Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Adolescent Depression

  • Depressive Disorders (K Cullen, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

Major depressive disorder is a global public health concern that is common in adolescents. Targeting this illness at the early stages of development is critical and could lead to better long-term outcomes because the adolescent brain is highly plastic and, hence, neural systems are likely to be more malleable to interventions. Although a variety of treatments are available, there are currently no guidelines to inform clinicians which intervention might be most suitable for a given youth. Here, we discuss current knowledge of prognostic and prescriptive markers of treatment outcome in adolescent depression, highlight two major limitations of the extant literature, and suggest future directions for this important area of research.

Recent findings

Despite significant effort, none of the potential demographic (gender, age, race), environmental (parental depression, family functioning), and clinical (severity of depression, comorbid diagnoses, suicidality, hopelessness) predictors have been robustly replicated to warrant implementation in clinical care. Studies on biomarkers that truly reflect pathophysiology are scarce and difficult to draw conclusions from.

Summary

More efforts should be directed towards potential neurobiological predictors of treatment outcome. Moreover, rather than evaluating potential predictors in isolation, modern machine learning methods could be used to build models that combine information across a large array of features and predict treatment outcome for individual patients. These strategies hold promise for advancing personalized healthcare in adolescent depression, which remains a high clinical priority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Thapar A, Collishaw S, Pine DS, Thapar AK. Depression in adolescence. Lancet Lond Engl. 2012;379:1056–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Avenevoli S, Swendsen J, He J-P, Burstein M, Merikangas KR. Major depression in the national comorbidity survey–adolescent supplement: prevalence, correlates, and treatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;54:37–44.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunn V, Goodyer IM. Longitudinal investigation into childhood-and adolescence-onset depression: psychiatric outcome in early adulthood. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188:216–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewinsohn PM, Rohde P, Seeley JR, Klein DN, Gotlib IH. Natural course of adolescent major depressive disorder in a community sample: predictors of recurrence in young adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1584–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao U, Chen L-A. Characteristics, correlates, and outcomes of childhood and adolescent depressive disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11:45–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Suicide. Lancet Lond Engl. 2009;373:1372–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nock MK, Green JG, Hwang I, McLaughlin KA, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Prevalence, correlates, and treatment of lifetime suicidal behavior among adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70:300–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ernst M. The triadic model perspective for the study of adolescent motivated behavior. Brain Cogn. 2014;89:104–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ducharme S, Albaugh MD, Hudziak JJ, Botteron KN, Nguyen T-V, Truong C, et al. Anxious/depressed symptoms are linked to right ventromedial prefrontal cortical thickness maturation in healthy children and young adults. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24:2941–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewandowski RE, Acri MC, Hoagwood KE, Olfson M, Clarke G, Gardner W, et al. Evidence for the management of adolescent depression. PEDIATRICS. 2013;132:e996–1009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Birmaher B, Brent D. Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007;46:1503–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. March J, Silva S, Petrycki S, Curry J, Wells K, Fairbank J, et al. Fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and their combination for adolescents with depression: treatment for adolescents with depression study (TADS) randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;292:807–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brent D, Emslie G, Clarke G, Wagner KD, Asarnow JR, Keller M, et al. Switching to another SSRI or to venlafaxine with or without cognitive behavioral therapy for adolescents with SSRI-resistant depression: the TORDIA randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299:901–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bridge JA, Iyengar S, Salary CB, Barbe RP, Birmaher B, Pincus HA, et al. Clinical response and risk for reported suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in pediatric antidepressant treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2007;297:1683–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsapakis EM, Soldani F, Tondo L, Baldessarini RJ. Efficacy of antidepressants in juvenile depression: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193:10–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldberg D. The heterogeneity of “major depression.”. World Psychiatry. 2011;10:226–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen ZD, DeRubeis RJ. Treatment selection in depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2018;14:209–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hyde JS, Mezulis AH, Abramson LY. The ABCs of depression: integrating affective, biological, and cognitive models to explain the emergence of the gender difference in depression. Psychol Rev. 2008;115:291–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Curry J, Rohde P, Simons A, Silva S, Vitiello B, Kratochvil C, et al. Predictors and moderators of acute outcome in the treatment for adolescents with depression study (TADS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45:1427–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilkinson P, Dubicka B, Kelvin R, Roberts C, Goodyer I. Treated depression in adolescents: predictors of outcome at 28 weeks. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;194:334–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tao R, Emslie G, Mayes T, Nakonezny P, Kennard B, Hughes C. Early prediction of acute antidepressant treatment response and remission in pediatric major depressive disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48:71–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Asarnow JR, Emslie G, Clarke G, Wagner KD, Spirito A, Vitiello B, et al. Treatment of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-resistant depression in adolescents: predictors and moderators of treatment response. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48:330–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. • Gunlicks-Stoessel M, Klimes-Dougan B, VanZomeren A, Ma S. Developing a data-driven algorithm for guiding selection between cognitive behavioral therapy, fluoxetine, and combination treatment for adolescent depression. Transl Psychiatry. 