Skip to main content
Log in

Is planning through the Internet (un)related to trip satisfaction?

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Information Technology & Tourism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between Internet use and trip satisfaction has up to now been tested only with subjective variables regarding the Internet (e.g., e-satisfaction), not on actual Internet use. Subjective variables, including satisfaction, may share common variance and thus show spurious correlations. The aim of this article is to test the relationship between trip satisfaction and actual Internet use for planning and booking accommodation and activities in overseas trips. We use a large sample (n = 14,586) of official statistics micro data of European leisure visitors to Spain in 2014 planning the trip by themselves and arriving by low cost airlines. We use structural equation models with ordinal variables and statistical power analysis. We include trip characteristics as controls, and carry out a sensitivity analysis of the conclusions by varying the set of controls and sample selection. We find barely no relationship between pre-trip Internet use and trip satisfaction. Power analysis and confidence intervals combined with the large available sample show that the relationship is either null or extremely weak. Sensitivity analyses keep conclusions unchanged. Our null results contradict prior expectations on a relationship which the literature takes for granted but has never been put to test. More detailed measurements of both Internet use and trip satisfaction could be considered in further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Technically speaking it is a diagonally weighted least squares method applied on a reduced form of the model and the residual polychoric correlations, with mean-and-variance adjusted test statistics using full weights and sandwich standard errors.

References

  • Amaro S, Duarte P (2013) Online travel purchasing: a literature review. J Travel Tour Mark 30:755–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayeh JK, Au N, Law R (2013) Do we believe in TripAdvisor? Examining credibility perceptions and online travelers’ attitude toward using user-generated content. J Travel Res 52(4):437–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker DA, Crompton JL (2000) Quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Ann Tour Res 27(3):785–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauernfeind U, Zins AH (2005) The perception of exploratory browsing and trust with recommender websites. Inf Technol Tour 8(2):121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess S, Sellitto C, Cox C, Buultjens J (2009) User-generated content (UGC) in tourism: benefits and concerns of online consumers. In: Newell S, Whitley E, Pouloudi N, Wareham J, Mathiassen L (eds) 17th European conference on information systems. University of Verona, Verona, pp 2–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cárdenas-García PJ, Pulido-Fernández JI, Pulido-Fernández MDLC (2016) The influence of tourist satisfaction on tourism expenditure in emerging urban cultural destinations. J Travel Tour Mark 33(4):497–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas F, Coenders G, Cummins RA, González M, Figuer C, Malo S (2008) Does subjective well-being show a relationship between parents and their children? J Happiness Stud 9:197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda JA, Frías DM, Rodríquez MA (2007) The influence of the Internet on destination satisfaction. Internet Res 17(4):402–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho YC, Agrusa J (2006) Assessing use acceptance and satisfaction toward online travel agencies. Inf Technol Tour 8(3–4):179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho HS, Byun B, Shin S (2014) An examination of the relationship between rural tourists’ satisfaction, revisitation and information preferences: a Korean case study. Sustainability 6(9):6293–6311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenders G, Satorra A, Saris WE (1997) Alternative approaches to structural modeling of ordinal data. A Monte Carlo study. Struct Equ Model 4(4):261–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenders G, Ferrer-Rosell B, Martínez-Garcia E (2016) Trip characteristics and dimensions of Internet use for transportation, accommodation, and activities undertaken at destination. J Hosp Mark Manag 25(4):498–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox C, Burgess S, Sellitto C, Buultjens J (2008) Users are doing it for themselves: how consumer-generated content is changing the face of tourism marketing. Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins RA (2010) Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: a synthesis. J Happiness Stud 11:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davern MT, Cummins RA, Stokes MA (2007) Subjective wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. J Happiness Stud 8(4):429–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Chiappa G, Zara A (2015) Offline vs. online intermediation: a study of booking behaviour of tourists travelling to Sardinia. In: Tussyadiahl I, Inverini A (eds) Information and communication technologies in tourism 2015. Springer, Vienna, pp 709–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Chiappa G, Lorenzo-Romero C, Gallarza MG (2015) Attitudes towards disintermediation in hotel reservations: Spanish travellers’ profile. Eur J Tour Res 9:129–143

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNeve KM, Cooper H (1998) The happy personality: a meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 124:197–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Lucas RE (1999) Personality and subjective wellbeing. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being, the foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 213–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Divisekera S (2010) Economics of tourist’s consumption behaviour: some evidence from Australia. Tour Manag 31(5):629–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer L, Forsyth P, Forsyth W (2010) Tourism economics and policy. Channel View Publications, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer (2016) Flash Eurobarometer 432: preferences of Europeans towards tourism. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C (1992) A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience. J Mark 56(1):6–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotis J, Buhalis D, Rossides N (2012) Social media use and impact during the holiday travel planning process. In: Fuchs M, Ricci F, Cantoni L (eds) Information and communication technologies in tourism 2012. Springer, Vienna, pp 13–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Franco A, Malhotra N, Simonovits G (2014) Publication bias in the social sciences: unlocking the file drawer. Science 345(6203):1502–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frías-Jamilena DM, del Barrio-García S, López-Moreno L (2013) Determinants of satisfaction with holidays and hospitality in rural tourism in Spain: the moderating effect of tourists’ previous experience. Cornell Hosp Q 54(3):294–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govers R, Go FM, Kumar K (2007) Virtual destination image: a new measurement approach. Ann Tour Res 34(4):977–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasser U, Simun M (2010) Digital lifestyle and online travel: Looking at the case of digital natives. In: Conrady R, Buck M (eds) Trends and issues in global tourism 2010. Springer, Berlin, pp 83–89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gretzel U, Yoo KH, Purifoy M (2007) Online travel review study: role and impact of online travel reviews. Laboratory for Intelligent Systems in Tourism, Texas A&M University, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth A, Haslwanter D (2016) Efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction of responsive mobile tourism websites: a mobile usability study. Inf Technol Tour 16(2):201–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huppertz JW (1979) Measuring components of equity in the marketplace: perceptions of inputs and outcomes by satisfied and dissatisfied consumers. In: Day RA, Hunt HK (eds) New dimensions of consumer satisfaction and complaining behavior. Indiana University School of Business, Bloomington, pp 140–143

