Skip to main content
Log in

Organic Matter and Nutrient Removal Performance of Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands Planted with Phragmite karka and Vetiveria zizanioide for Treating Municipal Wastewater

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Processes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three pilot horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HSSFCWs) were constructed, covered with a geomembrane and filled with gravel media. The study compared the performance of the three pilot HSSFCWs, two planted with Vetiveria zizanioide and Phragmite karka, and one without plants, and all containing aeration facilities in treating municipal wastewater. HSSFCWs were loaded at a hydraulic loading rate of 0.025 m/d and a maximum organic loading rate of 6.16 g BOD/m2d with a hydraulic retention time of 6 days. Results show that V. zizanioide had better removal efficiencies (TSS: 92.3%; BOD5: 92.0%; PO4 3−: 86.7%) than P. karka (TSS: 91.3%; BOD5: 90.5%; PO4 3−: 85.6%), whereas P. karka showed better removal efficiency of NH4 + (86%), NO3 (81.8%) and SO4 2− (91.7%) than V. zizanioide (NH4 +: 83.4%; NO3 : 81.3%; SO4 2−: 90.5%). Removal rates in unplanted CWs were lower for all parameters: TSS (78%), BOD5 (73%), NH4 + (61.0%), NO3 (55.5%), PO4 3− (67.6%), SO4 2− (78.1%). Higher removals of total coliform (3 log units) and Escherichia coli (2.4 log units) were obtained in the HSSFCW with plants compared to unplanted units (total coliform: 1.9 log units; Escherichia coli: 1.2 log units). Based on these findings, the treated water can be directly disposed into surface water bodies or used for irrigation as the concentrations of the pollutants are below the standard permissible limits of effluent discharge set by EEPA and WHO. Therefore, both V. zizanioide and P. karka are good candidates for remediation of wastewater by a constructed wetland system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abay GK (2010) Impact of low cost ground water contamination in the city of Addis Ababa. PhD thesis, University of South Africa

  • Abbasi HN, Lu X, Xu F, Xie J (2016) Wastewater treatment strategies in China: overview. Sci Lett 4(1):15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdel-hefya HI, El-Khateeba MA, Regelsbergerb M, El-Sheikh R, Shehata M (2009) Integrated system for the treatment of black water and greywater via UASB and constructed wetland in Egypt. Desalin Water Treat 8:272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbarzadeh A, Jamshidi S, Vakhshouri M (2015) Nutrient uptake rate and removal efficiency of Vetiveria zizanioide in contaminated waters. Pollution 1(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Akratos CS, Tsihrintzis VA (2007) Effect of temperature, HRT, vegetation and porous media on removal efficiency of pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 29:173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias ME, Brown M (2009) Feasibility of using constructed treatment wetlands for municipal wastewater treatment in the Bogota Savannah, Colombia. Ecol Eng 35:1070–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avelar FF, Matos ATD, Matos MPD, Borges AC (2014) Coliform bacteria removal from sewage in constructed wetlands planted with Mentha aquatica. Environ Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2014.893025

  • Avila C, Bayona J, Martinc S, Salas JJ, Garcia J (2015) Emerging organic contaminant removal in full-scale hybrid constructed wetland system for wastewater treatment and reuse. Ecol Eng 80:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskar G, Deeptha VT, Annadurai R (2014) Comparison of treatment performance between constructed wetland with different plants. IJRET 3(4):eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308

  • Beyene A, Addis T, Kifle D, Legesse W, Kloos H, Triest L (2008) Comparative study diatoms and macroinvertebrates as indicators of severe water pollution: case study of Kebena and Akaki rivers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ecol Indic 9:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyene A, Legesse W, Triest L, Kloos H (2009) Urban impact on ecological integrity of nearby rivers in developing countries: the Borkena River in highland Ethiopia. Environ Monit Assess 153:461–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonsong K, Chansiri M (2008) Efficiency of Vetiver grass cultivated with floating platform technique in domestic wastewater treatment. AUJT 12(2):73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisson J, Chazarenc F (2009) Maximizing pollutant removal in constructed wetlands: Should we pay more attention to macrophyte species selection? Sci Total Environ 407:3923–3930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Button M, Nivala J, Weber KP, Aubron T, Muller RA (2015) Microbial community metabolic function in subsurface flow constructed wetlands of different designs. Ecol Eng 80:162–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavan BL, Dhulap VP (2013) Developing a pilot scale angular horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland for the treatment of sewage through phytoremedetion with Colocacia esculenta. Int Res J Environ Sci 2(2):6–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Shena Z, Li X (2004) The use of Vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioide) in the phytoremediation of soil contamination with heavy metals. Appl Geochem 19:1553–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary AK, Kumar S, Sharma C (2011) Constructed wetlands: an approach for wastewater treatment. Elixir Pollution 37:3666–3672

