Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Less is more: time to expand the indications for minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) is one of the most widespread targeted parathyroid surgeries for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP). The aim of this study was to assess its limits and propose an expansion of its indications in the management of parathyroid pathology.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 77 consecutive patients who underwent MIVAP for PHP between Jan and Oct 2016 was conducted. The adequacy of the procedure and/or the need to convert to a standard cervicotomy was the main outcome of interest. Secondary outcomes of interest included: operative time, postoperative morbidity, postoperative pain assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and the length of the surgical incision.

Results

There were 64 females and 13 males with a mean age of 51 years. In one patient a concomitant en bloc thyroid lobectomy was required due to features suspicious of parathyroid carcinoma while exploration was required in two other patients. None of these three cases required conversion to standard cervicotomy. The mean operative time, length of incision and VAS score was 31 min, 17 mm and 1.6, respectively. Biochemical cure was achieved in all patients, and no postoperative morbidities were reported.

Conclusion

MIVAP offers the ability to perform a neck exploration and/or an en bloc thyroid lobectomy without the need to convert to a standard cervicotomy. Therefore, it not only serves as a targeted parathyroid procedure but also a potential alternative to full neck exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marcocci C, Brandi ML, Scillitani A, Corbetta S, Faggiano A, Gianotti L, Migliaccio S, Minisola S (2015) Italian Society of Endocrinology consensus statement: definition, evaluation and management of patients with mild primary hyperparathyroidism. J Endocrinol Invest 38:577–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Castellano E, Tassone F, Attanasio R, Gianotti L, Pellegrino M, Borretta G (2016) Mild primary hyperparathyroidism as defined in the Italian Society of Endocrinology’s Consensus Statement: prevalence and clinical features. J Endocrinol Invest 39:349–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruda J, Hollenbeak CS, Stack BC (2005) A systemic review of the diagnosis and treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism from 1995 to 2003. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:359–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tezelman S, Shen W, Shaver JK, Siperstein AE, Duh QY, Klein H, Clark OH (1993) Double parathyroid adenomas. Clinical and biochemical characteristics before and after parathyroidectomy. Ann Surg 218:300–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodman A, Politz D, Lopez J, Norman J (2011) Intrathyroid parathyroid adenoma: incidence and location—the case against thyroid lobectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 144:867–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wei CH, Harari A (2012) Parathyroid carcinoma: update and guidelines for management. Curr Treat Options Oncol 13:11–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Henry JF, Defechereux T, Gramatica L (1999) Minimally invasive videoscopic parathyroidectomy by lateral approach. Langenbecks Arch Surg 384:298–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miccoli P, Bendinelli C, Berti P, Vignali E, Pinchera A, Marcocci C (1999) Video-assisted versus conventional parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective randomized study. Surgery 126:1117–1121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Udelsman R (2002) Six hundred fifty-six consecutive explorations for primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg 235:665–670

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergenfelz A, Kanngiesser V, Zielke A, Nies C, Rothmund M (2005) Conventional bilateral cervical exploration versus open minimally invasive parathyroidectomy under local anaesthesia for primary hyperparathyroidism. Br J Surg 92:190–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miccoli P, Bendinelli C, Vignali E, Mazzeo S, Cecchini GM, Pinchera A, Marcocci C (1998) Endoscopic parathyroidectomy: report of an initial experience. Surgery 124:1077–1079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berti P, Materazzi G, Picone A, Miccoli P (2003) Limits and drawbacks of video-assisted parathyroidectomy. Br J Surg 90:743–747

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cetani F, Pardi E, Marcocci C (2016) Update on parathyroid carcinoma. J Endocrinol Invest 39:595–606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miccoli P, Materazzi G, Bonari G, Donatini G, Berti P (2008) Minimally-invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy. Oper Tech Otolaryngol 19:22–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alesina PF, Singaporewalla RM, Walz MK (2010) Video-assisted bilateral neck exploration in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and failed localization studies. World J Surg 34:2344–2349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bakkar S, Materazzi G, Biricotti M, De Napoli L, Conte M, Galleri D, Aghababyan A, Miccoli P (2016) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) from A to Z. Surg Today 46:255–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alesina PF, Hinrichs J, Kribben A, Walz MK (2010) Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) for secondary hyperparathyroidism: report of initial experience. Am J Surg 199:851–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

Corresponding author SB: study concept and design, data interpretation, article writing, final approval, accountability for all aspects of the work. VM: data collection, drafting, final approval, accountability for all aspects of the work. CC: data interpretation, final approval, accountability for all aspects of the work. SP: data collection, final approval, accountability for all aspects of the work. PM: study design, revision, final approval, accountability for all aspects of the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Bakkar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

No need for informed consent.

Funding

This study was not founded by any grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakkar, S., Matteucci, V., Corsini, C. et al. Less is more: time to expand the indications for minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy. J Endocrinol Invest 40, 979–983 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-017-0658-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-017-0658-2

Keywords

Navigation