Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using Audience Response System Technology and PRITE Questions to Improve Psychiatric Residents’ Medical Knowledge

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Interactive educational tools are thought to convey material effectively. Audience Response Systems (ARSs), in particular, have been shown to improve written test scores in several residency fields but have not been previously reported in psychiatry. Such an approach may prove a valuable tool in improving test performance and medical knowledge.

Methods

Psychiatry residents were required to attend 12 90-min review sessions throughout the summer that utilized previous Psychiatry Residency In-Training Exam (PRITE) questions and an ARS to provide immediate feedback and a stimulus for discussion. Preparation for these sessions was either unsupervised (phase I) or involved a personalized reading program for residents who scored below the 50th percentile. Data were evaluated with ANOVA and unpaired 2-tail tests.

Results

Overall performance on the PRITE examination improved significantly as compared to pre-intervention controls (change in score 17.0 ± SD 16.6 vs 6.4 ± 12.6, P = 0.0068). The addition of a personalized reading program did not improve raw score performance significantly beyond the improvement seen with ARS alone but did slightly improve percentile rank and STD score.

Conclusions

Utilization of the interactive ARS may improve performance on PRITE examination for residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The American College of Psychiatrists: http://www.acpsych.org/prite, accessed 11 November 2013.

  2. Juul D, Schneidman BS, Sexson SB, Fernandez F, Beresin EV, Ebert MH, et al. Relationship between resident-in-training examination in psychiatry and subsequent certification examination performances. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33(5):404–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shiroma PR, Alarcon RD. Selection factors among international medical graduates and psychiatric residency performance. Acad Psychiatry. 2010;34(2):128–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Webb LC, Sexson S, Scully J, Reynolds 3rd CF, Shore MF. Training directors' opinions about the psychiatry resident in-training examination (PRITE). Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149(4):521–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Strauss GD, Yager J, Liston EH. A comparison of national and in-house examinations of psychiatric knowledge. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141(7):882–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. The psychiatry milestone project (draft). April 2013 http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/PsychiatryMilestones.pdf.

  7. Krain LP. "It's high-tech, but is it better?": applications of technology in psychiatry education. Acad Psychiatry. 2007;31(1):40–9 (Erratum in: Acad Psychiatry 2007;31(2):172. Bostwick JM [removed]; Sampson S [removed]).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorrindo T, Baer L, Sanders KM, Birnbaum RJ, Fromson JA, Sutton-Skinner KM, et al. Web-based simulation in psychiatry residency training: a pilot study. Acad Psychiatry. 2011;35(4):232–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rohrbaugh R, Federman DG, Borysiuk L, Sernyak M. Utilizing VA information technology to develop psychiatric resident prescription profiles. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33(1):27–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boscardin C, Penuel W. Exploring benefits of audience-response systems on learning: a review of the literature. Acad Psychiatry. 2012;36:401–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson C, Hartling L, Campbell S, Oswald AE. The effects of audience response systems on learning outcomes in health professions education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 21. Med Teach. 2012;34:386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schackow TE, Chavez M, Loya L, Friedman M. Audience response systems = effect on learning in family medicine residents. Fam Med. 2004;36(7):496–504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pradhan A, Sparano D, Ananth CV. The influence of audience response system on knowledge retention: an application to resident education. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(5):1827–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodman C, Schultz SK. Faculty assessment of residents and the psychiatry resident in-training examination: is there a correlation? Acad Psychiatry. 1999;23:137–41.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smeltzer DJ, Jones JA. Reliability and validity of the psychiatry in-training examination. Acad Psychiatry. 1990;14:115–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

This study did not receive any extramural funding. Dr. El-Mallakh is a speaker and receives honoraria from AstraZeneca, Sunovion, and Otsuka. The other authors do not have any disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rif El-Mallakh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hettinger, A., Spurgeon, J., El-Mallakh, R. et al. Using Audience Response System Technology and PRITE Questions to Improve Psychiatric Residents’ Medical Knowledge. Acad Psychiatry 38, 205–208 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0058-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0058-2

Keywords

Navigation