    Google Scholar 

  • Danh LT, Truong P, Mammucari R, Tran T, Foster N (2009) Vetiver grass, Vetiveria zizanioides: a choice plant for phytoremediation of heavy metals and organic wastes. Int J Phytorem 11(8):664–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanya G, Jaya DS (2013) Pollutant removal in wastewater by Vetiver grass in constructed wetland system. IJERT 2:12

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyamanagowdru S, Lokeshappa B (2015) Comparative assessment and performance evaluation of horizontal flow constructed wetland using Vetiver and Canna species. IJEIT 4(10)

  • Edelstein M, Plaut Z, Dudai N, Ben-Hur M (2009) Vetiver (Vetiveria zizaniode) response to fertilization and salinity under irrigation conditions. J Environ Manag 91:215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDHS (2011) Ethiopian demographic and health survey. Report, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Ewemoje O, Sangodoyin A (2011) Developing a pilot scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland for phytoremedaition of primary lagoon effluent. Daniel Thevenot, 11th edn. of the world wide workshop for Young Environmental Scientists (www-yes-2011)-Urban waters: Resource or risks? Arcueil, France

  • FFE (2010) Forum For Environment. Ethiopian Environ Rev:227. http://www.phe-ethiopia.org/pdf/Ethiopian_Environment_Review.pdf

  • Gikas GD, Tsihrintzis VA (2014) Municipal wastewater treatment using constructed wetlands. Water Utility Journal 8:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Gikas GD, Akratos CS, Tsihrintis VA (2007) Performance monitoring of a vertical flow constructed wetland treating municipal wastewater. Global NEST Journal 9:277–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann H, Platzer C, Winker M, Muench EV (2011) Technology review of constructed wetlands subsurface flow constructed wetlands for grey water and domestic wastewater treatment. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), Eschborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Jampeetong A, Brix H, Kantawanichkul S (2012) Effects of inorganic nitrogen forms on growth, morphology, nitrogen uptake capacity and nutrient allocation of four tropical aquatic macrophytes (Salvina Cucullata, Ipomoea aquatic, Cyperus involucratus and Vetiveria zizanioides). Aquat Bot 97:10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec RH, Reddy KR (2001) Temperature effect on treatment wetland. Water Environ Res 73(5):543–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec RH, Wallace SD (2009) Treatment wetlands, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassa Y, Mengistu SD (2014) Nutrient uptake efficiency and growth of two aquatic macrophyte species under constructed wetlands, Ethiopia. SINET: Ethiop J Sci 37(2):95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebede T, Yaekob T (2009) Research and development of vetiver grass (Vetiver zizanioides, L.) in Ethiopia. Report. Jimma Research Center, Jimma

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenatu A (2011) Evaluation of the performance of constructed wetland system for treatment of brewery wastewater. Master’s thesis, Addis Ababa Institute of Technology University, Addis Ababa

  • Kivasi AK (2001) The potential for constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in developing countries: a review. Ecol Eng 16:545–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesage E, Rousseau DPL, Meers E, Van de Moortel AMK, Laing GD, Tack FMG, De Pauw N, Verloo MG (2007) Accumulation of metals in the sediment and reed biomass of a combined constructed wetland treating domestic wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut 183:253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mairi J, Lyimo T, Njau K (2012) Performance of subsurface flow constructed wetland for domestic wastewater treatment. Tanz J Sci 38(2):66–79

