matching in Pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 101. doi:10.1901/jeab.1963.6-101. Retrieved from ISI:A19634769B00003.
Blough, D. S. (1959). Delayed matching in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2, 151–160. doi:10.1901/jeab.1959.2-151.
Bortoloti, R., & de Rose, J. C. (2009). Assessment of the relatedness of equivalent stimuli through a semantic differential. The Psychological Record, 59, 563–590. Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html.
Bortoloti, R., & De Rose, J. C. (2012). Equivalent stimuli are more strongly related after training with delayed matching than after simultaneous matching: A study using the implicit relational assement procedure (IRAP ). The Psychological Record, 62, 41–54. Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html.
Buffington, D. M., Fields, L., & Adams, B. J. (1997). Enhancing equivalence class formation by pretraining of other equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 47, 69–96. Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html.
Constantine, B., & Sidman, M. (1975). Role of naming in delayed matching-to-sample. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 680–689. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=3799735.
Dickins, D. W., Bentall, R. P., & Smith, A. B. (1993). The role of individual stimulus names in the emergence of equivalence relations: The effects of interpolated paired-associates training of discordant associates between names. The Psychological Record, 43, 713–724.
Fields, L., Arntzen, E., Nartey, R. K., & Eilifsen, C. (2012). Effects of a meaningful, a discriminative, and a meaningless stimulus on equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 163–181. doi:10.1901/jeab.2012.97-163.
Fields, L., Arntzen, E., & Moksness, M. (in press). Stimulus Sorting: A quick and sensitive index of equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record.
Grehan, P. M. (1998). Depressed subjects' formation of mood congruent and incongruent equivalence relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York.
Leslie, J. C., Tierney, K. J., Robinson, C. P., Keenan, M., & Watt, A. (1993). Differences between clinically anxious and non-anxious subjects in a stimulus equivalence training task involving threat works. The Psychological Record, 43, 153–161. Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html.
Nartey, R. K., Arntzen, E., & Fields, L. (in press). The functions of meaningful stimuli disclosed by equivalence class formation: conditional discriminative functions. The Psychological Record. Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html.
Plaud, J. J. (1995). The formation of stimulus equivalences: Fear-relevant versus fear-irrelevant stimulus classes. The Psychological Record, 45, 207–222. Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html.
Travis, R. W., Fields, L., & Arntzen, E. (in press). Discriminative functions and over-training as class-enhancing determinants of meaningful stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.
Tyndall, I. T., Roche, B., & James, J. E. (2004). The relation between stimulus function and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 257–266. doi:10.1901/jeab.2004.81-257.
Urcuioli, P. (2013). Stimulus control and stimulus class formation. In G. Madden, W. V. Dube, T. D. Hackenberg, G. P. Hanley, & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), APA Handbook of Behavior Analysis (Vol. 1, pp. 361–386). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Watt, A., Keenan, M., Barnes, D., & Cairns, E. (1991). Social categorization and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 41, 33–50. Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html.
White, K. G. (2013). Remembering and forgetting. In G. Madden, W. V. Dube, T. D. Hackenberg, G. P. Hanley, & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), APA Handbook of Behavior Analysis (Vol. 1, pp. 411–437). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Conflict of Interest
There is no conflict of interest to declare concerning the three authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arntzen, E., Nartey, R.K. & Fields, L. Identity and Delay Functions of Meaningful Stimuli: Enhanced Equivalence Class Formation. Psychol Rec 64, 349–360 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0066-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0066-3