Skip to main content
Log in

Conference report “Stoffwechsel. Histories of metabolism”, workshop organized by Mathias Grote at Technische Universität Berlin, November 28–29th, 2014

  • Original paper
  • Published:
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historical analyses of what metabolism has been conceived of, how concepts of metabolism were related to disciplines such as nineteenth-century nutritional physiology or twentieth-century biochemistry, and how their genealogies relate to the current developments may be helpful to understand the various, at times polemic, ways in which the boundaries between metabolism and heredity have been re-drawn. Against this background, a small number of scholars gathered in Berlin for a workshop that equally aimed at bringing new stories to the fore, and at considering seemingly known ones in a new light. Some aspects of the discussions are summarized in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Landecker (2013b) discusses the shifting boundaries between metabolism and reproduction in the history of the life sciences. It is interesting to note that metabolism was quite visible in the historiography of the life sciences until the early 1990s, such as in the works of Robert Kohler (1975) or Frederic Holmes on biochemistry (e.g. Holmes 1992). After that, molecular genetics progressively moved into the focus of attention.

  2. See the forthcoming book: K. Nickelsen (2015). Explaining Photosynthesis. Modelling Biochemical Mechanisms 1840–1960. Dordrecht: Springer.

  3. In 1952, microbiologist C.B. van Niel, one of Kluyver’s former assistants argued that “the enormous clarification brought about by the enunciation of the ‘unitarian approach’ […] has become so much a part of our thinking that the very fact of its once having been started is no longer taken into account.” (van Niel 1953, p. 11).

  4. Elizabeth Neswald (2011) has argued for the central role of the necessary interaction and cooperation between experimenters and animals in nineteenth-century nutrition experiments. Since the workshop papers focused on bacteria, plants, and chemical engineering, this issue perhaps did not arise, but it should be important for a broader perspective on metabolism that includes research on humans and animals.

  5. In this latter molecular biological, informational version, the ways organisms “make proteins” has become part of the history of molecular biology, as epitomized in the 1968 Nobel prize for the “genetic code” to Robert Holley, Har Gobind Khorana and Marshall Nirenberg. See Kay (2000) and Rheinberger (1997) for more details.

References

  • Bachelard, G. (1972). L’actualité de l’histoire des sciences. In G. Bachelard (Ed.), L’engagement rationaliste (pp. 137–152). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, C. (2004). Metapher und Experiment. Von der Virusforschung zum genetischen Code. Göttingen: Wallstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creager, A. N. H. (2013). Life atomic: A history of radioisotopes in science and medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Lorenzo, V. (2014). From the selfish gene to selfish metabolism: Revisiting the central dogma. BioEssays, 36, 226–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchesneau, F. (2007). The delayed linkage of heredity with cell theory. In S. Müller-Wille & H.-J. Rheinberger (Eds.), Heredity produced: At the crossroads of biology, politics, and culture, 1500–1870 (pp. 293–314). Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Holmes, F. L. (1992). Between biology and medicine: The formation of intermediary metabolism. Berkeley: University of California Office for the History of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, F. L. (2001). Meselson, Stahl, and the Replication of DNA: A history of ‘the most beautiful experiment in biology’. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kamminga, H., & Cunningham, A. (Eds.). (1995). The science and culture of nutrition, 1840–1940. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, L. E. (2000). Who Wrote the Book of Life? A history of the genetic code. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Kluyver, A. J., & Donker, H. J. L. (1926). Die Einheit in der Biochemie. Chemie der Zelle und Gewebe: Zeitschrift für die Probleme der Gärung, Atmung und Vitaminforschung, 13, 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, R. E. (1975). The history of biochemistry: a survey. Journal of the History of Biology, 8(2), 275–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landecker, H. (2011). Food as exposure: Nutritional epigenetics and the new metabolism. BioSocieties, 6, 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landecker, H. (2012). The life of movement: from microcinematography to live-cell imaging. Journal of Visual Culture, 11, 378–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landecker, H. (2013a). Post-industrial metabolism: Fat knowledge. Public Culture, 25(3), 495–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landecker, H. (2013b). Metabolism, reproduction, and the aftermath of categories. Feminist & Scholar Online 11(3), online edition.

  • Morgan, N. (1990). The strategy of biological research programmes: Reassessing the ‘dark age’ of biochemistry, 1910–1930. Annals of Science, 47(2), 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Wille, S., & Rheinberger, H.-J. (2012). A cultural history of heredity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Neswald, E. (2011). Eigenwillige Objekte und widerspenstige Dinge. Das Experimentieren mit Lebendigem in der Ernährungsphysiologie. In N. Adamowsky, R. Felfe, M. Formisano, G. Toepfer, & K. Wagner (Eds.), Affektive Dinge. Objektberührungen in Wissenschaft und Kunst (pp. 51–79). Göttingen: Wallstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, M. A. (2014). Philosophy of microbiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostwald, W. (1914). Die Welt der vernachlässigten Dimensionen. Eine Einführung in die Kolloidchemie. Dresden: Th. Steinkopff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnes, O. (2003). From agents to cells. Theodor Schwann’s research notes of the years 1835–1838. In F. L. Holmes, J. Renn & H.-J. Rheinberger (Eds.), Reworking the bench: Research notebooks in the history of science (pp. 119–140). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Rasmussen, N. (1997). Picture control: The electron microscope and the transformation of biology in America, 1940–1960. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Towards a history of epistemic things. Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwann, Th. (1839). Mikroskopische Untersuchungen über die Übereinstimmung in der Struktur und dem Wachsthum der Thiere und Pflanzen. Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Niel, C. B. (1953). Introductory remarks on the comparative biochemistry of microorganisms. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology, 41(1), 11–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathias Grote.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grote, M., Keuck, L. Conference report “Stoffwechsel. Histories of metabolism”, workshop organized by Mathias Grote at Technische Universität Berlin, November 28–29th, 2014. HPLS 37, 210–218 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-015-0071-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-015-0071-0

Keywords

Navigation