Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Forest Practices on Water Resources Recharge in the Boreal Climate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Processes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of forestry practices on water resources in the middle-boreal zone of central Finland. The long-term research was performed at Kivesvaara experimental plots (6428 N, 2733 E) and Oijusluoma small catchments (6550 N, 290 E), with a detailed snow observation at Paljakka (6526 N, 2626 E). Forestry practices included clear-cut, shelterwood and seed cutting with different techniques of soil preparation and reforestation. The clear-cut (particularly by the total biomass harvest including stump removal) has increased the water yield (a positive feedback). But, on the other hand, it has caused a drop in retention and lag-time, and an increase of peak-flows, as well as increasing mobility of nitrogen and phosphorus. Thus, the clear-cut of mature spruce stands (Picea abies) increased the groundwater recharge by 63 mm (i.e., 24%), and the total biomass harvest of one-half of the experimental catchment increased the water yield by 44 mm (i.e., 15%) during three years after the harvest. A significant increase in contents of nitrogen persisted in groundwaters more than 25 years after the clear-cut, and 10 years after the natural regeneration (shelterwood or seed cutting). During the monitored period of 28 years, the total output of nitrogen from subsequent forest plantations ranged from 12 to 21 tons per hectare (i.e., exceeding 5–9 times the output from control mature spruce stands). By natural regeneration, the ten-year mean load of nitrogen exceeded 2.5–5 times the load at control plots. After the total biomass harvest (a whole tree and stump removal), the mean annual outflow of nitrogen and phosphorus was 5.4 and 0.11 k g h a −1 (exceeding 2.5 and 1.8 times the pre-treatment stream-flow). These results confirmed the hypothesis of a significant impact of forest practices on water resource control in the boreal forest biome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahtiainen M, Huttunen P (1999) Long-term effects of forestry managements on water quality and loading in brooks. Boreal Environ Res 4:101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström S (1992) The HBV model – its structure and applications. SMH1 Reports Hydrology No. 4, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden, p 35

  • Bosch JM, Hewlett JD (1982) A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration. J Hydrol 55:3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuankuan W, Xiaofeng Z (1994) Studies on forest benefits on decreasing flood discharge and increasing base runoff in northern China. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on forest hydrology. University of Tokyo, Tokyo, pp 545–549

  • EC (2012) Report on the implementation of the Water Framework Directive: Finland. Commission Staff Working Document, COM 670, European Commission, Brussel, p 63

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster NW, Bhatti JS (2006) Forest ecosystems: nutrient cycling. In: Encyclopedia of Soil Science. Taylor & Francis, New York, USA, pp 718–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Grip H (1982) Water chemistry and runoff in forest streams at Kloten. Dissertation, UNGI rapport 58, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, p 144

  • Hämet-Ahti L (1981) The boreal zone and its biotic subdivisions. Fennia-Int J Geogr 159:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins RH, Ward TJ, Woodward DE, Van Mullem JA (2009) Curve number hydrology: state of the practice. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, p 112

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpeläinen T, Tuomenvirta H, Jylhä K (2008) Climatological characteristics of summer precipitation in Helsinki during the period 1951–2000. Boreal Environ Res 13:67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortelainen P, Mattsson T, Finér L, Ahtiainen M, Saukkonen S, Sallantaus T (2006) Controls on the export of C, N, P and Fe from undisturbed boreal catchments, Finland. Aquat Sci 68:453–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremsa J (2016) Effects of forest harvesting on runoff processes in the boreal environment. In: Czech. Dissertation, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, p 122

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremsa J, Křeček J, Kubin E (2015) Comparing the impacts of mature spruce forests and grasslands on snow melt, water resource recharge, and run-off in the northern boreal environment. Int. J. Soil Water Conserv Res 3:50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krčmář V, Křeček J, Vrtiška J (2014) Effects of forest harvest on the vegetation cover: Oijusluoma, Finland. Special Technical Map, Faculty of Civil Engineering Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

