Skip to main content
Log in

Reducing measurement errors during functional capacity tests in elders

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Accuracy is essential to the validity of functional capacity measurements.

Aim

To evaluate the error of measurement of functional capacity tests for elders and suggest the use of the technical error of measurement and credibility coefficient.

Methods

Twenty elders (65.8 ± 4.5 years) completed six functional capacity tests that were simultaneously filmed and timed by four evaluators by means of a chronometer. A fifth evaluator timed the tests by analyzing the videos (reference data).

Results

The means of most evaluators for most tests were different from the reference (p < 0.05), except for two evaluators for two different tests. There were different technical error of measurement between tests and evaluators. The Bland–Altman test showed difference in the concordance of the results between methods. Short duration tests showed higher technical error of measurement than longer tests. In summary, tests timed by a chronometer underestimate the real results of the functional capacity.

Discussion

Difference between evaluators’ reaction time and perception to determine the start and the end of the tests would justify the errors of measurement.

Conclusion

Calculation of the technical error of measurement or the use of the camera can increase data validity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM et al (1995) Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 332:556–561. doi:10.1056/NEJM199503023320902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization (2015) World report on ageing and health. WHO Press, Geneva

  3. Society AG, Society BG (2011) Summary of the updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society clinical practice guideline for prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03234.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization (2007) Global report on falls prevention in older age. Community health (Bristol). WHO Press, Geneva (9789241563536)

  5. Pataky Z, Armand S, Müller-Pinget S et al (2014) Effects of obesity on functional capacity. Obesity 22:56–62. doi:10.1002/oby.20514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Orfila F, Ferrer M, Lamarca R et al (2006) Gender differences in health-related quality of life among the elderly: the role of objective functional capacity and chronic conditions. Soc Sci Med 63:2367–2380. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennell K, Dobson F, Hinman R (2011) Measures of physical performance assessments: self-paced walk test (SPWT), stair climb test (SCT), six-minute walk test (6MWT), chair stand test (CST), timed up & go (TUG), sock test, lift and carry test (LCT), and car task. Arthritis Care Res 63:350–370. doi:10.1002/acr.20538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leenders M, Verdijk LB, van der Hoeven L et al (2013) Patients with type 2 diabetes show a greater decline in muscle mass, muscle strength, and functional capacity with aging. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:585–592. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Byrne C, Faure C, Keene DJ, Lamb SE (2016) Ageing, muscle power and physical function: a systematic review and implications for pragmatic training interventions. Sport Med 46:1311–1332. doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0489-x

  10. Almeida OP, Hankey GJ, Yeap BB et al (2017) Depression among nonfrail old men is associated with reduced physical function and functional capacity after 9 years follow-up: the health in Men Cohort Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 18:65–69. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suman-Horduna I, Roy D, Frasure-Smith N et al (2013) Quality of life and functional capacity in patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:455–460. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bertoli J, Biduski GM, Freitas C de la R (2016) Six weeks of Mat Pilates training are enough to improve functional capacity in elderly women. J Bodyw Mov Ther. doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.12.001 (in press)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wanderley FAC, Oliveira NL, Marques E et al (2015) Aerobic versus resistance training effects on health-related quality of life, body composition, and function of older adults. J Appl Gerontol 34:143–165. doi:10.1177/0733464812468502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parkatti T, Perttunen J, Wacker P (2012) Improvements in functional capacity from nordic walking: a randomized controlled trial among older adults. J Aging Phys Act 20:93–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bartlett NR, Macleod S (1954) Effect of flash and field luminance upon human reaction time. J Opt Soc Am 44:306–311. doi:10.1364/JOSA.44.000306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rains JD (1963) Signal luminance and position effects in human reaction time. Vision Res 3:239–251. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(63)90057-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr D a (1999) Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr 82:165–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Raj IS, Bird SR, Westfold BA, Shield AJ (2017) Determining criteria to predict repeatability of performance in older adults: using coefficients of variation for strength and functional measures. J Aging Phys Act 25:94–98. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2015-0012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang CY, Sheu CF, Protas EJ (2009) Test-retest reliability and measurement errors of six mobility tests in the community-dwelling elderly. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr 4:8–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldberg A, Chavis M, Watkins J, Wilson T (2012) The five-times-sit-to-stand test: validity, reliability and detectable change in older females. Aging Clin Exp Res 24:339–344. doi:10.1007/BF03325265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Butler AA, Menant JC, Tiedemann AC, Lord SR (2009) Age and gender differences in seven tests of functional mobility. J Neuroeng Rehabil 6:31. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hopkins WG (2000) Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sport Med 30:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hyman R (1953) Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. J Exp Psychol 45:188–196. doi:10.1037/h0056940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bland MJ, Altman DG (1999) Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Stat Methods Med Res 8:161–179. doi:10.1177/096228029900800204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Santos L, Ribeiro AS, Schoenfeld BJ et al (2017) The improvement in walking speed induced by resistance training is associated with increased muscular strength but not skeletal muscle mass in older women. Eur J Sport Sci 17:488–494. doi:10.1080/17461391.2016.1273394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramírez-Campillo R, Castillo A, de la Fuente CI et al (2014) High-speed resistance training is more effective than low-speed resistance training to increase functional capacity and muscle performance in older women. Exp Gerontol 58:51–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Foundation for Research Support of the State of Amazonas (FAPEAM) for PhD scholarship conceded to ESB and Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for MSc scholarship conceded to LBRO and PhD scholarship conceded to BMM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cíntia de la Rocha Freitas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the local Human Research Ethics Committee (CAAE: 55528916.8.00000121), and the protocol was written in accordance with the standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 29 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva, M.E., Orssatto, L.B.R., Bezerra, E.S. et al. Reducing measurement errors during functional capacity tests in elders. Aging Clin Exp Res 30, 595–603 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0820-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0820-x

Keywords

Navigation