Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent as a prognostic factor in Japanese hemodialysis patients: the Q-Cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous epidemiological evidence has suggested that responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) is related to prognosis in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We investigated the effects of hyporesponsiveness to ESA on mortality and cardiovascular events in Japanese HD patients, taking modifying factors into account.

Methods

A total of 2,905 Japanese HD patients aged ≥18 years who received ESA treatment were prospectively followed up for 4 years. Responsiveness to ESA was estimated using an erythropoietin resistance index (ERI), defined as erythropoietin dosage per week divided by post-HD weight and hemoglobin value (U/kg/week/g/dl). Patients were divided into three groups by tertiles of ERI levels: low ERI, ≤5.10; intermediate ERI, 5.11–9.43; high ERI, ≥9.44. Risk estimates were calculated by a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results

During follow-up, 482 patients died from any causes. The 4-year survival rate decreased linearly with higher ERI levels, being 87.5, 82.9, and 72.0 % for low, intermediate, and high ERI group (p for trend <0.001). Compared with the low ERI group, the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (mHR) was significantly higher in the high ERI group [mHR, 1.64 (95 % confidence interval, 1.27–2.11)]. In the high ERI group, patients with Kt/V ≥ 1.57 had a significantly lower risk of death from any causes compared with those with Kt/V ≤ 1.56 [mHR, 0.73 (0.54–0.98)].

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that ESA responsiveness can be considered a significant prognostic factor in Japanese HD patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kilpatrick RD, Critchlow CW, Fishbane S, Besarab A, Stehman-Breen C, Krishnan M, Bradbury BD (2008) Greater epoetin alfa responsiveness is associated with improved survival in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:1077–1083

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. López-Gómez J, Portolés J, Aljama P (2008) Factors that condition the response to erythropoietin in patients on hemodialysis and their relation to mortality. Kidney Int Suppl 74(Suppl 111):S75–S81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fukuma S, Yamaguchi T, Hashimoto S, Nakai S, Iseki K, Tsubakihara Y, Fukuhara S (2012) Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent responsiveness and mortality in hemodialysis patients: results from a cohort study from the dialysis registry in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 59:108–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Locatelli F, Pisoni RL, Akizawa T, Cruz JM, DeOreo PB, Lameire NH, Held PJ (2004) Anemia management for hemodialysis patients: kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines and dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS) findings. Am J Kidney Dis 44(5 Suppl 2):27–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Akizawa T, Pisoni RL, Akiba T, Saito A, Fukuhara S, Asano Y, Hasegawa T, Port FK, Kurokawa K (2008) Japanese haemodialysis anaemia management practices and outcomes (1999−2006): results from the DOPPS. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:3643–3653

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Besarab A, Bolton WK, Browne JK, Egrie JC, Nissenson AR, Okamoto DM, Schwab SJ, Goodkin DA (1998) The effects of normal as compared with low hematocrit values in patients with cardiac disease who are receiving hemodialysis and epoetin. N Engl J Med 339:584–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Phrommintikul A, Haas SJ, Elsik M, Krum H (2007) Mortality and target haemoglobin concentrations in anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease treated with erythropoietin: a meta-analysis. Lancet 369:381–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Streja E, Kovesdy CP, Greenland S, Kopple JD, McAllister CJ, Nissenson AR, Kalantar-Zadeh K (2008) Erythropoietin, iron depletion, and relative thrombocytosis: a possible explanation for hemoglobin-survival paradox in hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 52:727–736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaysen G, Müller H, Ding J, Chertow G (2006) Challenging the validity of the EPO index. Am J Kidney Dis 47:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. National Kidney Foundation, KDOQI (2006) II: clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for anemia in chronic kidney disease in adults. Am J Kidney Dis 47(5 Suppl 3):S16–S85

    Google Scholar 

  11. Locatelli F, Aljama P, Bárány P, Canaud B, Carrera F, Eckardt KU, Hörl WH, Macdougal IC, Macleod A, Wiecek A, Cameron S, European Best Practice Guidelines Working Group (2004) Revised European best practice guidelines for the management of anaemia in patients with chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 19(Suppl 2):ii1–ii47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pisoni RL, Bragg-Gresham JL, Young EW, Akizawa T, Asano Y, Locatelli F, Bommer J, Cruz JM, Kerr PG, Mendelssohn DC, Held PJ, Port FK (2004) Anemia management and outcomes from 12 countries in the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis 44:94–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McFarlane PA, Pisoni RL, Eichleay MA, Wald R, Port FK, Mendelssohn D (2010) International trends in erythropoietin use and hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 78:215–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rao DS, Shih MS, Mohini R (1993) Effect of serum parathyroid hormone and bone marrow fibrosis on the response to erythropoietin in uremia. N Engl J Med 328:171–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lee G, Miller J, Streja E, Jing J, Robertson JA, Kovesdy CP (2009) Predictors of hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 53:823–834

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Locatelli F, Andrulli S, Memoli B, Maffei C, Del Vecchio L, Aterini S, De Simone W, Mandalari A, Brunori G, Amato M, Cianciaruso B, Zoccali C (2006) Nutritional-inflammation status and resistance to erythropoietin therapy in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:991–998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rattanasompattikul M, Molnar MZ, Zaritsky JJ, Hatamizadeh P, Jing J, Norris KC, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K (2013) Association of malnutrition-inflammation complex and responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in long-term hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 28:1936–1945

