Abstract
In their 2016 article, “Navigating a Managed Care Peer Review: Guidance for Clinicians Using Applied Behavior Analysis [ABA] in the Treatment of Children on the Autism Spectrum,” Papatola and Lustig provide an overview of the managed care process, discuss the medical necessity of ABA, and offer guidance to clinicians on how to navigate the managed care peer review process. Given that the authors are employed by a large international health insurance carrier and conduct peer reviews on behalf of that organization, this response seeks to provide guidance from both the clinical and public policy perspectives that reflect best practices in the field of autism treatment. This response is not written with the intention of providing or replacing legal advice; rather, this paper offers health care providers of ABA an essential understanding of some of the laws that govern and support their efforts to secure medically necessary treatment and the mechanisms in place with which to challenge decisions by managed care organizations, health plans, and health insurance issuers that may be contrary to best practices. Finally, suggestions are offered on how to navigate a peer review to ensure optimal outcomes and, when necessary, to lay the groundwork to overturn a funding source decision that does not reflect best practices or the standard of care in ABA-based autism treatment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Andresen, J. S. (1998). Is utilization review the practice of medicine? Implications for managed care administrators. The Journal of Legal Medicine, 19(3), 431–454.
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2014). Applied behavior analysis treatment of autism spectrum disorder: practice guidelines for healthcare funders and managers. Retrieved from http://bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/ABA_Guidelines_for_ASD.pdf.
Bergthold, L. A. (1995). Medical necessity: do we need it? Health Affairs, 14(4), 180.
Bibby, P., Eikeseth, S., Martin, N. T., Mudford, O. C., & Reeves, D. (2002). Progress and outcomes for children with autism receiving parent-managed intensive interventions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 23, 81–104.
California Health Benefits Review Program. (2016). Analysis of California Senate Bill (SB) 1034 Health Care Coverage: autism. A report to the 2015–2016 California State Legislature. Retrieved from http://chbrp.ucop.edu/index.php?action=read&bill_id=207&doc_type=1000.
Callahan, D. (1991). Medical futility, medical necessity: the-problem-without-a-name. The Hastings Center Report, 21(4), 30–35.
CDC. (2014). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders among children aged 8 years: autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 63(2), 1–22.
Eikeseth, S. (2009). Outcome of comprehensive psycho-educational interventions for young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(1), 158–178. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2008.02.003.
Fenske, E. C., Zalenski, S., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1985). Age at intervention and treatment outcome for autistic children in a comprehensive intervention program. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 3, 49–58. doi:10.1016/S0270-4684(85)80005-7.
Hall, M. A., & Anderson, G. F. (1951-1992). Health insurers’ assessment of medical necessity. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140, 1637–1712. doi:10.2307/3312428.
Harris, S. L., & Handleman, J. S. (2000). Age and IQ at intake as predictors of placement for young children with autism: a four- to six-year follow-up. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 137–142.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(2), 197–209.
Kesselheim, A. S. (2001). What’s the appeal? Trying to control managed care medical necessity decisionmaking through a system of external appeals. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 149(3), 873.
Myers, S., & Plauche Johnson, C. (2007). Management of children with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics, 120(5), 1162–1182. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2362.
Papatola, K. J., & Lustig, S. L. (2016). Navigating a managed care peer review: guidance for clinicians using applied behavior analysis in the treatment of children on the autism spectrum. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(2),135–145. doi:10.1007/s40617-016-0120-5.
Serna, R. W., Lobo, H. E., Fleming, C. K., Fleming, R. K., Curtin, C., Foran, M. M., & Hamad, C. D. (2015). Innovations in behavioral intervention preparation for paraprofessionals working with children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30(1), 1–12. doi:10.1177/016264341503000101.
Strauss, K., Mancini, F., & Fava, L. (2013). Parent inclusion in early intensive behavior interventions for young children with ASD: a synthesis of meta-analyses from 2009 to 2011. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(9), 2967–2985. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.007.
Stuart, M. (2011). Autism insurance reform: a comparison of state initiatives. Indiana Health Law Review., 8(2), 498–537 Retrieved from http://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/ihlr/.
Sundberg, M. L. (2008). The verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: the VB-MAPP. Concord: AVB Press.
U.S. Department of Labor & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2016). Warning signs: plan or policy non-quantitative treatment limitations (NQTLs) that require additional analysis to determine mental health parity compliance. Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/warning-signs-plan-or-policy-nqtls-that-require-additional-analysis-to-determine-mhpaea-compliance.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Funding
No funding was obtained in completion of this manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kornack, J., Herscovitch, B. & Williams, A.L. A Response to Papatola and Lustig’s Paper on Navigating a Managed Care Peer Review: Guidance for Clinicians Using Applied Behavior Analysis in the Treatment of Children on the Autism Spectrum. Behav Analysis Practice 10, 386–394 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0192-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0192-x