Skip to main content
Log in

Project ECHO in Psychiatric Workforce Development: the Example of a Perinatal Mental Health ECHO

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Perinatal mental health and substance use disorders (PMHSUD) often go unrecognized and untreated. This study examined the use of the Project ECHO model to teach obstetric, primary care, and mental health clinicians about screening, diagnosis, and treatment of PMHSUD.

Methods

Participants in 3 years of the University of Washington’s Moms’ Access Project (MAP) ECHO program (2019–2022) completed pre- and post-program surveys. Nine participants in year 1 completed qualitative interviews. Dedoose was used for qualitative analysis of interviews.

Results

Of 136 participants, 62.5% (15/24) completed both pre- and post-surveys in year 1, 56% (28/50) in year 2, and 32.2% (20/62) in year 3. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they were glad to have participated (96.8%; 60/62) and that they had used information learned in the program in treating a patient (95.1%; 58/61). In all years, respondents endorsed increased confidence regarding learning objectives of the program. Qualitative interviews following year 1 yielded themes of hierarchy of competence, motivation versus results of participation, connection, and politics of change: position and practice type.

Conclusions

Findings supported the feasibility, acceptability, and self-reported effectiveness of the ECHO model for workforce development in PMHSUD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data Availability

Data analyzed as part of this current program evaluation are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Gopalan P, Spada ML, Shenai N, Brockman I, Kell M, Livingston S, et al. Postpartum depression – identifying risk and access to intervention. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022;24:889–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Smid MC, Terplan M. What obstetrician-gynecologists should know about substance use disorders in the perinatal period. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;139:317–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Four in 5 pregnancy-related deaths in the U.S. are preventable. September 19, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/p0919-pregnancy-related-deaths.html Accessed 17 Sept 2023.

  4. Cox EQ, Sowa NA, Meltzer-Brody SE, Gaynes BN. The perinatal depression treatment cascade: baby steps toward improving outcomes. J Clin Psych. 2016;77:1189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garbarino AH, Kohn JR, Coverdale JH, Kilpatrick CC. Current trends in psychiatric education among obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. Acad Psych. 2019;43:294–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Osborne LM, MacLean JV, Barzilay EM, Meltzer-Brody S, Miller L, Yang SN. Reproductive psychiatry residency training: a survey of psychiatric residency program directors. Acad Psych. 2018;42:197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Byatt N, Moore Simas TA, Lundquist RS, Johnson JV, Ziedonis DM. Strategies for improving perinatal depression treatment in North American outpatient obstetric settings. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;33(4):143–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arora S, Geppert CM, Kalishman S, Dion D, Pullara F, Bjeletich MB, et al. Academic health center management of chronic diseases through knowledge networks: Project ECHO. Acad Med. 2007;82(2):154–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Socolovsky C, Masi C, Hamlish T, Aduana G, Arora S, Bakris G, et al. Evaluating the role of key learning theories in ECHO: a telehealth educational program for primary care providers. Prog Commun Health Partnersh. 2013;7:361–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bessell E, Kim JS, Chiem L, McDonald A, Thompson D, Glozier N, et al. Effectiveness of Project ECHO programs in improving clinician knowledge and confidence in managing complex psychiatric patients: a waitlist-controlled study. Acad Psych. 2023;47:25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou C, Crawford A, Serhal E, Kurdyak P, Sockalingam S. The impact of Project ECHO on participant and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2016;91:1439–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore JD, Casanova MP, Ryu S, Smith LH, Baker RT. Examining ECHO Idaho’s perinatal substance use disorder program. J Rural Ment Health. 2023;47(1):10–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture REDCap a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang S, Fu Y. Otter transcription. Mountain View, CA: Otter.ai, Inc.; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sociocultural Research Consultants. Dedoose version 9.0.17. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC.; 2021.

  16. Sockalingam S, Rajaratnam T, Zhou C, Serhal E, Crawford A, Mylopoulos M. Building mental health capacity: exploring the role of adaptive expertise in the ECHO virtual learning model. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2021;41:104–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Joshi A, Pathere A, Hameed U, Hempel E, McShane M, Lehman E, et al. Using the Project ECHO model to facilitate mental health training in graduate and undergraduate medical education: results from two pilot programs. Acad Psych. 2023;47:416–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Erdly C, Etyemez S, Standeven LR, Nagle-Yang S, Osborne LM. Setting common standards for reproductive psychiatry education: effectiveness of the National Curriculum in Reproductive Psychiatry. Acad Psych. 2023;47:63–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Caton L, Shen H, Miele GM, Darfler K, Sandoval JR, Urada D, et al. Opening the “black box”: four common implementation strategies for expanding the use of medications for opioid use disorder in primary care. Implement Res Pract. 2021;2:26334895211005810.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

MAP ECHO was funded by the Perigee Fund, the Cambia Health Foundation, and anonymous donors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah S. Cowley.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Amritha Bhat and Deborah S. Cowley received funding from the Perigee Fund, from the Cambia Health Foundation, and from anonymous donors for the MAP ECHO program. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramaraj, A.B., Franz, N.A., Bhat, A. et al. Project ECHO in Psychiatric Workforce Development: the Example of a Perinatal Mental Health ECHO. Acad Psychiatry 48, 249–253 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-023-01917-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-023-01917-z

Keywords

Navigation