Abstract
Dixon et al. (Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8:7–15, 2015) outlined methods to evaluate research rankings of behavior analytic graduate training programs and their graduate faculty. Publications across five behavior analytic journals were evaluated and cumulative totals were obtained for each program and its faculty members. Critchfield (Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8:3–6, 2015) noted that these measures indicated that many graduate students in behavior analysis are receiving training by faculty members with limited research productivity. This commentary offers some suggestions and refinements of the procedures used by Dixon et al. that might provide a more sensitive measure of scholarly productivity in our field. The implications of these suggestions are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carr, J. E., & Briggs, A. M. (2010). Strategies for making regular contact with the scholarly literature. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 3, 13–18.
Critchfield, T. S. (2015). What counts as high-quality practitioner training in applied behavior analysis? Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 3–6. doi:10.1007/s40617-015-0049-0.
Dixon, M. R., Reed, D. D., Smith, T., Belisle, J., & Jackson, R. E. (2015). Research rankings of behavior analytic graduate training programs and their faculty. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 7–15.
Friman, P. C. (2010). Come on in, the water is fine: Achieving mainstream relevance through integration with primary medical care. The Behavior Analyst, 33, 19–36.
Moore, J., & Cooper, J. O. (2003). Some proposed relations among the domains of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 69–84.
Schlinger, H. J., Jr. (2010). Perspectives on the future of behavior analysis: Introductory comments. The Behavior Analyst, 33, 1–5.
Vyse, S. (2013). Changing course. The Behavior Analyst, 36, 123–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reeve, S.A. Expanding the Scope of Research Productivity Indices: a Commentary on Dixon, Reed, Smith, Belisle, and Jackson (2015). Behav Analysis Practice 8, 142–143 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0073-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0073-0