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taniguchi M, Yamada S, Tokumoto M, Tsuruya K, Hirakata H, Fujimi S, Iida M (2009) Does cinacalcet improve the prognosis of dialysis patients? Ther Apher Dial 13:S15–S19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Daugirdas JT (1989) The post: pre dialysis plasma urea nitrogen ratio to estimate K.t/V and NPCR: validation. Int J Artif Organs 12:420–427

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mallick S, Rafiroiu A, Kanthety R, Iqbal S, Malik R, Rahman M (2012) Factors predicting erythropoietin resistance among maintenance hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif 33:238–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Solomon SD, Uno H, Lewis EF, Eckardt KU, Lin J, Burdmann EA, Zeeuw D, Ivanovich P, Levey AS, Parfrey P, Remuzzi G, Singh AK, Toto R, Huang F, Rossert J, McMurray JJV, Pfeffer MA, For the Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events with Aranesp Therapy (TREAT) Investigators (2010) Erythropoietic response and outcomes in kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 363:1146–1155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stenvinkel P, Alvestrand A (2002) Inflammation in end-stage renal disease: sources, consequences, and therapy. Semin Dial 15:329–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pecoits-Filho R, Lindholm B, Axelsson J, Stenvinkel P (2003) Update on interleukin-6 and its role in chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18:1042–1045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Regidor DL, Kopple JD, Kovesdy CP, Kilpatrick RD, McAllister CJ, Aronovitz J, Greenland S, Kalantar-Zadeh K (2006) Associations between changes in hemoglobin and administered erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and survival in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 17:1181–1191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramirez SPB, Kapke A, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Saran R, Pearson J, Hirth RA, Messana JM, Daugirdas JT (2012) Dialysis dose scaled to body surface area and size-adjusted, sex-specific patient mortality. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7:1977–1987

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Port FK, Ashby VB, Dhingra RK, Roys EC, Wolfe RA (2002) Dialysis dose and body mass index are strongly associated with survival in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:1061–1066

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheung AK, Rocco MV, Yan G, Leypoldt JK, Levin NW, Greene T, Agodoa L, Bailey J, Beck GJ, Clark W, Levey AS, Ornt DB, Schulman G, Schwab S, Teehan B, Eknoyan G (2006) Serum beta-2 microglobulin levels predict mortality in dialysis patients: results of the HEMO study. J Am Soc Nephrol 17:546–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the participants in the Q-Cohort Study, members of the Society for the Study of Kidney Disease, and all personnel at participating institutions involved in the study. The following personnel (institutions) participated in the study: Takashi Ando (Hakozaki Park Internal Medicine Clinic); Takashi Ariyoshi (Ariyoshi Clinic); Koichiro Goto (Goto Clinic); Fumitada Hattori (Nagao Hospital); Harumichi Higashi (St Mary’s Hospital); Tadashi Hirano (Hakujyuji Hospital); Kei Hori (Munakata Medical Association Hospital); Takashi Inenaga (Ekisaikai Moji Hospital); Hidetoshi Kanai (Kokura Memorial Hospital); Shigemi Kiyama (Kiyama Naika); Tetsuo Komota (Komota Clinic); Hiromasa Kuma (Kuma Clinic); Toshiro Maeda (Kozenkai-Maeda Hospital); Junichi Makino (Makino Clinic); Dai Matsuo (Hirao Clinic); Chiaki Miishima (Miishima Clinic); Koji Mitsuiki (Japanese Red Cross Fukuoka Hospital); Kenichi Motomura (Motomura Naika Clinic); Sadatoshi Nakamura (Kokura Daiichi Hospital); Hidetoshi Nakamura (Kokura Daiichi Hospital); Koichi Nakashima (Ohashi Internal Circulatory Clinic); Nobumitsu Okita (Shiroishi Kyoritsu Hospital); Shinichiro Osato (Osato Jin Clinic); Sakura Sakamoto (Fujiyamato Spa Hospital); Keiko Shigematsu (Shigematsu Clinic); Kazumasa Shimamatsu (Shimamatsu Naika Iin); Yoshito Shogakiuchi (Shin-Ai Clinic); Hiroaki Takamura (Hara Hospital); Kazuhito Takeda (Iizuka Hospital); Asuka Terai (Chidoribashi Hospital); Hideyoshi Tanaka (Mojiko-Jin Clinic); Suguru Tomooka (Hakozaki Park Internal Medicine Clinic); Jiro Toyonaga (Fukuoka Renal Clinic); Hiroshi Tsuruta (Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital); Ryutaro Yamaguchi (Shiseikai Hospital); Taihei Yanagida (Saiseikai Yahata General Hospital); Tetsuro Yanase (Yanase Internal Medicine Clinic); Tetsuhiko Yoshida (Hamanomachi Hospital); Takahiro Yoshimitsu (Gofukumachi Kidney Clinic, Harasanshin Hospital); Koji Yoshitomi (Yoshitomi Medical Clinic). This study was supported by the Kidney Foundation (H19 JKFB 07-13, H20 JKFB 08-8, H23 JKFB 11-11) and the Japan Dialysis Outcome Research Foundation (H19-076-02, H20-003).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuhiko Tsuruya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eriguchi, R., Taniguchi, M., Ninomiya, T. et al. Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent as a prognostic factor in Japanese hemodialysis patients: the Q-Cohort study. J Nephrol 28, 217–225 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-014-0121-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-014-0121-9

Keywords

Navigation