  • Kubin E (1995a) Site preparation and leaching of nutrients. In: Ritari A, Saarenmaa H, Saarela M, Poikajärvi (eds) Proceedings of the IUFRO symposium, Northern silviculture and management. August 16–22, 1987, Lapland, Finland. Metla research notes, vol 567, pp 55–62

  • Kubin E (1995b) The effect of clear cutting, waste wood collecting and site preparation on the nutrient leaching to groundwater. In: Nilsson LO, Hüttl RF, Johansson UT (eds) Nutrient uptake and cycling in forest ecosytems. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 661–670

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kubin E (1998) Leaching of nitrate nitrogen into the groundwater after clear felling and site preparation. Boreal Environ Res 3:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubin E, Kemppainen L (1991) Effect of clear cutting of boreal spruce forest on air and soil temperature conditions. Acta Forestalia Fennica 225:1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubin E, Krecek J (2008) Impact of forestry practices on groundwater quality in the boreal environment. In: Taniguchi M, Burnett WC, Fukushima Y, Haigh M, Umezawa Y (eds) From headwaters to the ocean: hydrological change and water management. CRC press, Kyoto, Japan, pp 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupi C, Morin H, Deslauriers A, Rossi S, Houle D (2013) Role of soil nitrogen for the conifers of the boreal forest: a critical review. Int J Plant Soil Sci 2:155–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA, p 155

    Google Scholar 

  • Metla (2014) Finnish statistical yearbook of forestry (in finnish): Official statistics of Finland: Agriculture, forestry and fishery, 44 ed. The Finnish Forest Research Institute (Metla), Helsinki, Finland, p 450

  • NASA (2014) Landsat science. http://landsat.usgs.gov. Accessed on the 24th october 2016

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part i – a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poikolainen J, Piispanen J, Karhu J, Kubin E (2009) Long-term changes in nitrogen deposition in Finland (1990–2006) monitored using the moss Hylocomium splendens. Environ Pollut 157:3091–3097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rekolainen S, Posch M, Kämäri J, Ekholm P (1991) Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of annual phosphorus load estimates from two agricultural basins in Finland. J Hydrol 128:237–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusanen K, Finer L, Antikainen M, Korkka-Niemi K, Backman B, Britschgi R (2004) The effect of forest cutting on the quality of groundwater in large aquifers in Finland. Boreal Environ Res 9:253–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Saastamoinen O, Matero J, Horne P, Kniivilä E, Haltia E, Vaara M, Mannerkoski H (2014) Classification of boreal forest ecosystem goods and services in Finland. Reports and Studies in Forestry and Natural Sciences, No. 11, University of Eastern Finland, Finland, p 197

  • Seibert J (2005) HBV Light version 2, user’s manual. Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, p 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw EM (1991) Hydrology in Practice. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom, p 537

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan C (2002) Calculating a water poverty index. World Dev 30:1195–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamm CO, Holmen H, Popovic B, Wiklander G (1974) Leaching of plant nutrients from soils as a consequence of forestry operations. Ambio 3:211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuorenmaa J, Rekolainen S, Lepisto A, Kenttamies K, Kauppila P (2002) Losses of nitrogen and phosphorus from agricultural and forest areas in Finland during the 1980s and 1990s. Environ Monit Assess 76:213–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weier J, Herring D (2000) Measuring vegetation (NDVI & EVI). Earth observatory, http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov. Accessed on the 24th october 2016

  • Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR (2001) Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 37:701–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (Programme on Groundwater and catchment impacts of stump harvesting), Czech Technical University in Prague (SGS 14/128/OHK1/2T/11) and the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic (INTER-EXCELLENCE: INTER-COST LTC 17006, 2017). The experimental treatment was managed by UPM and Metsähallitus, field observations and chemical analyses carried out by Luke (Natural Resources Institute Finland). The Oulanka Research Station of the Oulu University supported water sampling and run-off registrations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ladislav Palán.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kubin, E., Křeček, J. & Palán, L. Effects of Forest Practices on Water Resources Recharge in the Boreal Climate. Environ. Process. 4, 509–522 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-017-0249-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-017-0249-4

Keywords

Navigation