  • Maria M, Edagardo V, De AJ, Alberto L (2015) The effect of the hydraulic retention time on the performance of an ecological wastewater treatment: An anaerobic filtration with a constructed wetland. Water 7:1149–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mburu N, Tebitendwa SM, Rousseau DPL, Bruggen JJAV, Lens PNL (2013) Performance evaluation of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands for the treatment of domestic wastewater in the tropics. J Environ Eng 139(3):358–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meers E, Tack FMG, Tolpe I, Michels E (2008) Application of a full-scale constructed wetland for tertiary treatment of piggery manure: monitoring results. Water Air Soil Pollut 193:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf and Eddy Inc. (2003) Wastewater engineering, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, Inc, Boston EISBN 0-07-112250-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips S (1995) Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Volume 7. Poaceae (Gramineae). The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Development of Systematic Botany, Uppsala Univeristy, Uppsala In Hedberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Sani AR, Dareini F (2014) Treatment of hosipital wastewater by Vetiver and typical reed plants at wetland. Indian J Fundamental Applied Life Sci 4(53):890–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehar S, Sumera S, Naeem S, Perveen I, Ali N, Ahmad S (2015) A comparative study of macrophytes influence on wastewater treatment through subsurface flow hybrid constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 81:62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanakis AI, Akratos CS, Tsihrintzis VA (2011) Effect of wastewater step-feeding on removal efficiency of pilot scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 37:431–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stottmeister U, Wiebner A, Kuschk P, Kappelmeyer U, Kastner MO, Bederski RAM, Moormann H (2003) Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Advances 22:93–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadesse A, Eshetu L, Andualem M, Seyoum L (2016) Performance of pilot scale anaerobic-SBR system integrated with constructed wetlands for the treatment of tannery wastewater. Environ Process. 3(4):815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-016-0171-1

  • Tanner CC (2001) Plants as ecosystem engineers in subsurface flow treatment wetlands. Sci Technol 44(11-12):9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Truong P, Danh LT (2015) The Vetiver system for improving water quality prevention and treatment of contaminated water and land, 2nd edn. The Vetiver Network International

  • Tuncsiper B, Ayaz SC, Akca L (2012) Coliform bacteria removal from septic wastewater in a pilot-scale combined constructed wetland system. Environ Eng Manag J 11(10):1873–1879

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Water (2015) Wastewater management, UN-Water Analytical brief report

  • USEPA (2000) United States Environmental Protection Agency. Constructed Wetland Treatment of Municipal Wastewaters. Office of Research and Development Cincinnati, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Moortel AMK, Meers E, De Pauw N, Tack FMG (2010) Effects of vegetation, season and temperature on the removal of pollutants in experimental floating treatment wetlands. Water Air Soil Pollut 212:281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2005) Horizontal subsurface flow and hybrid constructed wetland systems for wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 25:478–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2009) The use of constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow for various types of wastewater. Ecol Eng 35:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2010) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water 2:530–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2011) Plants used in constructed wetland with horizontal subsurface flow: A review. Hydrobiologia 674:133–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J, Kropfelova L (2009) Removal of organics in constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow: a review of the field experience. Sci Total Environ 407:3911–3922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J, Kropfelova L, Svehla J, Chrastny V, Stichov J (2009) Trace elements in phragmite australis growing in constructed wetlands for treatment of municipal wastewater. Ecol Eng 35:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2006) Wastewater uses in agriculture. Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and grey water. Vol 2, ISBN 92 4 154683 2

  • Wu S, Carvalho PN, Muller JA, Manoj VR, Dong R (2016) Sanitation in constructed wetlands: A review on the removal of human pathogens and faecal indicators. Sci Total Environ 541:8–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia H, Ke H, Deng Z, Tan P, Liu S (2004) Ecological effectiveness of vetiver constructed wetland in treating oil-refined wastewater. Guangzhou, China

  • Yang Z, Qian W, Zhang J, Xie H, Feng S (2016) Effect of plant harvesting on the performance of constructed wetlands during summer. Water 8:24. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8010024

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financed by grants from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Ethiopian Ministry of Education, Research Fund for International Young Scientists (Grant Agreement No: W/5799-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenatu Angassa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angassa, K., Leta, S., Mulat, W. et al. Organic Matter and Nutrient Removal Performance of Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands Planted with Phragmite karka and Vetiveria zizanioide for Treating Municipal Wastewater. Environ. Process. 5, 115–130 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-017-0276-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-017-0276-1

Keywords

Navigation