Skip to main content
Log in

A CBPR Study to Test the Impact of a Church-Based Health Empowerment Program on Health Behaviors and Health Outcomes of Black Adult Churchgoers

  • Published:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Black adults in the United States are disproportionately affected by health disparities, such as overweight and obesity. Research suggests that Black adults engage in fewer health-promoting behaviors (e.g., physical activity and healthy eating) than their non-Hispanic White counterparts. These health-promoting behaviors are known protective factors against overweight/obesity and related health concerns. This community-based participatory research study employed a waitlist control design and a university–church partnership approach to test the impact of a church-based health-empowerment program designed to increase health-promoting behaviors (called health-smart behaviors) and improve health indicators (e.g., reduce weight) among overweight/obese Black adult churchgoers. Results indicate that the intervention group (n = 37) experienced a significant increase in levels of healthy eating and physical activity and a significant decrease in weight compared to the waitlist control group (n = 33). Results from this study have implications for the design of church-based, culturally sensitive health promotion interventions to increase health-smart behaviors and ultimately prevent and reduce obesity and related diseases in Black communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2020: Disparities. http://healthypeople.gov/2020/about/disparitiesAbout.aspx. Accessed July 13, 2015.

  2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014;311:806–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. An, R. Prevalence and Trends of Adult Obesity in the US, 1999–2012. ISRN Obes. 2014.

  4. Danaei G, Ding EL, Mozaffarian D, Taylor B, Rehm J, Murray CJ, et al. The preventable causes of death in the United States: comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLoS Med. 2009. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000058.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. World Health Organization, 2009.

  6. Vucenik I, Stains JP. Obesity and cancer risk: evidence, mechanisms, and recommendations. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2012;1271(1):37–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Report of the physical activity guidelines advisory committee. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  8. White KM, Terry DJ, Troup C, et al. Predicting the consumption of foods low in saturated fats among people diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The role of planning in the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite. 2010;55(2):348–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Affuso O, Cox TL, Durant N, Allison DB. Attitudes and beliefs associated with leisure-time physical activity among African American adults. Ethn Dis. 2011;21(1):63–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bovell-Benjamin A, Dawkins N, Pace R, Shikany JM. Dietary consumption practices and cancer risk in African Americans in the rural South. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010;21(3):57–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koenig HG. Religion, spirituality, and health: the research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry. 2012;2012:1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baruth M, Wilcox S, Saunders RP. The role of pastor support in a faith-based health promotion intervention. Fam Community Health. 2013;36:204–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baruth M, Wilcox S, Condrasky MD. Perceived environmental church support is associated with dietary practices among African-American adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:889–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilcox S, Parrott A, Baruth M, et al. The faith, activity, and nutrition program: a randomized controlled trial in African-American churches. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44:122–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yeary KHK, Klos LA, Linnan L. The examination of process evaluation use in church-based health interventions: a systematic review. Health Promot Pract. 2012;13(4):524–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bopp M, Peterson JA, Webb BL. A comprehensive review of faith-based physical activity interventions. AJLM. 2012;6(6):460–78.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tucker CM, Butler A, Loyuk I, et al. Predictors of a health-promoting lifestyle and behaviors among low-income African American mothers and white mothers of chronically ill children. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009;101(2):103–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Pressure Institute. Your Guide to Lowering Blood Pressure. 2003.

  19. Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The health promoting lifestyle profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res. 1987. doi:10.1097/00006199-198703000-00002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tucker CM, Rice KG, Hou W, et al. Development of the motivators of and barriers to health-smart behaviors inventory. Psychol Assess. 2011. doi:10.1037/a0022299.

    Google Scholar 

  21. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults; the evidence report. Obes Res. 1998;6(2):51S–209S.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ethan D, Samuel L, Basch CH. An analysis of Bronx-based online grocery store circulars for nutritional content of food and beverage products. J Community Health. 2013;38(3):521–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hannon PA, Harris JR, Sopher CJ, et al. Improving low-wage, midsized employers’ health promotion practices: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(2):125–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhandari A, Wagner T. Self-reported utilization of health care services: improving measurement and accuracy. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63:217–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. DiMatteo MR. Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research. Med Care. 2004;4:200–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Currie M, King G, Rosenbaum P, Law M, Kertoy M, Specht J. A model of impacts of research partnership in health and social services. Eval Program Plann. 2005;4:400–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sadler LS, Larson J, Bouregy S, et al. Community-university partnerships in community-based research. Prog Commun Health Partnerships: Res, Educ Action. 2012;6(4):463–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. VanDevanter N, Kwon S, Sim S, et al. B free CEED coalition. Evaluation of community-academic partnership functioning: center for the elimination of hepatitis B health disparities. Prog Commun Health Partnerships: Res, Educ Action. 2011;5(3):223–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge PepsiCo for providing the funding to support the study reported in this manuscript. PepsiCo was not involved in the aspects of designing or conducting this study and was not involved in interpreting the results of this study or in writing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillermo M. Wippold.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The study was founded by PepsiCo (grant number 0091084). PepsiCo was not involved in project design, implementation, or data analyses.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Animal studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors of this study.

Conflict of interest

Carolyn M. Tucker, Ph.D., Guillermo M. Wippold, M.S., Jaime L. Williams, M.S.Ed., Tya M. Arthur, Ph.D., Frederic F. Desmond, Ph.D., and Karlyne C. Robinson, B.S., declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tucker, C.M., Wippold, G.M., Williams, J.L. et al. A CBPR Study to Test the Impact of a Church-Based Health Empowerment Program on Health Behaviors and Health Outcomes of Black Adult Churchgoers. J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 4, 70–78 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-015-0203-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-015-0203-y

Keywords

Navigation