2020;10:321 This is the first study to use machine learning to build predictive models of treatment outcome in adolescent depression.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kowatch RA, Carmody TJ, Emslie GJ, Rintelmann JW, Hughes CW, Rush AJ. Prediction of response to fluoxetine and placebo in children and adolescents with major depression: a hypothesis generating study. J Affect Disord. 1999;54:269–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Clarke G, Hops H, Lewinsohn PM, Andrews J, Seeley JR, Williams J. Cognitive-behavioral group treatment of adolescent depression: prediction of outcome. Behav Ther. 1992;23:341–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jayson D, Wood A, Kroll L, Fraser J, Harrington R. Which depressed patients respond to cognitive-behavioral treatment? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;37:35–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rohde P, Seeley JR, Kaufman NK, Clarke GN, Stice E. Predicting time to recovery among depressed adolescents treated in two psychosocial group interventions. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74:80–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Brent DA, Kolko DJ, Birmaher B, Baugher M, Bridge J, Roth C, et al. Predictors of treatment efficacy in a clinical trial of three psychosocial treatments for adolescent depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;37:906–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheung A, Mayes T, Levitt A, Schaffer A, Michalak E, Kiss A, et al. Anxiety as a predictor of treatment outcome in children and adolescents with depression. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2010;20:211–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Weersing VR, Weisz JR. Community clinic treatment of depressed youth: benchmarking usual care against CBT clinical trials. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70:299–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Alegria M, Vallas M, Pumariega AJ. Racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric mental health. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2010;19:759–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Bridge JA, Horowitz LM, Fontanella CA, Sheftall AH, Greenhouse J, Kelleher KJ, et al. Age-related racial disparity in suicide rates among US youths from 2001 through 2015. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172:697–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sullivan PF, Neale MC, Kendler KS. Genetic epidemiology of major depression: review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1552–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rice F, Harold G, Thapar A. The genetic aetiology of childhood depression: a review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002;43:65–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rasic D, Hajek T, Alda M, Uher R. Risk of mental illness in offspring of parents with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of family high-risk studies. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40:28–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaslow NJ, Deering CG, Racusin GR. Depressed children and their families. Clin Psychol Rev. 1994;14:39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sander JB, McCarty CA. Youth depression in the family context: familial risk factors and models of treatment. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2005;8:203–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Goodyer IM, Herbert J, Tamplin A, Secher SM, Pearson J. Short-term outcome of major depression: II. Life events, family dysfunction, and friendship difficulties as predictors of persistent disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36:474–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. King CA, Hovey JD, Brand E, Ghaziuddin N. Prediction of positive outcomes for adolescent psychiatric inpatients. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36:1434–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Asarnow JR, Goldstein MJ, Tompson M, Guthrie D. One-year outcomes of depressive disorders in child psychiatric in-patients: evaluation of the prognostic power of a brief measure of expressed emotion. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1993;34:129–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Feeny NC, Silva SG, Reinecke MA, McNulty S, Findling RL, Rohde P, et al. An exploratory analysis of the impact of family functioning on treatment for depression in adolescents. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2009;38:814–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Birmaher B, Brent DA, Kolko D, Baugher M, Bridge J, Holder D, et al. Clinical outcome after short-term psychotherapy for adolescents with major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:29–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zisk A, Abbott CH, Bounoua N, Diamond GS, Kobak R. Parent–teen communication predicts treatment benefit for depressed and suicidal adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019;87:1137–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Mufson L, Dorta KP, Wickramaratne P, Nomura Y, Olfson M, Weissman MM. A randomized effectiveness trial of interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed adolescents. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:577–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rohde P, Clarke GN, Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Kaufman NK. Impact of comorbidity on a cognitive-behavioral group treatment for adolescent depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40:795–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Weersing VR, Iyengar S, Kolko DJ, Birmaher B, Brent DA. Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescent depression: a benchmarking investigation. Behav Ther. 2006;37:36–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Young JF, Mufson L, Davies M. Impact of comorbid anxiety in an effectiveness study of interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45:904–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Abbott CH, Zisk A, Bounoua N, Diamond GS, Kobak R. Predicting patterns of treatment response and outcome for adolescents who are suicidal and depressed. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019;58:897–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Barbe RP, Bridge J, Birmaher B, Kolko D, Brent DA. Suicidality and its relationship to treatment outcome in depressed adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004;34:44–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. • Forbes EE, Olino TM, Ryan ND, Birmaher B, Axelson D, Moyles DL, et al. Reward-related brain function as a predictor of treatment response in adolescents with major depressive disorder. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010;10:107–18. This is the first fMRI study to examine neural indices of reward processing as potential predictors of treatment, reporting that youths with blunted reward processing had worse outcomes after 8 weeks of CBT or CBT+SSRI.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Webb CA, Auerbach RP, Bondy E, Stanton CH, Appleman L, Pizzagalli DA. Reward-related neural predictors and mechanisms of symptom change in cognitive behavioral therapy for depressed adolescent girls. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020;S2451902220302007.

