Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the role of sociability, sense of community and course satisfaction on students' engagement in flipped classroom supported by facebook groups

  • Published:
Journal of Computers in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, how students’ engagement can be developed in flipped classroom (FC) model has become a critical issue addressed in an educational context. Evidence suggests that students’ behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement may decrease in FC in time. It is thought that social networking sites (SNS) can contribute to this problem in FC. Since it is believed that students will show greater interest in discussions and knowledge exchange about the course, supporting courses with SNS is significant in terms of providing students with a social learning environment, it is assumed that students’ role of sociability, sense of community, and course satisfaction will increase, thereby promoting students’ engagement in those courses supported by SNS. This assumption appears in the literature as a gap that needs to be explored. In this sense, the purpose of this current research is to examine perceived sociability, sense of community, and student satisfaction and to determine how these variables predict behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement of students in FC supported by a virtual learning community. A total of 219 university students at a state university in Turkey. The research was carried out in the Computing I course conducted according to the FC model, and it was supported by the virtual learning community created on Facebook. Knowledge sharing and discussions about the course were made in Facebook groups. The data draws on students’ responses via three self-report instruments: satisfaction scale, students’ engagement scale, perceived sociability scale, and sense of community scale. Stepwise multiple linear regression was conducted for the data analysis. The findings indicate that students’ engagement in FC applications supported by the Facebook-based virtual learning community is high. Regarding sub-dimensions, students’ behavioral and emotional engagement scores are high, while cognitive engagement is moderate. Additionally, perceived sociability, sense of community, and satisfaction are significant predictors of students’ engagement. Several implications and future research recommendations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abedin, B., Daneshgar, F., & D’Ambra, J. (2011). Enhancing non-task sociability of asynchronous CSCL environments. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2535–2547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. Exploring

  • Almodiel, M. C., & Lacaste, A. V. (2020). Relationship between learning style and the use of social media as a learning management system for online learners. In K. C. Li (Ed.), Innovating Education in Technology-Supported Environments (pp. 37–51). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.

  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. (2019). Flipped learning and parent engagement in secondary schools: A South Australian case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1294–1319. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosselut, G., Castro, O., Chevalier, S., & Fouquereau, E. (2020). Does perceived cohesion mediate the student personality–engagement relationship in the university setting? Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(8), 1692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouta, H., Retalis, S., & Paraskeva, F. (2012). Utilising a collaborative macro-script to enhance student engagement: A mixed method study in a 3D virtual environment. Computers & Education, 58(1), 501–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheah, C. W. (2021). Developing a gamified AI-enabled online learning application to improve students’ perception of university physics. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. S. D., Gonyea, R., & Kuh, G. (2008). Learning at a distance: Engaged or not? Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(3), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, X. X. X., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. S., Su, Y. S., Huang, C. S., & Yang, S. J. (2018, August). Effects of using social ınstructional videos and flipped classroom on students' learning achievements in smart campus. In 2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3) (pp. 317–319). IEEE.

  • Chen, S. Y., Kuo, H. Y., & Hsieh, T. C. (2019). New literacy practice in a Facebook group: The case of a residential learning community. Computers & Education, 134, 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipchase, L., Davidson, M., Blackstock, F., Bye, R., Colthier, P., Krupp, N., Dickson, W., Turner, D., & Williams, M. (2017). Conceptualising and measuring student disengagement in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datu, J. A. D., Yang, W., Valdez, J. P. M., & Chu, S. K. W. (2018). Is facebook involvement associated with academic engagement among Filipino university students? A cross-sectional study. Computers & Education, 125, 246–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education, 68, 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, L., Kim, C., & Orey, M. (2017). Studies of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 115, 126–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, L., Er, E., & Orey, M. (2018). An exploratory study of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 120, 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergun, E., & Usluel, Y. (2015a). The Turkish adaptation of student engagements scale in online learning environment: A study of validity and reliability. Journal of Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 5(1), 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergun, E., & Usluel, Y. (2015b). Developing the scale of to be perceived social towards online learning environments: Validity and reliability study. Egitim Teknolojileri Arastirmalari Dergisi, 6(6), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergun, E., & Avcı, U. (2018). Knowledge sharing self-efficacy, motivation and sense of community as predictors of knowledge receiving and giving behaviors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokcearslan, S. (2013). Developing a scale for the sense of community in online learning: A validity and reliability study. The Journal of Turkish Librarianship, 27(1), 154–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulbahar, Y. (2012). Study of developing scales for assessment of the levels of readiness and satisfaction of participants in e-learning environments. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 45(2), 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, M. Z., & Walker, K. B. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education, 39, 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoi, V. N., & Hang, H. L. (2021). Student engagement in the facebook learning environment: a person-centred study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211030158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imlawi, J., Gregg, D., & Karimi, J. (2015). Student engagement in course-based social networks: The impact of instructor credibility and use of communication. Computers & Education, 88, 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58(1), 162–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., Ozturk, H. T., & Yilmaz, R. (2017). The effect of structure in flipped classroom designs for deep and surface learning approaches. In A. İşman, J. Willis, A. Donaldson, F. Dabaj, & E. Z. Liu (Eds.), The Turkish online Journal of Educational Technology, November 2017 (pp. 732–750). TOJET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., Yilmaz, R. (2019a). Flipped learning model: encountered problems in practice and solution suggestions [Ters yüz öğrenme modeli: uygulamada karşılaşılan sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri]. II. International Symposium of Academic Studies on Education and Culture, I-SASEC 2019, 12–14 September 2019, Mersin, Turkey.

  • Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2019b). The impact of feedback form on transactional distance and critical thinking skills in online discussions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1612265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2021). Learning analytics intervention improves students’ engagement in online learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09547-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazanidis, I., Pellas, N., Fotaris, P., & Tsinakos, A. (2018). Facebook and Moodle integration into instructional media design courses: A comparative analysis of students’ learning experiences using the Community of Inquiry (CoI) model. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(10), 932–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazanidis, I., Pellas, N., Fotaris, P., & Tsinakos, A. (2019). Can the flipped classroom model improve students’ academic performance and training satisfaction in Higher Education instructional media design courses? British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 2014–2027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status (pp. 386–434). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. M., Kim, M. S., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & Van Buuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 49(2), 176–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 683–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. C., Chen, Y. C., & Tai, S. J. D. (2017). A social network analysis on elementary student engagement in the networked creation community. Computers & Education, 115, 114–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, M., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., Hillman, T., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Peterson, L. (2018). Higher education dominance and siloed knowledge: A systematic review of flipped classroom research. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0101-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444–453.

  • McNeil, S. G., Robin, B. R., & Miller, R. M. (2000). Facilitating interaction, communication and collaboration in online courses. Computers & Geosciences, 26(6), 699–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meishar-Tal, H., Kurtz, G., & Pieterse, E. (2012). Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milman, N. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it be used? Distance Learning, 9(3), 85–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Education: A systems View. Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musib, M. K. (2014). Student perceptions of the impact of using the flipped classroom approach for an introductory-level multidisciplinary module. CDTL Brief, 17(2), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzammil, M., Sutawijaya, A., & Harsasi, M. (2020). Investigating student satisfaction in online learning: the role of student interaction and engagement in distance learning university. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21, 88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelimarkka, M., Leinonen, T., Durall, E., & Dean, P. (2021). Facebook is not a silver bullet for teachers’ professional development: Anatomy of an eight-year-old social-media community. Computers & Education, 173, 104269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngoc Hoi, V. (2021). Augmenting student engagement through the use of social media: the role of knowledge sharing behaviour and knowledge sharing self-efficacy. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1948871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk, E. (2009). Adaptation of the classroom community index: The validity and reliability study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 36, 193–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk, T., Karademir, T., Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2015). Examining flipped classroom model from students' point of view. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on education and new learning technologies, Barcelona - 6th - 8th of July 2015.

  • Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS: Survival Manual. McPherson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellas, N. (2014). Exploring interrelationships among high school students’ engagement factors in introductory programming courses via a 3D multi-user serious game created in Open Sim. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(12), 1608–1628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, W., & Pretorius, M. (2020). Facebook or fail-book: Exploring “community” in a virtual community of practice. ReCALL, 32(3), 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11(2), 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roque-Hernández, R. V., Díaz-Roldán, J. L., López-Mendoza, A., & Salazar-Hernández, R. (2021). Instructor presence, interactive tools, student engagement, and satisfaction in online education during the COVID-19 Mexican lockdown. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1912112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran, N., & Cummings, D. J. (2018). An examination of the relationship between Facebook groups attached to university courses and student engagement. Higher Education, 76(6), 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0253-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to Learn: Integrating Theory and Practice. Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, Q. T. T., & Nguyen, L. V. (2020). EFL student engagement in an english for specific purposes tourism class: flipping the class with facebook. In M. R. Freiermuth (Ed.), Technology and the Psychology of Second Language Learners and Users (pp. 175–202). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 11(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ustun, A. B., Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2021). Investigating the role of accepting learning management system on students’ engagement and sense of community in blended learning. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10500-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Alten, D. C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Cano, E., & Díez-Arcón, P. (2021). Facebook or LMS in distance education? Why university students prefer to interact in Facebook groups. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(3), 119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. K. (2008). The effects of a synchronous communication tool (yahoo messenger) on online learners’ sense of community and their multimedia authoring skills. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1), 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education, 114, 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willms, J. D. (2003). Student Engagement at School: A Sense of Belonging and Participation: Results from PISA 2000. Publications de l’OCDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, R., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2020). Examination of the effectiveness of the task and group awareness support system used for computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1355–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09741-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, R., Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Keser, H. (2020). Vertical versus shared e-leadership approach in online project-based learning: A comparison of self-regulated learning skills, motivation and group collaboration processes. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(3), 628–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, M., Lee, J., & Jo, I. H. (2021). Video learning analytics: Investigating behavioral patterns and learner clusters in video-based online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, 100806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that they have no funding of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science, Department of Computer Technology and Information Systems, Bartın University, Bartın, Turkey

    Fatma Gizem Karaoğlan Yılmaz & Ramazan Yılmaz

Authors
  1. Fatma Gizem Karaoğlan Yılmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ramazan Yılmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramazan Yılmaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yılmaz, F.G.K., Yılmaz, R. Exploring the role of sociability, sense of community and course satisfaction on students' engagement in flipped classroom supported by facebook groups. J. Comput. Educ. 10, 135–162 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00226-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00226-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation