Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fostering college students’ creative capacity through computer-supported knowledge building

  • Published:
Journal of Computers in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore how knowledge building could support the generation of creative ideas among college students and accordingly foster their creativity. The study was conducted in Knowledge Forum (KF), a knowledge building environment, where students were encouraged to engage in idea-centered activities. Participants were 38 college students and data mainly came from students’ online activities in KF, and a pre–post test concerning creativity. The results indicate that (1) students’ divergent thinking skills were improved after taking this course; (2) students were able to generate more promising ideas and progressively build on one another’s ideas toward the end of the course; and (3) students’ performance in KF is also positively correlated with their higher-level creative skills. Overall, this study demonstrates that knowledge building activities were useful to enhance student creativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J., & McKool, S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment. In C. S. Schreiner (Ed.), Handbook of assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education (pp. 65–77). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2005). Does assessment kill student creativity? The Educational Forum, 69, 254–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Design Research for Sustained Innovation. Cognitive Studies, Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 9(3), 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. K., Lam, I. C., & Leung, R. W. (2012). Can collaborative knowledge building promote both scientific processes and science achievement? International Journal of Educational Psychology (IJEP), 1(3), 199–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2015). Advancing knowledge-building discourse through judgments of promising ideas. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1910). The influence of Darwin on philosophy. NY: Henry Holt and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64(2), 110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H.-Y. (2011). Beyond group collaboration: Facilitating an idea-centered view of collaboration through knowledge building in a science class of fifth-graders. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(2), 248–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H.-Y., Chen, F. C., Chai, C. S., & Chan, W. C. (2011). Teacher-education students’ views about knowledge building theory and practice. Instructional Science, 39(4), 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Benjamin, W., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and design thinking: A framework to support ICT lesson design for 21st century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 535–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster dictionary (2016). Definition of creativity. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/creativity.

  • Partnership for 21st skills (2015). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/overview/skills-framework.

  • Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1996(72), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 1370–1373). New York: Macmillan Reference, USA.

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Lubart, T. I., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2005). Creativity. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 351–370). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1966). The torrance tests of creative thinking-norms-technical manual research edition-verbal tests, forms A and B-figural tests, forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. J., Chen, Y. F., Guo, G. T., Lin, W. W., Liu, C. H., & Chen, Y. H. (1998). Creative thinking test and research manual. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y. C., Yeh, Y. L., & Chen, Y. H. (2012). From knowledge sharing to knowledge creation: A blended knowledge-management model for improving university students’ creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Messina, R. (2010). Collaborative productivity as self-sustaining processes in a grade 4 knowledge building community. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference of the learning sciences—volume 1 (pp. 49–56). International Society of the Learning Sciences. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1854360.1854367.

  • Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9-and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 117–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC

    Pei-Yi Lin, Hsien-Ta Lin & Huang-Yao Hong

  2. Learning Technologies, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Yu-Hui Chang

Authors
  1. Pei-Yi Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu-Hui Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hsien-Ta Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huang-Yao Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huang-Yao Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, PY., Chang, YH., Lin, HT. et al. Fostering college students’ creative capacity through computer-supported knowledge building. J. Comput. Educ. 4, 43–56 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0063-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0063-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation