Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale: prevalence and demographic correlates of orthorexia nervosa among Chinese university students

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

As there is no measure available in Chinese for assessing orthorexia nervosa (ON), and as the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (DOS) has demonstrated to be a valid measure for such a purpose, the current study aimed to obtain a Chinese version of the DOS (C-DOS), to evaluate psychometric properties of the C-DOS in a sample of Chinese university students, and to explore the prevalence of ON among the participants.

Methods

According to standard procedures, the C-DOS was obtained and administered to 1075 mainland Chinese university students (52.7% female) recruited from two provinces in mainland China. To examine the factor structure of the C-DOS, the total sample was split into two halves, one for exploratory factor analysis, and the other for confirmatory factor analysis. The ordinal alpha and test–retest reliability were examined. Convergent and divergent validity was assessed by conducting Pearson correlation analyses between the C-DOS and other theoretically related/unrelated measures. Prevalence of ON was estimated based on the total score of the C-DOS with the cutoff value of 30.

Results

A three-factor structure was revealed for the C-DOS. The C-DOS showed good internal consistency with an ordinal alpha of 0.80, and it also had good test–retest reliability of 0.77. The total scores of the C-DOS had strong and statistically significant positive correlations with eating inflexibility, while the total scores had weak correlations with other eating disturbances. Strong measurement invariance across gender groups was also supported. The prevalence of ON was 7.8% with males showing higher rates of ON than females (10.6% vs. 5.3%).

Conclusions

The Chinese version of the DOS (C-DOS) was psychometrically adequate for the sample of Chinese students. Given the high prevalence of ON found in the current study, more attention to ON, as well as further research and potential interventions, are warranted in China.

Level of evidence

Descriptive (cross-sectional) study, Level V.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bratman S (1997) Original orthorexia essay. Yoga J

  2. Dunn TM, Bratman S (2016) On orthorexia nervosa: a review of the literature and proposed diagnostic criteria. Eat Behav 21:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Depa J, Schweizer J, Bekers S-K, Hilzendegen C, Stroebele-Benschop N (2017) Prevalence and predictors of orthorexia nervosa among German students using the 21-item-DOS. Eat Weight Disord 22(1):193–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0334-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaki B, Pal S, Bandyopadhyay A (2013) Exploring scientific legitimacy of orthorexia nervosa: a newly emerging eating disorder. J Hum Sport Exerc 8(4):1045–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn TM, Gibbs J, Whitney N, Starosta A (2017) Prevalence of orthorexia nervosa is less than 1%: data from a US sample. Eat Weight Disord 22(1):185–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0258-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koven NS, Abry AW (2015) The clinical basis of orthorexia nervosa: emerging perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 11:385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sánchez FG, Rial BR (2005) Orthorexia nervosa. A new eating behavior disorder? Actas Esp Psiquiatr 33(1):66–68

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donini LM, Marsili D, Graziani M, Imbriale M, Cannella C (2004) Orthorexia nervosa: a preliminary study with a proposal for diagnosis and an attempt to measure the dimension of the phenomenon. Eat Weight Disord 9(2):151–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Eating Disorders Association (2018) https://www.nationaleatingdisorders.org/learn/by-eating-disorder/other/orthorexia. Accessed May 17 2018

  10. Bosi ATB, Çamur D, Güler Ç (2007) Prevalence of orthorexia nervosa in resident medical doctors in the faculty of medicine (Ankara, Turkey). Appetite 49(3):661–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dell’Osso L, Carpita B, Muti D, Cremone I, Massimetti G, Diadema E, Gesi C, Carmassi C (2018) Prevalence and characteristics of orthorexia nervosa in a sample of university students in Italy. Eat Weight Disord 23(1):55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-017-0460-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Varga M, Thege BK, Dukay-Szabó S, Túry F, van Furth EF (2014) When eating healthy is not healthy: orthorexia nervosa and its measurement with the ORTO-15 in Hungary. BMC Psychiatry 14(1):59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Parra-Fernandez ML, Rodríguez-Cano T, Onieva-Zafra MD, Perez-Haro MJ, Casero-Alonso V, Camargo JCM, Notario-Pacheco B (2018) Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the ORTO-15 questionnaire for the diagnosis of orthorexia nervosa. PLoS One 13(1):e0190722. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Reynolds R (2018) Is the prevalence of orthorexia nervosa in an Australian university population 6.5%? Eat Weight Disord 23(4):453–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-018-0535-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pike KM, Dunne PE (2015) The rise of eating disorders in Asia: a review. J Eating Disord 3(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-015-0070-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tong J, Miao S, Wang J, Yang F, Lai H, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Hsu LG (2014) A two-stage epidemiologic study on prevalence of eating disorders in female university students in Wuhan, China. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 49(3):499–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-013-0694-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kadish YA (2012) The role of culture in eating disorders. Br J Psychother 28(4):435–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0118.2012.01311.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bratman S, Knight D (2000) Health food junkies: overcoming the obsession with healthful eating. Broadway Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Donini LM, Marsili D, Graziani M, Imbriale M, Cannella C (2005) Orthorexia nervosa: validation of a diagnosis questionnaire. Eat Weight Disord 10(2):e28–e32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson KM (2011) Is the fixation on “healthy” unhealthy? A study on orthorexia nervosa. Kent State University, Kent

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gleaves DH, Graham EC, Ambwani S (2013) Measuring’orthorexia’: development of the eating habits questionnaire. Int J Educ Psychol Assess 12(2):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barthels F, Meyer F, Pietrowsky R (2015) Die Düsseldorfer Orthorexie Skala–Konstruktion und evaluation eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung ortho-rektischen Ernährungsverhaltens. Z Klin Psychol Psychother 44:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Missbach B, Dunn TM, König JS (2016) We need new tools to assess orthorexia nervosa. A commentary on “prevalence of orthorexia nervosa among college students based on Bratman’s test and associated tendencies”. Appetite 108:521–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Costa CB, Hardan-Khalil K, Gibbs K (2017) Orthorexia nervosa: a review of the literature. Issues Mental Health Nurs 38(12):980–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2017.1371816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Missbach B, Hinterbuchinger B, Dreiseitl V, Zellhofer S, Kurz C, König J (2015) When eating right, is measured wrong! A validation and critical examination of the ORTO-15 questionnaire in German. PLoS One 10(8):e0135772. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Roncero M, Barrada JR, Perpiñá C (2017) Measuring orthorexia nervosa: psychometric limitations of the ORTO-15. Span J Psychol 20:e41. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2017.36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chard CA, Hilzendegen C, Barthels F, Stroebele-Benschop N (2018) Psychometric evaluation of the English version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexie Scale (DOS) and the prevalence of orthorexia nervosa among a US student sample. Eat Weight Disord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-018-0570-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou B-F (2002) Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related diseases in Chinese adults—study on optimal cut-off points of body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci 15(1):83–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brislin RW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cultur Psychol 1(3):185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Duarte C, Ferreira C, Pinto-Gouveia J, Trindade I, Martinho A (2017) What makes dietary restraint problematic? Development and validation of the inflexible eating questionnaire. Appetite 114:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cappelleri J, Bushmakin A, Gerber R, Leidy N, Sexton C, Lowe M, Karlsson J (2009) Psychometric analysis of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R21: results from a large diverse sample of obese and non-obese participants. Int J Obes 33(6):611–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shi M, Kong F, Chen H, Cheng D (2011) Applicability of Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire among Chinese women undergraduates. Chin J Clin Psychol 19(6):737–739

    Google Scholar 

  34. Garner DM, Olmstead MP, Polivy J (1983) Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Int J Eat Disord 2(2):15–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. R Core Team (2018) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Austria, 2015. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org

  36. Revelle W (2014) Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Northwestern University, Evanston, p 165

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rosseel Y (2012) Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). J Stat Softw 48(2):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jorgensen T, Pornprasertmanit S, Schoemann A, Rosseel Y (2018) semTools: useful tools for structural equation modeling. R Package Version 0.5-1

  39. Hayton JC, Allen DG, Scarpello V (2004) Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: a tutorial on parallel analysis. Organ Res Methods 7(2):191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  41. Satorra A, Bentler PM (2001) A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika 66(4):507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lt Hu, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (1998) Multivariate data analysis, vol 5. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  44. Van de Schoot R, Lugtig P, Hox J (2012) A checklist for testing measurement invariance. Eur J Dev Psychol 9(4):486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen FF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model 14(3):464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model 9(2):233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Enders CK (2006) A primer on the use of modern missing-data methods in psychosomatic medicine research. Psychosom Med 68(3):427–436. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000221275.75056.d8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  49. Barrada JR, Roncero M (2018) Bidimensional structure of the orthorexia: development and initial validation of a new instrument. Ann Psychol 34(2):283–291

    Google Scholar 

  50. Aksoydan E, Camci N (2009) Prevalence of orthorexia nervosa among Turkish performance artists. Eat Weight Disord 14(1):33–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kinzl JF, Hauer K, Traweger C, Kiefer I (2006) Orthorexia nervosa in dieticians. Psychother Psychosom 75(6):395–396. https://doi.org/10.1159/000095447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ab Hamid MR, Azman NN, Said N, Rahman ANA (2018) Orthorexia nervosa and the quality of life among health sciences students in Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor. Environ Behav Proc J 3(7):121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Fidan T, Ertekin V, Isikay S, Kaya D, Esin I, Asfuroglu B (2014) Orthorexia nervosa and education. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 24(SUPPL. 2):S731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu Z (2011) The culture of Chinese healthcare and its contemporary significance. J Educ Coll Jilin Prov 27:26–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Flaws B (2000) The TAO of Healthy eating: dietary wisdom according to chinese medicine. Bukupedia

  56. Brytek-Matera A, Donini LM, Krupa M, Poggiogalle E, Hay P (2015) Orthorexia nervosa and self-attitudinal aspects of body image in female and male university students. J Eat Disord 3(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-016-0105-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Oberle CD, Samaghabadi RO, Hughes EM (2017) Orthorexia nervosa: assessment and correlates with gender, BMI, and personality. Appetite 108:303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ramacciotti C, Perrone P, Coli E, Burgalassi A, Conversano C, Massimetti G, Dell’Osso L (2011) Orthorexia nervosa in the general population: a preliminary screening using a self-administered questionnaire (ORTO-15). Eat Weight Disord 16(2):e127–e130. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Valera JH, Ruiz PA, Valdespino BR, Visioli F (2014) Prevalence of orthorexia nervosa among ashtanga yoga practitioners: a pilot study. Eat Weight Disord 19(4):469–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-014-0131-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Arusoğlu G, Kabakçi E, Köksal G, Merdol TK (2008) Orthorexia nervosa and adaptation of ORTO-11 into Turkish. Turk J Psychiatry 19(3):283–291

    Google Scholar 

  61. Koven NS, Senbonmatsu R (2013) A neuropsychological evaluation of orthorexia nervosa. Open J Psychiatry 3(02):214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Fidan T, Ertekin V, Işikay S, Kırpınar I (2010) Prevalence of orthorexia among medical students in Erzurum, Turkey. Compr Psychiatry 51(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinbo He.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the research committee of Hunan University and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all the surveyed participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of topical collection on orthorexia nervosa.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Parallel analysis

figure a

Appendix 2: The Chinese version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (C-DOS)

figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J., Ma, H., Barthels, F. et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale: prevalence and demographic correlates of orthorexia nervosa among Chinese university students. Eat Weight Disord 24, 453–463 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00656-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00656-1

Keywords

Navigation