Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of the Spanish version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale for older adults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) is the only validated scale for measuring perceived fatigability in older adults.

Aims

We validated the PFS Spanish version by assessing convergent validity with respect to several measures of physical performance, physical activity, physical function and disability.

Methods

A cross-sectional validation study of 79 community-dwelling older adults aged 70 and older from Barcelona, Spain was included. Translation–retrotranslation was performed. Convergent validity was assessed in relation to physical activity and performance measurements, and analyzed with Spearman correlation coefficients, a linear trend test and non-linear regression. We also assessed the discriminant validity of the PFS physical score between participants with different physical activity and performance levels.

Results

Higher PFS physical scores were inversely associated with the Short Physical Performance Battery (r = − 0.5, p < 0.001) and weak to moderately correlated with gait speed (r = 0.38, p = 0.001), and self-reported weekly walking time (r = 0.24, p = 0.035).

Conclusion

The PFS is a novel, brief instrument to assess fatigability in Spanish-speaking older adults, with good convergent validity against physical performance measurements. Thus, the PFS can be used in Spanish-speaking populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swain MG (2000) Fatigue in chronic disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 99:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Meng H, Hale L, Friedberg F (2010) Prevalence and predictors of fatigue in middle-aged and older adults: evidence from the health and retirement study. J Am Geriatr Soc 58:2033–2034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03088.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Eldadah BA (2010) Fatigue and fatigability in older adults. PMR 2:406–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.03.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander NB, Taffet GE, Horne FM et al (2010) Bedside-to-bench conference: research agenda for idiopathic fatigue and aging. J Am Geriatr Soc 58:967–975. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02811.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Basu N, Yang X, Luben RN et al (2016) Fatigue is associated with excess mortality in the general population: results from the EPIC-Norfolk study. BMC Med 14:122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0662-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Richardson CA, Glynn NW, Ferrucci LG et al (2015) Walking energetics, fatigability, and fatigue in older adults: the study of energy and aging pilot. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 70:487–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glu146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Simonsick EM, Glynn NW, Jerome GJ et al (2016) Fatigued, but not frail: perceived fatigability as a marker of impending decline in mobility-intact older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 64:1287–1292. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14138

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Cardiovascular health study collaborative research group, frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M146–M56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0078-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Glynn NW, Santanasto AJ, Simonsick EM et al (2015) The Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale for older adults: development and validation. J Am Geriatr Soc 63:130–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization (2010) Global recommendations on physical activity for health. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pahor M, Blair S, Espeland M et al (2006) Effects of a physical activity intervention on measures of physical performance: results of the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot (LIFE-P) Study. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:1157–1165. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/61.11.1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25:3186–3191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM et al (1995) Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 332:556–561. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199503023320902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cabrero-García J, Muñoz-Mendoza CL, Cabañero-Martínez MJ et al (2012) Valores de referencia de la Short Physical Performance Battery para pacientes de 70 y más años en atención primaria de salud. Aten Primaria 44:540–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2012.02.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L et al (1994) A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49:M85-94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K et al (2011) Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA 305:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S et al (2009) Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging 13:881–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM et al (2010) European working group on sarcopenia in older people, sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Report of the European working group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing 39:412–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq034

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S et al (2003) Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol 95:1851–1860. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00246.2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Lopez-Fontana C, Varo JJ (2005) Validation of the Spanish version of the physical activity questionnaire used in the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals’ Follow-up Study. Public Health Nutr 8:920–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M et al (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1381–1395. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Denkinger MD, Igl W, Coll-Planas L et al (2009) Evaluation of the short form of the late-life function and disability instrument in geriatric inpatients—validity, responsiveness, and sensitivity to change. J Am Geriatr Soc 57:309–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02095.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Abizanda P, López-Jiménez M, López-Torres J et al (2011) Validation of the Spanish version of the short-form late-life function and disability instrument. J Am Geriatr Soc 59:893–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03392.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McAuley E, Konopack JF, Motl RW et al (2005) Measuring disability and function in older women: psychometric properties of the late-life function and disability instrument. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:901–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Swinscow TDV (1997) Correlation and regression. In: University of S. Campbell (eds) Stat. Sq. One, 9th edn. BMJ Publishing Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schnelle JF, Buchowski MS, Ikizler TA et al (2012) Evaluation of two fatigability severity measures in elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:1527–1533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04062.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Rosario Jimenez, Esperança Palacios and Palmira Villafuerte of the ABS Vallcarca-Sant Gervasi for their help in conducting the clinical trial and assessments. Jordi González-Guerra and Irene Garcia for their help in conducting the interviews. Àlex Domingo, Gabriela del Valle Gómez, Cristina Puchol, Ignasi Bolibar, Alejandro Carrera Rodriguez for their help in the translation procedure of the Spanish version of the PFS.

Funding

The sub-study is part of a clinical trial “Exercise Park Equipment for Improving Physical Function and Physical Activity Levels in the Elderly” (NCT02375594) that had partial funding by Lappset España—Lappset Group Oy. The NCT02375594 clinical trial sponsor had no role in conducting the analyses, interpreting or reviewing the data included in this paper. The original Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale development and validation was funded by a Pittsburgh Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center Developmental Pilot Grant NIH P30 AG024826 and also from the Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura M. Pérez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Animal and Human Experimentation Ethics Committee of the Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was collected from all participants.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2753 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pérez, L.M., Roqué, M., Glynn, N.W. et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale for older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 31, 209–214 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-018-0959-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-018-0959-0

Keywords

Navigation