    Google Scholar 

  • ITE (2014) EGATUR. Tourist expenditure survey. Methodology. Instituto de Turismo de España, Madrid. http://estadisticas.tourspain.es/es-ES/estadisticas/egatur/metodologia/ReferenciaMetodolgica/NotaMetodológicaEncuestadeGastoTurístico.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2015

  • Kladou S, Mavragani E (2015) Assessing destination image: an online marketing approach and the case of TripAdvisor. J Destin Mark Manag 4(3):187–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozak M, Rimmington M (2000) Tourist satisfaction with Mallorca, Spain, as an off-season holiday destination. J Travel Res 38(3):260–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmi R, Ganesan P (2010) Does self-service technology impact destination image and customer delight? Worldwide Hosp Tour Themes 2(5):520–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam JM, Tan SH, Oh YL (2014) Exploring Internet influence towards travel satisfaction. Proc Soc Behav Sci 130:542–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marine-Roig E, Anton Clavé S (2016) A detailed method for destination image analysis using user-generated content. Inf Technol Tour 15(4):341–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memarzadeh F, Blum SC, Adams C (2015) The impact of positive and negative e-comments on business travelers’ intention to purchase a hotel room. J Hosp Tour Technol 6(3):258–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll-de-Alba J, Prats L, Coromina L (2016) The effect of tourism expenditure on the behaviour of tourists in Barcelona. Int J Bus Glob 17(3):445–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén B (1984) A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 49:115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2012) Mplus user’s guide, 7th edn. Muthén and Muthén, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor P (2010) Managing a hotel’s image on TripAdvisor. J Hosp Mark Manag 19(7):754–772

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J Mark Res 17(4):460–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL, Swan JE (1989) Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: a field survey approach. J Mark 53(2):21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öz M (2015) Social media utilization of tourists for travel-related purposes. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 27(5):1003–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implication for future research. J Mark 49:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao AR (2005) The quality of price as a quality cue. J Mark Res 42(4):401–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabiote CM, Frías DM, Castañeda JA (2012) The moderating effect of uncertainty avoidance on overall perceived value of a service purchased online. Internet Res 22(2):180–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saris WE, Satorra A (1993) Power evaluations in structural equation models. In: Bollen KA, Scott Long J (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 181–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Saris WE, Satorra A, van der Veld WM (2009) Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Struct Equ Model 16(4):561–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherpenzeel AC, Saris WE (1997) The validity and reliability of survey questions. A meta-analysis of MTMM studies. Sociol Method Res 25(3):341–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta A, Wiggins SN (2014) Airline pricing, price dispersion, and ticket characteristics on and off the internet. Am Econ J Econ Policy 6(1):272–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiotsou R, Vasioti E (2006) Satisfaction: a segmentation criterion for “short term” visitors of mountainous destinations. J Travel Tour Mark 20(1):61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag BM, Frijters P, Ferrer-i-Carbonell A (2003) The anatomy of subjective well-being. J Econ Behav Organ 51(1):29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Marcussen C (2007) Tourist motivation, market segmentation and marketing strategies. In: 5th Bi-annual symposium of the international society of culture, tourism, and hospitality research, Charleston, pp 1–27. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.533.3306&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 25 April 2016

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first two authors want to acknowledge the support of the Catalan Autonomous Government grant 2014SGR551 funding their research group “Compositional and Spatial Data Analysis (COSDA)”, the Spanish Health Ministry Grant CB06/02/1002 funding their research group “Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)”, the Spanish Economy and competitiveness Ministry/FEDER Grant MTM2015-65016-C2-1-R funding their project “COmpositional Data Analysis and RElated meThOdS (CODA-RETOS)”, and the University of Girona Grant MPCUdG2016/069 funding their project “Statistical and Econometric Modeling”. The third author wants to acknowledge the support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness Grant CSO2014-51785-R funding the project “The transformative effects of global mobility patterns in tourism destination evolution (MOVETUR)”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berta Ferrer-Rosell.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Internet and satisfaction questions from the EGATUR questionnaire

  • At any time when planning this trip, did you use the Internet to search for information or make a reservation? (yes/no)

    • (If yes)

      •  Did you use the Internet to search for information about accommodation? (yes/no)

      •  Did you use Internet to search for information about activities? (yes/no)

      • Did you use Internet to pay for an accommodation reservation? (yes/no)

      • Did you use Internet to pay for an activity reservation? (yes/no)

  • Rate the trip as a whole (from 0 “very bad” to 10 “very well”)

Appendix 2: Estimates of the model in Fig. 1

Table 5 shows the standardized estimates and statistical significance of the parameters of the model in Fig. 1, without the effects of Internet use on trip satisfaction, in other words, only with the control variables.

Table 5 Standardized model estimates for each of the dependent variables

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrer-Rosell, B., Coenders, G. & Marine-Roig, E. Is planning through the Internet (un)related to trip satisfaction?. Inf Technol Tourism 17, 229–244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-017-0082-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-017-0082-7

Keywords

Navigation