Abstract
Over the last few decades, behaviorism as a philosophy of the science of psychology, especially in the field of behavior analysis and related areas, has diversified to the point that scholars from inside and outside the field are often confused about what exactly behaviorism is. The aim of this study is to analyze how such diversification of behaviorism has arisen over time and what factors might have contributed to it using evolutionary biology’s concept of adaptive radiation as an analogical process. Diversification of behaviorism has occurred in many areas over time as behaviorism has extended its field of practice. Although some characteristics of behaviorism remained, other characteristics were modified. One such characteristic that went through extensive modification is the agent-free approach to the analysis of behavior: the agent problem. This approach has met criticism from inside and outside the field and has been under a strong selective pressure. The present article discusses how the agent problem in a different niche has shaped behaviorism into new forms that we see today.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs.
Baum, W. M. (2002). From molecular to molar: A paradigm shift in behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2002.78-95.
Baum, W. M. (2007). Commentary on Foxall, Intentional behaviorism. Behavior & Philosophy, 35, 57–60 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27759529.
Baum, W. M. (2011a). Behaviorism, private events, and the molar view of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 34(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392249.
Baum, W. M. (2011b). No need for private events in a science of behavior: Response to commentaries. The Behavior Analyst, 34(2), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392255.
Baum, W. M. (2012). Rethinking reinforcement: Allocation, induction, and contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.97-101.
Baum, W. M. (2013). What counts as behavior? The molar multiscale view. The Behavior Analyst, 36(2), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392315.
Branch, M. N., & Malagodi, E. F. (1980). Where have all the behaviorists gone? The Behavior Analyst, 3(1), 31–38.
Breland, K., & Breland, M. (1961). The misbehavior of organisms. American Psychologist, 16(11), 681. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040090.
Brown, P. L., & Jenkins, H. M. (1968). Auto-shaping of the pigeon’s key-peck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1.
Burgos, J. (2003). Laudable goals, interesting experiments, unintelligible theorizing. Behavior & Philosophy, 31, 19–45 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759445.
Burgos, J. (2007). About aboutness: Thoughts on intentional behaviorism. Behavior & Philosophy, 35, 65–76 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759531.
Catania, A. C. (2011). On Baum’s public claim that he has no significant private events. The Behavior Analyst, 34(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392254.
Claus, C. K. (2007). B. F. Skinner and T. N. Whitehead: A brief encounter, research similarities, Hawthorne revisited, what next? The Behavior Analyst, 30(1), 79–86.
Day, W. (1983). On the difference between radical and methodological behaviorism. Behaviorism, 11(1), 89–102 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759016.
Day, W. E. (1969). On certain similarities between the philosophical investigations of Ludwig Wittgenstein and the operationism of B. E Skinner. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 489–506.
Day, W. F. (1980). The historical antecedents of contemporary behaviorism. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 203–262). New York: Academic Press.
Estes, W. K., & Skinner, B. F. (1941). Some quantitative properties of anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(5), 390. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062283.
Foxall, G. (2008). Intentional behaviorism revisited. Behavior & Philosophy, 36, 113–155 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759548.
Foxall, G. R. (2007). Intentional behaviorism. Behavior & Philosophy, 35, 1–55 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27759528.
Foxall, G. R. (2017). Behavioral economics in consumer behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 40(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0127-4.
Gibbon, J. (1981). On the form and location of the psychometric bisection function for time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 24(1), 58–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(81)90035-3.
Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1992). Some clinical implications of contextualistic behaviorism: The example of cognition. Behavior Therapy, 23(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80383-1.
Hineline, P. N. (2001). Beyond the molar—molecular distinction: We need multiscaled analyses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 75(3), 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2001.75-342.
Kantor, J. R. (1933). In defense of stimulus-response psychology. Psychological Review, 40(4), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073851.
Kantor, J. R. (1963). The scientific evolution of psychology, Vol. 1. Bloomington: Principia Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11183-000.
Killeen, P. (1984). Emergent behaviorism. Behaviorism, 12(2), 25–40 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759042.
Killeen, P. R., Fetterman, J. G., & Bizo, L. A. (1997). Time's causes. In C. M. Bradshaw & E. Szabadi (Eds.), Time and behaviour: Psychological and neurobehavioural analyses (pp. 79–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: “Gold,” “ribbon” or “puzzle?”. Research Policy, 40(10), 1354–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.002.
Langthorne, P., & McGill, P. (2008). Functional analysis of the early development of self-injurious behavior: Incorporating gene-environment interactions. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113(5), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1352/2008.113:403-417.
MacCorquodale, K. (1970). On Chomsky's review of Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13(1), 83–99.
Malone, J. C. (2004). Modern molar behaviorism and theoretical behaviorism: Religion and science. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2004.82-95.
Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(1), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149.
Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst., 16(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392623.
Miguel, C. F. (2013). Jack Michael’s motivation. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393119.
Moore, J. (2001). On distinguishing methodological from radical behaviorism. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2001.11434196.
Moore, J. (2007). Comments on “Intentional Behaviorism by G. R. Foxall”. Behavior & Philosophy, 35, 113–130 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759535.
Pavlov, I. P. (1960). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1927).
Rachlin, H. (1994). Behavior and mind: The roots of modern psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rachlin, H. (2011). Baum’s private thoughts. The Behavior Analyst, 34(2), 209–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392251.
Rachlin, H. (2013). About teleological behaviorism. The Behavior Analyst, 36(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392307.
Rider, D. P. (1991). The speciation of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 14(2), 171–181.
Rolider, A., & Axelrod, S. (2005). The effects of “behavior-speak” on public attitudes toward behavioral interventions: A cross-cultural argument for using conversational language to describe behavioral interventions. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, N. A. Neef, S. M. Peterson, D. M. Sainto, G. Cartledge, R. Gardner III, et al. (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 283–293). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Schluter, D. (2000). The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shimp, C. P. (2013). Toward the unification of molecular and molar analyses. The Behavior Analyst, 36(2), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392316.
Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1990). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. BF Skinner Foundation. (Original work published 1938)
Staddon, J. (2001). The new behaviorism: Mind, mechanism and society. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Staddon, J. (2017). Theoretical behaviorism. Behavior & Philosophy, 45, 27–44.
Staddon, J. (2018). The devolution of social science. Retrieved from https://quillette.com/2018/10/07/the-devolution-of-social-science/
Sundberg, M. L. (1993). The application of establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16(2), 211–214.
Sundberg, M. L. (2013). Thirty points about motivation from Skinner’s book Verbal Behavior. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29, 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393120.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158.
Watson, J. B. (1957). Behaviorism (Rev. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Original work published 1930).
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Araiba, S. Current Diversification of Behaviorism. Perspect Behav Sci 43, 157–175 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00207-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00207-0