Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Health Equity Scholars Program: Innovation in the Leaky Pipeline

  • Published:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite attempts to increase enrollment of under-represented minorities (URMs: primarily Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, and Native American students) in health professional programs, limited progress has been made. Compelling reasons to rectify this situation include equity for URMs, better prepared health professionals when programs are diverse, better quality and access to health care for UMR populations, and the need for diverse talent to tackle difficult questions in health science and health care delivery. However, many students who initiate traditional “pipeline” programs designed to link URMs to professional schools in health professions and the sciences, do not complete them. In addition, program requirements often restrict entry to highly qualified students while not expanding opportunities for promising, but potentially less well-prepared candidates. The current study describes innovations in an undergraduate pipeline program, the Health Equity Scholars Program (HESP) designed to address barriers URMs experience in more traditional programs, and provides evaluative outcomes and qualitative feedback from participants. A primary outcome was timely college graduation. Eighty percent (80%) of participants, both transfer students and first time students, so far achieved this outcome, with 91% on track, compared to the campus average of 42% for all first time students and 58–67% for transfers. Grade point averages also improved (p = 0.056) after program participation. Graduates (94%) were working in health care/human services positions and three were in health-related graduate programs. Creating a more flexible program that admits a broader range of URMs has potential to expand the numbers of URM students interested and prepared to make a contribution to health equity research and clinical care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bond ML, Cl C, Baxley SM. Institutional support for diverse populations: perceptions of Hispanic and African American students and program faculty. Nurse Educ. 2015;40:134–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kreuter MW, Griffith DJ, Thompson V, Brownson RC, McClure S, Sharff DP, Clark EM, Haire-Joshu D. Lessons learned from a decade of recruitment and training to development minority health professionals. Am J Public Health. 2001;101:S188–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grumbach K, Mendoza R. Disparities in human resources addressing the lack of diversity in the health professions. Health Aff. 2008;27:413–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Newman LA, Pollock R, Johnston-Thompson MC. Increasing the pool of academically oriented African American medical and surgical oncologists. Cancer. 2003;97(1 Suppl):329–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vela MB, Kim KE, Tang H, Chin MH. Improving undergraduate minority medial student recruitment with health disparities curriculum. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(Suppl 2):82085.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Institute of Medicine. Unequal treatment: National Academy Press; 2002. Washington DC.

  7. Newsome F. Black contributions to the early history of Western medicine: lack of recognition as a cause of black under-representation in US medical schools. JAMA. 1979;71:189–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson WE, Pattillo RA, Stiles JK, Schattan G. Biomedical research’s unpaid debt. EMBRO Reports. 2014;15:333–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Terrell C, Beaudreau J. 3000 by 2000 and beyond: next steps for promoting diversity in the health professions. J Dental Ed. 67:1048–52.

  10. Editorial. Encouraging minority scientists. Nat Immunol; 2009: 927.

  11. Ginther DK, Schaffer WT, Schnell J, Masimore B, Liu F, Haak LL, Kington R. Race, ethnicity and NIH research awards. Science. 2011;333:1015–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Valantine HA, Collins FS. National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:12240–122402. doi:10.1073/pnas.1515612112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Alexander C, Chen E, Grumbach K. How leaky is the health career pipeline? Minority student achievement in college gateway courses. Acad Med. 2009;84:797–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. James R, Starks H, Segrest VA, Burke W. From leaky pipeline to irrigation system: minority education through the lens of community-based participatory research. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action. 2012;6:471–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barr DA, Gonzalez ME, Wanart SF. The leaky pipeline: factors associated with early decline in interest in premedical studies among underrepresented minority undergraduate students. Acad Med. 2008;83:503–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boaten BA, Thomas B. How can we ease the social isolation of underrepresented minority students. Acad Med. 2011;86:1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Walton GM, Cohen GL. A brief social belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science. 2011;331:1447–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nugent KE, Childs G, Jones R, Cook P. A mentorship model for retention of minority students. Nurs Outlook. 2004;52:89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Odom KL, Morgan Roberts L, Johnson RI, Cooper LA. Exploring obstacles to and opportunities for professional success among ethnic minority medical students. Acad Med. 2007;82:146–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalsbeek DH. Reframing retention strategy for institutional imprvements: new directions for higher education. No. 161. San Francisco: Josey-Bass-Wiley; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  21. US Department of Education. Promising and practical strategies to increase post-secondary success. www.ed.gov/college-completion/promising-strategies/tages/retention Accessed 4/1/2017.

  22. Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies. The six-year graduation rate of the Fall 2008 cohort of first-time full-time freshman. Executive Summary. University of Massachusetts Boston, 2014. Downloaded from: https://www.umb.edu/oirap/retention_graduation Accessed March 2, 2016.

  23. Graduation Rates Work Group. Building a culture and systems that support student success: a plan for significantly improving undergraduate retention and graduation rates at UMass Boston. Report University of Massachusetts Boston May. 2011;4

  24. Byars-Winston AM, Branchaw J, Pfund C, Leverett P, Newton J. Culturally diverse undergraduate researcher’s academic outcomes and perceptions of their research mentoring relationships. Int J Sci Ed. 2015; doi:10.1080/0950069.2015.1085133. Downloaded Oct. 15, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lopatto D. Survey of undergraduate research experiences-SURE. First findings. Cell Biology Education. 2004;3:270–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. MacLachlan AJ. Minority undergraduate programs intended to increase participation in biomedical careers. Mt Sinai J Med. 2012;79:769–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The development of the HESP program was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (1 P60 MD006912) to the Center for Health Equity Intervention Research at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Jeroan Allison, MD, MPH, Professor and Vice Chair, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences and Associate Vice Provost for Health Disparities Research, PI; and Milagros Rosal, PhD, Professor, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Co-PI. We wish to thank the many students, staff, and faculty who contributed to the development of the program over the last 4 years and especially to staff who assisted with many different aspects of the program: Chioma Nnaji, MPH, CHEIR Program Director, Elizabeth de la Rosa, BA, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health Research Assistant, and Yvonne Gomes Santos, BA, Director of Public Affairs, Trotter Institute, UMass Boston.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carole C. Upshur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Upshur, C.C., Wrighting, D.M., Bacigalupe, G. et al. The Health Equity Scholars Program: Innovation in the Leaky Pipeline. J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 5, 342–350 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-017-0376-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-017-0376-7

Keywords

Navigation