Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Translational neonatology research: transformative encounters across species and disciplines

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the laborious and intimate work of turning bodies of research animals into models of human patients. Based on ethnographic research in the interdisciplinary Danish research centre NEOMUNE, we investigate collaboration across species and disciplines, in research aiming at improving survival for preterm infants. NEOMUNE experimental studies on piglets evolved as a platform on which both basic and clinical scientists exercised professional authority. Guided by the field of multi-species research, we explore the social and material agency of research animals in the production of human health. Drawing on Anna Tsing’s concept of “collaborative survival”, we show that sharing the responsibility of the life and death of up to twenty-five preterm piglets fostered not only a collegial solidarity between basic and clinical scientists, but also a transformative cross-fertilization across species and disciplines—a productive “contamination”—facilitating the day-to-day survival of piglets, the academic survival of scientists and the promise of survival of preterm infants. Contamination spurred intertwined identity shifts that increased the porosity between the pig laboratory and the neonatal intensive care unit. Of particular significance was the ability of the research piglets to flexibly become animal-infant-patient hybrids in need of a united effort from basic and clinical researchers. However, ‘hybrid pigs’ also entailed a threat to the demarcation between humans and animals that consolidates the use of animals in biomedical research, and efforts were continuously done to keep contamination within spatial limits. We conclude that contamination facilitates transformative encounters, yet needs spatial containment to materialize bench-to-bedside translation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An obligatory FELASA C course according to the EU Directive 2010/63/EU Article 23.2 and accredited by the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA) as well as the Ministry of Environment and Food under the Danish Government.

  2. Brain studies in which the piglets lived up to 26 days in the pig laboratory instead of the usual 5 days.

References

  • Aaltola, A. (2008). Personhood and animals. Environmental Ethics, 30, 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ankeny, R. A., & Leonelli, S. (2011). What’s so special about model organisms? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 42(2), 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, C., & Michael, M. (2014). Enacting the ‘neuro’ in practice: Translational research, adhesion and the promise of porosity. Social Studies of Science, 44(5), 680–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714534333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candea, M. (2010). ‘I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat’: Engagement and detachment in human-animal relations. American Ethnologist, 37(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01253.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creager, A. N. H. (2002). The life of a virus: Tobacco mosaic virus as an experimental model, 1930–1965. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, S. H. (2008). Translational science: Past, present, and future. BioTechniques, 44(2), ii–viii. https://doi.org/10.2144/000112749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dam, M. S., & Svendsen, M. N. (2017). Treating piglets: Balancing standardization and individual treatments in translational neonatology research. BioSocieties. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-017-0071-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. (2012). What is a humanized mouse? Remaking the species and spaces of translational medicine. Body & Society, 18(3–4), 126–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X12446378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friese, C. (2013). Realizing potential in translational medicine. Current Anthropology, 54(S7), S129–S138. https://doi.org/10.1086/670805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friese, C., & Clarke, A. (2012). Transposing bodies of knowledge and technique: Animal models at work in reproductive sciences. Social Studies of Science, 42(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711429995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimura, J. H. (1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and ‘translation’. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 168–211). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindrajan, R. (2015). “The goat that died for family”: Animal sacrifice and interspecies kinship in India’s Central Himalayas. American Ethnologist, 42(3), 504–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium: FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, T., & Ideland, M. (2012). Challenging bio-objectification: Adding noise to transgenic silences. In N. Vermeulen, S. Tamminen, & A. Webster (Eds.), Bio-objects: Life in the 21st Century (pp. 13–26). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, R. E. (1994). Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonelli, S. (2012). When humans are the exception: Cross-species databases at the interface of biological and clinical research. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 214–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711436265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C. A. C. (2002). Before there were standards: The role of test animals in the production of empirical generality in physiology. Journal of the History of Biology, 35(2), 329–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. E. (1988). Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences. Social Studies of Science, 18(2), 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marincola, F. M. (2003). Translational medicine: A two-way road. Journal of Translational Medicine, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-1-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M., Wainwright, S. P., & Williams, C. (2005). Temporality and prudence: On stem cells as ‘phronesic things’. Configurations, 13, 373–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu, J., & Walker, W. A. (2011). Necrotizing enterocolitis. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1005408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prainsack, B., Svendsen, M. N., Koch, L., Ehrich, K. (2010). How do we collaborate? Social science researchers’ experience of multidisciplinarity in biomedical settings. BioSocieties, 5(2), 278–286. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/doifinder/10.1057/biosoc.2010.7. Accessed 18 March 2013.

  • Rader, K. (2004). Making mice: Standardizing animals for American biomedical research, 1900–1955. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, S. O., Martin, L., Østergaard, M. V., Rudloff, S., Li, Y., Roggenbuck, M., et al. (2016). Bovine colostrum improves neonatal growth, digestive function, and gut immunity relative to donor human milk and infant formula in preterm pigs. American Journal of Physiology. Gastrointestinal Liver Physiology, 311(3), 480–491. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00139.2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangild, P. T., Thymann, T., Schmidt, M., Stoll, B., Burrin, D. G., & Buddington, R. K. (2014). The preterm pig as a model in pediatric gastroenterology. Journal of Animal Science, 91(10), 4713–4729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, R. L., Thymann, T., Østergaard, M. V., Støy, A. C. F., Krych, L., Nielsen, D. S., et al. (2015). Early gradual feeding with bovine colostrum improves gut function and NEC resistance relative to infant formula in preterm pigs. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal Liver Physiology, 309(5), G310–G323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, M. N. (2009). Kritisk engageret videnskab. Erfaringer fra forskning om gen- og forplantningsteknologierne. Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund, 6(10), 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, M. N., & Koch, L. (2013). Potentializing the research piglet in experimental neonatal research. Current Anthropology, 54(S7), S118–S128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in the capitalist ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, S., Williams, C., Michael, M., Farsides, B., & Cribb, A. (2006). From bench to bedside? Biomedical scientists’ expectations of stem cell science as a future therapy for diabetes. Social Science and Medicine, 63(8), 2052–2064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson-Kovacs, D., & Hauskeller, C. (2012). The clinician-scientist: Professional dynamics in clinical stem cell research. Sociology of Health & Illness, 34(4), 497–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Danish Council for Strategic Research. We are grateful to the basic and clinical researchers in the animal facility at the University of Copenhagen for welcoming us and including us in their work. We also thank the preterm piglets for opening our eyes to the agency of nonhumans. For inspiring comments we are grateful to Jason De León. Finally, thank you to Laura E. Navne, Iben M. Gjødsbøl and Lene Koch for their support in every aspect of academic living.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mie S. Dam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dam, M.S., Sangild, P.T. & Svendsen, M.N. Translational neonatology research: transformative encounters across species and disciplines. HPLS 40, 21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-018-0185-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-018-0185-2

Keywords

Navigation