  52. Barch DM, Whalen D, Gilbert K, Kelly D, Kappenman ES, Hajcak G, et al. Neural indicators of anhedonia: predictors and mechanisms of treatment change in a randomized clinical trial in early childhood depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;88:879–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. • Klimes-Dougan B, Westlund Schreiner M, Thai M, Gunlicks-Stoessel M, Reigstad K, Cullen KR. Neural and neuroendocrine predictors of pharmacological treatment response in adolescents with depression: a preliminary study. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;81:194–202 This study provides initial evidence that biomarkers of ACC function predict outcome to treatment with SSRI in depressed youths, which is consistent with substantial evidence showing that the rostral ACC is one of the most robust prognostic markers of treatment in adult MDD.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Goodyer IM, Herbert J, Altham PME. Adrenal steroid secretion and major depression in 8- to 16-year-olds, III. Influence of cortisol/DHEA ratio at presentation on subsequent rates of disappointing life events and persistent major depression. Psychol Med. 1998;28:265–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rutledge RB, Chekroud AM, Huys QJ. Machine learning and big data in psychiatry: toward clinical applications. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019;55:152–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Luedtke A, Sadikova E, Kessler RC. Sample size requirements for multivariate models to predict between-patient differences in best treatments of major depressive disorder. Clin Psychol Sci. 2019;7:445–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Widge AS, Bilge MT, Montana R, Chang W, Rodriguez CI, Deckersbach T, et al. Electroencephalographic biomarkers for treatment response prediction in major depressive illness: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2019;176:44–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Treadway MT, Pizzagalli DA. Imaging the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder - from localist models to circuit-based analysis. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2014;4:5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Phillips ML, Chase HW, Sheline YI, Etkin A, Almeida JRC, Deckersbach T, et al. Identifying predictors, moderators, and mediators of antidepressant response in major depressive disorder: neuroimaging approaches. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172:124–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Kraus C, Kadriu B, Lanzenberger R, Zarate CA, Kasper S. Prognosis and improved outcomes in major depression: a review. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9:127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Harmer CJ. Neural predictors of treatment response in depression. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2014;1:125–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Papakostas GI, Fava M. Predictors, moderators, and mediators (correlates) of treatment outcome in major depressive disorder. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2008;10:439–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Patel MJ, Khalaf A, Aizenstein HJ. Studying depression using imaging and machine learning methods. NeuroImage Clin. 2016;10:115–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Godlewska BR. Neuroimaging as a tool for individualized treatment choice in depression: the past, the present and the future. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2020;7:32–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kujawa A, Burkhouse KL. Vulnerability to depression in youth: advances from affective neuroscience. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2017;2:28–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Ang Y-S, Kaiser R, Deckersbach T, Almeida J, Phillips ML, Chase HW, et al. Pretreatment reward sensitivity and frontostriatal resting-state functional connectivity are associated with response to bupropion after sertraline nonresponse. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;88:657–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Whitton AE, Reinen JM, Slifstein M, Ang Y-S, McGrath PJ, Iosifescu DV, et al. Baseline reward processing and ventrostriatal dopamine function are associated with pramipexole response in depression. Brain. 2020;143:701–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Pizzagalli DA. Frontocingulate dysfunction in depression: toward biomarkers of treatment response. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;36:183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Pizzagalli DA, Webb CA, Dillon DG, Tenke CE, Kayser J, Goer F, et al. Pretreatment rostral anterior cingulate cortex theta activity in relation to symptom improvement in depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75:547–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Miller CH, Hamilton JP, Sacchet MD, Gotlib IH. Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging of major depressive disorder in youth. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72:1045–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Lichenstein SD, Verstynen T, Forbes EE. Adolescent brain development and depression: a case for the importance of connectivity of the anterior cingulate cortex. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;70:271–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Dr. Ang was supported by the A*STAR National Science Scholarship as well as the Kaplen Fellowship in Depression from Harvard Medical School. Dr. Pizzagalli was partially supported by R37MH068376.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuen-Siang Ang DPhil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Over the past 3 years, Dr. Diego Pizzagalli has received consulting fees from BlackThorn Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Compass Pathway, Engrail Therapeutics, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals as well as one honorarium from Alkermes. In addition, he has received stock options from BlackThorn Therapeutics and research support from National Institute of Mental Health, Dana Foundation, Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, and Millennium Pharmaceuticals. No funding from these entities was used to support the current work, and all views expressed are solely those of the authors. Dr. Ang declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Depressive Disorders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ang, YS., Pizzagalli, D.A. Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Adolescent Depression. Curr Treat Options Psych 8, 18–28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-020-00237-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-020-00237-5

Keywords

Navigation